Complexity-Theoretic Foundations of Quantum Supremacy Experiments

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BosonSampling Scott Aaronson (MIT) Talk at BBN, October 30, 2013.
Advertisements

How Much Information Is In Entangled Quantum States? Scott Aaronson MIT |
The Learnability of Quantum States Scott Aaronson University of Waterloo.
Are Quantum States Exponentially Long Vectors? Scott Aaronson (who did and will have an affiliation) (did: IASwill: Waterloo) Distributions over n-bit.
Quantum Versus Classical Proofs and Advice Scott Aaronson Waterloo MIT Greg Kuperberg UC Davis | x {0,1} n ?
Quantum Software Copy-Protection Scott Aaronson (MIT) |
Multilinear Formulas and Skepticism of Quantum Computing Scott Aaronson UC Berkeley IAS.
Limitations of Quantum Advice and One-Way Communication Scott Aaronson UC Berkeley IAS Useful?
How Much Information Is In A Quantum State? Scott Aaronson MIT |
Quantum Double Feature Scott Aaronson (MIT) The Learnability of Quantum States Quantum Software Copy-Protection.
New Evidence That Quantum Mechanics Is Hard to Simulate on Classical Computers Scott Aaronson Parts based on joint work with Alex Arkhipov.
Pretty-Good Tomography Scott Aaronson MIT. Theres a problem… To do tomography on an entangled state of n qubits, we need exp(n) measurements Does this.
Scott Aaronson Institut pour l'Étude Avançée Le Principe de la Postselection.
QMA/qpoly PSPACE/poly: De-Merlinizing Quantum Protocols Scott Aaronson University of Waterloo.
Oracles Are Subtle But Not Malicious Scott Aaronson University of Waterloo.
The Equivalence of Sampling and Searching Scott Aaronson MIT.
The Computational Complexity of Linear Optics Scott Aaronson and Alex Arkhipov MIT vs.
Quantum Computing with Noninteracting Bosons
New Computational Insights from Quantum Optics Scott Aaronson.
New Evidence That Quantum Mechanics Is Hard to Simulate on Classical Computers Scott Aaronson (MIT) Joint work with Alex Arkhipov.
New Evidence That Quantum Mechanics Is Hard to Simulate on Classical Computers Scott Aaronson Parts based on joint work with Alex Arkhipov.
Solving Hard Problems With Light Scott Aaronson (Assoc. Prof., EECS) Joint work with Alex Arkhipov vs.
The Computational Complexity of Linear Optics Scott Aaronson (MIT) Joint work with Alex Arkhipov vs.
Scott Aaronson (MIT) The Limits of Computation: Quantum Computers and Beyond.
New Computational Insights from Quantum Optics Scott Aaronson Based on joint work with Alex Arkhipov.
Space complexity [AB 4]. 2 Input/Work/Output TM Output.
One time-travelling bit is as good as logarithmically many
Scott Aaronson (MIT) Forrelation A problem admitting enormous quantum speedup, which I and others have studied under various names over the years, which.
Space complexity [AB 4]. 2 Input/Work/Output TM Output.
CSCI 4325 / 6339 Theory of Computation Zhixiang Chen.
The Road to Quantum Computing: Boson Sampling Nate Kinsey ECE 695 Quantum Photonics Spring 2014.
Quantum Computing Paola Cappellaro
Scott Aaronson (MIT) ThinkQ conference, IBM, Dec. 2, 2015 The Largest Possible Quantum Speedups H H H H H H f |0  g H H H.
Verification of BosonSampling Devices Scott Aaronson (MIT) Talk at Simons Institute, February 28, 2014.
The Kind of Stuff I Think About Scott Aaronson (MIT) LIDS Lunch, October 29, 2013 Abridged version of plenary talk at NIPS’2012.
An Introduction to Quantum Computation Sandy Irani Department of Computer Science University of California, Irvine.
Scott Aaronson (MIT  UT Austin) Aspen Center for Physics, March 25, 2016 Joint work with Lijie Chen Complexity-Theoretic Foundations of Quantum Supremacy.
Scott Aaronson (MIT  UT Austin) Strachey Lecture, Oxford University May 24, 2016 Quantum Supremacy.
Quantum Computing and the Limits of the Efficiently Computable Scott Aaronson (MIT) Papers & slides at
Quantum Shift Register Circuits Mark M. Wilde arXiv: National Institute of Standards and Technology, Wednesday, June 10, 2009 To appear in Physical.
Quantum Computing and the Limits of the Efficiently Computable Scott Aaronson (MIT  UT Austin) NYSC, West Virginia, June 24, 2016.
MA/CSSE 473 Day 9 Primality Testing Encryption Intro.
Scott Aaronson (UT Austin) Banff, September 8, 2016 Joint work with Lijie Chen Complexity-Theoretic Foundations of Quantum Supremacy Experiments QSamp.
Quantum Algorithms Oracles
Scott Aaronson (MIT) April 30, 2014
Scott Aaronson (UT Austin)
BosonSampling Scott Aaronson (University of Texas, Austin)
Complexity-Theoretic Foundations of Quantum Supremacy Experiments
Scott Aaronson (UT Austin)
Scott Aaronson (MITUT Austin)
Bio Scott Aaronson is David J. Bruton Centennial Professor of Computer Science at the University of Texas at Austin.  He received his bachelor's from Cornell.
Quantum Supremacy and its Applications
Three Questions About Quantum Computing
Scott Aaronson (MIT) Talk at SITP, February 21, 2014
Based on joint work with Alex Arkhipov
Certified Randomness from Quantum Supremacy Inimitability
Scott Aaronson (UT Austin)
Three Questions About Quantum Computing
BosonSampling Scott Aaronson (University of Texas, Austin)
Certified Randomness from Quantum Supremacy Scott Aaronson (UT Austin)
Quantum Supremacy and its Applications (!)
Quantum Computing and the Quest for Quantum Computational Supremacy
Quantum Supremacy and its Applications (!)
Complexity-Theoretic Foundations of Quantum Supremacy Experiments
Quantum Computation and Information Chap 1 Intro and Overview: p 28-58
Quantum Supremacy and its Applications Inimitability
Complexity-Theoretic Foundations of Quantum Supremacy Experiments
Scott Aaronson (UT Austin) Papers and slides at
Scott Aaronson (UT Austin) UNM, Albuquerque, October 18, 2018
Impossibility of SNARGs
Presentation transcript:

Complexity-Theoretic Foundations of Quantum Supremacy Experiments QSamp Samp Scott Aaronson (UT Austin) Physics of the Universe Summit, Jan. 7, 2017 Joint work with Lijie Chen (Tsinghua)

QUANTUM SUPREMACY |  #1 Application of QC: Disprove the QC skeptics (and the Extended Church-Turing Thesis)! Forget for now about applications. Just concentrate on certainty of a quantum speedup over the best classical algorithm for some task

The Sampling Approach Examples: BosonSampling (A The Sampling Approach Examples: BosonSampling (A.-Arkhipov 2011), FourierSampling/IQP (Bremner-Jozsa-Shepherd 2011), QAOA,… Consider problems where the goal is to sample from a desired distribution over n-bit strings Compared to problems with a single valid output (like Factoring), sampling problems can be Easier to solve with near-future quantum devices, and Easier to argue are hard for classical computers! (We “merely” give up on: practical applications, fast classical way to verify the result) PostBQP: where we allow postselection on exponentially-unlikely measurement outcomes PostBPP: Classical randomized subclass Theorem (A. 2004): PostBQP = PP PostBPP is in the polynomial hierarchy PostBQP PostBPP

Carolan et al. 2015: Demonstrated BosonSampling with 6 photons Carolan et al. 2015: Demonstrated BosonSampling with 6 photons! Many optics groups are thinking about the challenges of scaling up to 20 or 30… Meantime, though, in a few years, we might have 40-50 high-quality qubits with controllable couplings, in superconducting and/or ion-trap Still won’t be enough for most QC applications. But should suffice for a quantum supremacy experiment! What exactly should the experimenters do, how should they verify it, and what can be said about the hardness of simulating it classically?

The Random Quantum Circuit Proposal Generate a quantum circuit C on n qubits in a nn lattice, with d layers of random nearest-neighbor gates Apply C to |0n and measure. Repeat T times, to obtain samples x1,…,xT from {0,1}n Apply a statistical test to x1,…,xT : check whether at least 2/3 of them have more the median probability (takes classical exponential time, which is OK for n40) Publish C. Challenge skeptics to generate samples passing the test in a reasonable amount of time

Our Strong Hardness Assumption There’s no polynomial-time classical algorithm A such that, given a uniformly-random quantum circuit C with n qubits and m>>n gates, Theorem: Assume SHA. Then given as input a random quantum circuit C, with n qubits and m>>n gates, there’s no polynomial-time classical algorithm that even passes our statistical test for C-sampling with high probability Note: There is a polynomial-time classical algorithm that guesses with probability (just expand 0|nC|0n out as a sum of 4m terms, then sample a few random ones)

Time-Space Tradeoffs for Simulating Quantum Circuits Given a general quantum circuit with n qubits and m>>n two-qubit gates, how should we simulate it classically? “Schrödinger way”: Store whole wavefunction O(2n) memory, O(m2n) time n=40, m=1000: Feasible but requires TB of RAM “Feynman way”: Sum over paths O(m+n) memory, O(4m) time n=40, m=1000: Infeasible but requires little RAM Best of both worlds?

Theorem: Let C be a quantum circuit with n qubits and d layers of gates. Then we can compute each transition amplitude, x|C|y, in dO(n) time and poly(n,d) memory C1 C2 Proof: Savitch’s Theorem! Recursively divide C into two chunks, C1 and C2, with d/2 layers each. Then Can do better for nearest-neighbor circuits, or when more memory is available This algorithm still doesn’t falsify the SHA! Why not?

Other Things We Showed Any strong quantum supremacy theorem (“fast approximate classical sampling of this experiment would collapse the polynomial hierarchy”)—of the sort we sought for BosonSampling—will require non-relativizing techniques (It doesn’t hold in black-box generality; there’s an oracle that makes it false) If one-way functions exist, then quantum supremacy is possible with but efficiently computable oracles If you want to prove quantum supremacy possible relative to efficiently computable oracles, then you’ll need to show either that it’s possible in the unrelativized world, or that NPBQP

Summary In the near future, we might be able to perform random quantum circuit sampling with ~40 qubits Central question: how do we verify that something classically hard was done? Quantum computing theorists would be urgently called upon to think about this, even if there were nothing theoretically interesting to say. But there is!