EPA CMAQ Development Team

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
POMI Po Valley Model Intercomparison Exercise CAMx model overview In cooperation with AMA - MI.
Advertisements

U.S. EPA Office of Research & Development October 25, 2011 Prakash Bhave, Golam Sarwar, Havala Pye, George Pouliot, Heather Simon, Jeffrey Young, Chris.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Changes in U.S. Regional-Scale Air.
N emissions and the changing landscape of air quality Rob Pinder US EPA Office of Research and Development Atmospheric Modeling & Analysis Division.
Office of Research and Development Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division, National Exposure Research Laboratory Overview of the Two-way Coupled WRF-CMAQ.
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009.
Incorporation of the Model of Aerosol Dynamics, Reaction, Ionization and Dissolution (MADRID) into CMAQ Yang Zhang, Betty K. Pun, Krish Vijayaraghavan,
Improving the Representation of Atmospheric Chemistry in WRF William R. Stockwell Department of Chemistry Howard University.
4-km AIRPACT vs 12-km AIRPACT Both with dynamic boundary conditions from MOZART-4 Figures created on 5/29/2011 (corrected corrupted JPROC input file)
Air Quality-Climate Interactions Aijun Xiu Carolina Environmental Program.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Jonathan Pleim and the CMAQ Development.
Next Gen AQ model Need AQ modeling at Global to Continental to Regional to Urban scales – Current systems using cascading nests is cumbersome – Duplicative.
CMAQ (Community Multiscale Air Quality) pollutant Concentration change horizontal advection vertical advection horizontal dispersion vertical diffusion.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory Atmospheric Modeling Division, Research Triangle Park, NC September 17, 2015 Annmarie.
A Modeling Investigation of the Climate Effects of Air Pollutants Aijun Xiu 1, Rohit Mathur 2, Adel Hanna 1, Uma Shankar 1, Frank Binkowski 1, Carlie Coats.
WRAP Update. Projects Updated 1996 emissions QA procedures New evaluation tools Model updates CB-IV km MM5 Fugitive dust NH 3 emissions Model.
Coupling between the aerosols and hydrologic cycles Xiaoyan Jiang Climatology course, 387H Dec 5, 2006.
Assessment of the Impacts of Global Change on Regional U.S. Air Quality: A synthesis of climate change impacts on ground-level ozone An Interim Report.
Application of the CMAQ-UCD Aerosol Model to a Coastal Urban Site Chris Nolte NOAA Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division Research Triangle Park, NC 6.
Office of Research and Development Atmospheric Modeling Division, National Exposure Research Laboratory WRF-CMAQ 2-way coupled system: Part I David Wong,
William G. Benjey* Physical Scientist NOAA Air Resources Laboratory Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division Research Triangle Park, NC Fifth Annual CMAS.
Jonathan Pleim 1, Shawn Roselle 1, Prakash Bhave 1, Russell Bullock 1, William Hutzell 2, Deborah Luecken 2, Chris Nolte 1, Golam Sarwar 2, Ken Schere.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling Division Photo image area measures 2” H x 6.93” W and can.
Evaluation of Models-3 CMAQ I. Results from the 2003 Release II. Plans for the 2004 Release Model Evaluation Team Members Prakash Bhave, Robin Dennis,
THE MODELS-3 COMMUNITY MULTI- SCALE AIR QUALITY (CMAQ) MODEL: 2002 RELEASE – NEW FEATURES Jonathan Pleim, Francis Binkowski, Robin Dennis, Brian Eder,
New Features of the 2003 Release of the CMAQ Model Jonathan Pleim 1, Gerald Gipson 2, Shawn Roselle 1, and Jeffrey Young 1 1 ASMD, ARL, NOAA, RTP, NC 2.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Office of Research and Development.
Cloud-mediated radiative forcing of climate due to aerosols simulated by newly developed two-way coupled WRF-CMAQ during 2006 TexAQS/GoMACCS over the Gulf.
Georgia Institute of Technology SAMI Aerosol Modeling: Performance Evaluation & Future Year Simulations Talat Odman Georgia Institute of Technology SAMI.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division October 21, 2009 Evaluation of CMAQ.
Assessment of aerosol direct effects on surface radiation in the northern hemisphere using two-way WRF-CMAQ model Jia Xing, Jonathan Pleim, Rohit Mathur,
Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division,
Simulation of the indirect radiative forcing of climate due to aerosols by the two-way coupled WRF-CMAQ model over the continental United States: Preliminary.
W. T. Hutzell 1, G. Pouliot 2, and D. J. Luecken 1 1 Atmospheric Modeling Division, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 2 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development Implementation of an Online Photolysis Module in CMAQ 4.7 Christopher G. Nolte.
MRPO Technical Approach “Nearer” Term Overview For: Emissions Modeling Meteorological Modeling Photochemical Modeling & Domain Model Performance Evaluation.
Although this work was reviewed by EPA and approved for publication, it may not necessarily reflect official Agency policy Jonathan Pleim, Shawn Roselle,
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Examining the impact of aerosol direct.
Office of Research and Development Atmospheric Modeling Division, National Exposure Research Laboratory WRF-CMAQ 2-way Coupled System: Part II Jonathan.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development Examination of sulfate production by CB05TU, RACM2, and RACM2 with SCI initiated.
Donna Schwede U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Does nudging squelch the extremes in regional climate modeling?
Simulation of PM2.5 Trace Elements in Detroit using CMAQ
Adverse Effects of Drought on Air Quality in the US
SAPRC07T Implementation within the CMAQ model.
Development of a Multipollutant Version of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System Shawn Roselle, Deborah Luecken, William Hutzell,
Lupu, Semeniuk, Kaminski, Mamun, McConnell
Model Future: Nesting with Regional Models
A Performance Evaluation of Lightning-NO Algorithms in CMAQ
16th Annual CMAS Conference
Characterization of CMAQv5.2:
Charles University in Prague
Simulation of primary and secondary (biogenic and anthropogenic) organic aerosols over the United States by US EPA Models-3/CMAQ: Evaluation and regional.
17th Annual CMAS Conference, Chapel Hill, NC
17th Annual CMAS Conference, Chapel Hill, NC: October 22-24, 2018
Policy-driven priorities for improvements to the CMAQ photochemical modeling system Heather Simon, Kristen Foley, Sharon Phillips, Norm Possiel, Shawn.
Quantification of Lightning NOX and its Impact on Air Quality over the Contiguous United States Daiwen Kang, Rohit Mathur, Limei Ran, Gorge Pouliot, David.
Modeling the impacts of green infrastructure land use changes on air quality and meteorology—case study and sensitivity analysis in Kansas City Yuqiang.
Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division,
Changes to the Multi-Pollutant version in the CMAQ 4.7
Chemistry Café and the Model Independent Chemistry Module (MICM)
Deborah Luecken and Golam Sarwar U.S. EPA, ORD/NERL
Modeling the trace-elemental composition of PM2.5 in CMAQ
Some thoughts on future air quality models from a WRF-Chem modeler
The Value of Nudging in the Meteorology Model for Retrospective CMAQ Simulations Tanya L. Otte NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, RTP, NC (In partnership with.
JEHN-YIH JUANG, Donna Schwede, and Jon Pleim
CMAQ model as a tool for generating input data for HM and POP modeling
PM modelling assessment in Northern Italy
Michael Moran Air Quality Research Branch
Current Research on 3-D Air Quality Modeling: wildfire!
Presentation transcript:

