Short introduction to aeroelasticity

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LINFLOW 1.4 The Company.
Advertisements

Coulomb or Dry Friction Damping.
PLOTTING PHASE PORTRAITS WITH MATLAB:
Aeroelasticity : Complexities and Challenges in Rotary–Wing Vehicles
Power Flow Active Control of Aeroelastic Flutter for a Nonlinear Airfoil with Flap N.Zhao 1,2, Supervisors – Dr. Y.P.Xiong 1 and Prof. D.Q.Cao 2 1 School.
Frequency response When a linear system is subjected to a sinusoidal input, its steady state response is also a sustained sinusoidal wave, with the same.
Basic Aerodynamic Theory
Stability and Control.
Simulating an Insect-Scale Flapping Wing Air Vehicle
CE 579: STRUCTRAL STABILITY AND DESIGN
CE 579: STRUCTRAL STABILITY AND DESIGN
Stability and Flight Controls
Rotational Motion Stability and Control.
Airframe Structural Modeling and Design Optimization
Analyses of tunnel stability under dynamic loads Behdeen Oraee; Navid Hosseini; Kazem Oraee 1.
FLIGHT DYNAMICS OF THE FLEXIBLE AIRCRAFT INCLUDING UNSTEADY AERODYNAMIC EFFECTS Grégori Pogorzelski (1,2), Roberto G. A. da Silva (1) and Pedro Paglione.
Formulation of a complete structural uncertainty model for robust flutter prediction Brian Danowsky Staff Engineer, Research Systems Technology, Inc.,
FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS CONVERSION FACTORS FOR NATURAL VIBRATIONS OF BEAMS Austin Cosby and Ernesto Gutierrez-Miravete Rensselaer at Hartford.
Fig.6 Next Generation Airplane ( ■ Design of Next Generation Airplanes - Lightweight airframe - High aspect ratio.
Aerospace Engineering Laboratory II Vibration of Beam
A PPLIED M ECHANICS Lecture 03 Slovak University of Technology Faculty of Material Science and Technology in Trnava.
ITA – Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica
An Introduction to Rotorcraft Dynamics
In the Name of Allah, the Gracious, the Merciful
J.Cugnoni, LMAF/EPFL,  Goal: ◦ extract natural resonnance frequencies and eigen modes of a structure  Problem statement ◦ Dynamics equations (free.
BASICS OF DYNAMICS AND ASEISMIC DESIGN
1 Aerodynamic theories. 2 DLM Reference AIAA Journal, Vol. 7, No. 2, February 1969, pp
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 7 – Control effectiveness (2)
“Adde parvum parvo magnus acervus erir” Ovid Purdue Aeroelasticity
Aeroelasticity (made simple)
1 Flutter Computation Examples – Simple Cases Flutter Computation Examples A binary aeroelastic system has the following expression Find the stiffness.
Aerodynamic Damping (WP2)
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 23 Representing motion with complex numbers and arithmetic 1 Purdue Aeroelasticity.
Purdue Aeroelasticity
Uncontrolled copy not subject to amendment
CE 579: STRUCTRAL STABILITY AND DESIGN
NON-LINEAR OSCILLATIONS OF A FLUTTERING PLATE
Linear Buckling Analysis
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 6-Control effectiveness
Purdue Aeroelasticity
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 6
Tacoma Narrows Bridge & Aeroelastic Fluttering
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lectures 22, 23
Solid Mechanics Course No. ME213.
Purdue Aeroelasticity
Aerospace Engineering Experimentation and Laboratory II Vibration of Beam by NAV.
Buckling & Stability Critical Load
Purdue Aeroelasticity
Purdue Aeroelasticity
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 6 – Multi-DOF systems
Copyright 2008-Purdue University
UNIT V STABILITY ANALYSIS 9
CHAPTER 1 Force Analysis. Deformation Analysis.
Model Problems of Compound Flight
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 7-Control effectiveness
Purdue Aeroelasticity
Purdue Aeroelasticity
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 22
STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS SEYE NIGUSSIE. Introduction WHAT IS STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS ?  Dynamics concerned with the study of force and motion which are time dependent.
PLOTTING PHASE PORTRAITS WITH MATLAB:
Engineering Mechanics: Statics
Engineering Mechanics: Statics
Purdue Aeroelasticity
Unit 2 Unmanned Aircraft
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lectures 10 and 11
Introduction to Aeronautical Engineering
NİŞANTAŞI ÜNİVERSİTESİ
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 10
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 4
Flutter-a scary instability
Presentation transcript:

Short introduction to aeroelasticity

Introduction “Aeroelasticity” is the term used to denote the field of study concerned with the interaction between the deformation of an elastic structure in an airstream and the resulting aerodynamic force. Classical aerodynamic theories provide a prediction of the forces acting on a body of a given shape. Elasticity provides a prediction of the shape of an elastic body under a given load.

Introduction In aeroelasticity, one finds that the loads depend on the deformation (i.e., aerodynamics) and that the deformation depends on the loads (i.e., structural mechanics/dynamics); thus, one has a coupled problem. It is of interest that aeroelastic phenomena played a major role throughout the history of powered flight. The Wright brothers utilized controlled warping of the wings on their Wright Flyer in 1903 to achieve lateral control. This was essential to their success in achieving powered flight because the aircraft was laterally unstable due to the significant anhedral of the wings.

