TEST MODULE WG Cradles for CLIC module supporting system

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CLIC two-beam module integration issues 4 th CLIC Advisory Committee (CLIC-ACE), May 26-28, 2009 CLIC two-beam module integration issues G. Riddone on.
Advertisements

SPL Intercavity support Conceptual design review 04/11/ A. Vande Craen TE/MSC-CMI.
, CLIC Test Module Meeting Status of the DB Quad adjustable support design Mateusz Sosin CLIC Module WG Meeting, 22-May-2013.
Alignment of DB and MB quadrupoles Hélène MAINAUD DURAND 17/11/2011 With a lot of input from Sylvain GRIFFET.
H. MAINAUD DURAND on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignement team QD0 and BDS pre-alignment.
H. MAINAUD DURAND CLIC ACTIVE PRE-ALIGNMENT SYSTEM: PROPOSAL FOR CDR AND PROGRAM FOR TDR.
H. MAINAUD DURAND, A. HERTY, A. MARIN, M. ACAR PERMANENT MONITORING OF THE LHC LOW BETA TRIPLETS: LATEST RESULTS AND PERSPECTIVES.
Workshop TS May 2008 GENERAL CLIC ALIGNMENT Progresses and strategy. Hélène MAINAUD DURAND, TS/SU/MTI.
Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory Stanford Linear Accelerator Center LCLS Undulator Physics.
TMM of the CLIC Two-Beam Module T0 in the LAB – Proceedings to structural FEA Riku Raatikainen
Influence of the Gravity, Vacuum and RF on CLIC Module T0 Behavior R. Raatikainen.
1 Presented at ColUSM by D. Ramos on behalf of the Cold Collimator Feasibility Study Working Group Longitudinal.
H. MAINAUD DURAND on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignement team with 3D views and data from Hubert Gerwig, Richard Rosing and Juha Kemppinen Pre-alignment.
1/9 Hélène Mainaud Durand Sylvain GRIFFET, 28/11/2011 BE/ABP-SU/ Adjustment of 4 Drive Beam Quads positions on TM0 CLIC girders EDMS Document No
Mechanical design, analysis and integration of pre-alignment systems for CLIC M.Anastasopoulos / BE-ABP-SU.
DELTA Quadrant Tuning Y. Levashov, E. Reese. 2 Tolerances for prototype quadrant tuning Magnet center deviations from a nominal center line < ± 50  m.
ALIGNMENT OF Q2 LOW BETA QUADRUPOLES D. Missiaen, On behalf of the EN-MEF-SU/MTI team 1.
H. SCHMICKLER Alignment challenges for a future linear collider.
K. Alam, CLIC workshop, October 16-18, CLIC workshop, October 2007 Working group “ Two beam hardware and integration” Test module in the two.
1 ACTIONS: Ashley French TASK STATUSCOMMENTS 1. Contact Berthet-SergeFuture 12/11/10 2. Contact Serge Mothot & Said Atieh (CERN Workshop) Future 12/11/10.
, CLIC Test Module Meeting Concept of ‘hexapod type’ DB Quad adjustable support Mateusz Sosin.
H. MAINAUD DURAND, BE-ABP/SU, 23/04/2010 STATUS OF THE CLIC PRE-ALIGNMENT STUDIES.
H. MAINAUD DURAND, on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignment team CLIC ACTIVE PRE-ALIGNMENT STUDIES: STATUS FOR CDR AND PROSPECTS FOR TDR PHASE.
CLIC alignment studies OUTLINE CLEX Alignment of the components Impact of beam on sensors readings Long term stability of the supports (girders, DB quad)
H. MAINAUD DURAND, on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignment team MDI alignment plans IWLC2010 International Workshop on Linear Colliders 2010.
Dmitry Gudkov BE/RF/PM CLIC Module Working Group PROTOTYPE TWO-BEAM MODULES (CLEX) Supporting and positioning system for CLEX modules main conclusions.
1/12 Sylvain GRIFFET, 17/10/2011 BE/ABP-SU/ Simulations of laser tracker AT401 measurements on TM0 CLIC girders EDMS Document No
STATUS of the final PACMAN bench integration PACMAN meeting 11/06/2015 Hélène Mainaud Durand.
DBQ support – motorization and performance upgrade Mateusz Sosin EN/MEF-SU.
Discussion points TBM meeting 23/09/2015. Updates Global 3D assembly updated, no severe problems/clashes T1 RF network dimensions updated WPS arms machined.
RUDE Vivien With the help of Hélène MAINAUD-DURAND And Mateusz SOSIN BE/ABP/SU CLIC MODULE September 19, 2011 Présentation REPORT OF THE CURRENT TESTS.
