Regulated Potential Spp. EDRR # species Data Type EDRR

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Instructions for using this template. Remember this is Jeopardy, so where I have written Answer this is the prompt the students will see, and where I.
Advertisements

October 5, 2007 Weed Watching Tips for Citizen Scientists Monitoring Invasive Plant Species Citizen Based Monitoring Conference Devil's Head Resort and.
Weed Identification Made Easy
Geospatial 09 Kathie Jewell April 29,2009 National Invasive Species Information Management System NISIMS.
Utah’s Noxious Weeds.
Ecological Sites and their Relationship to Soil Mapping Steve Campbell Soil Scientist USDA – Natural Resources Conservation Service West National Technology.
Colorado’s Noxious Weed Program Kelly Uhing State Weed Coordinator Colorado Department of Agriculture.
Salem District 12 northwest Oregon counties Approximately 403,000 acres BLM usually manages a small percentage of the land in any particular fifth-field.
FIELD METHODS Strategy for Monitoring Post-fire Rehabilitation Treatments Troy Wirth and David Pyke USGS – Biological Resources Division Forest and Rangeland.
Roseburg District. Noxious Weeds There are 33 noxious weeds documented on District There are 33 noxious weeds documented on District Total acres infested.
Synthesizing and Spatially Linking Disparate Datasets Catherine Crosier 1,2, Gregory J. Newman 1, and Thomas J. Stohlgren 1,2 1 Natural Resource Ecology.
5)Management c)Control iii)Biological methods = “biologically” damaging plants.
Click to edit Master title style 7/15/20151 Weeds of Medford District of the BLM  Of the 357 non-native plants documented here, there are over 30 listed.
War on Weeds ! Cindy A. Kinder University of Idaho, Camas County Extension, Fairfield, Idaho.
What’s wrong with planting non-native plants in an urban setting? Why do ecologists argue for native landscaping?
Activity Update Johnson County Weed & Pest.  Whitetop  Coupons  FS & BLM  S. thistle, Knapweed  Prairie dogs  Mosquitoes  Education programs 
Vale District Public Scoping Meetings Vegetation Treatments Using Herbicides on BLM Lands in Oregon Environmental Impact Statement Baker City 7/7/08 Vale.
SE-EPPC’s Invasive Plant Mapping Program - Update Chris Evans & Chuck Bargeron University of Georgia – Bugwood Network.
By: Courtney Thrams.  An Invasive Species is an alien species whose introduction causes or is likely to cause harm to the economy, environment, or human.
Synthesizing and Spatially Linking Disparate Datasets Catherine Crosier 1,2, Gregory J. Newman 1, and Thomas J. Stohlgren 1,2 1 Natural Resource Ecology.
Pennsylvania’s Online Invasive Species Database and Mapping System What is i MapInvasives? i MapInvasives is an online, GIS-based, all-taxa mapping tool.
INVASIVE PLANTS What are they and how can we pull together to win the war on weeds!
What Will We “Search By” Next? Building Custom GIS Search Applications for the Internet Presented By: Amy Kenum City of Huntsville:
Chuck Bargeron University of Georgia – Bugwood Network (Center for Invasive Species and Ecosystem Health)
