A methodology for establishing national frameworks for spectrum sharing between MFCNs and FSS/FS in the 3.6-3.8 GHz band 20 April 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Some important points on Regulatory Issues discussed at the second meeting of the Sub- working Group of RPG 1.Regulatory text for the new regional Agreement.
Advertisements

FIXED SATELLITE SERVICE and UAS (22 September 2010)
Earth Stations on Mobile Platforms (ESOMPs)
HGS Coordination Methodology: Initial Concepts 400 MHz Project.
Geolocation databases for spectrum sharing : ECC findings and studies EC DG CONNECT Workshop, 20 March 2015 Bruno Espinosa, Deputy Director, ECO.
Propagation loss models Lab 4 Engr. Mehran Mamonai.
Overview of Service Rules: Technical and Licensing Issues Keith Harper Electronics Engineer, Mobility Division, WTB November 29, GHz Band Auction.
Frequency Co-ordination -for what? The Agreement Frequency Co-ordination -Advantages Frequency Co-ordination -Disadvantages The Procedure Administrative.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0594r0 May 2015 Slide 1 60 GHz band Japanese Regulatory Update Date: 2015-May-xx Authors: Kazu Takahashi, Panasonic.
Summary of Path Loss in Propagation
Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) - Update on spectrum arrangements Spectrum arrangement options to support ITS in the MHz band in Australia.
April 2009 doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 May 2015
Doc.: IEEE /160r0 SubmissionSlide 1 Output power management for TVWS network coexistence Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE.
Radio Regulations Rights & obligations + applicable procedures Two mechanisms of sharing orbit / spectrum: Coordination Approach Efficiency First come,
Using TSB-88 Region MHz Using TSB-88 to insure frequency usage does not cause interference in Region 5.
1 2 nd INDUSTRY CONSULATION ON PROPOSED UNIFIED LICENSING FRAMEWORK IN KENYA: KCCT 19 th March 2008 Frequency Issues Communications Commission of Kenya.
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks(WPANs) Submission Title: Link Budget for m Date Submitted: 5 March 2012.
A new challenge – creating a regulatory environment for implementing geo-location databases for White Space Devices (WSD) Andy Gowans Date (26 th January.
©Ofcom IEEE 802 Plenary, Dallas, Tx RRTAG( ) meeting Consultation on Safety Related ITS 12 th November 2008 Andrew Gowans, Head of Exempt Technology.
© 2006 Sprint Nextel WP5D Meeting Results
RALI FX3 Microwave Fixed Services Frequency Coordination Glenn Odlum Senior Engineer Spectrum Engineering Section
DSRC Coexistence Date: Authors: November 2013 April 2009
Coexistence in heterogeneous networks Discuss the interference issue
©Ofcom Spectrum reform in the UK: The development of Spectrum Usage Rights Professor William Webb 2006.
Doc.: IEEE b Submission Jan 2013 Link Budget Calculation for NICT proposal ( b) IEEE P802.22b Wireless RANs Date:
SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT 2004 National Spectrum Managers Association Satellite Spectrum Management Issues Carlos M. Nalda May 19, 2004.
