The San Mateo County Grand Nexus Study

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Highland Park, Illinois Affordable Housing Trust Fund.
Advertisements

NeighborWorks ® America Neighborhood Stabilization Program.
Neighborhood Stabilization Program Round 2 - Consortia Michelle Winters LISC.
SDHC City Linkage Fee Stakeholders Meeting November 19,
CONCEPTS of VALUE. FACTORS OF VALUE UTILITY –THE ABILITY OF A PRODUCT TO SATISFY HUMAN WANTS. RELATES TO THE DAMAND SIDE OF THE MARKET. SCARCITY –THE.
PUBLIC HEARING: Development (Impact) Fees - Land Use Assumptions & Infrastructure Improvement Plan Reports June 30, 2014.
Real Estate Investment Chapter 10 Financing Real Estate Investments © 2011 Cengage Learning.
Interlocal Agreement – Transportation Impact Fees City Council Workshop July 9, 2013.
Reduction and Deferral of Impact Fees Board of County Commissioners Discussion Item March 29, 2011.
Public Workshops July 12, 2011 | Napa July 14, 2011 | St. Helena WELCOME!
Affordable Housing Delivery: Demographics and a Rationale for Action Affordable Housing Delivery: Demographics and a Rationale for Action Presented to.
Subsidy Retention in New Affordable Housing October 24, 2008 Hampton, New Hampshire October 24, 2008 Hampton, New Hampshire Benjamin D. Frost, Esq., AICP.
Housing Element Update Workshop The City of Fillmore is Currently Updating its Housing Element  State law mandates the Housing Element be included.
Housing Element Update March 30, 2009 Community Meeting.
Temple City Housing Element City Council /Planning Commission Study Session September 27, 2012.
© Cornerstone Partnership 2013 Best Practices in Inclusionary Housing Policy Design.
1 NJ SHARES ACCOUNTABILITY PLAN Jackie Berger 2004 NFFN June 7, 2004.
Accessory Dwelling Units: A Status Report Presented to the Kitsap County Regional Coordinating Council June 3, 2008.
West Oakland Specific Plan Equity Strategies. Potential impacts of new development and investment on existing West Oakland community New development &
© Cornerstone Partnership 2015 Keeping Homes Affordable & Communities Strong The Pros and Cons of Establishing an In-Lieu Fee.
Planning and Community Development Department Housing Element City Council February 03, 2014.
What’s Up with Affordable Housing in Seattle? SF Housing Action Coalition Regulatory Committee.
Affordable Housing Impact Mitigation Program Robert Feldstein, Mayor’s Office of Policy and Innovation September 10, 2015.
Local Housing Policy Initiatives & Engagement Housing WA Conference, October 6, 2015 Kelly Rider, Policy Director Kayla Schott-Bresler, Policy Manager.
Interlocal Agreement – Transportation Impact Fees City Council Meeting July 16, 2013.
Housing Element Update Workshop #2 January 28, 2009.
OneBayArea Grant Update ( Cycle 2 STP/CMAQ) Regional Advisory Working Group April 3, 2012 Craig Goldblatt, MTC.
Technical Assistance Office TCP Projects 2005 Contractual and Financial Management Administrative and Financial Handbook Prepared by IA, 14/12/2001 SOCRATES.
Workforce Housing Pilot Program and Economic Incentive Plan Update Board of County Commissioners August 25, 2009.
School Concurrency and the CEA Process Discussion Item August 28, 2012 School Concurrency and the CEA Process Discussion Item August 28, 2012.
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO MAYOR EDWIN M. LEE Presentation By: Mayor’s Office of Housing and Community Development May 20, 2015 Budget and Finance.
Housing & Career Services Department Finance Committee Nehemiah Court HUD Repayment William Huang March 14, 2016.
Placer County Housing Element Update Stakeholder/Community Workshop #2 – Auburn | April 10, Stakeholder/Community Workshop #2 Auburn Placer County.
City of Burlingame Housing Element Update Community Workshop # 2 | May 20, 2014.
Affordable Housing Impact Fees City Council Hearing, Redwood City October 26, 2015.
Meeting #27 November 18, Started Hearings: Foster City Redwood City (Residential and commercial) San Mateo (Commercial) Potential.
C/CAG Presentation June 12, Collaboration Better Policy Time and Money Saved Local and Regional Working Relationship with HCD Stakeholder Involvement.
July 16, TRACS Industry Group Meeting June 16 th and 17 th, 2004 Office of Housing Assistance and Contract Administration Oversight (HACAO)
Meeting #28 March 24, Junior Accessory Dwelling Units Photo by Jocelyn Knight.
Implementation of Housing Element Update of Housing Element City Council Meeting Tuesday, September 24, 2013.
Stormwater Utility City of Rowlett
Feb 15, 2017 RHNA SHARING.
21 Elements Meeting Ken Cole Director, San Mateo County Department of Housing August 18, 2016.
Prior Conversations with Board as We Explore Land Acquisition
Meeting #32 April 20, Elements.
The Scope of the Problem
INCENTIVE ZONING: A REALITY CHECK
Karen Chapple, Professor of City & Regional Planning
Commercial Linkage Fee Research
Competitive Sites and Redevelopment Programs
Community Development November 2011
Meeting 24 September 11, 2014 RHNA 5 21 Elements.
The Washington county community development agency
Rotary Foundation District 6540 District Grants
SAN DIEGO HOUSING FEDERATION WEAVING TOGETHER A COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH TO WELLNESS October 13, 2016.
Building an Inclusive Community
S W O T SWOT ANALYSIS – HUSSEY EVALUATION FOR POTENTIAL ACQUISITION
Using LIHTCs to Preserve Rural Affordable Housing
Urban Land Bank Demonstration Program
Early Learning Facilities
Rotary Foundation District 6540 District Grants
Housing & Career Services Department FY 2019 Recommended Budget
City Council October 15, 2018.
Affordable Housing Fees Study
Lot 7C Public Meetings to Date
Accessory Dwelling Units: Maximum Unit Size and Residential Impact Fee
COUNTY STRATEGIES TO PROMOTE HOUSING AFFORDABILITY AND JOBS
CSAC Southern California Counties Regional Meeting
24th Annual Walk-a-Thon Interfaith Habitat Saturday February 23, 2019
Regional Partnership for the Bay Area
Presentation transcript:

The San Mateo County Grand Nexus Study October 3, 2014

21 Elements Best Practices HCD Coordination Housing Element Material Public Outreach Housing Element Material Countywide Data and Coordination

Many similarities Some differences Land costs Strength of market Nexus Study Construct costs Spending patterns sf per worker Some differences Land costs Strength of market Any time there is jurisdiction specific data, we use it.

Lots of Cities How do you get them on board? Give them a deal they can’t refuse Make it as apolitical as possible Provide lots of time Redwood City San Mateo S. San Francisco San Bruno Pacifica

Grand Nexus Study Details Cost is approx. $15,000 per jurisdiction 14 jurisdictions participating plus Palo Alto Residential and commercial studies Nexus and feasibility Strategic Economics/Vernazza Wolfe selected through RFP 21 Elements coordinating Funding from HUD/MTC and Enterprise Community Partners Final reports by the end of the year

Yes Yes Yes Big Questions If there are multiple jurisdictions participating, is it accurate? Is it legally sound? Can it help meet our RHNA? Yes Yes Yes small print small print small print small print small print small print small print small print small print small print

Big Questions If there are multiple jurisdictions participating, is it accurate? Any time there is local data, we use it More robust outreach to developers More data points Every city gets their own study

Big Questions Is it legally sound? Every city gets their own study with local data Follow standard methodology For cities – there are always legal risks

Big Questions Can it help meet our RHNA? Potentially in future cycles Better to use existing law rather than change the law Transfer of RHNA is permitted currently

Units or Ducats Inclusionary or Impact Fee Based October 3, 2014

Units or Ducats Inclusionary or Impact Fee Based October 3, 2014

Big Questions Do you have a nexus study? Can you leverage the money? Can you spend the money (quickly)/how soon do you want the units? Are you committed to mixed income buildings/developments and neighborhoods? How much control do you want over the final product? What level of affordability do you want? Do you have capacity to manage the units?

Do you have a nexus study?

Can you leverage the money?

Can you spend the money (quickly)? We evaluated the length of time before an equivalent amount of funding was committed and expended and found that typically, the first commitment from a given fee payment was made after 33 months (2.75 years) and paid out 47 months (3.9 years) after the fee was received. Initially the Office of Housing was somewhat constrained regarding the location of projects that could receive bonus funds. In June of 2009, the passage of Ordinance 122990 removed this constraint and the funds have been committed more rapidly since. While the Office of Housing does not keep funds from different projects separate, in order to evaluate the typical length of time between receipt and commitment or expenditure of funds, Cornerstone constructed a model that assumed that money were spent in the order that it was received (ie. funds from a given project were not spent until all money from prior projects had been fully spent). City of Seattle, Uncommitted Funds

Are you committed to mixed income buildings and neighborhoods? We evaluated the length of time before an equivalent amount of funding was committed and expended and found that typically, the first commitment from a given fee payment was made after 33 months (2.75 years) and paid out 47 months (3.9 years) after the fee was received. Initially the Office of Housing was somewhat constrained regarding the location of projects that could receive bonus funds. In June of 2009, the passage of Ordinance 122990 removed this constraint and the funds have been committed more rapidly since. While the Office of Housing does not keep funds from different projects separate, in order to evaluate the typical length of time between receipt and commitment or expenditure of funds, Cornerstone constructed a model that assumed that money were spent in the order that it was received (ie. funds from a given project were not spent until all money from prior projects had been fully spent).

How much control do you want over the final product How much control do you want over the final product? What level of affordability do you want?

Do you have capacity to manage the units? 14% + Foreclosure rate City properties CLT properties