b-ID: p17 certification Version 1.0

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Search for Top Flavor Changing Neutral Current Decay t → qZ Ingyin Zaw DOE Review August 21, 2006.
Advertisements

Recent Results on the Possibility of Observing a Standard Model Higgs Boson Decaying to WW (*) Majid Hashemi University of Antwerp, Belgium.
ESTIMATING THE FAKE LEPTON BACKGROUND IN A SEARCH FOR PAIR PRODUCED STOPS AT CMS David Kolchmeyer Advisor: Alberto Graziano.
CDF Results Andrew Mehta Liverpool Christmas Meeting 2008.
Searching for Single Top Using Decision Trees G. Watts (UW) For the DØ Collaboration 5/13/2005 – APSNW Particles I.
Emily Thompson May 5 – UMass HEP Exp Group Meeting 1 Tag-probe method: Fitting Z → μ + μ - mass peaks Motivation: 1. Want to use long p T tail of muon.
WW  e ν 14 April 2007 APS April Meeting WW/WZ production in electron-neutrino plus dijet final state at CDFAPS April Meeting April 2007 Jacksonville,
Single-Top Cross Section Measurements at ATLAS Patrick Ryan (Michigan State University) Introduction to Single-Top The measurement.
1 4 th June 2007 C.P. Ward Update on ZZ->llnunu Analysis and Sensitivity to Anomalous Couplings Tom Barber, Richard Batley, Pat Ward University of Cambridge.
Slide 1 SMP-V: Report for Luminosity Calibration Study Jiyeon Han, Ping Tan Alexey Svyatkovskiy, Hwidong Yoo Stoyan Stoynev Ilya Kravchenko, Jamila Butt.
1 g g s Richard E. Hughes The Ohio State University for The CDF and D0 Collaborations Low Mass SM Higgs Search at the Tevatron hunting....
H → ZZ →  A promising new channel for high Higgs mass Sara Bolognesi – Torino INFN and University Higgs meeting 23 Sept – CMS Week.
Associated top Higgs search: with ttH (H  bb) Chris Collins-Tooth, 17 June 2008.
Sensitivity Prospects for Light Charged Higgs at 7 TeV J.L. Lane, P.S. Miyagawa, U.K. Yang (Manchester) M. Klemetti, C.T. Potter (McGill) P. Mal (Arizona)
Higgs to WW Analysis in CDF and ATLAS R StDenis. Higgs to WW CDF and ATLAS Reproduction of Previous Results:Identifying, datasets, Rows and columns Data.
Plenary Physics Meeting, 17 June 05 Per Jonsson Imperial College London 1 Higgs Searches with 1 fb -1 Per Jonsson Imperial College London On behalf of.
1 Single top in e+jets channel Outline : - Data and MC samples - Overview of the analysis - Loose and topological cuts - MC efficiencies and expected number.
Marcel Vreeswijk (NIKHEF) B tagging, performance vertexing Neural Net studies tt event selection mass reconstruction in tt events conclusions B tagging.
Slides for EB3. Left Problems from EB2 1. Why muon triggers are not used in e  channel? 2. Add backgrounds estimation for signal search region 3. Add.
Update on WH to 3 lepton Analysis And Electron Trigger Efficiencies with Tag And Probe Nishu 1, Suman B. Beri 1, Guillelmo Gomez Ceballos 2 1 Panjab University,
5/28/2002UTA group meeting1 An update of top to stop analysis How to estimate W->e cross section? Why the w to e cross section I used is so big? Next Choose.
Using Track based missing Et tools to reject fake MET background Muhammad Firdaus Mohd Soberi UMichigan-CERN Semester Program Thursday, 12 th February.
Puu Oo Cone, Hawaii Gordon Watts University of Washington For the DØ Collaboration DPF 2006.
A search for the ZZ signal in the 3 lepton channel Azeddine Kasmi Robert Kehoe Southern Methodist University Thanks to: H. Ma, M. Aharrouche.
ATLAS Higgs Search Strategy and Sources of Systematic Uncertainty Jae Yu For the ATLAS Collaboration 23 June, 2010.
La Thuile, March, 15 th, 2003 f Makoto Tomoto ( FNAL ) Prospects for Higgs Searches at DØ Makoto Tomoto Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (For the.
Mark OwenManchester Christmas Meeting Jan Search for h ->  with Muons at D  Mark Owen Manchester HEP Group Meeting January 2006 Outline: –Introduction.
