LSST Commissioning Overview and Data Plan Charles (Chuck) Claver Beth Willman LSST System Scientist LSST Deputy Director SAC Meeting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Test Automation Success: Choosing the Right People & Process
Advertisements

CMSC 2006 Orlando Active Alignment System for the LSST William J. Gressler LSST Project National Optical Astronomy Observatory (NOAO) Scott Sandwith New.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Preparation for Developmental Reviews.
System-wide issues Before we get to the telescope System integration and verification at the telescope Operations Maintenance and support.
Sept. 18, 2008SLUO 2008 Annual Meeting Science Opportunities with LSST David L. Burke SLAC/KIPAC.
WBS & AO Controls Jason Chin, Don Gavel, Erik Johansson, Mark Reinig Design Meeting (Team meeting #10) Sept 17 th, 2007.
NGAO Team Meeting Management Peter Wizinowich May 26, 2009.
CXC Implementing 2007 NRC Portals of the Universe Report Chandra X-ray Center Recommended Best Practices Roger Brissenden and Belinda Wilkes 25 April 2012.
Hunt for Molecules, Paris, 2005-Sep-20 Software Development for ALMA Robert LUCAS IRAM Grenoble France.
Framework for Compliance, Verification, and Non-Conformance George Angeli LSST All-Hands Meeting Bremerton August 17, 2015.
FLAO commissioning with InfraRed Test Camera (IRTC) S. Esposito, G. Brusa, A. Riccardi FLAO system external review, Florence, 30/31 March 2009.
Telescope Integration and Tests Tuesday Afternoon.
GOES Users’ Conference IV May 1-3, 2006 Broomfield, CO Prepared by Integrated Work Strategies, LLC 1 GOES USERS’ CONFERENCE IV: Discussion Highlights Algorithm.
Doug Tody E2E Perspective EVLA Advisory Committee Meeting December 14-15, 2004 EVLA Software E2E Perspective.
Planetary Science Archive PSA User Group Meeting #1 PSA UG #1  July 2 - 3, 2013  ESAC PSA Archiving Standards.
1 FINAL DESIGN REVIEW | TUCSON, AZ | OCTOBER 21-25, 2013 Name of Meeting Location Date - Change in Slide Master Overview of LSST Tools and Simulations.
FLAO system test plan in solar tower S. Esposito, G. Brusa, L. Busoni FLAO system external review, Florence, 30/31 March 2009.
1 FINAL DESIGN REVIEW | TUCSON, AZ | OCTOBER 21-25, 2013 Name of Meeting Location Date - Change in Slide Master Title of Presentation Andrew Connolly LSST.
Test and Integration Robyn Allsman LSST Corp DC3 Applications Design Workshop IPAC August , 2008.
GLAST LAT ProjectFace to Face Managers Meeting 04/14/ Integration and Test 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: I & T Input to Face to Face Managers.
Measured Progress ©2011 Guide to the Smarter Balanced IT Architecture Connecticut Assessment Forum August 14, 2012.
Proposal: staged delivery of Scheduler and OpSim V1 (2016) meet most of the SRD requirements – Deliver a system that can be extended with an improved scheduler.
ANALYSIS PHASE OF BUSINESS SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT METHODOLOGY.
International Data Centre October 2015Page 1 Progressive Commissioning Jerry Carter, Senior Scientist W. Randy Bell, Director Gerhard Graham, Coordinator.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Statistical Division CSPA: The Future of Statistical Production Steven Vale UNECE
1 SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation | 26 June - 1 July 2016 | Edinburgh, United Kingdom Investigating interoperability of the LSST Data Management.
1 OBSERVATORY CONTROL SYSTEM (OCS) FRANCISCO DELGADO OCS CAM.
Commissioning Planning
LSST Commissioning Overview and Data Plan Charles (Chuck) Claver Beth Willman LSST System Scientist LSST Deputy Director SAC Meeting.
LSST Commissioning Status Update & Overview Charles (Chuck) Claver LSST System Scientist SAC Meeting March 5, 2017.
Camera PDR/CD1 Planning 19 September 2008
Verification Matrix Process
ComCam Hardware and Interfaces James Howard ComCam CAM LSST 2017 Project & Community Workshop 2017 Aug 15.
Highlighting key definitions, suggested SAC roles, and challenges
Purpose of this discussion
Agenda ComCam planning and scheduling (James & Jacques) CCS & CCS-TCS Interface (Tony) Software to use ComCam Software to get data out of ComCam (Mike)
Telescope Assembly, Integration and Verification (AIV) WBS 04C. 14 J
Draft thoughts on selecting LSST DDFs
From LSE-30: Observatory System Spec.
Systems Engineering, Verification, and Commissioning for LSST George Z
GLAST Large Area Telescope Instrument Science Operations Center
ComCam Hardware and Interfaces James Howard ComCam CAM LSST 2017 Project & Community Workshop 2017 Aug 15.
Chapter 6: Database Project Management
Chapter 10 Software Quality Assurance& Test Plan Software Testing
LSST Commissioning: FY18 Planning
Simulations, Metrics and Merit Functions for Mini-surveys and Deep Drilling 1.
LSST Commissioning Kevin Reil LSST Commissioning Camera Rep
Software Life Cycle “What happens in the ‘life’ of software”
SOCS/Scheduler Development Plan Michael Reuter, Fransicso Delgado
Software Engineering (CSI 321)
IEEE Std 1074: Standard for Software Lifecycle
Chuck F Claver LSST System Scientist & Commissioning Lead
GSC2 6TH ANNUAL MEETING – Oct 19-20, 2000
OCS Scheduler Status Francisco Delgado T&S Software Manager
Defining the Activities
DOE: Transition from MIE to Early Operations Kevin Reil LSST Camera Commissioning Lead LSST Commissioning Plan Review January 24-26, 2017.
Management Breakout: DOE Budget Summary Vincent Riot LSST Camera Interim Project Manager LSST Commissioning Plan Review January 24-26, 2017.
Management Breakout: MREFC Budget Summary Victor L
LSST Control Software Integration Francisco Delgado OCS Software Manager LSST Commissioning Plan Review January 24-26, 2017.
Software & Hardware for Wavefront Estimation Pipeline Development Te-Wei Tsai Software Engineer Joint Technical Meeting March 6, 2017.
Software engineering -1
Click to add title Planning for LSST Verification George Angeli LSST All Hands Meeting Tucson August 15, 2016.
Observatory Control System
Overview of Science Verification Plan Keith Bechtol and Zeljko Ivezic LSST Commissioning Plan Review January 24-26, 2017.
Mark McKinnon EVLA Project Manager
Albania 2021 Population and Housing Census - Plans
PSS verification and validation
Key Issues and Today’s Goals
Question 1: Contingency for “extra” year
Commissioning Data – Who and Why?
Presentation transcript:

