Drivers of Deforestation and Forest Degradation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Governance for REDD+ Crystal Davis Governance of Forests Initiative World Resources Institute REDD Civil Society Coordination Seminar CIFOR campus, Bogor.
Advertisements

PRESENTATION OUTLINE Introduction Climate change initiatives Capacity Challenges.
Forest Carbon Partnership Facility R-PP Preparation DRIVERS OF DEFORESTATION AND DEGRADATION August, 13 – 14, 2009.
Basic Considerations  outlines the process by which the Government of Kenya will develop its national strategy for participating in an evolving international.
Katoomba Group Training Initiative Climate Change, Markets and Services Welcome and Introduction Course Introduction and Guidelines Participant Introduction:
Session 3: Drivers, processes and policy assessments
A. N. Gichu Kenya Forest Service REDD+ and REDD Readiness.
Presentation by Alfred N. Gichu Kenya’s REDD+ Readiness.
Francisco Sancho.  C-Neutrality (vision) should become a conductive strategy (action): Roadmap for the different sectors  Several development and CC.
Introducing the REDD+ Roadmap Process Bangladesh REDD+ Roadmap Launching Workshop Dhaka, 26 th October 2011.
FAO NAMA learning tool to support NAMA preparation in agriculture
World Bank - Forest Carbon Partnership Facility: REDD+ Readiness and Country Needs Alexander Lotsch Forest Carbon Partnership Facility The World Bank
Forest Carbon Partnership Facility Global Dialogue on Developing a Readiness Preparation Proposal August 13-14, 2009 Structure of the R-PP template Review.
UNDP Handbook for conducting technology needs assessments and Preliminary analysis of countries’ TNAs UNFCCC Seminar on the development and transfer on.
Developing Incentives for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD) The Readiness Mechanism Some ideas for your consideration next steps.
Critical issues facing REDD+ CPA Conference. Global Mechanisms: Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+), July 2010.
PRIVATE SECTOR ENGAGEMENT ON REDD+ IN VIETNAM, CURRENT AND POTENTIAL FUTURE Prepared by Vu Thanh Nam Vietnam administration of Forestry (VNFOREST)
The Roadmap to REDD Implementation in Tanzania: Potential Challenges and Opportunities Pius Z. Yanda, Emma T. Liwenga & Claude G. Mung’ong’o Institute.
Close to Nature Forestry and Forest Policy Challenges in Europe Ilpo Tikkanen, European Forest Institute Zvolen, Slovakia October, 2003 Together.
Forest Carbon Partnership Facility Participants Committee Meeting (FCPF PC3) Montreux, Switzerland, June 16-18, 2009 Guyana’s REDD Readiness-Plan Technical.
UNDP Current and post-2015 Climate Change Support Jan Kellett, Bureau for Policy and Programme Support Presentation, ACP, October 2015.
REDD+ Guiana Plateau project First Steering Committee Meeting Paramaribo, 6 August 2013 Rene Somopawiro SBB, Suriname.
Propose Strategic Objective and Strategy in the National REDD+ Strategy Version 4.
Session 10: Linking CBR+ with National REDD+ Programme in Cambodia Training of Trainer on REDD+ Concept for UNDP GEF SGP/CBR+ Grantees 7 October 2015.
Where and how can REDD+ deliver most benefits? Lera Miles, UNEP-WCMC 7 December 2015.
Network for Certification and Conservation of Forests.
REDD+ negotiations and key milestones from Cancun to Durban Geneva, 9 May 2011 Clea Paz-Rivera, UN-REDD Secretariat.
Support to National REDD+ Action: Global Programme Framework (SNA) Work Plan and Budget 2015 Information and Knowledge Sharing Sessions Twelfth.
