Soil Change after Three Decades of Conventional Till, No-Till, and Forest Succession in the Piedmont of Georgia, USA S. Devine1, D. Markewitz1, P. Hendrix2,3,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Soil Organic C, SON and SOP of Sandy Soils As Affected by Intensive Loblolly Pine Management in SE U.S. Deoyani V. Sarkhot.
Advertisements

Effect of Long-term Cattle Manure Application on Soil Test Phosphorus, Organic Carbon and Winter Wheat Grain Yield Natasha Macnack, Peter Omara, Lawrence.
Between-Bed pH pH is significantly higher in the two inner groups of beds relative to the outer two groups. Decomposition of the shredded leaves in the.
Mineralization of high-N organic fertilizers L. Sonon, D. Kissel, U. Saha, and SPW Lab Staff Agricultural and Environmental Services Labs. University of.
Additional Questions, Resources, and Moving Forward Science questions raised in the development of a science assessment Effect of Conservation Tillage.
Nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) is estimated to be 33% throughout the world, and can be lower in single, pre-plant applications compared with split nitrogen.
Jun-Aug/annual mean T precip.sum (degC) (mm) / / / / / / / /810 Jun-Aug/annual mean.
LECTURE 10 Introduction to some chemical properties of soils : Factors affecting plant growth (2)
Soil Quality Test Kit Tony Ingersoll NRCS Tri-State Natural Resources Technology Team.
Soil Acidity and pH Causes, remediation, and measurement.
“Near term response of surface soil nitrogen cycling and pools to forest clearing and burning” Heather E. Erickson Recent soils research from the Teakettle.
Fire Effects on Soil. What are the Functions of Soil within Ecosystems? Provides a medium for plant growth and supplies nutrients Regulates the hydrologic.
To show that intense management can increase the rate at which soil quality improves -To compare soil quality between two different management intensities.
Carbon content of managed grasslands: implications for carbon sequestration Justine J. Owen * and Whendee L. Silver Dept. of Environmental Science, Policy.
Revision Exercises Soil. Name the three different types of parent rock? Give examples of each type of rock How is each rock type formed? What is meant.
Residue Biomass Removal and Potential Impact on Production and Environmental Quality Mahdi Al-Kaisi, Associate Professor Jose Guzman, Research Assistant.
Results of forest soil inventory implemented in within the scope of the demonstration project BioSoil Soil stability in ecologically and socially.
Rate and Duration of Seed Component Accumulation in Water Stressed Soybeans José L. Rotundo & Mark Westgate Iowa State University, 1301 Agronomy Hall,
Soil Nutrient Availability Following Application of Biosolids to Forests in Virginia. Eduardo C. Arellano and Thomas R. Fox Department of Forestry, Blacksburg,
IntroductionIntroduction Land-use change or intensification can influence the dynamics and storage of soil organic matter (SOM) and the extent of carbon.
INFLUENCE OF LANDUSE ON ORGANIC MATTER DISTRIBUTION IN SOIL AGGREGATE SIZE FRACTIONS IN ILE-IFE, SOUTHWESTERN NIGERIA By Oyedele, D.J.; Pini, R.; Sparvolli,
Approach: Samples were obtained from 4 different plots of land, each with a different land-use. The land uses that were examined were a grassland (hayed),
Results of Long-Term Experiments With Conservation Tillage in Austria Introduction On-site and off-site damages of soil erosion cause serious problems.
Consequences of Aluminum or Ferrous Sulfate Amended Poultry Litter on Concentrations of Aluminum in Plant and Soil Sosten Lungu, Haile Tewolde and Dennis.
Site Description This research is being conducted as a part of the Detritus Input and Removal Treatments Project (DIRT), a cross-continental experiment.
Proposed Agriculture Courses Board of Education October 6, 2015.
Soil Carbon and Phosphorous Fractions in Ciampitti I.A. 123, F.O. García 1, G. Rubio 2 and L.I. Picone 4 Field Crop Rotations of the Argentine Pampas Ciampitti.
WP coordinator meeting June 17/ WP3 progress report.
Effects of parent material and land use on soil phosphorus forms in Southern Belgium Renneson 1 M., Dufey 2 J., Bock 1 L. and Colinet 1 G. 1 University.
