Update to ECLOUD Calculations for the

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

RedOffice.com Presentation templates Slide No. 1 RFA Detector Data of Electron Cloud Build-up and Simulations Eric Wilkinson Mentor: Jim Crittenden Cornell.

Advertisements

Using Tune Shifts to Evaluate Electron Cloud Effects on Beam Dynamics at CesrTA Jennifer Chu Mentors: Dr. David Kreinick and Dr. Gerry Dugan 8/11/2011REU.

CESR Synchrotron Radiation Tables - Range of Photon Rates and Beta-averaged Photon Rates - Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences.

Comparison of ECLOUD and POSINST Calculations of Coherent Tune Shifts with Emphasis on the Relative Drift and Dipole Contributions Jim Crittenden Cornell.

ECLOUD Calculations of Field Gradients During Bunch Passage Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education Electron Cloud.

LEPP, the Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics, has joined with CHESS to become the Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-based Sciences.

45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Resolution of ECLOUD Tune Shift Calculation Instability Jim Crittenden.

ECLOUD Calculations of Coherent Tune Shifts for the April 2007 Measurements - Study of SEY Model Effects - Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based.

ECLOUD Calculations of Coherent Tune Shifts for the April 2007 Measurements - Study of SEY Model Effects - Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based.

ECLOUD Calculations of Coherent Tune Shifts for the April 2007 and January 2009 Measurements - Preparation for PAC2009 FR5RF Paper and Poster - “Effects.

LEPP, the Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics, has joined with CHESS to become the Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-based Sciences.

45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Preliminary Results on the Introduction of the Rediffused SEY Component.

Electron Cloud in ilcDR: Update T. Demma, INFN-LNF.

45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Modeling Cyclotron Resonances in ECLOUD Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory.

45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Comparison of ECLOUD Calculations in Dipole and Quadrupole Fields.

ECLOUD Calculations of Coherent Tune Shifts for the April 2007 Measurements - This presentation limited to resolving drift/dipole weighting question -

45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Recent Studies with ECLOUD Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for.

ElectronsdFud Simulation Work at Cornell Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.

Space Charge Electric-Field Calculations for Coherent Tune Shift Estimations using the Electron-cloud Modelling Algorithm ECLOUD Jim Crittenden Cornell.

ECLOUD Calculations of Coherent Tune Shifts for the April 2007 Measurements - Thanks to Marco for clarifying the drift/dipole weighting - - Thanks to Gerry.

45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Comparison of ECLOUD Calculations in Dipole and Quadrupole Fields.

ECLOUD Simulations for CESR Witness Bunch Tune Shift Measurements Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.

CESR Synchrotron Radiation Tables and Electron Cloud Modelling Input Parameters Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.

45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York First Results on the Introduction of the Rediffused SEY Component.

49th ICFA Advanced Beam Dynamics Workshop October 8 –12, 2010 LEPP, the Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics, has joined with.

25-26 June, 2009 CesrTA Workshop CTA09 Electron Cloud Single-Bunch Instability Modeling using CMAD M. Pivi CesrTA CTA09 Workshop June 2009.

Webex Electron Cloud Evaluations for ILC DR Mauro Pivi on behalf of the ILC Electron Cloud Working Group - by Webex - KILC12 – Daegu Korea April 25, 2012.

March 23, 2010 CMAD a tracking and e-cloud beam instability parallel code (M.Pivi SLAC) Taking MAD(X) optics file at input, thus tracking the beam in a.

October 13,2010 WG Meeting Cornell U. Recommendation for Electron Cloud Mitigations in the ILC Damping Ring ILC DR Working Group October 13, 2010 Cornell.

Motivation and Overview David Rubin Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.

Cesr-TA Simulations: Overview and Status G. Dugan, Cornell University LCWS-08.

Nov 17, 2009 Webex Assessing the 3.2 km Ring feasibility: Simulation parameters for electron cloud Build-up and Instability estimation LC DR Electron Cloud.

Electron cloud measurements and simulations at CesrTA G. Dugan, Cornell University 4/19/09 TILC09 4/18/09.

Simulation of multipacting thresholds G. Iadarola and A. Romano on behalf of the LIU-SPS e-cloud team LIU SPS scrubbing review, 8 September, 2015.

Vacuum System S. Guiducci BTR, LNF 8 July RDR - electron damping ring:

Electron cloud study for ILC damping ring at KEKB and CESR K. Ohmi (KEK) ILC damping ring workshop KEK, Dec , 2007.

3 February 2010 ILC Damping Ring electron cloud WG effort Mauro Pivi SLAC on behalf of ILC DR working group on e- cloud ILC DR Webex Meeting Jan 3, 2010.

Electron Cloud in the International Linear Collider ILC Mauro Pivi work performed while at SLAC and the ILC Damping Ring Working Group High.

Electron Cloud Experimental Plans at Cesr-TA ILCDR08 - July 10, 2009 G. Dugan Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.

45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences.

LEPP, the Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics, has joined with CHESS to become the Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-based Sciences.

LEPP, the Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics, has joined with CHESS to become the Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-based Sciences.

Status of ECLOUD Simulations for the Shielded Button Measurements

Electron Cloud R&D at Cornell ILCDR08--7/8/08

Electron Cloud Meeting

Physics Scope and Work Plan for the Shielded-Pickup Measurements -- Synchrotron Radiation Photon Distributions Photoelectron Production Parameters.

First Look at the New SYNRAD3D Results

Detailed Characterization of Vacuum Chamber Surface Properties Using Measurements of the Time Dependence of Electron Cloud Development Jim Crittenden.