Introduction The first recorded and documented case of flutter in an aircraft occurred in 1916. The Handley Page O/400 bomber experienced violent tail oscillations as the result of the lack of a torsion-rod connection between the port and starboard elevators—an absolute design requirement of today. The incident involved a dynamic twisting of the fuselage to as much as 45 degrees in conjunction with an antisymmetric flapping of the elevators. Catastrophic failures due to aircraft flutter became a major design concern during the First World War and remain so today. R. A. Frazer and W. J. Duncan at theNational Physical Laboratory in England compiled a classic document on this subject entitled, “The Flutter of Aeroplane Wings”

Introduction Another major aircraft-design concern that may be classified as a static aeroelastic phenomenon was experienced in 1927 by the Bristol Bagshot, a twin engine, high-aspect-ratio English aircraft. As the speed was increased, the aileron effectiveness decreased to zero and then became negative. This loss and reversal of aileron control is commonly known today as “aileron reversal.” Aileron reversal generally does not lead to a catastrophic failure, it can be dangerous and therefore is an essential design concern

Introduction Steady (static) aeroelasticity: The field of static aeroelasticity is the study of flight-vehicle phenomena associated with the interaction of aerodynamic loading induced by steady flow and the resulting elastic deformation of the lifting-surface structure. These phenomena are characterized as being insensitive to the rates and accelerations of the structural deflections. There are two types Divergence and control reversal.

Introduction Steady (static) aeroelasticity: no inertial terms influence http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x10uqvs_wing-bending-a350_tech?search_algo=2 Divergence occurs when the moments due to aerodynamic forces overcome the restoring moments due to structural stiffness, so resulting in aircraft failure Control surface reversal the effect that aeroelastic deflections of the flexible wing have on the aerodynamic influence, or effectiveness, of the control surface in comparison to rigid wing. When the speed increases the effectiveness reduces until at some critical speed, called the reversal speed, this no response to application of the control surface.

Introduction Dynamic aeroelasticity The instability called “flutter,” which generally leads to a catastrophic structural failure of a flight vehicle. A formal definition of aeroelastic flutter is as follows: a dynamic instability of a flight vehicle associated with the interaction of aerodynamic, elastic, and inertial forces. From this definition, it is apparent that any investigation of flutter stability requires an adequate knowledge of the system’s structural dynamic and aerodynamic properties. Flutter is a self-excited and potentially destructive oscillatory instability in which aerodynamic forces on a flexible body couple with its natural modes of vibration to produce oscillatory motions with increasing amplitude.

Introduction Dynamic aeroelasticity The level of vibration will increase, resulting in oscillatory motion with amplitude sufficiently large to cause structural failure. Of the various phenomena that are categorized as aeroelastic flutter, lifting surface flutter is most often encountered and most likely to result in a catastrophic structural failure. As a result, it is required that lifting surfaces of all flight vehicles be analyzed and tested to ensure that this dynamic instability will not occur for any condition within the vehicle’s flight envelope.

Introduction Dynamic aeroelasticity The objective of such an analysis is to determine the flight conditions that correspond to the flutter boundary. It was previously noted that the flutter boundary corresponds to conditions for which one of the modes of motion has a simple harmonic time dependency. Because this is considered to be a stability boundary, it is implied that all modes of motion are convergent (i.e., stable) for less critical flight conditions (i.e., lower airspeed). Moreover, all modes other than the critical one are convergent at the flutter boundary.

Introduction Dynamic aeroelasticity The objective of such an analysis is to determine the flight conditions that correspond to the flutter boundary. It was previously noted that the flutter boundary corresponds to conditions for which one of the modes of motion has a simple harmonic time dependency. Because this is considered to be a stability boundary, it is implied that all modes of motion are convergent (i.e., stable) for less critical flight conditions (i.e., lower airspeed). Moreover, all modes other than the critical one are convergent at the flutter boundary. It is presumed that the solution involves simple harmonic motion. With such a solution specified, the equations of motion are then solved for the flight condition(s) that yields such a solution.

Introduction Dynamic aeroelasticity The objective of such an analysis is to determine the flight conditions that correspond to the flutter boundary. It was previously noted that the flutter boundary corresponds to conditions for which one of the modes of motion has a simple harmonic time dependency. Because this is considered to be a stability boundary, it is implied that all modes of motion are convergent (i.e., stable) for less critical flight conditions (i.e., lower airspeed). Moreover, all modes other than the critical one are convergent at the flutter boundary. It is presumed that the solution involves simple harmonic motion. With such a solution specified, the equations of motion are then solved for the flight condition(s) that yields such a solution.

Introduction Dynamic aeroelasticity The instability called “flutter,” which generally leads to a catastrophic structural failure of a flight vehicle. A formal definition of aeroelastic flutter is as follows: a dynamic instability of a flight vehicle associated with the interaction of aerodynamic, elastic, and inertial forces. Flutter http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OhwLojNerMU http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aZQlmxrmjXQ Dynamic response (gust) Buffeting Transonic buffetting

Introduction Very large, fully coupled CFD/CSD aeroelastic models: Random Averaged Navier Stokes, Large Eddy Structures, nonlinear Finite Elements. Aeroelastic tailoring: include aeroelastic calculations in the preliminary design process. Optimize aircraft while observing aeroelastic constraints. Active aeroelastic structures: flexible aircraft structures that can be deformed actively or passively to optimize aerodynamic characteristics.