You have learnt from the lessons in the earlier Modules that soil properties influence soil health. These soil properties in turn are affected by the agricultural.
Introduction to Soils Chapter 1. Air quality.
Above and Below ground decomposition of leaf litter Sukhpreet Sandhu.
STUBBLE BURNING AND TILLAGE EFFECTS ON SOIL ORGANIC C, TOTAL N AND AGGREGATION IN NORTHEASTERN SASKATCHEWAN S. S. Malhi 1 and H. R. Kutcher 1 1 Agriculture.
Soil Acidity and Liming Soil Acidity and Liming Fundamentals of Nutrient Management Training Course Dec, 2005 Louis McDonald Division of Plant and Soil.
Influence of Nitrogen Sources and Soil pH on Soil Microbial Communities in a Long-term Crop Rotation System Reji Mathew, Yucheng Feng, and Charles Mitchell.
Temporal and Spatial Influences of Juglands nigra and Gleditsia triacanthos on Soil Indicators in a Southern Appalachian Silvopasture Study Area By Scott.
Land-Use Types Depth (cm) Soil pHTotal N (g N/kg soil) Soil Particle Size Density (%)Land-Use Types ClaySiltSand Forest Forest.
Greenhouse Gases Emission and Carbon Sequestration in Agro-Ecosystems under Long-Term No-Till: Implications for Global Warming Mitigation Pierre-André.
Marco A. Galang, Lawrence A. Morris, and Daniel Markewitz D.B. Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, The University of Georgia, DW Brooks Drive,
S. P. Mazumdar, D. K.Kundu*, A. R.Saha and Debjani Ghosh Crop Production Division ICAR-Central Research Institute of Jute and Allied Fibres, Barrackpore,
Wood ash, the residue remaining from the combustion of bark, sawdust and yard waste for energy generation for forestry product operations, is an effective.
Integrated Nutrient Management (Nutrient Management Plan ) A Series of Lecture By Mr. Allah Dad Khan.
You Can Never Have Too Much Data –
Soil and Plant Growth What is soil?
Silvano L. Abreu1, Chad B. Godsey1, Gary Strickland2, and Jeff T
The Hubbard Brook Ecosystem Study
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
NDVI Active Sensors in Sugarbeet Production for In-Season and Whole Rotation Nitrogen Management.
Nitrogen and Phosphorus Concentrations
Faith Simitz and Benjamin D. Duval
Aweke M. Gelaw1, B. R. Singh1 and R. Lal2
CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF PEAT SOILS UNDER PINEAPPLE CULTIVATION
Carbon Cycling in Perennial Biofuel Management Systems
Proportion of intermediate diameter roots
Effect of land use systems on soil resources in Northern Thailand
Fire Effects on Soil September 20, 2006.
Topsoil Depth at the Centralia Site
Response to Treatments (Summer 2012) Pasture Recovery (Spring 2013)
C. Kallenbach1. , W. Horwath1, Z. Kabir1, J. Mitchell2, D
Results and discussion
Soil Long-term Nutrient Dynamics A Farm Experience in Brazil
Karolien Denef1, Catherine Stewart2, John Brenner3, Keith Paustian4
Evaluation of Midseason UAN Application Depth in Winter Wheat
Soil Chemistry Response to Wollastonite (CaSiO3) Addition at Hubbard Brook Chris E. Johnson Syracuse University.
13.6 Soil Profile The soil profile is a series of horizontal layers of different chemical composition, physical properties, particle size, and amount of.
