RF Synchronization Activity

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cascina, January 25th, Coupling of the IMC length noise into the recombined ITF output Raffaele Flaminio EGO and CNRS/IN2P3 Summary - Recombined.
Advertisements

Progress of the sub-harmonic bunching system (i.e. upgrading progress of BEPCII present bunching system) Pei Shilun for the SHBS team Accelerator center,
Particle Accelerator Engineering, London, October 2014 Phase Synchronisation Systems Dr A.C. Dexter Overview Accelerator Synchronisation Examples Categories.
Test of LLRF at SPARC Marco Bellaveglia INFN – LNF Reporting for:
R. Akre, P. Emma, P. Krejcik LCLS April 29, 2004 LCLS RF Stability Requirements LCLS Requirements The SLAC Linac.
Laser to RF synchronisation A.Winter, Aachen University and DESY Miniworkshop on XFEL Short Bunch Measurement and Timing.
RF Stability Working Group Jorn Jacob (ESRF), John Byrd (LBNL) General Issues RF phase and amplitude noise –filtered by cavity and translate into timing.
RF Synchronisation Issues
SLAC XFEL Short Bunch Measurement and Timing Workshop 1 Current status of the FERMI project (slides provided by Rene Bakker) Photoinjector laser system.
Stefan Simrock 3 rd LC School, Oak Brook, IL, USA, 2008, Radio Frequency Systems 1 Timing and Synchronization S. Simrock and Axel Winter DESY, Hamburg,
RF SYSTEM DESIGN FOR THE TOP-IMPLART ACCELERATOR V. Surrenti, G. Bazzano, P. Nenzi, L. Picardi,C. Ronsivalle, ENEA,Frascati, Italy ; F. Ambrosini, La Sapienza.
Additional RF system issues: Amplifier linearization Reference Phase distribution Master Clock Anders J Johansson Lund University.
LLRF Phase Reference System The LCLS linac is broken down into 4 separate linac sections. The LCLS injector will reside in an off axis tunnel at the end.
Phase noise measurements in TRIUMF ISAC 2 cryomodule K. Fong, M. Laverty TRIUMF.
Wir schaffen Wissen – heute für morgen 24 August 2015PSI,24 August 2015PSI, Paul Scherrer Institut Status WP 8.2 RF Low Level Electronic Manuel Brönnimann.
RF Synchronization Activity at SPARC A.Gallo and D. Alesini, M. Bellaveglia, R. Boni, G. Di Pirro, A. Drago, A.Ghigo P. Baldini, L. Cacciotti, M. Scampati,
LLRF System for Pulsed Linacs (modeling, simulation, design and implementation) Hooman Hassanzadegan ESS, Beam Instrumentation Group 1.
PULSE SHAPING ISSUES FOR THE PETS TESTING PROGRAM AT SLAC A.Cappelletti SLAC, Oct 2008.
SPIE, PA-IVKrzysztof Czuba1 Improved fiber-optic link for the phase reference distribution system for the TESLA technology based projects Krzysztof.
Longitudinal transfer function a.k.a. (M 55 ) measurements at the JLab FEL Pavel Evtushenko, JLab  Jlab IR/UV upgrade longitudinal phase space evolution.
SPPS, Beam stability and pulse-to-pulse jitter Patrick Krejcik For the SPPS collaboration Zeuthen Workshop on Start-to-End Simulations of X-ray FEL’s August.
LLRF-05 Oct.10,20051 Digital LLRF feedback control system for the J-PARC linac Shin MICHIZONO KEK, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (JAPAN)
Digital Phase Control System for SSRF LINAC C.X. Yin, D.K. Liu, L.Y. Yu SINAP, China
Frank Ludwig, DESY Content : 1 Stability requirements for phase and amplitude for the XFEL 2 Next LLRF system for optimized detector operation 3 Limitations.
Digital Phase Control System for SSRF LINAC C.X. Yin, D.K. Liu, L.Y. Yu SINAP, China
LCLS_II High Rep Rate Operation and Femtosecond Timing J. Frisch 7/22/15.
WELCOME TO IHEP. RF Phase Control for BEPCII Linac Accelerator Wenchun Gao.
Beam Loading experiment at KEK ATF ( Multi-train acceleration at KEK-ATF Injector ) KEK Masafumi Fukuda and Junji Urakawa LCWS /10/052 train acceleration.
LCLS LLRF System October 10-13, 2005 LLRF05 B. Hong, R. Akre, A. Hill, D. Kotturi, H. Schwarz SLAC, Stanford, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA Work supported.
Femtosecond phase measurement Alexandra Andersson CLIC Beam Instrumentation workshop.
BEPC II TIMING SYSTEM EPICS Seminar Presented by Ma zhenhan IHEP 20.August 2002.
WP8-HGA High Gradient Acceleration M. Biagini (INFN-LNF) WP8 coordinator Tiara Kickoff Meeting, CERN, Feb , 2011.
February 17-18, 2010 R&D ERL Brian Sheehy R&D ERL Laser and laser light transport Brian Sheehy February 17-18, 2010 Laser and Laser Light Transport.
RF low level control & synchronization A. Gallo, M. Bellaveglia, L. Cacciotti SPARC review committee – ENEA Frascati – 16/11/2005.
Design Approaches for the X band LLRF Systems Uros Mavric, XB-10, 2 nd of December 2010, Cockcroft Institute, UK
LLRF 15 Daresbury Andrew Moss ASTeC, STFC Daresbury Laboratory.
1 st TIARA Steering Committee A. Gallo – INFN Frascati deputy of TIARA WP8 leader STATUS OF TIARA WP8.
CarterFest 14 th July 2010 Stabilised Magnetrons Presentation to mark Professor Richard Carter’s contributions to Vacuum Electronics Delivered by Amos.
RF Pulse Compression system for CTF3.
Status of the SPARC laser and “dazzler” experiments
Status of SPARC synchronization system and possible upgrades
RF acceleration and transverse damper systems
Dither Luminosity feedback versus Fast IP feedback
LCLS_II High Rep Rate Operation and Femtosecond Timing
Summary of SPARC first-phase operations
An X-band system for phase space linearisation on CLARA
Timing and synchronization at SPARC
RF Synchronisation Issues
F.Marcellini, D.Alesini, A.Ghigo
WP02 PRR: Master Oscillator and RF Reference Distribution
LLRF and Beam-based Longitudinal Feedback Readiness
A Portion of the SCP RF Control System LCLS Related
CEPC RF Power Sources System
Intra-Pulse Beam-Beam Scans at the NLC IP
LLRF Control System Outline Scope Requirements Design Considerations
LCLS Longitudinal Feedback and Stability Requirements
FPGA Based Trigger System for the Klystron Department
RF Pulse Shaping.
LCLS Drive Laser Timing Stability Measurements
ATF project meeting, Feb KEK, Junji Urakawa Contents :
8.5 Modulation of Signals basic idea and goals
LCLS RF Stability Requirements
Device test stations Multi-probe electrical DC injection and optical input/output Near-field measurement Analogue characteristics 1) 50GHz Network analyzer,
Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS) LLRF Preliminary Design Review LLRF Monitor and Control System September 26, 2005 Ron Akre.
Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS) Low Level RF Status
Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS) Low Level RF Status
Undulator Cavity BPM Status
Low Level RF Status Outline Overview showing hardware instances
RF introduction Anders Sunesson RF group leader
Breakout Session SC3 – Undulator
Presentation transcript:

RF Synchronization Activity at SPARC                    Gallo and D. Alesini, M. Bellaveglia, R. Boni, G. Di Pirro, A. Drago, A.Ghigo P. Baldini, L. Cacciotti, M. Scampati, A. Sprecacenere, S. Quaglia                     6th SPARC Injector Review Committee - Frascati, 14 June 2005

SUMMARY General Layout; Demodulation of “square” pulsed RF signals: bench qualification; Phase monitoring of short pulses: bench qualification; Control of the phase noise from RF power stations: bench test of a fast intra-pulse phase lock system; To do list and Conclusions

SPARC RF DISTRIBUTION: SCHEMATIC LAYOUT

SPARC RF PHASE STABILITY GOALS: SPARC phase I: ± 3° between the Laser pulse and the Linac RF (RF gun mainly) SPARC phase II: ± 0.5° between the Laser pulse and the Linac RF (RF gun and RF compressor mainly)

Phase Lock to the RF Reference Line All the Linac RF signals will be phase-monitored respect to the RF ref. Line. The resolution of the phase measurements must be << 1 ps ( << 1° RF @ 2856 MHz) The slow phase phase variations will be sampled at 10 Hz (the Linac rep. rate) and corrected acting on the phase shifters (included those placed in the high power waveguide branches). The fast phase variations (i.e. the jitter with spectral components beyond 10 Hz) are much more difficult to correct. The possibility of implementing intra-pulse, fast phase lock to reduce the fast phase jitter introduced by the RF stations (klystrons + drivers) is well advanced. Phase Lock to the RF Reference Line