Search for a Standard Model Higgs Boson in the Diphoton Final State at the CDF Detector Karen Bland [ ] Department of Physics,
H->bb Note Plans for Summer Ricardo Gonçalo (RHUL) on behalf of the HSG5 H->bb group Higgs Working Group Meeting, 9 June 2011.
EPS Manchester Daniela Bortoletto Associated Production for the Standard Model Higgs at CDF D. Bortoletto Purdue University Outline: Higgs at the.
I'm concerned that the OS requirement for the signal is inefficient as the charge of the TeV scale leptons can be easily mis-assigned. As a result we do.
Viktor Veszpremi Purdue University, CDF Collaboration Tev4LHC Workshop, Oct , Fermilab ZH->vvbb results from CDF.
DPF Conf., Oct. 29, 2006, HawaiiViktor Veszpremi, Purdue U.1 Search for the SM Higgs Boson in the Missing E T + b-jets Final State at CDF V. Veszpremi.
Search for Pair Produced Stops Decaying to a Dileptonic Final State at CMS David Kolchmeyer.
Search for Standard Model Higgs in ZH  l + l  bb channel at DØ Shaohua Fu Fermilab For the DØ Collaboration DPF 2006, Oct. 29 – Nov. 3 Honolulu, Hawaii.
H->WW->lνlν Analysis - Improvements and results - - Data and MC - Higgs Working group meeting, 6 January 2011 Magda Chełstowska & Rosemarie Aben.
Suyong Choi (SKKU) SUSY Standard Model Higgs Searches at DØ Suyong Choi SKKU, Korea for DØ Collaboration.
Low Mass Standard Model Higgs Boson Searches at the Tevatron Andrew Mehta Physics at LHC, Split, Croatia, September 29th 2008 On behalf of the CDF and.
Andy Haas – Columbia D0 Meeting b-ID: p17 certification Version 1.0 Had a bug! CSIP input was not being calculated correctly in nn_cert framework -> closure.
Andy Haas D0 Columbia Meeting Slide 1 Top mass, ME, lepton+jets, p17 ● e/mu pt>20, met>20, 4 jets pt>20 ● triangle cuts to remove QCD ● >=1 NN b-tagged.
Searches for the Standard Model Higgs Boson at the Tevatron Gavin Hesketh Northeastern University On behalf of the CDF and D ⊘ Collaborations Hadron Collider.
1 Top activities in Milano. 2 Overview Study of W+jets background to semileptonic tt –I. Besana (1 st year PhD student, continuing work of diploma thesis)
Higgs Group Status and Plans
Andy Haas – Columbia D0 Meeting b-ID: p17 certification version 0: a pre-preliminary version... TRFs and fake rates exist, in btags_cert Has a fairly major.
Top quark pair cross-section D0 (1 fb -1 results) Viatcheslav Sharyy for D0 collaborations CEA-Saclay / IRFU/ SPP ● Introduction ● Dilepton.
Andy Haas – Columbia D0 Meeting b-ID: ** I'm on my own right now as convener... (might need more time at Fermi in the short term until new help arrives)
Satish Desai - 20 July Resonant Higgs Searches at DØ Satish Desai -- Fermilab on behalf of the DØ Collaboration 20 July 2007 European Physical Society.
on behalf of the DØ experiment
Erik Devetak Oxford University 18/09/2008
15/11/11 LHCb Liverpool Meeting
b-ID: p17 certification: Version 1.1 seems solid so far
CDS comments on supporting note
Top Tagging at CLIC 1.4TeV Using Jet Substructure
Search for a High Mass SM Higgs Boson at the Tevatron
SM Higgs for Summer p17 publications:
Venkat Kaushik, Jae Yu University of Texas at Arlington
Optimizing Foam, A Monte Carlo Event Generator
Search for WHlnbb at the Tevatron DPF 2009
Higgs → t+t- in Vector Boson Fusion
H->WW Wrote conference note for ee,emu,mumu combined
Higgs Plans for ICHEP Gave status at conveners meeting last Friday
NIKHEF / Universiteit van Amsterdam
Prospects for sparticle reconstruction at new SUSY benchmark points
Searches at LHC for Physics Beyond the Standard Model
ttbar Cross-Section Studies leading to ttbar Resonance
The others’ latest result about SUSY search with same-sign dimuon
Tim Scanlon Imperial College, London on behalf of the DØ Collaboration
Measurement of the Single Top Production Cross Section at CDF
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
Northern Illinois University / NICADD
Presentation transcript:

b-ID: p17 certification Version 1.0 Had a bug! CSIP input was not being calculated correctly in nn_cert framework -> closure tests failed in CAFe (but worked in nn_cert). Version 1.1 Retrained NN and derived TRFs with fixed CSIP variable. We've triple checked that there's no mismatch between nn_cert and CAFe anymore. Closure tests now pass in both nn_cert and CAFe. While we were at it.... Added more operating points. There's now 13... from L6 (fake rate = 8%) to MegaTight (fake rate = 0.05%). Updated “alpha” systematic using QCD MC. Version 2.0: for p17 publications Move to interpolated rather than functional parameterizations? Measure “beta” systematic using QCD d0mess b->mu MC. Need to work on data/MC b->mu/b->incl SF. Need to work on PV_Z parameterization. CAFe interface: Processor for updating an existing NN b-tag branch output with a new NN output... based on inputs stored in the branch. Much faster since it doesn't have to recalculate the inputs (do vertexing). Putting a lot of effort into taggability support: Processor for running over a data sample and deriving a taggability parameterization (Timour). Processor for applying a taggability parameterization to MC (Gordon). Additional taggability studies, n_PV, sample/trigger ... (Me, Ioana).

Stopped Gluinos: Still waiting to hear from EB.... it's been ~6 weeks since NP group approval for publication... p17 ZH(->mumubb): Properly combining ALPGEN samples with weighted normalizations from xs scaled to Z-peak. Upgraded to version 1.1 b-ID. Applied jet SSR corrections and recomputed MET. Applied taggability from the Top group parameterization Measured Higgs mass peak windows Did Bayesian limit setting Used systematics from p14 analysis Still haven't estimated QCD background (should be ~2 events, based on p14) Writing the analysis note Deadline: June 21 -> note to Higgs group! REU student is working on a NN for S/B separation, using variables like MET, M(mumu), jet angles (eta1, eta2, dphi, deta, dR), etc.

Di-jet Mass (2 b-tags) Data Total background Corrected background Z->mumu+Xlp Z->mumu+2b+Xlp Z->mumu+2c+Xlp ttbar->2l+bb ZZ WZ ZH->mumubb

Windows and limits p17 p14 Need to multiple by 1/(Z->mumu BR)=~30 to compare p17/p14 Results are consistent with: 2x efficiency (tagging? jet pT>15?) 3x integrated luminosity Exp. limits have improved by factor of ~2.3 ~ sqrt(6) ... -> consistent! p17 analysis is unoptimized still. 0.045 0.051 0.054 0.060 0.063 p14 0.29 0.30 0.37 0.43 0.51

ZH->mumubb (900pb-1 with NN)

NN selection variables pT_Z dR(mu1,2) m_Z

pt1 mET won't cut (70-110) for NN m_jj pt2

d_eta eta_1 dR(j1,j2) d_phi

NN output Simple 5 variable network (pt1,pt2,ZdR,met,mjj) Significance improves by factor ~1.25 with optimal cut of 0.85

Mean=0.07 Mean=0.34 p17 Search for NLLP->bb Had to fix a memory leak in my rootuple maker such that I could finish processing the PASS3 data. Used “valgrind” on my D0ChunkAnalyze executable. Turned out my leak was from making a new JES object each event, and the JES constructor leaks about 1k. Switched to just resetting a single JES object (also much faster!). Working on code to identify/cluster nearby vertices. Optimizing the matching of muons to vertices. More fakes matches past |eta|>1. Lots of fake matches at low pT too... (require pT > 3 GeV?) Looking at the charge of vertices. b-decays have no charge asymmetry. Material interactions do! Mean=0.07 Mean=0.34