Chemical Properties of Forest Soils in the Catskills Region
Comparing Three or More Means
Soils and their Significance
In-Field Soil Sampling
C.C. Mitchell*, D.P. Delaney (Auburn Univ.) & K.S. Balkcom (USDA-ARS)
Presentation transcript:

Soil Change after Three Decades of Conventional Till, No-Till, and Forest Succession in the Piedmont of Georgia, USA S. Devine1, D. Markewitz1, P. Hendrix2,3, and D. Radcliffe3 1D.B. Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, 2Odum School of Ecology, and 3Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA 1938 1967 1999 Tillage Experiment Area Forest Succession Plot Figure 2. Horseshoe Bend (HSB) was managed as pasture by the UGA Dairy from the 1930s to 1966 with periodic applications of dolomitic limestone to both the current tillage experiment area and forest succession plots. HSB was acquired by the Odum School of Ecology in 1966 and natural succession was then allowed to proceed for twelve years until 1978 when successional vegetation was cleared within the area of the tillage experiment. Since then, forest succession has continued for another three decades adjacent to the tillage experiment. Results Abstract Soil C concentration differs significantly only in the 0-5 cm layer: Forest Succession (FS) > No-Till (NT) > Conventional Till (CT) (Figure 3a). Soil C content in 0-15 cm is 24.4 in NT, 23.7 in FS, and 18.8 in CT. Soil C content from 0-2 m is significantly greater in FS and NT compared to CT (Table 3). Aggregate stability as measured by the structural stability index increases from CT to NT to FS in both A horizon depths (Table 2). Compared to CT-NT, FS soil profile has significantly lower concentrations of P to 30 cm (Fig. 3c), K to 1 m (Fig. 3d), Ca to 2 m (Fig. 3e), and Mg to 50 cm (Fig. 3f). FS soil pH and ECEC are significantly lower than CT-NT from the surface to 2 m depth (Figs. 3h-i), despite the fact that agricultural plots were last limed in 1980. Differences in exchangeable Ca contents of FS relative to CT-NT profiles (0-2 m) greatly exceed the quantity applied as lime, while differences in extractable P of FS relative to CT-NT profiles is an order of magnitude less than the estimated P fertilization (Table 3). NT profile nutrient content exceeds CT profile (0-2 m) by: 16% N, 28% P, 13% Ca, and 15% Mg (0-1 m), though differences are not statistically significant (Figs. 3b-f, Table 3). Land use affects soil properties and functions, which has important implications for biogeochemical cycles. The Horseshoe Bend (HSB) tillage experiment is a long-term investigation of no-tillage (NT) and conventional tillage (CT) agroecosystems begun in 1978 in the piedmont of Georgia, USA (Fig. 1 and 2). Nutrient cycling studies at HSB in the 1980s focused on how tillage alters nutrient retention, showing that NT soils may conserve more N, K, Ca, and Mg. In the 1990s, the focus shifted to differences in soil organic matter (SOM) dynamics in the upper 15 cm, showing that greater soil C contents from 0-5 cm in NT soils may be related to physical protection of SOM within soil aggregates. In this work, we sought to re-examine these research questions by emphasizing a full profile perspective (0-2 m) and by comparing the tillage treatments to adjacent forest succession (FS) plots. We measured total C and N, exchangeable nutrients, and pH from 0 to 2 m and quantified soil aggregate stability in the upper 15 cm. FS soils have greater soil C concentrations only in the 0-5 cm layer (Fig. 3a) that is associated with greater aggregate stability (Table 2). Soil C contents, however, do not differ between NT and FS surface soils, and FS has no significant increases in deeper soil C contents (Fig. 3a). Overall, C contents of both the NT and FS profiles are greater than the CT profile (Table 3). Nutrient chemistry also differs through the profiles with CT-NT soils having higher P to 30 cm, K to 100 cm, Ca to 200 cm, and Mg to 50 cm (Figs. 3c-f). NT and CT soils also have greater effective cation exchange capacity (ECEC) through 2 m (Fig. 3h). In contrast, FS soils have greater acidity through at least 2 m (Fig 3i); exchangeable acidity in FS decreases from a peak of 1 cmolc/kg at 5-15 cm to 0.02 cmolc/kg from 50-200 cm (Fig 3g). This low exchangeable acidity at depth in FS suggests a presence of residual lime from previous pasture management, though differences in the exchangeable Ca content of the FS profile relative to the CT-NT profiles greatly exceed Ca inputs as lime over the course of the experiment (Table 3). This Ca content difference between FS and CT-NT suggests that the FS profile has experienced a relatively