Charge collection studies with irradiated CMOS detectors

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Radiation damage in silicon sensors
Advertisements

Combined Measurement Results of dedicated RD50 Charge Multiplication Sensors Christopher Betancourt 2, Tom Barber 2, Gianluigi Casse 1, Paul Dervan 1,
Trapping in silicon detectors G. Kramberger Jožef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana Slovenia G. Kramberger, Trapping in silicon detectors, Aug , 2006,
Hartmut Sadrozinski US-ATLAS 9/22/03 Detector Technologies for an All-Semiconductor Tracker at the sLHC Hartmut F.W. Sadrozinski SCIPP, UC Santa Cruz.
Bulk Micromegas Our Micromegas detectors are fabricated using the Bulk technology The fabrication consists in the lamination of a steel woven mesh and.
Jaap Velthuis, University of Bristol SPiDeR SPiDeR (Silicon Pixel Detector Research) at EUDET Telescope Sensor overview with lab results –TPAC –FORTIS.
Standalone VeloPix Simulation Jianchun Wang 4/30/10.
On MCz SCSI after 24 GeV/c proton irradiation 12th RD50 Workshop Ljubljana, 2-4 June 2008 D. Creanza On behalf of the Bari and Pisa RD50 groups.
Semiconductor detectors
Charge collection studies on heavily diodes from RD50 multiplication run G. Kramberger, V. Cindro, I. Mandić, M. Mikuž Ϯ, M. Milovanović, M. Zavrtanik.
Summary of CMS 3D pixel sensors R&D Enver Alagoz 1 On behalf of CMS 3D collaboration 1 Physics Department, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
Techniques for determination of deep level trap parameters in irradiated silicon detectors AUTHOR: Irena Dolenc ADVISOR: prof. dr. Vladimir Cindro.
Charge collection studies on heavily diodes from RD50 multiplication run (update) G. Kramberger, V. Cindro, I. Mandić, M. Mikuž Ϯ, M. Milovanović, M. Zavrtanik.
KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Research Center of the Helmholtz Association Institut für Experimentelle Kernphysik
CCD Detectors CCD=“charge coupled device” Readout method:
Edge-TCT and Alibava measurements with pion and neutron irradiated micro-strip detectors V. Cindro 1, G. Kramberger 1, I. Mandić 1, M. Mikuž 1,2, M. Milovanović.
1 G. Pellegrini The 9th LC-Spain meeting 8th "Trento" Workshop on Advanced Silicon Radiation Detectors 3D Double-Sided sensors for the CMS phase-2 vertex.
SILICON DETECTORS PART I Characteristics on semiconductors.
Fully depleted MAPS: Pegasus and MIMOSA 33 Maciej Kachel, Wojciech Duliński PICSEL group, IPHC Strasbourg 1 For low energy X-ray applications.
Summary of CMS 3D pixel sensors R&D Enver Alagoz 1 On behalf of CMS 3D collaboration 1 Physics Department, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
Charge Collection Study of Heavily Irradiated Silicon Microstrip Detectors Chris Lucas (University of Bristol) Irena Dolenc Kittelmann, Michael Moll, Nicola.
8 July 1999A. Peisert, N. Zamiatin1 Silicon Detectors Status Anna Peisert, Cern Nikolai Zamiatin, JINR Plan Design R&D results Specifications Status of.
Analysis of Edge and Surface TCTs for Irradiated 3D Silicon Strip Detectors Graeme Stewart a, R. Bates a, C. Corral b, M. Fantoba b, G. Kramberger c, G.
Technology Overview or Challenges of Future High Energy Particle Detection Tomasz Hemperek
Charge Collection and Trapping in Epitaxial Silicon Detectors after Neutron-Irradiation Thomas Pöhlsen, Julian Becker, Eckhart Fretwurst, Robert Klanner,
Report on CMS 3D sensor tests Enver Alagoz 1 On behalf of CMS 3D collaboration 1 Physics Department, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
G. Kramberger, Charge collection properties of heavily irradiated expitaxial silicon detectors, RESMDD04, Oct , 2004, Firenze Setup and samples Setup.
Inversion Study on MCz-n and MCz-p silicon PAD detectors irradiated with 24 GeV/c protons Nicola Pacifico Excerpt from the MSc thesis Tutors: Prof. Mauro.
TCT measurements with SCP slim edge strip detectors Igor Mandić 1, Vladimir Cindro 1, Andrej Gorišek 1, Gregor Kramberger 1, Marko Milovanović 1, Marko.