Assessment of key policies and measures to address the drivers of deforestation and forest degradation in the context of REDD+ readiness in Nepal Dil B.
1 REDD+, biodiversity and people: Opportunities and risks John A. Parrotta, Chair, Global Forest Expert Panel (GFEP) on Biodiversity, Forest Management.
Bosque Patagónico Bosque Chaqueño YungasYungas REDD+ REDD+ ARGENTINA ARGENTINA REDD+ REDD+ ARGENTINA ARGENTINA Selva Misionera Bosque Patagónico.
REDD+ and multiple benefits Multiple benefits workshop Palu, 25 July 2012 Ulf Narloch UNEP – World Conservation Monitoring Centre.
Corruption Risk Assessment for REDD+ : Kenya’s experience Geneva, Switzerland 8 December 2013.
ELEMENTS FOR BRAZIL´S NATIONAL REDD+ STRATEGY Leticia Guimarães, REDD+ Focal Point Climate Change and Environmental Quality Secretariat Ministry of Environment.
Presentation title Enhancing synergies towards climate action and sustainable development on the ground GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop Da Nang, Vietnam,
International Seminar 2017
NATIONAL FORESTRY AUTHORITY
Template Contents of the Low Carbon Development Strategy (LCDS)
VALUE CHAINS, FINANCE AND INVESTMENTS
REDD+ and biodiversity
Country approaches to REDD+ Safeguards
Presentation title 5. Overview of the process to formulate and implement NAPs: process, 2 objectives, guidelines, the NAP-SDG iFrame, upcoming SBI assessment.
Overview of the international climate policy & finance framework and the building of the REDD+ mechanism Josep A. Garí Africa Advisor, UN-REDD Programme.
Makala: the necessary evil
CAFI EB8 Meeting, October 10, 2017
GEF governance reforms to enhance effectiveness and civil society engagement Faizal Parish GEC, Central Focal Point , GEF NGO Network GEF-NGO Consultation.
Country needs assessment Madagascar: Progress and next steps
Kenya’s REDD+ Readiness Activities
Lessons and Experiences from Zambia National REDD+ Coordinator
Overview Rationale Context and Linkages Objectives Commitments
DAFF CLIMATE CHANGE CONFERENCE 11 – 12 August 2011
Private sector development and SDGs in Albania
Focal Area and Cross Cutting Strategies – Climate Change
Progress of the preparations for a White Paper on Adaptation to Climate Change Water Directors’ meeting Slovenia June 2008 Marieke van Nood, Unit.
SSWG Presentation on: Forestry
Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Land Use and Forestry
GCF business model.
DEVELOPMENT OF MRV-SYSTEM & REL/RL IN TANZANIA
SNA Work Plan and Budget Revision 2015 (additional activities)
Overview Rationale Context and Linkages Objectives Commitments
Template and Process for Expression of Interest by Countries
Lao PDR Landscapes and Livelihoods Project (IDA/GEF +) ໂຄງ​ການຄຸ້ມ​ຄອງພູ​ມີ​ທັດ ແລະ ພັດ​ທະ​ນາ​ຊີ​ວິດ​ການ​ເປັນ​ຢູ່ (IDA/GEF +)
enhancing global climate ambition through markets
ECONOMICS IN THE WFD PROCESS
‘From REDD+ readiness to implementation’
OECD Green growth strategy Measuring progress through indicators
REDD+ Policy Overview Climate Protection Through Forest Conservation in the Pacific Islands Inception Workshop, November 2010 Suva, Fiji Dr Sean.
INFOSESSION CfP REDD+ GROUND-TRUTH PROJECTS
NDC GLOBAL CONFERENCE How transformational change promotes ambitious NDCs - assessing the potential of policies Government Secretariat of Climate Change.
Lessons learned from REDD+ readiness processes
Presentation transcript:

Drivers of Deforestation and Forest Degradation

Policies and Measures for REDD+ Implementation

REDD+ National Strategies and Action Plans (NS/AP)

Drivers of Deforestation and Forest Degradation What are drivers? Processes that result in deforestation and forest degradation. Direct drivers, (‘proximate causes’), human activities or immediate actions that directly impact forest cover and loss of carbon Indirect drivers, (‘underlying causes’ or ‘driving forces’), complex interactions of fundamental social, economic, political, cultural and technological processes.

Examples of direct drivers Drivers of Deforestation and Forest Degradation Examples of direct drivers Deforestation: subsistence and large- and small-scale commercial agriculture mining infrastructure development and urban expansion Forest degradation: legal and illegal timber extraction forest fires livestock grazing in forests fuelwood collection and charcoal production, long-fallow shifting cultivation

Examples of indirect drivers Drivers of Deforestation and Forest Degradation Examples of indirect drivers International level: markets, commodity prices, exchanges National level: population growth domestic markets national policies, fiscal incentives and subsidies weak governance and institutions poor cross-sectoral coordination poverty Local level: change in household behaviour And many more …

Apparent deforestation drivers by region Drivers of Deforestation and Forest Degradation Apparent deforestation drivers by region

Apparent degradation drivers by region Drivers of Deforestation and Forest Degradation Apparent degradation drivers by region

What about the future? Global population increase Drivers of Deforestation and Forest Degradation What about the future? Global population increase Economic growth patterns Demand for agricultural commodities Demand for products Use of fuel wood and charcoal

Drivers of Deforestation and Forest Defradation Why analyse drivers? Several UNFCCC decisions refer to drivers, developing countries are required to: Decision 4/CP.15: identify drivers of deforestation and forest degradation (DDFD) Decision 1/CP.16: address these drivers in their national strategies or action plans Decision 15/CP.19: ensure that the response to drivers are adapted to national circumstances

Drivers of Deforestation and Forest Degradation Why analyse drivers? Effectively engage key stakeholders, especially non-forest sectors (in many countries the main drivers) Define priorities for forest monitoring and MRV Justify national circumstances for adjusting reference emission levels Construct scenarios that may deviate from historical trends Design results-based actions that generate results-based payments

Comparing and prioritising drivers Drivers of Deforestation and Forest Degradation Comparing and prioritising drivers Four key indicators to support comparison: The amount of deforestation for one unit Benefits (social/economic/environmental) of one unit Costs (social/economic/environmental) of one unit of driver Access to REDD-compatible alternatives: e.g. smart or certified agriculture

Drivers of Deforestation and Forest Degradation: materials for group exercises

REDD+ National Strategies and Action Plans What do they contain? No specific guidance on content, but should address: Drivers of deforestation and forest degradation Land tenure issues Forest governance issues Gender considerations Safeguards Full and effective participation of relevant stakeholders, inter alia, indigenous peoples and local communities

Questions guiding the design process REDD+ National Strategies and Action Plans Questions guiding the design process Why? Development context and objectives of the country? Deforestation context (trends and related drivers) Country vision for REDD+? What? Policies & Measures (reforms & RBAs) considered by the country towards results How do they build on, supplement or change existing P&Ms? How? Piloted/coordinated, funded, implemented, monitored Through credible, pragmatic & efficient institutional, financial & legal arrangements

Key messages related to NS-AP NS/APs describe how emissions will be reduced and/o r how forest carbon stocks will be enhanced, conserved and/or sustainably managed in the implementation of REDD+; NS/APs are one of the four design elements required by the UNFCCC for REDD+ implementation and to access Results-Based Payments; Ensuring the quality of both the NS/AP design process and NS/AP document is essential, as it is an opportunity to: Build trust and support from national & international stakeholders; Give confidence in a country’s capacity to deliver REDD+ results to receive results-based payments; Maximize chances to attract financial support for the implementation of the NS/AP; Contribute to a well coordinated and more efficient readiness process. Strategic choices made on each of the four Cancun design elements of REDD+ (NS/AP, FREL/FRL, NFMS, SIS) may have strong implications for the others ,ensuring regular communication and feedback loops in their development and during their implementation is therefore critical; and Developing a NS/AP is an iterative, step-wise process.

