1Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Estimation of Entrance Surface Doses (ESDs) for common medical X-ray diagnostic examinations in Radiological Departments in Mashhad-IRAN Presenter: Mr.
Advertisements

State of Michigan Computed Tomography Regulations
Calibration of the DAP-meter
Institut de radiophysique CT Imaging and Dose Optimization: How medical physicists could help? Prof. Francis R. Verdun.
TERPSSC 2001Robert M. Gagne OVERVIEW OF DIGITAL IMAGING AND RADIATION PROTECTION ISSUES Robert M. Gagne MICAB/DECS/OST [From: Handbook.
x Critical care solutions delivered full circle Dramatically Reduce Risks from.
Conclusions of Today Round Table Conference Radiology Patient Dose Ir. Edward Smit Director of the Departement Health and Environment Brussels June 26th,
Radiation Protection of Patients Unit
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency RADIATION PROTECTION IN DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY Part 19.03: Optimization of protection in Mammography.
Radiographic Dosimetry
Annual Cost of NEC Reference: Pediatrics 2002;109, ;Impact of Necrotizing Enterocolitis on Length of Stay and Hospital Charges in Very Low Birth.
The Health Roundtable Instant bedside review of mobile CXR’s using Direct Capture Mobile X-Ray Presenter: Ryan Midgley Hospital Code Name: Royal Adelaide.
The ICRP System of Protection Applied to Medical Exposures
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Optimization of Protection in Computed Tomography (CT)-What can radiographers do? IAEA Regional Training Course.
Preparing Variable kVp Technique Charts By Prof. Stelmark.
Paediatric patient dose surveys Colin Martin and David Sutton.
RADIATION PROTECTION OF THE YOUNG PATIENT: Kenya perspective
Historical Review and Modalities in Diagnostics
Radiation Sources in medicine diagnostic Radiology
RADIATION PROTECTION IN DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY
MEASUREMENTS OF RADIATION DOSES IN MULTISLICES COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY EXAMINATIONS A. ELMAHDI*, A. SULIEMAN *Presenting author 1 Sudan Atomic Energy Commission,
Energy Georgi Simeonov European Commission DG ENER, Radiation Protection Unit (D3) Justificação e Optimização das Exposições Médicas a Radiações Ionizantes.
Part No...., Module No....Lesson No
Highlights on the Workshop on Radiation Protection in Paediatric Imaging held on 9 – 13 November 2015 Pr B MANSOURI Cairo Egypt Dec 2015 Regional.
Robyn Wright  Main health system campus located in Ann Arbor, MI  Department of Radiology established in 1913  U of M Hospital  C.S. Mott Childrens.
Doses in Fluoroscopy factors influencing patient doses Colin Martin and David Sutton.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency RADIATION PROTECTION IN DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY Part 15.4: Optimization of protection in radiography.
FLUORO/IR Radiography By Dr. Wambani, J.S. Chief Radiologist Kenyatta National Hospital IAEA RADIOGRAPHERS TRAINING 11 TH -16 TH July 2011.ACCRA,GHANA.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency General Radiography Radiation Sources in medicine diagnostic Radiology Day 7 – Lecture 1(1)
Jordan Russell, Medical Student, FRCP (C), Brent Burbridge, MD, FRCP (C), Jennifer Tynan, MD.
National Neonatal Registry (NNR) Content Neonatal Registry defined Neonatal Registry defined The National Neonatal Registry (NNR) The National Neonatal.
Sunday Case of the Day How does the presence of the object impact patient dose? A. Increases by 20% - 50% B. Increases by 3% - 5% C. No Change D. Decreases.
Technique Guidance Systems By Prof. Stelmark. Anatomic Programming Anatomic programming, or anatomically programmed radiography (APR), refers to a radiographic.
Organ dose and effective dose in Full spine Eaxamniations by EOS® Stereo-radiography with micro-dose settings. A study on anthropomorphic phantoms describing.
HEALTH CARE STATISTICS AND RESEARCH HEPR 410
RADIATION PROTECTION 04/12/2016.
Skin doses in cardiac intervention at St. Olav`s hospital Norway
Gold Standard/ Optimal Unacceptable / Suboptimal
Effective doses of ionizing radiation from medical procedures
Patient exposure trends and problems in implementing ALARA
University of Ulster, School of Life and Health Sciences.
Optimisation of Patient Protection for Radiography
Radiologic Technology
Long –Term Developmental Outcomes in Preterm Neonates Exposed to Hyperglycemia Camila Goldner Pérez, Judy Saslow MD, Vilmaris Quiñones Cardona MD, Elizabeth.
RADIATION PROTECTION IN DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY
El Paso First Healthplan, 1145 Westmoreland Drive
Retinopathy of Prematurity
Pediatric Radiology By Dr. Wambani, J.S. Chief Radiologist
CT dose optimization software synergy – A clinical perspective
Radiologic Technology
RADIATION PROTECTION Salman Albeshan.
DEPARTAMENTO DE PEDIATRIA
Radiation protection for paediatric patients
Figure 2. Entrance dose at the detector for the clinical (light grey bars) and reference (dark bars) protocols. From: COMPARISON OF WIRELESS DETECTORS.
The Development of Clinical Nursing
Exhibit Number: C19 Evaluation and Reduction of Head Computed Tomography Dose Because of full frame graphic use title slide sparingly because too many.
4D eXtended CArdiac-Torso (XCAT) Phantoms
Born too soon Worldwide, every year 15 million babies are born too soon (= before week 37 of pregnancy), that is more than 1 baby in 10 ≈ very.
General Radiography By Dr. Wambani, J.S. Chief Radiologist
Radiation Protection in Dental Radiology
Wednesday Case of the Day
INTRODUCTION TO RADIOLOGY IMAGING MODALITIES Asilah Al-Obeidani.
Roshan S Livingstone and Benedicta R Department of Radiology
Optimisation of paediatric x-ray examinations
Writing Committee Members et al. JACC 2018;j.jacc
Funnel plot showing the proportion of infants identified by the E-NAOI in English NHS trusts in 2014/2015. Funnel plot showing the proportion of infants.
The Radiography Student at The Johns Hopkins Hospital
Jesse Conterato, BA&Sc. RSNA 2016
Effects of tube voltage, filtration, and dose rate on the color difference of the indicator. Effects of tube voltage, filtration, and dose rate on the.
Presentation transcript:

1Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte Dose Reduction After Implementing an Optimization Protocol in Neonatal Radiography Cláudia Teles Martins1, Ana Coelho1, Ana Mendes1, Fábio Nogueira1, Flávia Silva1, Ilisito Silves Ferreira1, Dina Silva1, Paula Barradas1 1Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte claudia.teles.martins@gmail.com

Contents Context Purpose Methods Results Discussion What’s next?

Context Globally, 1 in 10 babies born prematurely In Portugal, 7,7% of all births are preterm and 8,7% of the newborn babies have low birthweight In NICU, imaging plays an important role CHLN is a general (non-pediatric) hospital

Purpose Characterize exposure and dose values in neonatal radiography Assess enrollment to an optimization protocol Establish local DRL’s to chest radiography performed in NICU Reduce radiation dose and optimize diagnostic quality in pediatric radiography

Methods Data Collection Phase 1 (5 months) Characterize the frequency of radiographic examinations in NICU Evaluate exposure and dose values Optimization Optimize portable equipment Promote optimization protocol between radiographers Phase 2 (2 months) Assess enollment to optimization protocol Establish DRL’s in chest radiography Data Collection Variables: sex, birth date, type of examination, projection, tube voltage (kV), tube current-time (mAs), DAP (dGycm2) and entrance exposure (μGy)

Methods Patients To be admitted in NICU To perform a radiographic examination with portable equipment Equipment Carestream DRX Revolution Wireless detector (CsI) Tamanho do detector: 25x30 Tamanho do pixel = 0,139 mm

Results Frequency of Radiographic Examinations Fase 1 (Total de exames: 237): Tórax (161, 72,2%); Abdómen (40; 16,9%); T+A (26; 11,0%) Fase 2 (Total de exames: 164): Torax (107, 80,5%); Abdomen (11; 8,3%); T+A (12; 9,0%); OA M. Sup (3, 2,3%)

