Talent Management Director

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Profile of Professional Growth
Advertisements

District Awards for Teacher Excellence A presentation to the ACISD Board of Trustees 4/17/08.
Certifying Teaching Excellence The Louisiana Initiative.
Hiring Practices “Getting it Right” Brenda Hammons- Assistant Superintendent Dave Cox – Director of Academic Programs.
ADEPT Framework
AN INITIATIVE OF FOUNDATIONS FOR A BETTER OREGON Corvallis School District Creative Leadership Achieves Student Success October 18, 2012.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
C.O.R.E Creating Opportunities that Result in Excellence.
ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Evidence. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T? Stage I: Preparation  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection.
The New Massachusetts Principal Evaluation
Choosing Excellence: National Board Certification You’re at the head of your class. Now go to the top of your profession.
Choosing Excellence: National Board Certification You’re at the head of your class. Now go to the top of your profession.
POST-TENURE REVIEW: Report and Recommendations. 2 OVERVIEW Tenure Field Test Findings Recommendations This is a progress report. Implementation, assessment,
Favorite Teacher Graffiti 1 National Board for Professional Teaching Standards Who was your favorite teacher? On the front wall write three qualities that.
Administrator-Association Collaboration-from MOUs to Problem-solving SIOUX CITY COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Do You Want to be Nominated to Win $10,000 ? Amy Burks Debbie Madjlesi MSTA Fall 2014.
Master Teacher Program Fall House Bill 1 Changes to Master Teacher Program –Eliminates EMIS report until 2011 Form I deleted Removes December timeline.
Choosing Excellence: National Board Certification Now go to the top of your profession.
Standards-Based Teacher Education Continuous Assessment of Teacher Education Candidates.
CSC Meeting School Leader Selection Process. Welcome Overview of school leader selection process Activities and timeline Roles & responsibilities Q&A.
Educator Effectiveness Digging into Domain 4. Educator Effectiveness in PA  PDE has been working since 2010 to develop an educator effectiveness model.
Master Teacher Program Overview Fall Master Teacher Program MT is now considered one requirement for the pathway for an advanced level of licensure.
MSP Summary of First Year Annual Report FY 2004 Projects.
The Big Interview By: Monique Watson. Introduction My name is Monique A. Watson and I applying for the director position at Inspiring Minds INC. child.
Assistant Principal Candidate Development Opportunity (APCDO)
Grades 7 to 12 Math & Science Specialist Talent Management Strategy
Board on science education
Instructional Leadership for a Professional Learning Culture:
Randolph County School System
Non-Tenured Employee Reviews
The Principal Hiring Process Overview
Accountability Overview Measures and Results
Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.
The Profile of Professional Growth
Huntsville City Schools
Accreditation: A Site Visitor’s Perspective Harry H
Principal Selection Process
Intent to Pursue Interim Certification Authority Under the Alabama Accountability Act Dr. Barbara Cooper May 16, 2013.
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
January 17, 2017 Board Workshop
National Board Certification
Hiring Processes Overview
DESE Educator Evaluation System for Superintendents
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
School Redesign and SRCL Implementation
New Agent Professional Development
CSC Meeting School Leader Selection Process
Advisory Committee for Principal Selection Overview and Preparation
Evaluating Principals Making a Fuzzy Process More Clear
2016 Tenure and Promotion Workshop Policy and Procedures Overview
Developing as a Professional
Aspiring School Leaders Information Session
Leadership Identification & Development Committee
Recommendation to the Board of Directors: New District Assessments
Implementing Race to the Top
Administrator Evaluation Orientation
Huntsville City Schools AdvancEd Engagement Review Report for Accreditation February 1, 2018.
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
Talent Management Director Professional Development Coordinator
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Huntsville City Schools
Focus Session Feedback Data
National Board Certification
Follow-Up Surveys of Graduates and Employers Preparation in the Content Area
SPPS School Leadership Eligibility Pool Process - Principal
MASTER TEACHER PROGRAM
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Nominations and Elections Process
Summit Hill Elementary School
Presentation transcript:

Talent Management Director HCS Hiring Process Lee Simmons Talent Management Director September 15, 2016

Huntsville Organizes a Talent Pool of Distinguished Teachers to be Considered for Membership on the Teacher Screening Committee Principals recommend distinguished teachers each year who have: Exceptional educational talent as evidenced by effective instructional practices and student learning results in the classroom and school Exemplary educational accomplishments beyond the classroom that provide models of excellence in the profession More than three (3) years of dedication to teaching students in the Huntsville City School System Strong long-range potential for professional and policy leadership Engaging and inspiring presence that motivates and impacts students, colleagues and the community

Distinguished Teachers are Assigned to the Teacher Screening Committee to Meet Requirements of the Consent Order and Other HCS Standards The Consent Order requires the District to ensure that the racial composition of each committee… approximates the District-wide racial composition of certified staff, except in exigent circumstances (e.g. individual calls in sick on short notice), which will be documented by the District. Additional measures that are considered for the composition of each committee includes the following: Content area taught School assignment Years of experience

