of aquatic environmental pollution

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Framework for the Ecological Assessment of Impacted Sediments at Mining Sites in Region 7 By Jason Gunter (R7 Life Scientist) and.
Advertisements

ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT BIOINDICATORS: THE ECOMAN PROJECT A multi-biomarker approach to ecosystem management Malcolm B. Jones Rebecca Brown, Mark Browne,
Irene Seco Manuel Gómez Alma Schellart Simon Tait Erosion resistance and behaviour of highly organic in-sewer sediment 7th International Conference on.
1 Europe’s water – an indicator-based assessment Niels Thyssen.
Lec 12: Rapid Bioassessment Protocols (RBP’s)
Passive acoustics as a monitoring tool for evaluating oyster reef restoration Introduction Approximately 21 acres of oyster reef have been created in the.
WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT In Saint-Petersburg (RUSSIA) Olga Nikolaeva, 2008.
Indicator Species. What is an indicator species? A species whose presence, absence or abundance reflects a specific environmental condition, habitat or.
Environmental Monitoring Methods SOURCES Concentrations in media (external dose) Emission rates SOURCES Concentrations in media (external dose) Emission.
Statistical variation of material properties In practice, material properties are seldom homogenous, as they are sensitive to variations in parameter such.
The Marine Strategy Framework Directive 17th March 2010, Newcastle North Sea Stakeholders Conference Leo de Vrees European Commission (DG Environment,
Supercourse Environmental Exposure Assessment And Biomarkers Wael Al-Delaimy, MD, PhD.
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR MARINE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ”GRIGORE ANTIPA” CONSTANTA, ROMANIA PROJECT TITLE Improvement of the scientific background for assuring.
Microbial Community Biomarker in Barnegat Bay Evangelina Pena 1, Lora McGuinness 1, Gary Taghon 1, Lee Kerkhof 1 Introduction Efforts to remediate anthropogenic.
Regional conference on Nutrient pollution control in the Danube- Black sea basin Chisinau, October BSRP Kaspars Zurins, Niclas Bergman, Johanness.
Science, consensus, and monitoring strategies : the art of revising a long-term benthic monitoring program Heather Peterson California Department of Water.
Appearances are Often Deceiving! A Lesson in Convergent Evolution By Devon Lee and Becky Kapley.
Monitoring Principles Stella Swanson, Ph.D.. Principle #1: Know Why We Are Monitoring Four basic reasons to monitor:  Compliance Monitoring: to demonstrate.
Managing aquatic systems using in-situ sensor technologies Background: Lakes and rivers are used for a range of ecosystem services including supply of.
“Lake Peipsi/River Narva basin – working together on the new Eastern border of the EU” Harry Liiv Deputy Secretary General on Environmental Management.
Community Vulnerability and Climate Change Dr. Shawn Dalton, Director, ESDRC, UNB, Fredericton Prativa Pradhan, MPHIL in Policy Studies, ESDRC, UNB, Fredericton.
WATERHOLIC - a drop of water, a drop of hope COLEGIUL TEHNIC „MIRON COSTIN” ROMAN, ROMÂNIA 23 – Palermo, ITALIA.
Francesca Sanna – 12/ Roma – IMEKOFOODS Water thermal pollution – Francesca Sanna – EMPIR Call 2016 Water thermal pollution metrology for biomarker.
Preliminary Scoping Effort. Presentation Objectives Identify need for additional sources of future funding Provide background on how elements were identified.
RiverLife and Implementation of the WFD Satu Maaria Karjalainen North Ostrobothnia Regional Environment Centre PRB Workshop , Ghent.
-1 Instructor: Dr. Yunes Mogheir.  By considering the system variables as random, uncertainties can be quantified on a probabilistic framework.  Loads.
Baltic Sea Regional Project Inesis Kiškis, World Bank.
Challenges, results and experience with cross-border cooperation - local and national level impacts - DRIMON and Transboundary Prespa Lake Basin Crossing.
New Environmental issues of water management in St- Petersburg Prof. Vladislav K. Donchenko Scientific Research Center for Environmental Safety Russian.
Week 9: IB Biology Monday: G.4.: Conservation of Biodiversity ‘Explain the use of biotic indices and indicator species in monitoring environmental change’
Paris 24/04/2010, Connectivity between research, public and policy makers Gulf of Riga Kristina Veidemane Baltic Environmental Forum.
- Proposed actions, targets and indicators to reach the objectives
How do we work… Samuli Korpinen, Finnish Environment Institute, Marine Research Centre HELCOM BalticBOOST WS on Physical loss and damage to the seafloor.
Lecture 10: Microcosmology
Preliminary results from a WW2 wreck
Claudette Kellar Research Summit August 2016
Department of Conservation and Marine Sciences, CPUT
Outline Bioassay background (5 mins)
HYGIENE STANDARDS AND OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE LIMITS
ICP waters; use of data from EMEP …and some results Brit Lisa Skjelkvåle and Heleen de Wit Norwegian Institute for Water Research.
US Environmental Protection Agency
coastal ecosystems. J. Richir, N. Luy, P. Serpe,
Challenges in a Changing World
Practical clinical chemistry
Oil Sands: integrate natural processes in hazard assessment
Using EcAp/IMAP indicators for MSP: Experience from Montenegro
Guidance report: Methodology for the assessment of ecological coherence of MPA’s Henk Wolters 30 October 2014.
Plymouth Environmental Research Centre
Quantifying Indicator Uncertainty
Models for Assessing and Forecasting the Impact of Environmental Key
Implementing Adaptive Management and Monitoring
Main new elements compared to FP6:
EEA - EMMA Workshop November 20-21, 2006 EEA, Copenhagen
Philippe QUEVAUVILLER
Pond Dipping You can determine the Water Quality Index by observing and counting the different species of benthic macro-invertebrates. Benthic: the ecological.
Introductory words on the 7th EU Framework Programme ( )
The normal balance of ingredients
Jacques Populus – Ifremer On behalf of the EUSeaMap project team
Marine Environment and Water Industry
Typology and classification of coastal waters in Estonia
Challenges in a Changing World
Research needs derived from MODELKEY findings
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Juhani Gustafsson, Finnish Environment Institute, SYKE
Water Science meets Policy Brussels 30 September 2010
Assessing the environmental status in the Mediterranean Sea: a case-study in Saronikos Gulf to be extended to the regional sea Angel Borja (AZTI), Alexandra.
SAV Restoration Review
“King Tide” on Sept. 29, 2015 Nag Marsh, Prudence Island, RI
Diana M. P. Galassi*, Barbara Fiasca*, Andrea Piermarocchi°
Some concepts for quantifying emissions of Priority Substances
Presentation transcript:

of aquatic environmental pollution Monitoring of cardiac activity of benthic invertebrates as a tool for bioindication of aquatic environmental pollution Sergey Kholodkevich1 ,2, Tatiana Kuznetsova1, Anton Kurakin1, Andrey Sharov1 1Institution of Russian Academy of Sciences Saint-Petersburg Scientific Research Center for Ecological Safety RAS; 2 Saint-Petersburg State University

Now in the majority of the countries steady interest to on-line systems of monitoring environmental state using benthic invertebrates is observed. Invertebrates have sufficient sensitivity for detection of chemical stress in the environment, e.g., aquatic ecosystems, including surficial, treated sewage and drinking water.

In our studies to assess ecosystem health (state) we use instrumental systems and technologies based on measurements of ecotoxicological biomarkers. Ecotoxicological biomarker is a biochemical, cellular, physiological or behavioral variation that can be measured in tissue or body fluid samples or at the level of whole organisms that provides evidence of exposure to and/or effects of one or more pollutants (and/or radiation) (Depledge, 1993). The biomarker concept, initially developed to form a basis for studies at the individual/population level, is extended to include community and ecosystem level studies. A strategy is outlined in which biomarkers might be used to assess chemical exposure and the cumulative, adverse effects of toxicants on biota in situ (Depledge et al., 1995).

Backgrounds of the method Chronic pollution of the aquatic ecosystems is reflected on the target invertebrates species adaptive capacities. Health of organisms from sites different in anthropogenic pressure could be assessed by standardized tests, based on analysis of recovery time of registered physiological and/or behavioural characteristics of tested organisms after a short-term functional loading in the range of species tolerance. In the frame of our studies it was shown that mollusks and crustacean from clean sites differ from polluted areas by recovery time of their cardiac activity pattern and behaviour after standardized test-treatment (Turja et al., 2014; Kholodkevich et al, 2017).

In 2010 at Winberg-2010 Conference for bioindication of ecosystem state in order to obtain accurate monitoring data on chemical stress in the invertebrates we proposed to use 2 new biomarkers: - heart rate recovery time (Trec, mins) after rapid change of medium salinity - test used as functional load ; - coefficient of HR variation (CV, %) over the group of tested organisms after removal of load.

Block-scheme of set up and automatic data processing Block-scheme of set up and automatic data processing. FP – photoplethysmograph, ADC – analog-to-digital converter, PC – portable computer, CI – cardiac interval, DF – digital filter, DA – distribution analysis, HR – heart rate, SD – standard deviation. Main mathematical characteristics of cardiac interval sample (no less 50-100).