Shaping the vision for REDD+ in the country REDD+ National Strategies and Action Plans Shaping the vision for REDD+ in the country

REDD+ National Strategies and Action Plans Analysing options and prioritising activities to implement Policies & Measures (PAMs) Factors which could influence the decision: The mitigation potential of the REDD+ activities in their national context; Potential social and environmental benefits and risks; The ability of the NFMS to measure the outcome of the overall package of PAMs; The ability to monitor the implementation and, as relevant, the outcome of individual PAMs (e.g. regeneration); The capacity (at national and subnational levels) to implement PAMs effectively and efficiently; The likely costs and benefits of the PAMs (incl. non-carbon benefits), as well as potential risks; Alignment with national (and/or subnational) development priorities and plans; Political acceptability and/or support for particular actions; The nature and scope of existing REDD-relevant PAMs, including existing forest-sector policies and plans; and Potential for (national/bilateral/multilateral) funding for PAMs implementation. Etc.

What are policies and measures? Policies and Measures for REDD+ Implementation What are policies and measures? PAMs - actions or interventions taken to support REDD+ activities (reducing emissions, conservation, sustainable management and enhancement) Central part of the NSAP: answering the “why” Anchored in the drivers and barriers analysis Set of policies, laws, regulations, practices, programmes, incentive systems… Can be direct or enabling

Illustrations of policies and measures? Policies and Measures for REDD+ Implementation Illustrations of policies and measures? Funding of fire prevention programmes Implementation of sustainable biomass energy programmes Strengthening of protected area networks and improved management (including community-based management) Support to / enhance community forestry Strengthening of forest law enforcement combined with improved forest monitoring Removal of subsidies for deforestation and forest degradation and/or land clearance taxation (fiscal framework) Incentivizing agroforestry or plantations as alternate sources of wood with payments for environmental services or easy access to land title Etc.

Dimensions to consider Policies and Measures for REDD+ Implementation Dimensions to consider Criteria for prioritizing PAMs Scope and Scale Funding opportunities (REDD+ or not) National Priorities Policy coherence Cost effectiveness Existing PAMs Social economic, political and governance barriers/opp.s Non-carbon/multiple benefits Carbon benefits Capacity to monitor Availability of data

Policies and Measures for REDD+ Implementation Issues to consider PAMS should evolve in parallel with development of safeguards systems Cross-sectorial and multi-stakeholders process, with various related challenges Political implications Scale of implementation and multiple levels of governance Identifying sources of finance to implement PAMs Monitoring system for PAMs implementation

Group exercice: Guiding questions REDD+ National Strategies and Action Plans Group exercice: Guiding questions What are the main development objectives of the country, and how they relate to forests: National development plan, National Climate Change strategy, INDC, Sectoral plans (i.e. mining, agriculture) The aim of this activity is to answer the question “Why?”, as presented. Divide the group into country groups. Ask each group to consider the question, “Why implement REDD+?”. Show the slide with the prompt questions. Allow each group 20 minutes to develop some answers to the three questions, and to write these on a flipchart paper. Ask each group to stick up their flipchart paper on the wall. Ask everyone to walk around the room looking at the answers given by other countries. Allow about 5/10 minutes for this. Ask participants if there are any general messages coming out of what each country has written. Manage a discussion about such issues. Summarise key points which emerge before moving on.

Group exercice: Guiding questions 2. Propose a 2 min pitch to explain if and why taking measures to protect forests is important for Suriname’s national development (and SDGs?): For the President, For a national newspaper, For the mining sector,

Group exercice: Guiding questions 3. Identify the sources and type of funds (international, national, private, grants, loans, bonds, etc) and potential amounts to finance REDD+ policies and measures identified in the R-PP.

Group exercice: Guiding questions 1. What are the main development objectives of the country, and how they relate to forests: National development plan, National Climate Change strategy, INDC, Sectoral plans (i.e. mining, agriculture) 2. Propose a 2 min pitch to explain if and why taking measures to protect forests is important for Suriname’s national development (and SDGs?): For the President, For a national newspaper, For the mining sector, 3. Identify the sources and type of funds (international, national, private, grants, loans, bonds, etc) and potential amounts to finance REDD+ policies and measures identified in the R-PP.

Thank you!