Monitor Pulse Survey 2014 Results

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What Drives Employee Engagement for Environmental Workforce Results from ECO Canadas 2011 Professional Engagement Study.
Advertisements

2013 CollaboRATE Survey Results
CREATING A CULTURE THAT ENGAGES AND RETAINS MILLENNIALS Like us and check in on facebook at DaleCarnegieNY Tweet during the workshop at #DaleCarnegie.
Biology Staff Survey Why we ran a staff survey  To see how things have changed since the last survey (2011)  To find out what’s working well and.
TalentMap 1 York Community Services: November 1-12, TalentMap Athabasca University – Spring TalentMap Employee Survey Results Presentation.
Burnley Borough Council Lancashire England Gina Cole Organisational Development Specialist.
2010 Annual Employee Survey Results
People Health Audit Frank Newman, C.H.R.L. Newman Human Resources  35 years HR experience  Finance Industry, Pharmaceutical Manufacturing, Semi-Conductor,
Getting the best from the talent you have Julia Howl | Jonathan Magee.
Patrick Mallon Creating change through Collaboration & Partnership 22 May 2007.
Lenovo Listens Manager Training Executive Summary
Staff Survey Executive Team Presentation (Annex B) Prepared by: GfK NOP September, Agenda item: 17 Paper no: CM/03/12/14B.
Highlights of the Staff Survey 2011 Cheryl Kershaw Director of Surveys and Research.
Engagement at The Health Trust Presented by Quantum Workplace 2014 Executive Report - The Health Trust.
Copyright, © 2004, Theresa M. Welbourne, Ph.D. 1 HR Confidence June Leadership Pulse Dr. Theresa M. Welbourne Preliminary Report June 16, 2004.
Vision: Provider of Choice Sunday Times Best Companies to Work For Survey measures workplace engagement by analysising respondents’ views in a number of.
Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust Corporate Division National Survey Outcomes & Staff Engagement, 2012 With comparison where applicable: Heart of England.
Improving Employee Health and Wellbeing at the University of Chester Karen Cregan, Assistant Director of HRM Services.
Group Members: Teng Mei Ling031857X Chan Ren Hui031771G Siti Raudhah031569Q R.Laarvanya030886R Ong Woan Wen030954P Final Presentation!!
© British Telecommunications plc 1 Accountability OEB Top Level Flash Results January 2011.
A. P. Moller - Maersk Employee Engagement Survey 2011 MDSI Corporate IT-Admin; RVA018 - Roberto - Valenciano Report.
Force Results – August 2012 Sussex Police Employee Survey 2012.
Staff engagement “pulse” survey Summer Overview 2431 responses = 41% return rate Questions based on National NHS survey 2012 Trust in lowest 20%
Employee Opinion Survey Results Highlights Lending Services 2012 Auth: People Research Associates Ltd Normative Values © PRA Ltd December 2012 GFS.
Chapter 9 Review How can you measure employee engagement levels over time?
School of Biological Sciences Staff Survey 2013 Department of Zoology Results Briefing, 21 May 2013.
STAFF DEVELOPMENT Human Resources STAFF DEVELOPMENT Human Resources Engagement Measures.
Overall NSW Health 2011 YourSay Survey Results YourSay - NSW Health Workplace Survey Results Presentation NSW Health Overall Presented by: Robyn Burley.
Staff Survey Results and Recommendations ORC International Helen Shaw | Insight Consultant April 2016 Classification: Private.
1 Home Care Support Outcome Based Specification Workshop 26 th November 2009.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration February 23, 2016 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey (FEVS) From Results to Action Presented by: Kim Haney-Brown.
Creating Positive Culture through Leadership (Recovery Orientation) Jennifer Black.
Volunteer Engagement Survey Results May 29, 2013.
Staff survey: Your SAY 2016 Managers’– Presentation for Staff
National Staff Survey 2016 Main Findings
2016 Duck River EMC Employee Survey
Annex A Staff Survey - Headline Findings (1)
Leadership Principles for Engaging People
A great place to work – engaging with and motivating others
Discovering your role as a leader
Learning and Development Developing leaders and managers
Top Key Driver Questions That Impact Engagement – Executive Branch
The High Cost of Low Morale
Items in red require your input
EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT & PERFORMANCE IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR
OGA overview and update
Summary.
EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY RESULTS
Items in red require your input
Learning and Development Developing leaders and managers
Employee Engagement Survey
Items in red require your input
Summary This report presents the results from South Tyneside CCG’s 360° Stakeholder Survey The annual CCG 360° Stakeholder Survey, which has been.
Patients Forum Meeting –
Employee Engagement 2018 Example of analysis report
UA Workplace Experience Survey - Chime in!
2017 UC Staff Engagement Survey
Empire Southwest 2017 Companywide EOS Results.
Executive summary People Matter Survey 2018 KERANG DISTRICT HEALTH.
Butler University Great Colleges To Work For
2017 UC Staff Engagement Survey
2018 Great Colleges Survey for Champlain College
People Lead: This is the visual representation of our model. This model supports and reinforces our definition of leadership - achieving results, with.
Employee Engagement Defined
By Md. Al-Amin (Mli).
2018 UNC System Employee Engagement Survey Results
SDHR Forum Peter Kim VP, Culture and Counsel.
Enter Your Work Unit Here Enter Date Here
Engagement Planning - Communications
Pulse Survey Follow up 2019.
Presentation transcript:

Monitor Pulse Survey 2014 Results ExCo meeting – 14 November 2014

Pulse Survey Results 2014 Response rate Response rates across the company have risen against previous survey and well above benchmarks in public as well as private sector firms.

Pulse Survey Results 2014 Headliners Most favourable (highest scores overall) Best against Monitor overall (greatest difference against firm’s scores) Most improved since Feb survey (greatest difference against previous survey) 1 Provider Appraisal Sector Development 2 Organisation Transformation Provider Regulation 3 4 Strategic Communications Legal Services & CEO Office 5 6 7 Cooperation & Competition Top 5 scores I am proud to work for Monitor (81%) I believe strongly in the purpose and objectives of Monitor (81%) I would recommend Monitor as a great place to work (76%) Working here makes me want to do the best work I can (75%) I understand my part to play in delivering Monitor’s corporate strategy (71%) Lowest 5 scores Inappropriate behaviour is dealt with effectively where I work (47%) Leaders demonstrate our values in their everyday behaviour and actions (46%) Leaders provide a clear and compelling vision for Monitor’s future (43%) I am satisfied with the opportunities I have to progress at Monitor (38%) I believe Monitor’s performance management system is fair and equitable (33%)

Pulse Survey Results 2014 Strengths and areas for focus Less than 6 months service Females Senior grades (VSM, level 1 & 2) Engagement & commitment category Ethnicity: Asians Cooperation & competition had highest response rate Provider Appraisal had the greatest positive impact on overall stats Between 1 and less than 2 years Role Level 3 Leadership (ExCo and Directors) category Ethnicity: Others Provider Regulation has the greatest negative impact on overall stats and the lowest response rate Areas to focus

Legal Services & CEO Office Pulse 2014 engagement index Pulse Survey Results 2014 Engagement Index SAY Employee advocacy I am proud to work for Monitor Pulse Feb survey I would recommend Monitor as a great place to work STAY Employee commitment I believe strongly in the purpose and objectives of Monitor I intend to still be working for Monitor in 12 months time STRIVE Discretionary effort Working here makes me want to do the best work I can Monitor motivates me to contribute more than is normally required in my work Directorate Provider Regulation Provider Appraisal Sector Development Monitor overall OT Strat Comms CCD Legal Services & CEO Office All Economics KIM Policy & SD MD Office Pricing Enforce & PR MD Office Finance, Reporting And Risk Regional Monitoring Pulse 2014 engagement index 76% 77% 74% 73% 82% 75% 69% 70% 72% 71% 66% 63% Difference to Feb survey 4% n/a -5% 19% -12% 16% -3% 1% -11% -8% 8% Difference to Pulse Monitor overall 5% 2% 10% 3% -2% 0% -1% -6% -9%

Pulse Survey Results 2014 Engagement Index

Pulse Survey Results 2014 Leadership questions – 2 of 2 Benchmarks: PS < 500 = Public Sector companies with less than 500 employees. 250 – 700 = all companies with 250 to 700 employees (used in full survey)

Pulse Survey Results 2014 Leadership questions – 1 of 2 Benchmarks: PS < 500 = Public Sector companies with less than 500 employees. 250 – 700 = all companies with 250 to 700 employees (used in full survey)

