Role of genetic and non-genetic mechanisms in furan risk

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Perspectives from EPA’s Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program
Advertisements

Dosimetry in Risk Assessment and a bit More Mel Andersen McKim Conference QSAR and Aquatic Toxicology & Risk Assessment June 27-29, 2006.
Evaluation of a potential mutagenic MOA based on analysis of the weight of evidence and using the modified Hill criteria Martha M. Moore, Ph.D. Director,
Safety and Extrapolation Steven Hirschfeld, MD PhD Office of Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapy Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research FDA.
Regulatory Toxicology James Swenberg, D.V.M., Ph.D.
Is depleted uranium a carcinogen? Keith Baverstock PhD Department of Environmental Science University of Kuopio Finland.
Chemical Carcinogens – workplace risk assessment and health surveillance Tiina Santonen Paide.
Etiology of cancer: Carcinogenic agents
William H. Farland, Ph.D. Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator for Science Office of Research and Development U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Biomarkers:
REVIEW OF THE LOW DOSE RADIATION RESEARCH PROGRAM (LDRRP) IN THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE FOR BIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH.
What Do Toxicologists Do?
Introduction of Cancer Molecular Epidemiology Zuo-Feng Zhang, MD, PhD University of California Los Angeles.
Food and Drug Administration Preclinical safety data for “first in human” (FIH) clinical trials in healthy volunteer subjects Oncology Drug Advisory Committee.
June 16-19, USEPA Cancer Guidelines: Mode of Carcinogenic Action 1 ICABR – Impacts of the Bioeconomy on Agricultural Sustainability, the Environment.
Guidance for Industry M4S: The CTD-Safety
ILSI Risk Science Institute Acrylamide Toxicity: Research to Address Key Data Gaps Presented by Dr. Stephen S. Olin ILSI Risk Science Institute.
EU Framework Programme 6, Priority 5: ”Food Quality and Safety”,Topic 41: “Human health implications of exposure to chemical residues in the environment”
National Committee for the Certification of Radiation Protection Officer BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF IONIZING RADIATION.
Committee on Carcinogenicity (COC) Approach to Risk Assessment of Genotoxic Carcinogens David H. Phillips* COC Chairman Descriptive vs. Quantitative.
1 Overview of Scientific Issues J. Craig Rowlands, Ph.D. Nutrition Programs and Labeling Staff Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition.
28/05/12 Questions (Rispondete alle domande che seguono usando il colore rosso per il testo) Tossicologia - Rubbiani Maristella.
1 FAO/WHO Seminar on Acrylamide in Food, Arusha, 16 March 2003 EU Commission Perspective on Acrylamide in Food Dr Martin Slayne European Commission Directorate.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration Notice: Archived Document The content in this document is provided on the FDA’s website for reference purposes only.
Kevin M. Crofton, PhD US Environmental Protection Agency McKim Conference Duluth MN September 17, 2008 Thyroid Mediated CNS Dysfunction How to use what.
Furan in Food Summary and Charge to the FAC and SCNT Terry C. Troxell, Ph.D. Director Office of Plant and Dairy Foods FDA Center for Food Safety and Applied.
Reporter Hung-Jen Hsieh. Non-invasive scintigraphic monitoring of gene expression in a HSV-1 thymidine kinase gene therapy model K.W.MORIN, E.E.KNAUS.
Juan Alguacil, MD Huelva University Brussels, 26 June 2012 Limits on Occupational Exposure Limits for Carcinogens 8th Seminar on workers’ protection &
Biomarkers Biomarkers - markers in biological systems with a sufficently long half-life which allow location where in the biological system change occur.
Laboratory toxicology. Toxicological methods In vitro –Cell cultures –Cell-free systems –Mechanistic In vivo (lab animals) –Acute –Subchronic –Chronic.
MAIN TOXICITY TESTING. TESTING STRATEGIES A number of different types of data are used in order to establish the safety of chemical substances for use.
Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Dekant Department of Toxicology University of Würzburg Germany Risk, Hazard, and Innovation.
Background on Furan in Foods Nega Beru, Ph.D. Director, Division of Plant Product Safety Office of Plant and Dairy Foods Center for Food and Applied Nutrition.
Daily used nanoparticles increases the incidence of cancer presented by Hanan Ramadan Hamad Mohamed Zoology Department Faculty of Science Cairo University.
QSAR in CANCER ASSESSMENT PURPOSE and AGENDA Gilman Veith Duluth MN May 19-21, 2010.