LSST Commissioning Overview and Data Plan Charles (Chuck) Claver Beth Willman LSST System Scientist LSST Deputy Director SAC Meeting March 5, 2017

Phases of LSST Commissioning Primary Activity Sequencing: Outline Phases of LSST Commissioning Primary Activity Sequencing: Phase 1: Early System AI&T w/ComCam Phase 2: Full System AI&T w/LSSTCam Phase 3: Science Verification Current commissioning data plan

The Commissioning Plan is structured in phases Phase 0: Pre-Commissioning - Test procedure definition - Test analysis script development using the LSST code base - Procedure & script validation with simulation tools - Special hardware/software development - Subsystem oversight an monitoring Phase I: Early System AI&T with ComCam (6 months) - early interface testing - procedure verification - telescope alignment and AOS control - sub-scale DM pipeline testing - early science verification tests Phase II: Full System AI&T with Science Camera (7 months) - camera-telescope integration, alignment & AOS control - full-scale DM pipeline testing - full-scale science verification test Phase III: Science Verification (5 months) - mini-Survey 1 focus on Alert Production - mini-Survey 2 focus on 10-year depth - Data release processing ComCam + integrating structure LSSTCam + integrating structure on transport cart

Commissioning Activity Sequencing by WBS Phase 0 Preparations 3 planned sustained observing campaigns Phase 1 Early System AI&T w/ComCam Phase 2 Full System AI&T w/LSSTCam Phase 3 Science Verification

Phase 1 – ComCam – Telescope AI&T 06C.02.03.04 A single raft camera operating as a surrogate of the full science camera. Utilizes as many LSSTCam system interfaces as possible: CCS-OCS: Command/Control SDS-DM: Image data delivery WDS-TCS: Wavefront sensing GDS-TCS: Guiding Early interface testing and control systems verification Electro-optical tests, optical alignment and preliminary active optics verification Sustained observing campaigns and operations optimization Conceptual layout of ComCam with Camera surrogate mass integrated to rotator interface and telescope integrating structure.