EPA CMAQ Development Team The Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System: On-going and Planned Developments Rohit Mathur and EPA CMAQ Development Team Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division, NERL, EPA

Model Development Team : Jesse Bash Prakash Bhave Russ Bullock Ann Marie Carlton Ellen Cooter Rob Gilliam Steve Howard Bill Hutzell Rohit Mathur Sergey Napelenok Chris Nolte Tanya Otte Rob Pinder Jon Pleim George Pouliot Shawn Roselle Golam Sarwar Donna Schwede Heather Simon John Streicher David Wong Jeff Young Ying Xie

Recent CMAQ Releases CMAQv4.7 Released in Fall 2008 Supporting evaluation: Foley et al., Geoscientific Model Development, 2010. CMAQv4.7.1 (Interim release in June, 2010) Instrumented models (DDM-3D, Sulfur Tracking, Primary Carbon Apportionment) 20 SO4 @ 0700 UTC Aqueous chemistry Improving numerical robustness and mass conservation Vertical Advection additional divergence-based constraint on time-step vertical advection represented w/PPM Numerous updates/bug-fixes see release notes

CMAQv5.0 Planned Updates Target Release: Fall 2011 Gas-phase Mechanisms SAPR07TB Fully updated organic and inorganic reactions Updated photolysis rates, inclusion of temperature and pressure dependencies (especially important in upper levels) Use of operator species to better represent chemical reactions in low-NOx conditions Additional species with high emissions, high toxicity, or high SOA formation are treated explicitly (xylene, a-pinene, benzene, 1,3-butadiene, etc.) Updated isoprene mechanism (see Ying Xie’s presentation) Slightly lower peak compared to SAPRC99 Lower O3 error at mid-range, but higher error at extremes

CMAQv5.0 Planned Updates Gas-phase Mechanisms Changes in mean 8-hr O3 (CB05-TU - CB05-Base) CB05 Updated toluene mechanism by Whitten et al. (2010) See presentation by G. Sarwar RACM2 A possible option ppbV New York Region Mean bias decreased slightly with CB05-TU at higher observed O3