Chapter 15.3 Risk Assessment 2002 WHO report: “Focusing on risks to health is the key to preventing disease and injury.” risk assessment—process of evaluating.
NUATRC/TCEQ Air Toxics Workshop October Air Toxics Air Toxics: What We Know, What we Don’t Know, and What We Need to Know Human Health Effects –
PHL 472 Chemical Carcinogens Abdelkader Ashour, Ph.D. 2 nd Lecture.
European Patients’ Academy on Therapeutic Innovation Non-clinical development.
Furan-Induced Cytotoxicity, Cell Proliferation, and Tumorgenicity in Mouse Liver Dr. Glenda Moser.
The Future of Chemical Toxicity Testing in the U.S.
Pediatric Subcommittee of the AIDAC October 29-30, Topical Immunosuppressants (Calcineurin Inhibitors) - Animal Toxicology October 30, 2003 Barbara.
Perspective on the current state-of-knowledge of mode of action as it relates to the dose response assessment of cancer and noncancer toxicity Jennifer.
QSAR in CANCER ASSESSMENT PURPOSE and AGENDA Gilman Veith Duluth MN May 19-21, 2010.
Toxic effects Acute / chronic Reversible / irreversible Immediate / delayed Idiosyncratic - hypersensitivity Local / systemic Target organs.
1. Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency Risk assessment with regard to food and feed safety Risk analysis Why risk assessment in the.
James G. Farrelly, Ph.D. Pharmacology Team Leader Division of Antiviral Drug Products Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Food and Drug Administration.
Acute Toxicity Studies Single dose - rat, mouse (5/sex/dose), dog, monkey (1/sex/dose) 14 day observation In-life observations (body wt., food consumption,
Targeting of reactive oxygen species can be a potential therapeutic strategy for cancer treatment Ying-Ray Lee 1, San-Yuan Chen 2, and Hau-Ren Chen 3 1.
Date of download: 6/23/2016 Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. A model depicting the modes of action of genotoxic and nongenotoxic.
Health Benefits PHTYOME FP7-SME PHYTOME (315683) Brussels, November 16, 2015 Prof. dr. Theo M. de Kok Coordinator PHYTOME project Maastricht University,
for Human Pharmaceuticals Kyung-Chul Choi D.V.M., Ph.D.
Communication: Safety Summary
FIFRA SAP Meeting February 2, 2010
Transcription Factor Ets-1 Negatively Regulates
10 – BIOMARKERS Introduction
Regulatory Considerations for Coronary Drug Coated Balloons – FDA View
Pesticides and the Wirtzs, Part III: Communication and Dosing
BASIC ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY
Bystander Effects.
Genetic Susceptibility
Adaptive Response to Low Dose Radiation
K. Lenhard Rudolph, Daniel Hartmann, Oliver G. Opitz  Gastroenterology 
Health Effects of Radiation
Environmental Carcinogenesis
Ovanes Mekenyan, Milen Todorov, Ksenia Gerova
Using Mode of Action to Reduce Uncertainty in Risk Estimates
EFSA’s Chemical Hazards Database
Note lack of cytotoxicity
Positive Genetox Findings on a Candidate Pharmaceutical…. Now What
Presentation transcript:

Role of genetic and non-genetic mechanisms in furan risk (P1) Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Dekant (Coordinator) dekant@toxi.uni-wuerzburg.de , Dr. Angela Mally mally@tox.uni-wuerzburg.de, University of Würzburg, Department of Toxicology, Germany (P2) Dr. Eugenia Dogliotti dogliott@iss.it , Dr. Riccardo Crebeli crebelli@iss.it, Dr. Margherita Bignami bignami@iss.it, Istituto Superiore di Sanita, Department of Environment and Primary Prevention, Rome, Italy (P3) Prof. Dr. Dieter Schrenk schrenk@rhrk.uni-kl.de, Dr. Hans-Joachim Schmitz hschmitz@rhrk.uni-kl.de, Division of Food Chemistry and Environmental Toxicology, University of Kaiserslautern, Germany (P4) Prof. Dr. Kevin Chipman j.k.chipman@bham.ac.uk, School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom (P5) Dr. Pasquale Mosesso mosesso@unitus.it, Università degli Studi della Tuscia, Dipartimento di Agrobiologia e Agrochimica, Viterbo, Italy (P6) Jan-Willem Wegener jan.willem.wegener@ivm.vu.nl, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands (P7) Stella H. Howell stella@euroenvironmentalcontainers.co.uk, Eco Trace Ltd, United Kingdom (P8) Dr. Colin Servais colin.servais@rdls.nestle.com, Dipl.Ing Alfred Studer alfred.studer@rdls.nestle.com, Nestlé Research Center, Lausanne, Switzerland EU contact: Dr. Ebba Barany, Scientific Officer, European Commission, ebba.barany@ec.europa.eu Role of genetic and non-genetic mechanisms in furan risk FURAN-RA Project No.: SSPE-CT-2006-44393 Instrument: STREP Start date of project: 01.01.2007 Duration: 36 month This project is supported by the European Commission Thematic Priority 8.1 “Policy - oriented research - Scientific support to policies - SSP” Sixth Framework Programme www.furan-ra.toxi.uni-wuerzburg.de