Results Exposure parameters on phase 1 and 2 Chest Abdomen Babygram Examination E.P. Phase 1 Protocol Phase 2 Mean ± SD Min-Max Chest kV 66,6 ± 12,8 43-110 65 65,0 ± 6,4 47-102 mAs 1,59 ± 0,55 0,56-9 0,71 1,05 ± 0,56 0,32-3,6 Abdomen 64 ± 6,8 50-73 64,8 ± 2,9 59-70 2,05 ±1,92 0,71-9 1,10 ± 0,73 0,71-2,5 Babygram 63,9 ± 10,2 43-90 65,5 ± 9,6 48-90 1,58 ± 0,69 0,63-2,8 1,21 ± 0,78 0,32-2,8 Fase 1: Tórax (n=168); Abdómen (n=); T+A (n=26) Fase 2: Torax (n=105); Abdómen (n=8); T+A (n=12)

Results Enrollment to Optimization Protocol Examination kV mAs ✔   Chest (n=107) 51 (47,7%) 31 (29%) 24 (23,4%) 56 (52,3%) 48 (44,9%) 3 (2,8%) Abdomen (n=11) 6 (54,5%) 2 (18,2%) (27,3%) 5 (45,5%) Babygram (n=12) (41,7%) (25%) 4 (33,3%) (50%) 2 (16,7%)

Results 34,1% DAP and Entrance Exposure on phase 1 and 2 Examination Mean ± SD Min-Max P75 Chest DAP 0,261 ± 0,272 0,021-1,954 0,309 0,138 ± 0,141 0,006-0,983 0,171 0,000 EE 88,8 ± 81,2 4,4 – 685,6 96,4 58,5 ± 68,0 5,4 – 590,0 63,5 Abdomen 0,250 ± 0,218 0,032-1,052 0,286 0,169 ± 0,193 0,032-0,565 0,311 0,066 98,9 ± 89,3 17,8 – 52,0 118 52,8 ± 47,2 10,9 – 130,0 103,9 0,244 Babygram 0,217 ± 0,154 0,042-0,725 0,307 0,222 ± 0,227 0,021-0,771 0,520 70,5 ± 50,1 19 - 219 84,4 57,4 ± 53,4 7,8 - 175,2 87,6 0,202 34,1% Mediana, min, max, p value

Discussion Mean Entrance Exposure 58,5 μGy

Discussion Local DRL for chest examination (P75) 63,5 μGy

What’s next? Increase enrollment to the optimization protocol Establish DRL’s suitable to weight Develop and perform evaluation of diagnostic quality of NICU radiography Avaliação da qualidade diagnóstica Formação em radiologia pediátrica

References Bahreyni Toossi MT, Malekzadeh M. Radiation dose to newborns in neonatal intensive care units. Iran J Radiol [Internet]. 2012 Sep [cited 2014 Sep 26];9(3):145–9. Available from: Instituto Nacional de Estatística. Estatísticas Demográficas 2014. Lisboa; 2015. Makri T, Yakoumakis E, Papadopoulou D, Gialousis G, Theodoropoulos V, Sandilos P, et al. Radiation risk assessment in neonatal radiographic examinations of the chest and abdomen: a clinical and Monte Carlo dosimetry study. Phys Med Biol. 2006;51(19):5023–33. World Health Organization. Born Too Soon - The Global Action Report on Preterm Birth. 2012. Olgar T, Onal E, Bor D, Okumus N, Atalay Y, Turkyilmaz C, et al. Radiation exposure to premature infants in a neonatal intensive care unit in Turkey. Korean J Radiol [Internet]. 2008 [cited 2012 Feb 4];9(5):416–9. Available from: Lacerda M, Silva T, Khoury HJ, Vieira J, Matushita J. Riscos dos exames radiográficos em recém-nascidos internados em um hospital público de Belo Horizonte. Radiol Bras. 2008;41(5):325–9. Faghihi R, Mehdizadeh S, Sina S, Alizadeh FN, Zeinali B, Kamyab GR, et al. Radiation dose to neonates undergoing X-ray imaging in special care baby units in Iran. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2012;150(1):55–9. Frayre a. S, Torres P, Gaona E, Rivera T, Franco J, Molina N. Radiation dose reduction in a neonatal intensive care unit in computed radiography. Appl Radiat Isot [Internet]. Elsevier; 2012;71:57–60. Available from: Radiation Protection in Paediatric Radiology - Safety Reports Series no71. 2012.