Date of download: 10/19/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Date of download: 5/27/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Reducing Residual Stress in 7050 Aluminum Alloy Die Forgings by Heat Treatment.
Advertisements

Date of download: 5/29/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: The Impact of Weld Metal Creep Strength on the Overall Creep Strength of 9% Cr.
Date of download: 6/22/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: A Finite-Temperature Continuum Theory Based on Interatomic Potentials J. Eng.
Date of download: 6/23/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Self-Folding of Thick Polymer Sheets Using Gradients of Heat J. Mechanisms Robotics.
Date of download: 6/27/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Optical Microscopy-Aided Indentation Tests J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 2008;130(1):
Date of download: 7/2/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Performance Testing of a Parabolic Solar Concentrator for Solar Cooking J. Sol.
Date of download: 7/8/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Creep Strength and Microstructure of AL20-25+Nb Alloy Sheets and Foils for Advanced.
Date of download: 7/9/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Schematic diagram of the coordinate system; θ is the viewing angle and O.R. represents.
Date of download: 7/9/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Experimental Investigation of Boiler Pressure Behavior in Closed-Open-Closed System.
Date of download: 11/12/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Experimental and Numerical Analysis of Low Output Power Laser Bending of Thin.
Date of download: 11/12/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 9/27/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 9/30/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/3/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/5/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/7/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/7/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Measures of Bulk and Grain Strain in Deformation Processes
Date of download: 10/12/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/14/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/14/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: A Hyperelastic Constitutive Law for Aortic Valve Tissue
Date of download: 10/15/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/16/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/18/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/20/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/21/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Effect of Resin Formulation on Thermoset Viscoelasticity
Date of download: 10/22/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/22/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/23/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Effect of High Strain Rate on Indentation in Pure Aluminum
Date of download: 10/23/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/23/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/23/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/23/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/24/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/24/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/25/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/27/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/28/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Hole-Drilling Residual Stress Profiling With Automated Smoothing
Date of download: 11/2/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/2/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/3/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/6/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/6/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/7/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/8/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/11/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/14/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/15/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/2/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/15/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/17/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/18/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/25/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/27/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/27/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/31/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 1/1/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 1/1/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 1/1/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 1/3/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Shear Deformation in Rectangular Auxetic Plates
Date of download: 1/13/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 3/4/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 3/8/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Presentation transcript:

Date of download: 10/19/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Mechanical Behavior of Alloy AA6111 Processed by Severe Plastic Deformation: Modeling and Experiment J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 2007;129(3):380-389. doi:10.1115/1.2744396 Figure Legend: Schematic illustrations showing: (a) details of ECAP sample which consists of stacked AA6111 sheet specimens; and (b) details of the ECAP die geometry

Date of download: 10/19/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Mechanical Behavior of Alloy AA6111 Processed by Severe Plastic Deformation: Modeling and Experiment J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 2007;129(3):380-389. doi:10.1115/1.2744396 Figure Legend: Schematic diagram of strain hardening coefficient Θ versus reduced stress σ*=σ−σY showing a linear dependence and the definition of ΘII and σs*. The dashed line represents the Considère condition for necking.

Date of download: 10/19/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Mechanical Behavior of Alloy AA6111 Processed by Severe Plastic Deformation: Modeling and Experiment J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 2007;129(3):380-389. doi:10.1115/1.2744396 Figure Legend: Schematic diagram of Θσ* versus σ* corresponding to the hybrid model that includes the effect of geometric obstacles to dislocation glide (such as grain boundaries or second-phase particles). The upper parabola is obtained from the lower one by a parallel shift along the ordinate axis. After Ref. .

Date of download: 10/19/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Mechanical Behavior of Alloy AA6111 Processed by Severe Plastic Deformation: Modeling and Experiment J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 2007;129(3):380-389. doi:10.1115/1.2744396 Figure Legend: Schematic illustration of Θ versus σ* diagram of a typical AA6111 sample showing deviations from linear behavior and defining ΘII as well as σs1* and σs2*

Date of download: 10/19/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Mechanical Behavior of Alloy AA6111 Processed by Severe Plastic Deformation: Modeling and Experiment J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 2007;129(3):380-389. doi:10.1115/1.2744396 Figure Legend: Schematic illustration of a Θσ* versus σ* diagram of a typical AA6111 sample showing a deviation from a parabolic form (solid line) and defining parameters used in the “two parabola” approach

Date of download: 10/19/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Mechanical Behavior of Alloy AA6111 Processed by Severe Plastic Deformation: Modeling and Experiment J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 2007;129(3):380-389. doi:10.1115/1.2744396 Figure Legend: The dependence of yield strength on the grain size for samples heat treated at different annealing temperatures (Hall–Petch diagram)

Date of download: 10/19/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Mechanical Behavior of Alloy AA6111 Processed by Severe Plastic Deformation: Modeling and Experiment J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 2007;129(3):380-389. doi:10.1115/1.2744396 Figure Legend: The relation between uniform elongation and grain size of samples heat treated at different annealing temperatures (full symbols: ECAP; open symbols: rolling)

Date of download: 10/19/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Mechanical Behavior of Alloy AA6111 Processed by Severe Plastic Deformation: Modeling and Experiment J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 2007;129(3):380-389. doi:10.1115/1.2744396 Figure Legend: The stress-strain curve of commercial sheet and in-house processed sheet (AQ process, one and four passes of ECAE) annealed at 410°C and 540°C

Date of download: 10/19/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Mechanical Behavior of Alloy AA6111 Processed by Severe Plastic Deformation: Modeling and Experiment J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 2007;129(3):380-389. doi:10.1115/1.2744396 Figure Legend: The stress-strain curves of UFG samples subjected to various numbers of ECAP passes and heat treatments

Date of download: 10/19/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Mechanical Behavior of Alloy AA6111 Processed by Severe Plastic Deformation: Modeling and Experiment J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 2007;129(3):380-389. doi:10.1115/1.2744396 Figure Legend: The relation between the reduced saturation stress and the inverse of the grain size for samples annealed at 250–275°C

Date of download: 10/19/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Mechanical Behavior of Alloy AA6111 Processed by Severe Plastic Deformation: Modeling and Experiment J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 2007;129(3):380-389. doi:10.1115/1.2744396 Figure Legend: Correlation between the experimental and the calculated true uniform strain (full symbols: calculated from Eq. ; open symbols: as determined from the calculated stress-strain curves (“two-parabola” description) using the Considère condition)