RF Demodulation Channel based on I&Q Detector passive, low cost, 4 quadrants, amplitude independent 1 I&Q Demodulator 0.5 k€ ½ PCI Sampling Board 0.4 k€ 1 RF Isolator 0.2 k€ RF Attenuators 0.1 k€ 1.2 k€ 1/4 PCI Samp. Board 0.2 k€ 1 Peak Detector 0.2 k€ 1 Directional Coup. 0.2 k€ 0.7 k€ CW RF Total cost: 1.9 k€/channel (High Quality) 1.2 k€/channel (Standard) Pulsed RF RF Isolator

PULSAR I&Q DEMODULATOR MODEL ID I4-0428 (custom)

PULSAR I&Q DEMODULATOR MODEL ID I4-0428 : CALIBRATION

PULSAR ID I4-0428 Long Term Acquisition

PULSAR ID I4-0428 + ADLINK 9810 20 MS/s PCI Sampling Board Phase Resolution

LASER to RF Line Syncronization The phase of the Laser pulse respect to the Linac RF reference line will be continuously monitored and the “slow drifts” (i.e. the phase noise in a frequency band limited to ½ of the Linac rep. rate) will be compensated (shifting the phase of the RF ref. Line seems the simplest way to do it). The “fast phase jitter” (i .e. the noise in a band larger than ½ of the rep. rate) of the Laser pulse can’t be compensated and must be kept inside the acceptable limits by specifications (1°nrequested to the manufacturer).

Monitoring the synchronization of the bunch from the Gun and of the laser pulse

HOMDYN Time-of-Flight Simulations

Bunch Monitor Cavity TM010 – 2856 MHz R/Q = 28.5 W Q0 = 15000 (Al) Qext = 30000 Vp (@ 1 nC) = 4 V = 0.5 ms ftun  10 kHz Bunch Monitor Cavity TE111 – 2985 MHz R/Q = 0.5 W Q0 = 17000 (Al)

Bench measurements of short pulse synchronization

Results of the bench measurements of short pulse synchronization

BENCH MEASUREMENTS OF A FAST INTRA-PULSE PHASE-LOCK CONTROL An intra-pulse phase-lock system is under study to actively correct the fast phase jitter coming from the RF stations. Since the RF pulse is about 4.5 ms long, the rise time of the system should be of the order of 1 ms, corresponding to a bandwidth of about 1 MHz. A fast phase modulator is needed, while the overall delay of the connections (including the group delay of the RF station) should be limited to  150 ns. The speed of the OpAmps manipulating the signal has also to be adequate.

PHASE STABILITY MEASUREMENTS DAFNE LINAC – STATION B August 2003 mixer sensitivity = 5.6 mV/Deg

± 2.5° ± 1° Long Term (90 min) phase variation: Short Term (16 shots) phase variation: ± 1°

KLYSTRON PHASE LOCK

FAST PHASE LOCK FEEDBACK SYSTEM Sketch of the Experimental Set-up “Noisy” RF Station

PULSAR ST-G9-411 Phase Shifter CALIBRATION FREQUENCY RESPONSE

Lock Amp: Circuit sketch Fast Phase Lock Feedback System: Open Loop Gain (amplitude and phase)

OPEN LOOP CLOSED LOOP

OPEN LOOP + noise CLOSED LOOP + noise

To do list and Conclusions

DAFNE LINAC KLYSTRON MEASUREMENTS The phase jitter at the output of one of the DAFNE TH2128C Linac klystrons has been measured to figure out the amount of expected noise in the SPARC case and to gain some experience in this subject.

Open/Closed Loop Phase Pulses 256 frames with  10°pp , 10 kHz phase noise  10°pp Single shot phase pulses

KLYSTRON PHASE NOISE MEASUREMENTS CONCLUSIONS The measured phase jitter at the output of the Linac station-B klystron is about ± 2.5° in long term and ± 1° in short term. The main contribution seems to come from the driver amplifiers (planar triode technology). In the SPARC case the driver amplifiers will be of a different and better performing technology (pure class A, solid state) with tight phase jitter specification (1° rms). The expected phase jitter values of the SPARC RF stations are consequently lower.