T. Lari – INFN Milan Status of ATLAS Pixel Test beam simulation Status of the validation studies with test-beam data of the Geant4 simulation and Pixel.
A CCE and TCT Study on low resistivity MCz p-on-n detectors Nicola Pacifico, Michael Moll, Manuel Fahrer 16 th RD50 workshop, Barcellona, 31 May-2 June.
CVD Diamond Sensors for the Very Forward Calorimeter of a Linear Collider Detector K. Afanaciev, E. Kouznetsova, W. Lange, W. Lohmann.
CNM double-sided 3D strip detectors before and after neutron irradiation Celeste Fleta, Richard Bates, Chris Parkes, David Pennicard, Lars Eklund (University.
Study on and 150  m thick p-type Epitaxial silicon pad detectors irradiated with protons and neutrons Eduardo del Castillo Sanchez, Manuel Fahrer,
Giulio Pellegrini 27th RD50 Workshop (CERN) 2-4 December 2015 Centro Nacional de MicroelectrónicaInstituto de Microelectrónica de Barcelona 1 Status of.
Irradiated 3D sensor testbeam results Alex Krzywda On behalf of CMS 3D collaboration Purdue University March 15, 2012.
FBK 3D CMS pixel sensors preliminary lab measurements E. Alagoz 1, A. Krzywda 1, D. Bortoletto 1, I. Shipsey 1, G. Bolla 1, and G. F. Dalla Betta 2, M.
Simulation of new P-Type strip detectors 17th RD50 Workshop, CERN, Geneva 1/15 Centro Nacional de MicroelectrónicaInstituto de Microelectrónica de Barcelona.
TCT measurements with irradiated strip detectors Igor Mandić 1, Vladimir Cindro 1, Andrej Gorišek 1, Gregor Kramberger 1, Marko Milovanović 1, Marko Mikuž.
CdTe prototype detector testing Anja Schubert The University of Melbourne 9 May 2011 Updates.
Investigation of electric field and evidence of charge multiplication by Edge-TCT G.Kramberger, V. Cindro, I. Mandić, M. Mikuž, M. Milovanović, M. Zavrtanik.
TCT measurements with strip detectors Igor Mandić 1, Vladimir Cindro 1, Andrej Gorišek 1, Gregor Kramberger 1, Marko Milovanović 1, Marko Mikuž 1,2, Marko.
Zheng Li, 96th LHCC open session, 19th November 2008, CERN RD39 Status Report 2008 Zheng Li and Jaakko Härkönen Full author list available at
Investigation of the effects of thickness, pitch and manufacturer on charge multiplication properties of highly irradiated n-in-p FZ silicon strips A.
E-TCT measurements with laser beam directed parallel to strips Igor Mandić 1, Vladimir Cindro 1, Andrej Gorišek 1, Gregor Kramberger 1, Marko Mikuž 1,2,
TCT measurements of HV-CMOS test structures irradiated with neutrons I. Mandić 1, G. Kramberger 1, V. Cindro 1, A. Gorišek 1, B. Hiti 1, M. Mikuž 1,2,
SPiDeR  Status of SPIDER Status/Funding Sensor overview with first results –TPAC –FORTIS –CHERWELL Beam test 09 Future.
3D Simulation Studies of Irradiated BNL One-Sided Dual-column 3D Silicon Detector up to 1x1016 neq/cm2 Zheng Li1 and Tanja Palviainen2 1Brookhaven National.
24/02/2010Richard Bates, 5th Trento workshop, Manchester1 Irradiation studies of CNM double sided 3D detectors a. Richard Bates, C. Parkes, G. Stewart.
Radiation damage studies in LGAD detectors from recent CNM and FBK run
Fully Depleted Low Power CMOS Detectors
First production of Ultra-Fast Silicon Detectors at FBK
Graeme Stewarta, R. Batesa, G. Pellegrinib, G. Krambergerc, M
Position Sensitive TCT Measurements with 3D-stc detectors
HV-MAPS Designs and Results I
Investigation of diamond sensors for calorimetry
Setup for measurements with SCT128 in Ljubljana: SCTA128VG chip
HVCMOS sensor technology R&D
Igor Mandić1, Vladimir Cindro1, Gregor Kramberger1 and Marko Mikuž1,2
Ivan Peric for ATLAS and CLIC HVCMOS R&D and Mu3e Collaborations
(proxy for Harris Kagan) for the RD42 Collaboration
HVCMOS Detectors – Overview
Simulation of signal in irradiated silicon detectors
Testbeam Results for GaAs and Radiation-hard Si Sensors
CCE measurements with Epi-Si detectors
Semiconductor Detectors
Beam Test Results for the CMS Forward Pixel Detector
Irradiated FBK 3D sensor lab tests
CVD Diamond Sensors for the Very Forward Calorimeter of a Linear Collider Detector K. Afanaciev, D. Drachenberg, E. Kouznetsova, W. Lange, W. Lohmann.
Igor Mandić1, Vladimir Cindro1, Gregor Kramberger1 and Marko Mikuž1,2
Presentation transcript:

Charge collection studies with irradiated CMOS detectors

15x6 array of 50x250 um2 pixels Contacts: single pixel all other pixels Structure B IR laser beam Two sets: unthinned (700 um), no back plane, substrate bias over implant on top thinned to 200 um, back plane processed, bias through BP

Passive test structure B, substrate resistitivity 300 kOhm cm

E-TCT, not thinned samples Bonded: outmost ring (substrate) – to GND all n-wells except single single n-well  HV connected to n-wells Charge profiles at different bias Single n-well read out (others at HV) Profile width vs. bias

E-TCT after irradiation not thinned samples

Neff vs. Phi Zoom to low fluences N_eff smaller than before irradiation not measured  probably below 1e13, should measure there to get good estimate of acceptor removal constant linear fit good enough, g_c larger than “usual” value g_c = 0.02 cm-1 similar as previous LFoundry

Measure also samples thinned to 200 um samples full depletion clearly visible on thinned sample

90Sr setup HV-CMOS: small signals, large noise  S/N very low detector ORTEC 142 charge sensitive amplifier + custom made shaper (25 ns) + digital oscilloscope 90Sr PMT ampl. cooling jig DUT HV-CMOS: small signals, large noise  S/N very low clean sample of events needed (no hits missing DUT) require a large detector (trigger rate), good collimation, small scintillator Measurement: Calibration with a 300 µm thick Si pad detector 1) Record N ( = 2500) waveforms 2) Average over all waveforms and determine time of the signal peak 3) Sample waveforms at the peak 4) Fill spectrum

depleted depth from E-TCT ~ 280 um  expected MPV ~ 21000 el Structure B is small and we can’t collimate so that we measure only events with tracks passing through the detector but before irradiation and at low fluences signal and noise peak well separated and Landau could be fit Before irradiation: MPV = 13300 el 260 V Thinned Thinned: Depleted depth ~ 190 um  expected charge 13500 el Not thinned: depleted depth from E-TCT ~ 280 um  expected MPV ~ 21000 el Consistent!

After irradiation, Ф = 5e13 n/cm2 MPV = 13100 el MPV = 9000 el Thinned to ~ 200 um, substrate bias via back plane depleted depth from E-TCT ~ 180 um (fully depleted)  expected MPV: ~ 13500 el  measured MPV ~ 13000 el Not thinned, substrate bias from top: depleted depth from E-TCT: ~ 260 um  expected MPV ~ 19000 el  measured MPV ~ 9000 el  Large difference between samples with and without back plane after irradiation! Diffusion neglected (from measurements with AMS structure we expect ~ 1000 el before irradiation (~ 0 el after irradiation))

Much smaller charge than expected from E-TCT in samples with top substrate bias Samples with Back Plane contact as expected

Explanation: difference due to different weighting field in back or top bias after irradiation No back plane, substrate biased via implant on top Back plane (and thinned), substrate biased via back plane Collecting electrode: Uw = 1 Collecting electrode: Uw = 1 Depleted region Depleted region e d D d h Undepleted bulk Substrate bias: Uw = 0 Before irradiation: Undepleted substrate before irradiation low resistivity (Ohmic) weighting potential Uw = 0 carriers drift across whole weighting field: all charge collected After irradiation: substrate resistivity (Ohmic) high weighting potential 0 at the back plane implant  if fully depleted D = d full charge collection (except trapping)  if not fully depleted carriers don’t cross whole weighting field  charge collection reduced by a factor d/D  depending on geometry and device thickness this factor can be much better than in the case of top bias Before irradiation: Undepleted substrate before irradiation low resistivity (Ohmic) weighting potential Uw = 0 carriers drift across whole weighting field: all charge collected After irradiation: substrate resistivity (Ohmic) high, weighting potential 0 at the bias implant on top  Carriers trapped in low field at the end of depleted depth, before they reach the substrate bias electrode  carriers don’t drift across all whole weighting field  partial charge collection