Summary In a recent investigation, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) identified the chemical furan in a variety of food items that undergo heat treatment. Furan is a potent hepatotoxicant and liver carcinogen in rodents. Although data on human intake of furan is limited, it appears that there is a relatively narrow margin between human exposure and doses which cause liver tumors in rodents, suggesting that the presence of furan in food may present a potential risk to human health. However, the presently available data on furan toxicity is insufficient to perform a risk assessment and more research regarding the mechanism of furan carcinogenicity is needed. The project will investigate modes of action for tumor induction in liver by the food contaminant furan by addressing the role of DNA and protein binding of furan, oxidative DNA damage, non-genotoxic alteration of proliferation and apoptosis, cytogenetics and cytotoxicity in furan-mediated liver toxicity and carcinogenicity. The methods applied will include state-of-the-art analytical procedures to quantify furan induced DNA-adducts in very low concentrations, DNA-damage or cytogenetic changes, biomarkers, gene-arrays and modern cell biology to characterize furan induced changes in cellular function in the target cells of carcinogenesis in relevant species and in vitro systems. The results will provide data on the mode-of-action of furan induced liver carcinogenesis as a scientific basis for a conclusive assessment of health risks in humans due to dietary exposure. ~ 40 µg/kg ~ 125 µg/kg ~ 69 µg/kg ~ 15 µg/kg Objectives Since the mechanisms of carcinogenic activity of furan in rodents are not well understood, the objectives of this proposal are to generate relevant mechanistic information as a support for the ongoing risk assessment of human furan exposures with food. The importance of mode-of-action research on furan is underscored by the comparatively small difference in the estimated human exposures and the doses of furan, which cause carcinoma in the liver of experimental animals. A detailed elucidation of genotoxic and non-genotoxic mechanisms and their possible dose-response relationships and interconnectivity are of fundamental importance for a reliable risk assessment. Assessment of the role of the accumulation of oxidative DNA damage in the mechanism of neoplastic transformation by means of a genetically modified mouse models. (WP 4) Detailed analysis of gene expression changes. (WP5) Characterization and quantitative assessment of genetic changes induced by furan and cis-2-butene-1,4-dial in mammalian cells with special consideration on mechanisms for induction of gene mutations and cytogenetic changes. (WPs 6.1, 6.2 and 6.3) Characterization of furan and cis-2-butene-1,4-dial induced effects on toxicity parameters, and DNA-damage in cell culture models for the specific target cells of furan in order to elucidate cell-specific mechanisms. (WP 7) Analysis of furan in food as a better basis for exposure assessment from food and mechanisms of formation during food processing. (WPs 8.1 and 8.2) Provision of a risk assessment of furan in food. (WP 9) Description of work Characterization and quantitation of DNA- and protein binding of furan in liver of rats and mice over a wide dose range. Both responses after single and after repeated exposures will be assessed. (WPs 1.1 and 1.2) Analysis of biomarkers of toxicity, genotoxicity and epigenetic changes affecting gene expression, tissue structure changes and cell proliferation in target cell populations of furan in order to elucidate cell-specific mechanisms. Again, special attention will be given to determine the dose dependence of the effects. (WPs 2.1. and 2.2) Assessment of the genotoxic and clastogenic potential of furan in rodent liver by comet assay, cytogenetics and biomarkers of genetic damage. (WPs 3.1 and 3.2) The final outcome of the proposed research will be a careful assessment of the genotoxic potential of furan in the target cells in vivo for carcinogenicity, generation of information on the potential relevance of DNA lesions and the tissue environment changes that may exacerbate mutations. Combining these findings will provide a risk/benefit analysis and a scientific basis to justify limits for human furan exposures.