NPSTC Meetings, November 2007 Margaret Daly and Sean O’Hara Syracuse Research Corporation New York Statewide Wireless Network Program RPC 700 MHz Interference.
SubmissionJoe Kwak, InterDigital1 PHY measurements for interference reduction from 11h Joe Kwak, Marian Rudolf InterDigital doc: IEEE /537r0July.
Doc.: IEEE /12??r0 SubmissionSlide 0 IEEE 802 Plenary, Dallas, Tx RRTAG( ) meeting Consultation on Safety Related ITS 12 th November 2008.
AI MHz MHz ECC DEC (15)01 + CEPT report 53 ECC-FCC-IC Liaison Meeting Maisons Alfort, May 2015 Didier Chauveau ECC PT1 Chairman.
Doc.: IEEE /??r0 TG4a Presentation Andy Gowans/Mark Austin – OFCOM UK Slide 0 Ultra Wideband in Europe The EC Decision January 2007.
1 70/80/90 GHz Web-Based Coordination Improving the Effectiveness of the Domestic Spectrum Management Process National Spectrum Managers Association Arlington,
August, 2012 MBANS FCC Rules Summary Information document for SRD/MG on the FCC adopted MBAN rules under part 95 MedRadio service on 24 May 2012.
,4-3,8 GHz ECC Decision (11)06 + Guidelines to support the implementation of this framework at national level (mobile/FSS and mobile/FS coexistence)
Basics of the U.S. Table of Frequency Allocations
Operation of Radar Services in 76 – 81 GHz band
FIXED SATELLITE SERVICE and UAS (22 September 2010)
Prescriptive vs Performance-Based Regulatory Approaches
平成30年6月 March 2009 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Technical requirements of Japanese.
LRTC 3.4 – 3.8 GHz Ericsson input PT1 XO 29 – 31/
PRELIMINARY POSITION OF THE RCC CAs ON THE AGENDA ITEMS OF THE WORLD RADIOCOMMUNICATION CONFERENCE 2012.
Spectrum Frontiers – 5G Michael Ha, Deputy Chief
Requirements Discussion
Basics of the U.S. Table of Frequency Allocations
Evaluation Model for LTE-Advanced
Point-to-Multipoint Broadband Opportunities in the MHz Band
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
5G Micro Cell Deployment in Coexistence with Fixed Service
GSM Base Station Antennas
European 5G regulatory developments
Updates on the 60GHz bands
May 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Proposed European Regulations] Date Submitted:
MHz FCC Action Date: Authors: March 2005
Submission Title: Link Budget for m
FCC Spectrum Sharing in the 3.5GHz Band Comments Approval
Functional Requirements for EHT Specification Framework
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Intended IG Objectives] Date Submitted:
Per-User Data Rate, Band and Bandwidth Options for VHT
Submission Title: [Regulatory Update]
Coordination of Satellite networks
April 24, Study Group 1 A Regulatory Framework for Use of TV Channels by Part 15 Devices John Notor, Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
New TGSRR Standard for receiver tests Document for discussions
MHz FCC Action Date: Authors: May 2006 May 2006
Amendment Proposal for TV White Spaces Operation
Possible Future Agenda Items
Agenda Item Overview & draft India proposal
Functional Requirements for EHT Specification Framework
GSC position on key WRC-19 AI 1.5 ESIMs
RF Feasibility of 120 MHz Channelization for China
Preliminary GSC positions on WRC-19 agenda items 1.13 IMT
Presentation transcript:

A methodology for establishing national frameworks for spectrum sharing between MFCNs and FSS/FS in the 3.6-3.8 GHz band 20 April 2015

Contents Summary Spectrum sharing framework Operational guidelines and calculations

Summary This contribution proposes a methodology for establishing a spectrum sharing framework by means of identifying a toolbox of options which administrations will be able to adopt as best suited to their national circumstances. A spectrum sharing framework can be understood as a set of sharing rules, and its development will require the involvement of all relevant stakeholders. Such rules can be incorporated in the relevant national technical licence conditions, as is common practice today, and will also define procedures to be followed during the roll-out stage of the MFCN networks.

Summary Sharing framework is based on the following principle: Regulators would specify the criteria for the protection of the incumbent users (FSS/FS) in terms of the maximum permitted interference at the input to the FSS and FS receivers. These limits would then be used to calculate (as specified by the regulator) the maximum permitted power (EIRP) to be radiated from any given MFCN base station sector. No specific values or value ranges are proposed for the various technical parameters involved in the calculations. These will be the subject of future contributions. There is always a trade-off between the simplicity of a spectrum sharing framework and spectrum sharing efficiency. The proposed methodology is intended to provide the flexibility for administrations to exploit this trade-off.

C/(N+I) – “link aware” criterion Summary Protection criterion: C/(N+I) – “link aware” criterion has potential for more efficient spectrum sharing can be used when link budgets are known I/N – interference based criterion is more conservative and therefore can be overprotective can be used when link budgets are not known

Contents Summary Spectrum sharing framework Operational guidelines and calculations

No incumbents MFCN has exclusive access to spectrum MFCN BS No incumbents MFCN has exclusive access to spectrum MFCN BS 68 dBm/5MHz MFCN BS MFCN BS MFCN BS 68 dBm/5MHz 68 dBm/5MHz 68 dBm/5MHz MFCN BS MFCN BS MFCN BS 68 dBm/5MHz 68 dBm/5MHz 68 dBm/5MHz 68 dBm/5MHz

FSS/FS incumbents Non-exclusive access to spectrum MFCN BS FSS/FS incumbents Non-exclusive access to spectrum FSS MFCN BS MFCN BS MFCN BS MFCN BS FS MFCN BS MFCN BS MFCN BS

Accounting for multiple base stations and sectors Three possible approaches can be identified to account for interference from multiple MFCN base station sectors (i.e., for the aggregation effect): Single-sector calculations with inclusion of a specific ‘safety’ margin to account for the actual existence of multiple sectors. Single-operator (multi-sector) calculations with insectors clusion of a specific ‘safety’ margin to account for the actual existence of multiple from other operators. Multi-operator (multi-sector) calculations with no* specific safety margin. * National regulators may specify safety margins for reasons other than aggregation.

Option A: MFCN operators perform calculations Calculations are performed independently by the MFCN operators, with regulatory oversight. Regulator MFCN operator 1 Calculations Sharing-specific provisions attached to the frequency usage rights Calculations MFCN operator 2 Calculations (optional/reference) Calculations MFCN operator 3 Database of FSS receivers MFCN operators’ calculations may be subject to regulator oversight Database of FS receivers

Option B: Third party performs calculations Calculations are performed by a third party on behalf of all MFCN operators, with regulatory oversight. Regulator MFCN operator 1 Sharing-specific provisions attached to the frequency usage rights Third Party MFCN operator 2 Calculations Calculations (optional/reference) Third party’s calculations may be subject to regulator oversight MFCN operator 3 Database of FSS receivers Database of FS receivers

Option C: Regulator performs calculations Calculations are performed by the national regulator. Regulator MFCN operator 1 Sharing-specific provisions attached to the frequency usage rights MFCN operator 2 Calculations MFCN operator 3 Database of FSS receivers Database of FS receivers

Contents Summary Spectrum sharing framework Operational guidelines and calculations

Example geometry IFSS,T G1 G2 IFS,T P P P  f1 Most susceptible FSS receiver f1 f2 FSS MS Maximum permitted received interference: IFSS,T FS Frequency G1 coupling gain including antenna gains & angular discriminations MS network coverage Most susceptible FS receiver G2 coupling gain including antenna gains & angular discriminations MFCN base station Maximum permitted received interference: IFS,T P P P 

Calculations gTx GProp gRxGA,Rx GP Regulator may specify Calculate: calculation of coupling gain: Propagation and antennas Calculate: Maximum permitted EIRP Regulator specifies maximum permitted interference P gTx Propagation gain GProp gRxGA,Rx GP Rx MFCN base station FSS Regulator may specify: interferer’s leakage (ACLR) and receiver selectivity (ACS)

Interference from multiple sources (aggregation) Total interference must not exceed the maximum value permitted Maximum permitted (target) interference, IT 0.5 dB Sector #5, I5 Sector #4, I4 Aggregated interference I Sector #3, I3 Sector #2, I2 Sector #1, I1

Partitioning of interference budget Operator distributes its allocated interference budget among sectors Total interference budget equally partitioned to three operators Maximum permitted (target) interference, IT MFCN operator #3 Aggregated interference I MFCN operator #2 MFCN operator #1

Simple restriction zones (to reduce complexity) Simple and cautious restriction zones can be used to reduce computational complexity. Base stations outside the restriction zones would not be subject to any restrictions for the avoidance of harmful interference to the FSS/FS. f = 0 FSS/FS receiver) 24 dBm 68 f  0 receiver Cautious restriction zones for OMNI BS

More precise restriction zones Include: more sophisticated propagation models digital terrain maps, and receiver angular discrimination 60 Macro cell 40 Outdoor small cell 20 Indoor small cell -20 -40 dBm / x MHz