Design the fixed and free end cantilever abutments to the 20m span deck shown to carry Load Model 1 and vehicles SV80, SV100 and SV196 for Load Model 3.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter-2 Parts of Steel Bridge.
Advertisements

1 Design and drawing of RC Structures CV61 Dr. G.S.Suresh Civil Engineering Department The National Institute of Engineering Mysore Mob:
2.2 STRUCTURAL ELEMENT BEAM
Design of foundation for Fattouh building in Nablus
2.2 STRUCTURAL ELEMENT Reinforced Concrete Slabs
Chp12- Footings.
Bridge Engineering (6) Superstructure – Concrete Bridges
By : Prof.Dr.\Nabil Mahmoud
Lecture 33 - Design of Two-Way Floor Slab System
Chapter 3 LOADS ON BRIDGES.
Lecture Goals Slab design reinforcement.
Taller, Longer, Lighter IABSE–IASS Symposium, London, September 2011 EXPANSION JOINTS FOR EVER LONGER, LIGHTER BRIDGES Thomas Spuler Mageba SA 680.
1 Design and drawing of RC Structures CV61 Dr. G.S.Suresh Civil Engineering Department The National Institute of Engineering Mysore Mob:
UNIT-I STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR ROAD BRIDGE
Slide 1 Assignment 3. Slide 2 PROBLEM 1 Calculate the maximum deflection in a beam clamped at the both ends as shown in Figure below where the thickness.
Sean Dalton Chapter 3 Slope and deflection of beams.
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd
BFC (Mechanics of Materials) Chapter 2: Shear Force and Bending Moment
Reinforced Concrete Design II
1 Design and Detailing of steel in Combined Footings Dr. M.C. NATARAJA.
FOUNDATION DESIGN.
ERT352 FARM STRUCTURES FOUNDATION DESIGN
SELECTION AND INSTALLATION OF BRIDGE EXPANSION JOINTS
1 Summary Sheet Session Number : Date : Subject Expert : Dr. M.C. Nataraja Professor Department of Civil Engineering, Sri Jayachamarajendra.
Beam Design.
1 Design and drawing of RC Structures CV61 Dr. G.S.Suresh Civil Engineering Department The National Institute of Engineering Mysore Mob:
Group N Chris Jones Ella Feekins Nikoline Hong
Umm Al-Qura University Department of Civil & Structural Engineering 1 Design of reinforced concrete II Design of one-way solid slabs Lecture (1)
STRUT & TIE MODELS (S-T-M)
Plain & Reinforced Concrete-1 CE-313
FOOTINGS. FOOTINGS Introduction Footings are structural elements that transmit column or wall loads to the underlying soil below the structure. Footings.
Analyses of Bolted Joint for Shear Load with Stainless Steel Bushing and Frictionless Shim-Flange Interface Two cases of shim plates were investigated.
WORKSHEET 4 BEAMS.
Session 15 – 16 SHEET PILE STRUCTURES
 2005 Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd 7. Transverse Shear 1 CHAPTER OBJECTIVES Develop a method for finding the shear stress in a beam having a prismatic.
AN-Najah National University Faculty of Engineering Civil Engineering Department Structural Design of a Hotel Building Prepared by: Mohammed Qawariq Faris.
©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG 1 COMPOSITE FLOORS - II.
A simply supported beam of span 8 m carries two concentrated loads of 32 kN and 48 kN at 3m and 6 m from left support. Calculate the deflection at the.
6- Calculation of shear stress at composite interface: A)Under service load: Strain and stress distributions across composite beam cross- section, under.
Chapter 13 Concrete Form Design. SLAB FORM DESIGN Method WALL AND COLUMN FORM DESIGN DESIGN OF LATERAL BRACING.
Strength of Materials Malayer University Department of Civil Engineering Taught by: Dr. Ali Reza Bagherieh In The Name of God.
Continuously Reinforced Concrete Pavement
P14 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR CRCP FOR EACH TEXAS ENVIRONMENTAL REGION Center for Transportation Research The University of Texas at Austin.
60 kN 100 kN 130 kN Q.1 Determine the magnitude, sense, and direction of the resultant of the concurrent force system below
Results Verification Has the model been correctly implemented?
AR362 - Structural Systems In Architecture IV Lecture : Foundations
Technodyne International Limited C967 - LAGUNA LBNO LENA LSc Tank Design Update 2 Robin Atkinson LAGUNA LBNO General Meeting 1st –
Dr Badorul Hisham Abu Bakar
1 ROAD & BRIDGE RESEARCH INSTITUTE WARSAW Juliusz Cieśla ASSESSSMENT OF PRESTRESSING FORCE IN PRESTRESSED CONCRETE BRIDGE SPANS.
Structural Considerations for Bridges
Structural Design of Technology College in Hebron University
Temperature distribution and deflection in a bimetal
Chapter 5: Substructure
Chapter-2 Parts of Steel Bridges.
FOR 5TH SEMESTER DIPLOMA IN CIVIL ENGINEERING
Structure II Course Code: ARCH 209 Dr. Aeid A. Abdulrazeg
SINGLY REINFORCED BEAM (R.C.C)
Chapter 3 BENDING MEMBERS.
SINGLY REINFORCED BEAM (R.C.C)
Design Ribbed and Flat Slabs
BEAM BY WSM BY AQUIB ZAFAR Assist Professor ACET,Nagpur
Structure II Course Code: ARCH 209 Dr. Aeid A. Abdulrazeg.
Structure II Course Code: ARCH 209 Dr. Aeid A. Abdulrazeg
By :Dr. Aeid A. Abdulrazeg
EAT 415 :ADVANCED STEEL BUILDING DESIGN PLATE GIRDER
2.2 STRUCTURAL ELEMENT Reinforced Concrete Slabs
Examples on Equilibrium
Equilibrium Of a Rigid Body.
Structure II Course Code: ARCH 209 Dr. Aeid A. Abdulrazeg.
Presentation transcript:

Design the fixed and free end cantilever abutments to the 20m span deck shown to carry Load Model 1 and vehicles SV80, SV100 and SV196 for Load Model 3. Analyse the abutments using a unit strip method. The bridge site is located south east of Oxford (to establish the range of shade air temperatures). 

A grillage analysis gave the following characteristic reactions for the various load cases: Critical Vertical Reaction Under One Beam

From UK NA to BS EN 1991-1-5:2003 Figures NA. 1 and NA From UK NA to BS EN 1991-1-5:2003 Figures NA.1 and NA.2 the minimum and maximum shade air temperatures are -17 and +34°C respectively.

From UK NA to BS EN 1991-1-5:2003 Figures NA. 1 and NA From UK NA to BS EN 1991-1-5:2003 Figures NA.1 and NA.2 the minimum and maximum shade air temperatures are -17 and +34°C respectively.

For bridge deck type 3 the corresponding minimum (Te,min) and maximum (Te,max) effective bridge temperatures are -11 and +36°C from BS EN 1991-1-5:2003 Figure 6.1. Hence the temperature range = 11 + 36 = 47°C.

For bridge deck type 3 the corresponding minimum (Te,min) and maximum (Te,max) effective bridge temperatures are -11 and +36°C from BS EN 1991-1-5:2003 Figure 6.1. Hence the temperature range = 11 + 36 = 47°C.

Form EN 1991-1-5 Table C.1 - Coefficient of thermal expansion for a concrete deck = 10 × 10-6 per °C. However CIRIA Report C660 ("Early-age thermal crack control in concrete") suggests that a value of 10 × 10-6 per °C is unsuitable for some of the concrete aggregates used in the UK and suggest a value of 12 × 10-6 per °C should be used if the type of aggregate has not been specified.

Hence the range of movement at the free end of the 20m span deck = 47 × 12 × 10-6 × 20 × 103 = 11.3mm. The design th. movement in the deck will be ± [(11.3 / 2) γF] = ±[11.3 × 1.35 /2] = ± 8mm. Option 1 - Elastomeric Bearing: With a maximum ultimate reaction = 240 + 60 + 430 = 730kN then a suitable elastomeric bearing would be Ekspan's Elastomeric Pad :Bearing EKR35: Maximum Load = 1053kN Shear Deflection = 13.3mm Shear Stiffness = 12.14kN/mm Bearing Thickness = 19mm

Note: the required shear deflection (8mm) should be limited to between 30% to 50% of the thickness of the bearing. The figure quoted in the catalogue for the maximum shear deflection is 70% of the thickness.  A tolerance is also required for setting the bearing if the ambient temperature is not at the mid range temperature. The design shade air temperature range will be -17 to +34°C which would require the bearings to be installed at a shade air temperature of [(34+17)/2-17] = 9°C to achieve the ± 8mm movement.  If the bearings are set at a maximum shade air temperature (T0) of 16°C then, by proportion the deck will expand 8×(34-16)/[(34+17)/2] = 6mm and contract 8×(16+17)/[(34+17)/2] = 10mm.  Let us assume that this maximum shade air temperature of 16°C for fixing the bearings is specified for T0 in the Contract and design the abutments accordingly. Horizontal load at bearing for 10mm contraction = 12.14 × 10 = 121kN. This is an ultimate load hence the characteristic horizontal load = 121 / 1.35 = 90kN. If a fixed abutment is used then the movement will take place at one end so: Total horizontal load on each abutment = 11 × 90 = 990 kN ≡ 990 / 11.6 = 85kN/m. If no fixed abutment is used then the movement will take place at both ends so: Total horizontal load on each abutment = 85/2 = 43kN/m. 

Option 2 - Sliding Bearing: With a maximum ultimate reaction of 730kN and longitudinal movement of ± 8mm then a suitable bearing from the Ekspan EA Series would be /80/210/25/25: Maximum Load = 800kN Base Plate A dimension = 210mm Base Plate B dimension = 365mm Movement ± X = 12.5mm  

Average characteristic permanent load reaction = (1900 + 320) / 11 = 2220 / 11 = 200kN Contact pressure under base plate = 200000 / (210 × 365) = 3N/mm2 As the mating surface between the stainless steel and PTFE is smaller than the base plate then the pressure between the sliding faces will be in the order of 5N/mm2. Ekspan recommend a coefficient of friction = 0.05, however use a coefficient of friction = 0.08 for long term exposure conditions. Hence total horizontal load on each abutment when the deck expands or contracts = 2220 × 0.08 = 180kN ≡ 180 / 11.6 = 16kN/m.