Method in use Diagnostic of functional state of mollusks was done by analysis of characteristics of cardiac activity measured by non-invasive fiber-optic method and by the use of hyper- or hypo-osmotic treatment. Biomarker Тrecov: Time of HR recovery to background level (after restoration of water salinity in tank) 1 – changes in HR of mollusk, 2 – background level of HR, 3 – recovery time of HR.

In the recent report the examples of application of suggested biomarkers in organisms from different aquatoria: -the Gulf of Finland (Kholodkevich et al., 2017), - the Bothnian Sea (Turja et al., 2014), - the Gulf of Riga and a few lakes in Latvia (Kurakin et al., 2012), - the Belt Sea, - the Boka Kotorska Bay (Adriatic Sea), and in rivers of the Yaroslavl Region.

Examples of the caged mussels experiments in use Assessment of biological effects of anthropogenic chemical stress: Method was approbated in the EU-funded projects for ecosystem health assessment of the Baltic Sea sub-regions : BONUS+BEAST Program (Biological Effects of Anthropogenic Chemical Stress: Tools for the Assessment of Ecosystem Health); HYDROTOX (Water Toxicity Estimation)

Retrieving the cages with the exposed mussels on board of the R/V “ARANDA" of the Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE,Helsinki) BEAST project (2009-2011)

Batches of mussels with the optic-fiber sensors on their shells before deployment in cages at study sites

In laboratory testing physiological characteristics of the exposed mussels (Tallinn Bay expedition, 2014)

Integrated Biomarker Response HR recovery time in mussels from stations S1, S2, G1, G2, located in the Gulf of Bothnia, Baltic Sea Parameters: LMS, Phagocytosis, Condition index, LPO, AChE

Trec in Anodonta (n = 14) from different contaminated sites: river Yagorba, near Cherepovets and the Rybinsk Reservoir (upper River Volga), Borok

(Borok=reference site) Sharov et al., 2013 Reduction of HR of Anodonta by changing salinity during 1 h and returning of HR to the background level during the subsequent restore of water salinity (Borok=reference site) Sharov et al., 2013

Recovery of HR of Anodonta (n=8) from contaminated site (river Yagorba, near city Cherepovets) Heart rate recovery time more than 5 hours

Heart rate recovery in Anodonta (n = 14) from different in pollution sites of the Eastern Gulf of Finland (2013-2014)

The objectives of the study in Sevastopol city (Crimea) was the evaluation of functional state (health) of the mussels Mytilus galloprovincialis Lam., living in these waters, assessed using the physiological biomarkers proposed by us and considered above.

Recently, we tested our technology for bioindication of ecological state (health) of coastal marine ecosystems (in 4 marine areas of Sevastopol city: the bays of Kazachy, Martynova and South, near its exit (at Grafskaya harbour) and in its end zone) on the basis of diagnostics of health of mussels living in them, occupying an important place in the normal functioning of their biocenosis.

The results of testing mussels from four water areas of the city of Sevastopol (Trec - the average time of restoration of the background heart rate after the removal of the functional test load, CVHR - the coefficient of variation of the heart rate for the tested group of mussels, measured from the time of reliable restoration of background heart rate).

The results of the testing of M The results of the testing of M. galloprovincialis mussels from different water areas with the help of hypo-saline functional load Sampling sites n Trec, min CVHR, % Kazachy bay 9 35,3±2,8 Martynova bay 8 50,6±4,4 14 Grafskaya harbour 51,4±9,1 17 South bay 10 76,8±9,1 24 Note: n - number of tested mussels; Trec - averaged recovery time of the background heart rate; The CVHR is the coefficient of variation of the heart rate for the test group of mussels.

CONCLUSIONS Monitoring of cardiac activity in benthic invertebrates is used as an effective tool in environmental pollution assessment. Health of organisms from different in anthropogenic pressure sites can be assessed by the use of bioelectronic system and analysis heart rate recovery and behavior after a short-term functional load (salinity change). The methodological approach and method proposed could help the authorities to discriminate sites different in ecological state and to make assess in express way.

Bio-approach Living organisms very well “know” their environment Bio-approach  Living organisms very well “know” their environment. This “knowledge” is displaying in various way. It could be sharp changes of behavior in a case of accidental environmental toxic pollution, or slow change of physiological parameters as a result of absorption and accumulation of pollutants. They know about their environment better than we Procambarus clarkii Achatina fulica Littorina Littorea Mytilus edulis Carcinus maenas Adriatic Sea crab Mytilus galloprovincialis Homarus gammarus

Thank you for your attention!