CMAQv5.0 Planned Updates Photolysis In-line photolysis module: Increasing flexibility Read relevant input data from an ascii file (created by a pre-processor) Easily modify/introduce associated data (e.g., quantum yield, cross section) new reactions Alternate option for estimation of actinic flux Multivariate regression of multi-stream calculations Modulation of surface albedo at each wavelength Employs land-use data from MCIP files; expands on approach of Laepple et al. (2005) Temporal and spatial (fractional land-use) variations

CMAQv5.0 Planned Updates Particulate Matter Treatment Organic Carbon Numerous new pathways for SOA formation were implemented in v4.7 Summertime under estimation still persist Tracking literature to identify justifiable ways of “squeezing” more SOA from existing biogenic emissions Parameterizations for Hvap NOx-dependent biogenic SOA yields (presentation by H. Pye) Volatility Basis Set On going collaboration with EPRI and CMU Possible option in CMAQv5.0

Non-Carbon Organic Mass (NCOM) CMAQv5.0 Planned Updates PM Treatment: Non-carbon organic mass CMAQ v4.7 Summer 2002 – 2005 OM/OC Ratio Best Estimate from IMPROVE data Summer 2002 – 2008 Non-Carbon Organic Mass (NCOM) H. Simon et al. ACPD, in press Plans for CMAQ v5.0 Source-specific OM/OC ratios in primary emissions Simulate oxidation of primary OC → NCOM See P. Bhave’s presentation

CMAQv5.0 Planned Updates PM Treatment “Unspeciated” PM2.5: PMother Cool season: high-bias Warm season: low-bias Characterizing seasonal bias in PMother PH2O PNA PCL PNH4 PNCOM PAL PCA PFE PSI PTI PMG PK PMN PMOTHR PM2.5 Emissions Linkage w/other CMAQ modules: Na, Cl, NH4, and H2O (already explicit species in CMAQ) NCOM is needed to accurately model total organic mass (OM) Al,Ca,Fe,Si,Ti (a linear combination of these represents crustal material ) Mg,K,Ca (for ISORROPIA v2.0) Fe,Mn (for AQCHEM) See H. Simon’s presentation

CMAQv5.0 Planned Updates PM Treatment Aerosol Thermodynamics ISORROPIAv2.0 Fugitive Dust Emissions See D. Tong’s presentation from the 2008 CMAS conference

CMAQv5.0 Planned Updates Clouds Aqueous Chemistry CMAQ subgrid clouds are loosely connected to the clouds simulated in the meteorological model Convective rainfall from met. model drives the CMAQ convective precipitating cloud model CMAQ convective cloud model differs from the convective cloud scheme used in the meteorological model Investigating the potential use of the Grell scheme (available in WRF, MM5) to improve consistency in representation of impacts of clouds on vertical re-distribution of pollutants Aqueous Chemistry Rosenbrock solver

Impact of LNOx on NO3- wet deposition CMAQv5.0 Planned Updates Dry Deposition Bi-directional treatment of NH3 flux See Posters by Megan Gore and Ellen Cooter & Presentation by Jesse Bash Mosaic approach Output dry deposition flux for the different land-use categories within a grid cell Linkage with ecological assessment studies Emissions MEGAN based biogenic emission Lightning NOx See D. Allen’s 2009 CMAS presentation Fugitive dust Impact of LNOx on NO3- wet deposition kg/ha; summer 2004

CMAQv5.0 Planned Updates Structural Changes The name-list option Eliminates the numerous include files Species specification via a namelist See Poster by Jeff Young Aerosol module redesign Eliminating dependencies and duplication across modules See Poster by Steve Howard

Two-Way Coupled WRF-CMAQ Modeling System Design and Model Features Aerosol Optics & Feedbacks Volume weighted refractive indices for 19 wavelength intervals based on - Composition and size distribution - SO42-, NO3-, NH4+, Na+, Cl-, EC, POA, anthropogenic and biogenic SOA, other primary, water CAM and RRTMG Shortwave radiation schemes inWRF Effects of aerosol scattering and absorption on photolysis Effects of O3 on long-wave radiation Indirect effects (see presentation by S. Yu) Flexible design of model coupling allows data exchange through memory resident buffer-files flexibility in frequency of coupling identical on-line and off-line computational paradigms with minimal code changes both WRF and CMAQ models to evolve independently; Maintains integrity of WRF and CMAQ

2-Way Coupled WRF-CMAQ Modeling System: Early Results (8/6/06: 22Z) Surface PM2.5 Aerosol Optical Depth Optical properties of aerosols Reduction in shortwave radiation reaching the surface in regions of aerosol loading Reduction in PBL Changes in radiation impact simulated dynamical features Reduction in SW (also a reduction In temperature)

Schedule Now through March, 2011: continued development and testing March-end, 2011: freeze β-version of the code β-version of the code will be made available upon request to facilitate the integration of community contributions Additional details: CMAS User forum on Thursday October 14 April-August, 2011: additional testing/evaluation/documentation September 2011: CMAQv5.0 release WRF-CMAQ system release