Applicants Are Screened Based on Seven Key Areas to Determine Eligibility for Interviews Screening Areas: Current Alabama Certification and/or Reciprocity Requirements Met Highly Qualified Status Praxis Results Grade Point Average Satisfactory/Excellent Scores from at least Three References Satisfactory/Excellent Background Check Employment Lapses This past year we took a district-wide hiring approach to ensure that all schools had a list of talented candidates and we would move toward Unitary Status. Effective teachers were identified in four ways: Nationally Board Certified, Nominated as a Model Classroom, Member of the Teacher Leader Network, and Nominated by the principal as an effective teacher. STAR Enterprise Assessment results were reviewed to identify teachers who had substantial growth. Teachers were selected to serve on the Teacher Screening Committee who showed substantial growth of their students and their names appeared 3 to 4 times in the areas mentioned earlier. Principals were selected also related to the success they had shown in their schools compared to the STAR Assessment, school walk throughs, recommendations for the Directors of Instruction.

Potential Teachers are Interviewed at the District Level by Teacher Screening Committees Candidates complete two open-ended prompts that relate to the following areas: 21st Century Learning Data Analysis and Instructional Planning Candidates are interviewed with ten questions and scored on a rubric. Face-to-Face Skype Phone Teacher Screening Committees reach consensus on a forty-point scoring rubric and provide a final score for each applicant. This past year we took a district-wide hiring approach to ensure that all schools had a list of talented candidates and we would move toward Unitary Status. Effective teachers were identified in four ways: Nationally Board Certified, Nominated as a Model Classroom, Member of the Teacher Leader Network, and Nominated by the principal as an effective teacher. STAR Enterprise Assessment results were reviewed to identify teachers who had substantial growth. Teachers were selected to serve on the Teacher Screening Committee who showed substantial growth of their students and their names appeared 3 to 4 times in the areas mentioned earlier. Principals were selected also related to the success they had shown in their schools compared to the STAR Assessment, school walk throughs, recommendations for the Directors of Instruction.

Interview Rubrics Consist of 10 Questions With a Score of 1-4 and 40 Total Possible Points 1 -- There is no evidence of knowledge or skill set. 2 -- There is minimal evidence of knowledge or skill set. 3 -- There is evidence of a good level of knowledge or skill set. 4 -- There is evidence of extensive knowledge or skill set. Sample Questions: Describe how you assess and provide feedback to your students. What role would technology play in designing and executing a lesson? Name an accomplishment from your previous teaching that characterizes your work? This past year we took a district-wide hiring approach to ensure that all schools had a list of talented candidates and we would move toward Unitary Status. Effective teachers were identified in four ways: Nationally Board Certified, Nominated as a Model Classroom, Member of the Teacher Leader Network, and Nominated by the principal as an effective teacher. STAR Enterprise Assessment results were reviewed to identify teachers who had substantial growth. Teachers were selected to serve on the Teacher Screening Committee who showed substantial growth of their students and their names appeared 3 to 4 times in the areas mentioned earlier. Principals were selected also related to the success they had shown in their schools compared to the STAR Assessment, school walk throughs, recommendations for the Directors of Instruction.

Final Interview Scores are Recorded and Used to Identify Candidates for Placement in Schools According to the Number of Vacancies One to two vacancies in the same content area: Four Unique Candidates Three vacancies in the same content area: Five Unique Candidates Four vacancies in the same content area: Six Unique Candidates Five or more vacancies in the same content area: Three more unique candidates than the number of vacancies This past year we took a district-wide hiring approach to ensure that all schools had a list of talented candidates and we would move toward Unitary Status. Effective teachers were identified in four ways: Nationally Board Certified, Nominated as a Model Classroom, Member of the Teacher Leader Network, and Nominated by the principal as an effective teacher. STAR Enterprise Assessment results were reviewed to identify teachers who had substantial growth. Teachers were selected to serve on the Teacher Screening Committee who showed substantial growth of their students and their names appeared 3 to 4 times in the areas mentioned earlier. Principals were selected also related to the success they had shown in their schools compared to the STAR Assessment, school walk throughs, recommendations for the Directors of Instruction.

Over the Past Five Years, on Average 71% of New Hires Attended In-State Colleges Percentage of Applicants Interview Score Data Average Score 33.98   Median Score 34.5 Mode 39 (19 scores) High 40 Low 24 Top 25% 38 Top 75% 31

During the 2016-2017 Hiring Cycle, Most New Hires From In-State Colleges Came from Athens State, Alabama, UNA, and Auburn Number of New Hires from In- State Colleges

During the 2016-2017 Hiring Cycle, the Average Interview Score for Applicants Who Attended In-State Colleges was 76% Average Interview Score

During the 2016-17 Hiring Cycle, 91% of Applicants from In-State Colleges Who Were Interviewed Were Recommended by a Screening Committee % of applicants from this college that were recommended by a screening committee In State College

About the Same Number of New Teachers During the 2016 – 2017 Hiring Cycle, Huntsville City Schools Interviewed More Candidates than In Previous Hiring Cycles, But Hired About the Same Number of New Teachers Interview Score Data Average Score 33.98   Median Score 34.5 Mode 39 (19 scores) High 40 Low 24 Top 25% 38 Top 75% 31