CLIC survey and alignment 1 CLIC CES meeting STARTSLIDE CLIC SURVEY AND ALIGNMENT Hélène MAINAUD DURAND.
Dmitry Gudkov BE-RF-PM CLIC Module Working Group Engineering design of the adjustable supporting system for DBQ.
CLIC Module meeting, 22/08/2011 N. Chritin (EN/MME) Cradles design for CLIC module supporting system (EDMS )  General principle  Main inputs an.
Short range alignment strategy in CLEX and first results CLIC Workshop January 2015 on behalf of : Hélène Mainaud-Durand, Mateusz Sosin Mathieu.
The CLIC alignment studies 1 CLIC workshop October 2007 THE CLIC ALIGNMENT STUDIES Hélène MAINAUD DURAND.
CLIC Module WG 20/07/2009 H. MAINAUD DURAND, BE-ABP/SU Pre-alignment system and impact on module design.
1 Thermal tests planning for mock-up TM0 Thermal tests planning for CLIC prototype module type 0 May 30th,
cern.ch 1 A. Samoshkin 28-Feb-2011 Progress on CDR module design.
Engineering design of the V-supports J.Huopana Input from: G.Riddone, A.Samoshkin, R.Nousiainen, D.Gudkov, N.Gazis.
CLIC module Experimental program for module array Module review, June 22 nd 2015Elena Daskalaki, BE-RF-MK.
Fiducialisation and initial alignment of components for CLIC Mateusz Sosin on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignment team CLIC Workshop 2015.
cern.ch CLIC MEETING (17-Dec-2010) CLIC TWO-BEAM MODULE LAYOUT (short introduction) BE / RF 1.
Peak temperature rise specification for accelerating structures: a review and discussion CLIC meeting
Procurement for the Supporting Systems
Alignment system and impact on CLIC two-beam module design H. Mainaud-Durand, G. Riddone CTC meeting –
Pre-alignment of quadrupoles 1 CLIC stabilization day, STARTSLIDE PRE-ALIGNMENT OF THE MAIN BEAM QUADRUPOLES Hélène MAINAUD DURAND.
Measurements of DB supporting systems Fiducialisation Sylvain GRIFFET, 21/03/2011 Measurements performed in February and early March /13 EDMS n°
H. MAINAUD DURAND on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignement team QD0 and BDS pre-alignment.
CLIC08 Workshop, CERN October 2008 PRE-ALIGNMENT STUDY STATUS AND MODEL FOR THE BEAM DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS TS/SU/MTI Thomas TOUZE Hélène MAINAUD DURAND.
19-Sept-2012] «BE-RF-PM» TEST MODULES in the LAB DB girders (epucret) for T1 & T4: Optimization of the V-shaped supports Nick Gazis, Dmitry Gudkov, Vadim.
Midterm Review 28-29/05/2015 Progress on wire-based accelerating structure alignment Natalia Galindo Munoz RF-structure development meeting 13/04/2016.
BRAINSTORMING ON LASER BASED SOLUTIONS FOR CLIC PRE-ALIGNMENT INTRODUCTION Hélène MAINAUD DURAND, BE/ABP/SU, 09/02/2010 Status of the study CLIC pre-alignment.
H. MAINAUD DURAND Studies on active pre-alignment for the CLIC project.
H. MAINAUD DURAND on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignment team Status on CLIC pre-alignment studies.
H. MAINAUD DURAND on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignment team oWPS versus cWPS OUTLINE Introduction oWPS cWPS Results of inter-comparison tests
Two-beam module layout
Installation of the waveguides between MB T0#2 and DB T0#2
CLIC Parameter Working Group Two Beam Module Design
ALIGNMENT OF THE NEW TRIPLETS
Update on the DB Girders FE Analyses
on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignment team
PACMAN impact on future module design
Alignment methods developed for the validation of the thermal and mechanical behavior of the Two Beam Test Modules for the CLIC project Hélène MAINAUD.
Review on collimator movement with stepping motors
List of changes and improvements for the next generation CLIC module
Installation plan for LAB modules
Towards a common mechanical interface
Alignment challenges for a future linear collider
Review on collimator movement with stepping motors
Presentation transcript:

TEST MODULE WG Cradles for CLIC module supporting system H. MAINAUD DURAND, N. CHRITIN 04-07-11

SUMMARY Introduction: different types of cradles Requirements Boostec cradles Epucret cradles Conclusion: next steps concerning cradles

Introduction: girders and MB quad support Several components will be pre-aligned on supports:  Along the MB:  Along the DB: RF structures on girders  PETS + DB quad on girders MB quad on interface plate DB and MB girders will be interlinked with their extremities, based on so-called cradle. This allows a movement in the transverse girder interlink plane within 3 degrees of freedom (“articulation point between girders”). (Longitudinal direction adjusted thanks to a mechanical guiding). MB quad is mounted on an interface plate, allowing an adjustment along 5 degrees of freedom (longitudinal position will be positioned manually).

Introduction: test module and cradles Epucret S M Boostec S M Boostec S M Epucret S M S/M ? M S M C M S M C M M Master side Installed Ordered S Slave side To be designed 4

Introduction: terminology Girder Ves Targets for fiducialisation Cradle Linear actuators Sensors Longitudinal adjustment Mechanical pre-alignment 5

Requirements : main data Adjacent girders will be interlinked with their extremities (so called cradle), allowing a movement in the transverse girder interlink plane within 3 degrees of freedom (X, Y, roll) Colinearity of mean axis of Ves on two adjacent girders: 5 um, along X and Y axes in the transverse girder interlink plane 6

Requirements : main data Longitudinal positioning of +/- 0.3 mm will have no impact on the articulation point Each extremity of a girder equipped with a cradle On each cradle: several interfaces, positioned within 0.1 mm, and measured within 5 μm w.r.t mean axis of Ves. Once one girder is installed, the second shall be installed from the top, with no interferences with supports and stretched wires already in place Area protected : stretched wires Interchangeability between cradles. 7

Requirements : interfaces With sensors: Each cradle hosts the following sensors: 1 cWPS, screwed on a 3 balls interface 1 oWPS, screwed on a 3 balls interface 1 inclinometer, screwed on a 3 balls interface 1 temperature probe, inserted in a hole with a diameter of 4.1 mm Cradles must be rigid and stable in time, with no difference in their shape when equipped or not with sensors (deformations < 2 μm) Slave and Master cradles equipped for test module. Once everything is validated, only master cradles will be equipped. 8

Requirements : interfaces With girders: Reference surfaces for Boostec: one side / one below Reference surfaces for Epucret: one above / one side Boostec Epucret 9

Requirements : interfaces With actuators: Each cradle supported by 2 vertical linear actuators, already ordered, and on radial linear actuator. Range of each linear actuator: +/- 3 mm, resolution < 1 μm With mechanical pre-alignment: Manual adjustment in longitudinal: +/- 0.4 mm, resolution 10 μm With articulation point: Constraints and external forces applied: Vacuum Waveguides 10

Boostec cradles Design of the articulation point 11

Boostec cradles Design of the Boostec cradle: 12

Boostec / Epucret cradles 13

Epucret cradles 14

CONCLUSION First cradles installed are being tested in 169. Results are promising. Tests under progress Qualification of concept of articulation point (Micro-contrôle versus Boostec/CERN: Metrological evaluation Behavior of the articulation point w.r.t micrometric displacements, w.r.t larger displacements (+/- 1 mm) Impact at beam level Impact of displacements on adjacent articulation points Validation of algorithm of repositioning Implementation of active pre-alignment 15

CONCLUSION Rigidity and stress measurements on 3 pieces foreseen this summer, to validate the theoretical study Epucret cradles received (under CMM measurements), other mechanical parts (mechanical pre-alignment, articulation points) ordered last week, to be delivered end of July 2011. Technical note will be ready end of July. 16

Spare slides

For a force applied of 10 N (micrometric screw) at the level of the hole (blue area), we have a displacement of 7.5 mm. At the output, we have a displacement of 0.3 mm.

Elongation of 0.053 mm under a load of 400 kg Constraints in “ailettes” under load, with a displacement of 2 mm

Pivot under load and inclined (one vertical actuator at 3 mm, the other one at – 3 mm)