Pulse Survey Results 2014 Results by directorate – difference to February full survey Mon all (404 responses) Legal Services & CEO Office Organisation Transformation Strategic Communications Provider Regulation Sector Development Cooperation & Competition Provider Appraisal Category Question Pulse Diff to Feb My Engagement and Commitment I am proud to work for Monitor 81% 0% 66% 4% -14% 76% 3% 91% 5% 82% -13% 85% -9% I would recommend Monitor as a great place to work 2% 59% 86% 73% 11% 77% 57% 1% -17% I believe strongly in the purpose and objectives of Monitor -4% 79% 17% 7% 80% -6% 84% -5% I intend to still be working for Monitor in 12 months time 60% 55% 38% 45% 69% 6% 62% 46% -10% 70% Working here makes me want to do the best work I can 75% 12% 74% -8% Monitor motivates me to contribute more than is normally required in my work 52% -12% 50% 9% -1% 51% Patients First My team regularly looks for ways to make a difference for patients 63% 16% 43% 27% 30% -2% 18% I understand how our corporate strategy makes a difference for patients 68% 20% 15% 67% 14% 64% 24% 72% 13% Working Together There is good co-operation and communication between the teams I work with across Monitor 71% 8% -21% 37% 53% -18% Leadership (ExCo and Directors) Leaders demonstrate our values in their everyday behaviour and actions 29% -3% -20% 34% -30% Leaders are sufficiently visible and approachable at Monitor 33% -31% 42% 54% -11% Leaders provide a clear and compelling vision for Monitor's future 48% -15% 44% 26% -22% -19% My Manager I receive regular and constructive feedback on my performance -7% 40% I understand my part to play in delivering Monitor's corporate strategy 10% 19% 65% My Job I have clear, measurable work objectives 61% Performance and Development I am satisfied with the opportunities I have to progress at Monitor 31% 23% I am satisfied with the development I receive for my present job 49% Inappropriate behaviour is dealt with effectively where I work 47% 41% I believe Monitor's performance management system is fair and equitable 28% -34% 25% 36% Health and Well-Being I am satisfied with the support available if I experience stress or pressure 58%

Pulse Survey Results 2014 Results by team – difference to February full survey Provider Regulation Sector Development Mon all (404 responses) Enforcement & PR MD Office (19 responses) Finance, Reporting And Risk (26 responses) Regional Monitoring (56 responses) Economics (20 responses) KIM (38 responses) Policy & SD MD Office (30 responses) Pricing (50 responses) Category Question Pulse Diff to Feb My Engagement and Commitment I am proud to work for Monitor 81% 0% 89% - 92% 13% 91% 2% 95% 20% 79% -14% 80% 25% -5% I would recommend Monitor as a great place to work 76% 84% -3% 18% 85% 35% 77% 22% 72% -13% I believe strongly in the purpose and objectives of Monitor -4% 73% -6% -9% -8% -1% 82% I intend to still be working for Monitor in 12 months time 60% 69% 1% 66% 5% 70% 14% -7% 30% 58% Working here makes me want to do the best work I can 75% 74% 11% 24% 3% Monitor motivates me to contribute more than is normally required in my work 55% 54% 45% 31% -15% 53% 6% Patients First My team regularly looks for ways to make a difference for patients 63% 16% 38% 64% 27% 26% 8% 62% 23% I understand how our corporate strategy makes a difference for patients 68% 90% 34% -21% 32% Working Together There is good co-operation and communication between the teams I work with across Monitor 50% 42% -16% 39% -32% 47% -33% 48% 7% Leadership (ExCo and Directors) Leaders demonstrate our values in their everyday behaviour and actions 46% 37% 12% 40% Leaders are sufficiently visible and approachable at Monitor 52% -2% -10% 56% Leaders provide a clear and compelling vision for Monitor's future 43% My Manager I receive regular and constructive feedback on my performance -11% 41% -25% I understand my part to play in delivering Monitor's corporate strategy 71% 10% My Job I have clear, measurable work objectives Performance and Development I am satisfied with the opportunities I have to progress at Monitor 15% 36% I am satisfied with the development I receive for my present job 49% 29% 44% Inappropriate behaviour is dealt with effectively where I work 65% 17% 4% I believe Monitor's performance management system is fair and equitable 33% Health and Well-Being I am satisfied with the support available if I experience stress or pressure 61% 21%