Phase 2 – Camera-Telescope AI&T 06C.02.04.02 Pre-LSSTCam installation procedure and safety checkout, physical integration and functional tests LSSTCam start-up and OCS/TCS/CCS interface verification LSSTCam electro-optical tests, optical alignment and final active optics verification Full scale sustained observing campaigns and operations optimization LSSTCam - Telescope integration focus includes: Physical installation and basic functional checkout of LSSTCam Final calibration and verification of active optics look-up tables and optical feedback Integrated system requirements verification (OSS) OCS sequencing & functional interactions with scheduler driven observing

Phase 2 – Science Verification mini-Surveys: 06C.02.04 Image differencing template acquisition Template processing and & generation Level 1 Alert Production Verification Level 2 10-year Equivalent Science Verification focus includes: Final verification of Alert Production Final verification of 10-year data release processing (over limited area) Verification of the LSST Science Platform services (internal users) Exercising the SDQA tools

Data Production Milestones

Sustained Observing Periods during Commissioning

Candidate reference fields/area for LSST Commissioning Observations Additional input welcome. What early observing can be done to further establish reference fields?

Early Science Verification with ComCam Science images with ComCam provide a first opportunity to test DM software with LSST images Gradual transition from engineering focus to periods of sustained observing

Early Science Verification with LSSTCam Repeat sequence of early science verification observations and analysis from ComCam with LSSTCam, making use of experience and analysis tools gained with ComCam Focus on range of delivered performance over larger FOV

Final Science Verification with Mini-Surveys 5-month period demonstrating operational readiness Two 6-week continuous scheduler-driven mini-surveys exercising the Level-1 and Level-2 data production systems, respectively Comprehensive characterization of bulk data acquired under nominal observing conditions Identifying corner cases with the aid of a larger statistical sample of observations

Mini-Survey 1: Wide-Area Alert Production Objectives: Template building with DRP pipeline Level-1 processing, real-time alert generation Testing survey progress over wide area, validating observation simulations Observations: ~1600 deg2 x 15 visits x 6 filters x 2 phases (~30,000 visits, ~40 nights) In each phase, cover ~10% of footprint with exposure equivalent to 1 year of Wide-Fast-Deep survey Long equatorial stripe covering range of source densities Phase 1: Observations for template generation (3 weeks) Phase 2: Re-observing area for alert production (3 weeks) Phases separated by 6 weeks to allow for astrophysical evolution and template processing (mini-survey 2 scheduled in-between phases) 1 visit = 9.6 deg2, 825 visits per field in 10 years (~1 night per field) ~2,000 fields in the main deep-wide fast survey, 2.5 million total

Mini-Survey 2: 10-year Depth Survey Objectives: Focus on Level-2 data products at full survey depth Data quality characterization beyond the SRD through analyses that are closely tied to main science themes e.g., source detection completeness, star-galaxy separation, photo-z, weak-lensing null tests, cluster weak lensing Template generation and real-time alert production; these high-cadence observations will form an exceptional dataset for detailed characterization of transient, variable, and moving object alerts Observations: ~30 fields x 825 visits in 6 filters (~25,000 visits, ~30 nights) ~300 deg2 to full depth of Wide-Fast-Deep survey (~1% of footprint) Select fields to overlap with external reference datasets Scheduler used to optimize data quality across fields

Providing Input to the Commissioning Team The Commissioning team’s priority during the entire Commissioning period will be integrating and testing the hardware and software systems to ensure that they will deliver on the scientific requirements defined for the 10-year survey The Commissioning team may have some flexibility in the observing strategy and/or target fields to be implemented in each of the three commissioning phases. To prepare for this possibility, we plan to invite commissioning suggestions in 2018. The LSST Commissioning lead, with support from LSST’s Science Advisory Committee and Project Science Team, will evaluate community commissioning suggestions to determine which of them would drive the system to operational maturity most efficiently. LSST might not guarantee that any particular observations or observing strategies will be implemented during commissioning.