Complete Streets Award Program

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ODOT Pedestrian and Bicycle Program Sheila Lyons, PE Local Area Government Conference 2011.
Advertisements

Connecting Communities Planning Grant & Planning Tools Curtis Baker, Planning Administrator Krista Beniston, Planning Coordinator October 12,
Applicants Videoconference January 17,  MnDOT funding began in 2005 with federal transportation bill (SAFETEA-LU)  This solictation uses remaining.
Parking Benefit District City of Austin Transportation Department Parking Enterprise Division.
Louisiana Safe Routes To School Program
Idaho Safe Routes to School (SR2S). Purpose of SR2S Reverse the national trend of fewer children walking or biking to school Alleviate barriers that prevent.
York Region’s Pedestrian and Cycling Municipal Partnership Program Presentation to 2014 Sustainable Mobility and Healthy Communities Summit ACT Canada.
Transportation Alternatives. MAP-21 & TAP MAP-21 requires the following with respect to the allocation & selection of projects: ◦TAP funds sub-allocated.
Complete Streets Policy and Implementation Jason Ridgway February 11, 2014.
Green Light-Go Program Pennsylvania’s Municipal Signal Partnership Program April 7, 2015 Daniel Farley Chief, Traffic Signal and Arterial Management Section.
Safe Routes to School: An update on programs, practice and how public health is playing a role Nancy Pullen, MPH, Program Manager September 14, 2006.
Mapping the Way to Success: the Arkansas Safe Routes to School Program.
RECREATIONAL TRAILS PROGRAM MAUREEN NEIGHBORS, COMMUNITY SERVICES UNIT CHIEF CRYSTAL DAVIS, RECREATION AND CONSERVATION PROGRAMS MANAGER.
October Prop K Strategic Plan & 5-Year Prioritization Programs Presentation to the Citizens Advisory Committee October 24, 2007.
Transportation Planning Organization(TPO) City Council Workshop November 12, 2013.
2010 Wisconsin Safe Routes to School Funding SRTS Project Application Cycle Applications available January 2010 Applications due April 2, 2010 Approximately.
From Planning to Pouring: The Evolution of Safe Routes to School Julie Walcoff, Ohio DOT, Columbus, OH Alex Smith, Columbus Public Health, Columbus, OH.
Joint Urban Roadway Standards Workshop April 27, 2006.
Capital Improvement Program. During the Annual Strategic Action Plan (SAP) evaluation, long-term needs and priorities are identified by City Council Capital.
Broward Complete Streets Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Meeting Monday August 10, 2015.
Transportation Enhancements Application Workshop Welcome!! October 3 & 4, 2012.
ADOT Multimodal Planning Division Planning Assistance for Rural Areas (PARA) Program Overview December 4, 2013.
Comprehensive Plan Update Kevin O’Neill Seattle Bicycle Advisory Board September 2, 2015.
June 2012 Washington State Transportation Improvement Board Small City Funding Programs.
Tom Norton, Executive Director Colorado Department of Transportation American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials September 9, 2003.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation 1 Requirements for Pedestrian Improvements on Road Projects in the Board’s Six Year Priority Plan.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
City Leadership & Bike Edina Task Force Annual Work Session February 16 th, 2010.
AASHTO ANNUAL MEETING STANDING COMMITTEE ON PLANNING BILOXI, MS OCTOBER 30, 2010 Potential Changes to STAA Planning Process and Performance Measurement.
What is a TSP? Provides City with guidance for operating and improving a multimodal transportation system Focuses on priority projects, policies, and programs.
TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM 2016 Project Scoring Update Workshop.
PennDOT’s Transportation Alternatives Program November 16, 2015.
TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM 2016 Project Scoring Update Workshop.
TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM 2016 Project Scoring Update Workshop.
Livingston County Transportation Connectivity Plan Final Report December 2013.
Virginia House Bill 2 – Funding the Right Projects Intelligent Transportation System Activities May 19, 2016.
Transportation Improvement Board Complete Streets Program.
Department of Transportation and the Corporation for National and Community Service: Engaging Corps.
Metropolitan Planning Organization Advisory Council Florida Department of TRANSPORTATION Carmen Monroy Director, Office of Policy Planning April 28, 2016.
Chelan County Transportation Element Update
Urban Street Design Standards Overview of Project and Details
Growth Management Amendments Land Use & Transportation
The Central Avenue Connector Trail
The Administration of Subrecipient Agreements
Office of Transportation Planning Modal Planning Update
Nashville-Davidson County Strategic Plan For Sidewalks and Bikeways
ODOT Flexible Funds Program Overview
Complete Streets Policy + Bicycle / Pedestrian Plan
ETA Financial System Hot Topics
Complete Streets: Making Connections
Finance Committee & City Council August 8, 2016
Draft Transportation Element September 6, 2017
Data Impacts of Transportation Reauthorization: Data Community’s Plans and Strategies Pat Hu Chair, TRB National Transportation Data Requirements and Programs.
NVTA Countywide Pedestrian Plan of July 2016
Transportation Alternatives (TA) Set-aside
Funding the Next Generation Los Angeles June 25, 2018
Chris Metka 2017 Statewide Conference on Heritage ???
Complete Streets Award
Transportation Task Force Mission and Vision
Session two: Grant Guidelines Webinar/meeting
STP Shared Local Fund: Project Evaluation Criteria
Priority Process Review
FY 2020 Community Grants Training
Contract Award to Toole Design Group, LLC for Consultant Services to Prepare a Complete Street Blueprint Programming Tool City Council July 23, 2018 Item.
Capital Improvement Plans
MPO Board Presentation
S.260/H.R. 873: Transformation to Competitive Employment Act
Tia Citizens’ review panel November 5, 2018
SAFETEA-LU The Transportation Reauthorization Bill passed in 2005
Safe Routes to School John Schaefer State Coordinator.
Presentation transcript:

Complete Streets Award Program Washington State Transportation Improvement Board Complete Streets Award Program

Complete Streets Award Program Purpose Program structure Available funding The Legislature created the Complete Streets program to encourage local governments to adopt a Complete Streets policy calling for streets and roads designed with consideration of all users Purpose: Encourage local governments to adopt Complete Streets policies Designed to provide safe access to all users, including bicyclists, pedestrians, motorists, and public transportation users Adopt and spread the Complete Streets ethic Program structure Different than any other TIB program Not enough funding to run a successful grant program Too expensive to implement Too much coordination required to manage small project contribution Provides a role for interested parties Allocates funding to support program intent while maintaining simplicity Available Award Funds $10M for first cycle $14M for future biennia

What Should Agencies Do? Adopt a strong policy Integrate complete streets into plans Design with consideration for all users Know your existing & potential users Involve the community/nominating organizations Have a work plan What should agencies be doing? Adopt a strong policy Strong policy includes exception authority at a high level (i.e. mayor, city manager or elected officials) Integrate complete streets into your plans - comprehensive, pedestrian, bicycle Design with consideration for all users Know your users - both existing and potential Involve the community and nominating organizations in your design process Develop a work plan to show how you would spend the complete streets award money These steps are not required but they will strengthen your complete streets nomination

Eligible Work Plan Activities Eligible improvements Pedestrian infrastructure Bicycle infrastructure Access to transit Aesthetic improvements Work plans can include the following types of improvements: Pedestrian infrastructure Bicycle infrastructure Access to transit Aesthetic improvements Example work plan components: Design, repair, installation and construction of one or more complete streets components Repurpose excess width Add or replace sidewalk and ramps Add bike lanes Install bicycle facilities/racks Install pedestrian lighting Improve transit access Improve trail crossing

Non-Governmental Organizations Invited Nominators Department of Archeology & Historic Preservation Department of Commerce Department of Health Department of Transportation State Agencies Community Transportation Association – NW Feet First Futurewise Transportation Choices Coalition WA Bikes/Cascade Bicycle Club Non-Governmental Organizations Who can nominate? Nominators are invited by the TIB Nominators fall under two categories: State agency partners Nonprofit partners with transportation being a key focus of their purpose Nonprofits must be a statewide entity What should nominators look for? Indicators of the complete street ethic These may be multiple, agencywide items or one large project that creates a complete street

TIB Selection Process How are award recipients selected? What are the award levels? How is the award paid? How can the funds be used? What can go on a work plan? How long does an agency have to use the funds? How are award recipients selected? Agencies will be selected from the pool of nominations based on the indicators of good complete streets ethic What are the award levels? Awards are based on the implementation of the Complete Streets ethic; both past performance and planned activities How is the award paid? Awarded funds are paid immediately after approval of the agency’s proposed work plan and schedule Funds will be held by the recipient in a restricted account and expended on activities in the approved work plan How can the funds be used? Funds must be used on complete street elements within the jurisdiction A work plan will be negotiated and approved by TIB staff Funds can be used on any item on that work plan Work plans may be changed administratively to add or remove items What can go on a work plan? Local government street or road retrofit projects that include the addition of, or significant repair to, facilities that provide street access with all users in mind How long does an agency have to use the funds? Funds must be expended within three years of payment or recovered by TIB

Complete Streets Indicators Comp and strategic plan integration ADA, freight, bicycle and sidewalk plans Community engagement User performance data and statistics Complete Streets design training User-responsive standards Operational preparedness Complete Streets elements budget priority Evidence of past implementation What indicators will be used to look for good complete streets ethic? Comprehensive plan integration Strategic plan inclusion Specific modal plans for ADA, freight, bicycle and sidewalk Community engagement regarding design for all users Performance data and statistics about users Staff training in Complete Streets design Standards that allow responsiveness to users Evidence of operational preparedness Maintenance Sweeping Striping Landscape management Budget prioritization of Complete Streets elements Evidence of past implementation History of compliant projects Multimodal level of service standards History of actively implementing modal plans Presence of programs and enforcement of modal access Controlling traffic and speed Clearly apparent integration of Complete Streets elements Pedestrian scale lighting

Complete Streets Timeline September Call for nominations October Eligibility review of nominations October - December TIB Evaluation of nominations November - December Agency proposes work plan January Board awards selected nominees Nominators must submit to TIB no later than October 21, 2016 Board selects awardee agencies at the January 27, 2017 board meeting

Other TIB Funding Urban Arterial Program Small City Arterial Program Sidewalk Programs Small City Federal Match Program

Questions