Pulse Survey Results 2014 Results by directorate – difference to Monitor overall (404 responses) Legal Services & CEO Office Organisation Transformation Strategic Communications Provider Regulation Sector Development Cooperation & Competition Provider Appraisal Category Question Pulse Diff to Mon all My Engagement and Commitment I am proud to work for Monitor 81% 66% -16% 0% 76% -6% 91% 10% 82% 85% 4% I would recommend Monitor as a great place to work 59% -18% 86% 9% 73% -4% 77% 1% 57% -19% I believe strongly in the purpose and objectives of Monitor 79% -2% -5% 80% -1% 84% 3% I intend to still be working for Monitor in 12 months time 60% 55% 38% -22% 45% -15% 69% 62% 2% 46% 70% Working here makes me want to do the best work I can 75% -9% 6% 74% Monitor motivates me to contribute more than is normally required in my work 52% -3% 7% 50% 5% 51% Patients First My team regularly looks for ways to make a difference for patients 63% -8% 43% -20% 13% 23% I understand how our corporate strategy makes a difference for patients 68% 67% 64% 72% Working Together There is good co-operation and communication between the teams I work with across Monitor 71% 22% 37% -13% 53% Leadership (ExCo and Directors) Leaders demonstrate our values in their everyday behaviour and actions 16% 29% -17% 30% 34% -12% 11% Leaders are sufficiently visible and approachable at Monitor 20% 33% 42% -11% 54% Leaders provide a clear and compelling vision for Monitor's future 48% 24% 27% 44% 26% 19% My Manager I receive regular and constructive feedback on my performance 8% 21% 40% -14% 14% I understand my part to play in delivering Monitor's corporate strategy 65% My Job I have clear, measurable work objectives 61% Performance and Development I am satisfied with the opportunities I have to progress at Monitor 31% -7% I am satisfied with the development I receive for my present job 49% 15% Inappropriate behaviour is dealt with effectively where I work 47% 41% I believe Monitor's performance management system is fair and equitable 28% 25% -10% 36% Health and Well-Being I am satisfied with the support available if I experience stress or pressure 58% 12%

Pulse Survey Results 2014 Results by team – difference to Monitor overall Provider Regulation Sector Development Mon all (404 responses) Enforcement & PR MD Office (19 responses) Finance, Reporting And Risk (26 responses) Regional Monitoring (56 responses) Economics (20 responses) KIM (38 responses) Policy & SD MD Office (30 responses) Pricing (50 responses) Category Question Pulse Diff to Mon all My Engagement and Commitment I am proud to work for Monitor 81% 89% 8% 92% 11% 91% 10% 95% 14% 79% -2% 80% -1% I would recommend Monitor as a great place to work 76% 84% 5% 13% 85% 9% 3% 77% 0% 72% -4% I believe strongly in the purpose and objectives of Monitor 73% -8% 4% -5% 82% 1% I intend to still be working for Monitor in 12 months time 60% 19% 69% 66% 6% 70% 58% Working here makes me want to do the best work I can 75% 74% Monitor motivates me to contribute more than is normally required in my work 55% 54% 45% -10% 20% 53% Patients First My team regularly looks for ways to make a difference for patients 63% 16% 38% -24% 64% 32% -18% 62% I understand how our corporate strategy makes a difference for patients 68% -6% 90% 22% Working Together There is good co-operation and communication between the teams I work with across Monitor 50% 42% -7% 39% 30% 47% -3% 48% Leadership (ExCo and Directors) Leaders demonstrate our values in their everyday behaviour and actions 46% 7% 24% 37% -9% 40% Leaders are sufficiently visible and approachable at Monitor 52% -15% 2% 56% Leaders provide a clear and compelling vision for Monitor's future 43% 12% 15% -11% My Manager I receive regular and constructive feedback on my performance -22% -12% 41% -13% 21% I understand my part to play in delivering Monitor's corporate strategy 71% My Job I have clear, measurable work objectives Performance and Development I am satisfied with the opportunities I have to progress at Monitor 35% 36% I am satisfied with the development I receive for my present job 49% 31% 29% -20% 44% Inappropriate behaviour is dealt with effectively where I work 65% 18% 34% I believe Monitor's performance management system is fair and equitable 33% Health and Well-Being I am satisfied with the support available if I experience stress or pressure 61%