dramatic loss of Ca from some combination of uptake by roots and solution leaching. Solution leaching would have been enhanced by loss of pH dependent, negatively charged sites as a result of gradual acidification under FS. Finally, while a full profile analysis reveals greater nutrient availability under NT than under CT (Table 3), these differences are relatively minor compared to the more dramatic soil change that has occurred under FS over three decades. b a c Table 2. Aggregate characteristics for dry and wet sieving. Stability index is a ratio of Wet-Sieved Aggregate Mean Weight Diameter (MWD) to Dry-Sieved Aggregate MWD. Research Questions Have three decades of continuous conventional till, no-till, and forest succession led to differences in soil carbon contents over a 2 m profile? Hypothesis 1: Soil carbon contents (0-2 m) will increase in the order of Forest Succession > No-till = Conventional Till. Greater soil C accumulation in the upper horizon of no-till will be compensated by greater soil C accumulation in conventional till below the surface horizon. (2) Have forest succession and the tillage treatments led to differences in soil chemical properties and nutrient contents, especially below the surface horizon? Hypothesis 2: (a) Lime and fertilizer applications, rather than forest succession, will largely explain an expected divergence in soil chemical properties between the forest succession and tillage experiment soils. (b) Observations of lower solution concentrations of N, K, Ca, and Mg at 60 cm depth in the no-till soils in the early 1980s are expected to be evident today as greater nutrient availability to 2 m under no-till. e f d Table 3. Mean element contents for whole soil profiles (0-2 m) in 2007 and fertilizer inputs applied to conventional till and no-till soils since the beginning of the experiment (1978-2007). Table 1. Physical properties of the A horizon sampled in 2006. Soil Taxonomic class: fine loamy, siliceous, thermic, Rhodic Kanhapludult Forest Succession Conventional Till No-till Notes: Treatments that a share a letter for a particular nutrient are not significantly different using Tukey’s HSD (α=0.05, n=4). Bulk density assumed to be 1.5 g cm-3 from 0.15 to 2 m. Sum of Mg is only to 1 m, because of great variability below 1 m (Fig. 3f) that suggests differences in mineralogy due to temporal variability in alluvial deposition events. ANOVA not run for total profile P due to missing data. Figure 1. HSB Tillage Experiment on an old alluvial terrace in Winter 2007. Tillage consists of moldboard plowing and disking before planting of summer and winter crops. Conclusions Contrary to Hypothesis 1, three decades of forest succession did not lead to greater C contents relative to the no-till soil. However, both forest succession and no-till soils have greater overall C contents than the conventional till soil over the entire 0-2 m profile (Table 3) with 60% of this additional content occurring from 0-15 cm. Contrary to hypothesis 2a, there is evidence that forest succession, rather than liming, is largely responsible for the observed differences in soil Ca and acidity. Current Ca availability in the CT-NT profiles exceeds that in the FS profile by 8 times the Ca applied in lime to the CT-NT treatments (Table 3). In concurrence with hypothesis 2b, element totals from 0-2 m (Table 3) support earlier nutrient cycling studies at HSB that showed no-till soils lose less N, K, Ca, and Mg through leaching relative to conventional till. These treatment differences are minor compared to the soil change that has occurred under forest succession. Methods Four forest succession plots dominated by Quercus spp. were established in 2006 adjacent to the tillage experiment begun in 1978 (Fig 2a-c); n=4 for each treatment. Soil samples in 7 depth classes: 0-5, 5-15, 15-30, 30-50, 50-100, 100-150, and 150-200 cm (Table 1). Total C and N determined by pulverization and dry combustion, Mehlich I extracts analyzed for P, Ca, Mg, and K; 1 M KCl extracts titrated for exchangeable acidity; ECEC determined by sum of cations (K + Ca + Mg + ExAc); pH in 0.01 M CaCl2 0-5 and 5-15 cm soils were fractionated by both wet and dry sieving into <0.053, 0.053-0.25, 0.25-2, and >2 mm aggregate size classes. Differences in each soil property were tested by one-way ANOVA with land use as the main effect (n=4) in each depth class, using Tukey’s HSD (α=0.05) for means separation g h i Figures 3a-i. Data points are means ± 1 SE (n=4). Most dramatic changes have occurred with respect to exchangeable Ca, acidity, and pH in the forest succession soils to a depth of 2 m.