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN MODELING

Physics Scope and Work Plan for the Shielded-Pickup Measurements -- Synchrotron Radiation Photon Distributions Photoelectron Production Parameters.

Shielded Button Measurement/ECLOUD Simulation Comparison for 5

Electron Cloud Meeting

Ecloud in quadrupole & Sextupole

Jim Crittenden Electron Cloud Meeting 4 December 2013

First Attempt to Simulate the Shielded Button Measurements with ECLOUD

J.A.Crittenden, Y.Li, X.Liu, M.A.Palmer, J.P.Sikora (Cornell)

Jim Crittenden Electron Cloud/Impedance Meeting 27 May 2015

Electron Cloud in ilcDR: Update

SuperB General Meeting June , Perugia (Italy)

ILC DR instability simulations

Status of Ecloud Build-Up Simulations for the ILC DR’s

ILC DR instability simulations

ILC DR Working Group on Collective Effect: Electron Cloud

ILC Damping Ring electron cloud WG effort

Electron Cloud in ilcDR: Update

Electron Cloud Build-up in ilcDR

CTA 09 - Introduction David Rubin Cornell Laboratory for

ILC DR instability simulations

Recent Advances in Electron Cloud Buildup Measurements and Models at CESR (Part 2) Stephen Poprocki & Jim Crittenden Cornell University Accelerator Physics.

3.2 km FODO lattice for 10 Hz operation (DMC4)

Presentation transcript:

Update to ECLOUD Calculations for the 3.2 and 6.4 km ILC Damping Ring Lattice Designs - Update to quadrupole calculations presented 10 March 2010 after bug fix in secondary yield routine (see also CesrTA electron cloud meeting on 17 March 2010) - Calculations for 20 G solenoids replacing the drift regions, and the consequences for coherent tune shifts - Movies for electron cloud formation in quadrupoles and solenoids All material available at http://www.lepp.cornell.edu/~critten/ilcdr/23mar10 Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education ILC Damping Ring Electron Cloud Working Group Meeting 23 March 2010

ILC Damping Ring Working Group Meeting of 10 Mar 10 ECLOUD movie of quadrupole simulation showed unexpected asymmetry Before fix After fix A branch on quadrupole case in the routine for generating secondary electrons erroneously backwards-extrapolated macroparticles outside the v.c. back to the wrong place on the wall.

Element-averages of Twiss functions, beam sizes and photon rates on the outer vacuum chamber wall ex = 441 pm eY = 2 pm sZ = 5.6 mm dE = 0.127% 6.4 km (DCO4) ex = 525 pm eY = 2 pm sZ = 5.3 mm dE = 0.118% 3.2 km (DSB3) New tables with step size reduced from 10 cm to 1 cm. Note the higher ring fraction (factor 1.7) and radiation (factor 3.2) in dipoles for the 3.2 km ring.

ECLOUD input parameters See previous slide See previous slide See previous slide See previous slide 90% 20% (1.01 t.s. & 0.19 rediff) Dipole field: 0.27 T Quadrupole field: 7.0 T/m

Cloud density averaged over the vacuum chamber for the dipole regions 3.2 km lattice (DSB3) 6.4 km lattice (DCO4) The 3.2 km lattice has similar magnet strengths, but the density of dipoles in the arcs is higher. The analysis of 23Feb10 found 0.05e12. Introducing a rediffused component of 20% of the total SEY of 1.2 was later found to increase this maximum density value to about 0.1e12 without crossing the runaway threshold.

Cloud density averaged over the vacuum chamber for the solenoid regions 3.2 km lattice (DSB3) 6.4 km lattice (DCO4) The vacuum-chamber average of the cloud density is similar in the two rings, comparable to the dipole regions of the 6.4 km ring.

Cloud density averaged over the vacuum chamber for the quadrupole regions 3.2 km lattice (DSB3) 6.4 km lattice (DCO4) The vacuum-chamber average of the cloud density in the quadrupoles is slightly higher in the 3.2 km ring..

Drift and Dipole Contributions to the Coherent Tune Shifts frev = 47 kHz (6.4 km) and 94 kHz (3.2 km) 3.2 km lattice (DSB3) 6.4 km lattice (DCO4) The tune shifts are dominated by the drift regions in both cases. What happens when we turn on solenoids in the drift regions?

Solenoid and Dipole Contributions to the Coherent Tune Shifts frev = 47 kHz (6.4 km) and 94 kHz (3.2 km) 3.2 km lattice (DSB3) 6.4 km lattice (DCO4) The solenoids reduce the tune shift by more than an order of magnitude, and can change the sign. Now the dipoles dominate the tune shift in the 3.2 km ring.

Solenoid and Quadrupole Contributions to the Coherent Tune Shifts frev = 47 kHz (6.4 km) and 94 kHz (3.2 km) 3.2 km lattice (DSB3) 6.4 km lattice (DCO4) The quadrupole contribution is much smaller than the dipole contribution, but we may want to study trapping effects.

10-sigma density just prior to the passage of the 180th bunch Mauro's Table 10-sigma density just prior to the passage of the 180th bunch 1012 e/m3 Beam parameters and photon rates as on slides 3 and 4. Antechamber suppression 98% applied to both direct and reflected s.r. contribution. Reflected fraction is 90% of total. Direct contribution limited to two 0.5-mm vertical stripes, either together (no antechamber) or separated by 1 cm. NB: In some of the dipole and quadrupole calculations, saturation was not yet reached after the four trains. Also, these 10-sigma density values suffer from substantial statistical fluctuations.