An Introduction to the NC Natural Heritage Data Explorer (NHDE) Allison Schwarz Weakley, Conservation Planner NC Natural Heritage Program North Carolina.
The use of native vegetation in Xeriscaping creates habitat for native wildlife while reducing the risk of invasion Greg Cronin University of Colorado.
Minnesota Grassland Monitoring Team Pilot Season – 2008.
Prineville District Vegetation Treatments Using Herbicides on BLM Lands in Oregon Environmental Impact Statement.
COMMON MALLOW. DANDELION REDROOT PIGWEED GROUNDSEL.
Activity Update Johnson County Weed & Pest.  Whitetop  Coupons  Rock Creek Grant  Muddy Creek Grant  FS & BLM  S. thistle, Knapweed  Prairie dogs.
Noxious/Invasive Noxious/Invasive Weed Legislation Weed Legislation.
Invasive Species and Biological Controls
Airborne Hyperspectral Research & Development for Invasive Species Detection and Mapping Kenneth McGwire 1, Timothy Minor 1, Bradley Schultz 2, and Christopher.
Iowa Rivers Information System Inventory, Modeling, and Evaluation of Basin, In-Stream Habitat, and Fishery Resource Relationships Kevin Kane, Iowa State.
COMMON MALLOW. RED CLOVER REDROOT PIGWEED COMMON GROUNDSEL.
Mission: The San Luis Valley Weed Management Association is a public and private partnership created to promote awareness and management of noxious weeds.
Commonly Used Herbicides Rangeland & Non-crop Exploring Herbicides Used to Control Invasive Weeds.
Unit Webex Meetings Step 1: Targets, Threats, and Stresses.
Bureau of Land Management Invasive Species Program
COMMON MALLOW.
Irvine Ranch Conservancy Monitoring on the IRNL
Bitter Nightshade Common Weed Seed.
Training Using EDDMapS
Sweetwater Co Weed and Pest
GIS Basic Training June 7, 2007 – ICIT Midyear Conference
FISP Mission Statement
GIS On A Budget: Simple Applications for Real World Solutions
Landscape-level management needs for sharing spatial data
Integrated Data Management.
Extensible Platform Microsoft Dynamics 365
Advanced features iNaturalist
Mapping and Modelling Distribution of Invasive Plant Species
Hypothesis: There are no serious or systemic negative effects on Open Space due to recreation (including off-leash dogs). Good Evening Council, As the.
University of Georgia – Bugwood Network
Invasive Plants and Weeds
Utah Noxious Weeds 1. Bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon)
Hypothesis: There are no serious or systemic negative effects on Open Space due to recreation (including off-leash dogs). Good Evening Council, As the.
Do you like to see wildflowers?
How many different kinds of plants do you see?
NOXIOUS WEEDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Northeast Illinois Invasive Plant Partnership:
Most Common and Troublesome Weeds in
USA-NPN National Coordinating Office
Invasive Species Courtesy
WHAT DO THESE PLANTS HAVE IN COMMON?
Invasive Plant Species Management on F. E. Warren Air Force Base
Montana Agronomy Seed Identification Study Guide
Development & Implementation
Welcome to The Archuleta County Weed Tour
Utah Division of Forestry, Fire, & State Lands
Presentation transcript:

Noxious Weed Data Management in Colorado Lara Durán Colorado Department of Agriculture

25 40 16 24 105 Regulated Potential Spp. EDRR # species Data Type EDRR 9,000 ac QQ 16 24 Qualitative/ County 105 Potential Spp. EDRR

Data Flow for List B Annual Regulations CDA: Online Spatial Database, Shapefiles, Spray Records, GPS Negotiations Annual Rule = Regulation = Management Plans Statewide Maps Contractors Containment Maps Municipalities County Weed Manager Federal Factsheets State Annual rule decisions are driven by data from the field Non-Profit Orgs Local Management Plans Researchers Ag Producers Ag Public Citizen Scientists

USGS 7.5’ Quadrangle Map of Vail Pass Annual Rule Musk Thistle Example USGS 7.5’ Quadrangle Map of Vail Pass 9,000 acres Use annual rule to determine how to manage noxious weeds in the area By county, not by ecoregion

Musk thistle Statewide QQ Data 2015 field estimates

CDA Online Spatial Database List B Data CDA Online Spatial Database Application- Flex Database – 2008 Microsoft SQL Server Paper

Input/Table Export Acres Quarter Quad Assignments GIS Acres ≠ Input/Table Export Acres Web App Code Coarse Scale Trends?

Annual Regulation List B Data Assumptions & Caveats: Inaccuracies exist Data is incomplete Over-reporting & under-reporting Not all occurrences are GPS’d What does data tell us about rangelands in colorado Look at list b species- worst offenders & species less common

False Negatives False Positives Species Baseline 2002 Program Year Previous Rule Update MOST CURRENT Rule Update Total Change Over Time (Year2 –Year1) + (Year3-Year2) Relative Percent Change (Year3-Year1)/Year3 Comments Eurasian watermilfoil MYSP2 247 52,518 100% only List B aquatic species Oxeye daisy LEVU 3,440 16,506   Yellow nutsedge CYES 17 15,049 Spotted knapweed CEST8 1,580 4,921 4921 Moth mullein VEBL 1 339 979 978 Bouncingbet SAOF4 15 220 1046 1031 99% ornamental not inventoried & not a priorty Houndstongue CYOF 1,905 2,502 73,608 71,703 97% Common tansy TAVU 473 263 248 94% Russian olive ELAN 10,028 9,500 65,979 55,951 85% ornamental highly inventoried Black henbane HYNI 33 580 212 179 84% Musk thistle CANU4 15,760 46,491 87,633 71,873 82% Jointed goatgrass AECY 5,442 10,032 8127 81% Common & Cutleaf teasel DIFU2 DILA4 646 3,374 3,221 2575 80% easily accessible highways Chamomiles ANAR6 ANCO2 381 446 1752 1371 78% Scotch thistle ONAC 19,802 25,587 56,511 36,709 65% Wild caraway CACA19 760 114 1619 859 53% Dalmatian toadflax LIDA LIGE LIVU2 11,379 5,229 18,360 6,981 38% Canada thistle CIAR4 100,695 129,572 28,877 22% most prevelant List B Plumeless thistle CAAC 1,158 3,208 1,217 59 5% Salt cedar TARA 28,249 28,722 27,963 -286 -1% highly inventoried; biocontrol Hoary cress CADR 32,633 60,814 30,044 -2589 -9% Yellow toadflax LIVU2 41,048 874 33,532 -7516 -22% Leafy spurge EUES 74,084 39,978 39,567 -34,517 -87% Chinese clematis CLOR 1,062 331 -315 -95% Dames rocket HEMA3 1,139 563 -595 -106% Diffuse knapweed CEDI3 145,169 320 68,968 -76,201 -110% Russian knapweed CERE6 118,341 6,988 55,719 -62,622 -112% focus of on-the-ground treatment Perennial pepperweed LELA2 51,311 8,160 21,739 -29,572 -136% Bull thistle CIVU 2,087 6,889 -25,744 -374% Sulfur cinquefoil PORE5 6,189 668 -5,521 -826% Absinth wormwood ARAB3 52,427 3,636 726 -51,701 -7121% not a priority at local levels Acres Reported by Counties during Three Reporting Periods Baseline Previous Rule Current Rule Total Change/Time % Relative Change February 16, 2017 False Negatives False Positives

Ecological Thresholds Crossing Ecological Threshold? Native Sagebrush Example Native Plant Dynamics & Ecological Thresholds Modified from Tausch et al. 2009

Landfire Existing Vegetation vs. Quarter Quad Data 2011 and 2016

Eurasian watermilfoil Colorado Parks & Wildlife Waterbodies Colorado Parks & Wildlife vs. QQ Data

point, polygon, line data Russian olive 2009/2010 QQ vs. Tamarisk Coalition point, polygon, line data Yuma County

Use of plant cover for strategic management Leafy spurge Use of plant cover for strategic management

A New Future EDDMapS is a two way street Input data and export data Best way to coordinate and collaborate with multilpe people/organizations Can see where need to treat Can enter treatment records Can enter monitoring observations https://www.eddmaps.org

EDDMapSWest FREE & open source most current internet-based GIS technologies easy to use download or look at noxious weed data privacy protections professional mobile application treated EDRR management of priority species monitoring multiple users to verify submitted records biocontrol app

25 40 16 24 105 # species EDRR Data Type Regulated Potential Spp. ? Potential Spp. EDRR