SOLO TAXONONY Click on these symbols to reveal an item of information.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Writing Effective Learning Outcomes Department for the Enhancement of Learning, Teaching and Assessment RGU:DELTA.
Advertisements

Designing and Planning a Teaching Session This document is licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 UK: England & Wales license, available.
ORIC – Open Educational Resources for the Inclusive Curriculum 1 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike.
Outcomes-based Teaching and Learning Pre-workshop 1 Designing Intended Learning Outcomes Designing Intended Learning Outcomes.
Continuous Professional Development in Mathematics
1 Angela Ho, EDC Chan Chi Hung, Learning to Learn Project.
Assessment: generic issues Chris Shiel, Head of Learning and Teaching, IBAL 2 nd Project Management Conference for Excellence in Teaching Learning and.
EDU 550 Assignment 7.
Module design Setting aims and learning outcomes Dr. John Milliken School of Education Queens University Belfast.
» “Structure of Observed Learning Outcome” (SOLO) » It is a ‘taxonomy’: It classifies, categorises learning. » It describes increasingly complex stages.
 PRESENTED BY  Muhammad Asif Nadeem  Department of Education  I.U.B.
Quality Questioning Using the SOLO Taxonomy An online workshop
© Curriculum Foundation1 Part 2 Assessing our wider aspirations Part 2 Assessing our wider aspirations.
The Year of the Curriculum : Life Without Levels The programme consists of a Bridging Unit and five further units: (Have you completed the Bridging Unit.
GOOD MORNING. 2 Objectives of Learning VANAJA.M Assistant Professor Department of Education Acharya Nagarjuna University.
Deep Learning What is Deep Learning? Blank answers next to the Single ideas next to the Multiple ideas next to the.
An inquiry on Solo Ignition: Knowledge attack: What did know already ? Wonderings: Defining Solo How else could we use solo? How would it fit with.
What has this got to do with NCEA?
Biggs & Collis (1982) SOLO Taxonomy Overview and ideas for use Robin Trangmar Coleg Llandrillo.
1 Setting Appropriate Assessment and Grading Criteria.
Solo vs Bloom.
BBI3420 PJJ 2009/2010 Dr. Zalina Mohd. Kasim.  Bloom’s taxonomy of Educational Objectives (1956) provides 6 levels of thinking and questioning. A close.
Selected Responses How deep does the question dig?????
TLC Sixth Form Teaching The issues: Students disliked independent learning as it allowed room for mistakes to creep through unchecked. This led to a lack.
Linking the information process with Quality Teaching Intellectual quality Quality learning environment Significance © 2007 School Libraries and Information.
Definition Essay WIT Comp 2. Definition A definition essay is an essay that defines a word, term, or concept. In this essay you should not define a term.
Yr 7.  Pupils use mathematics as an integral part of classroom activities. They represent their work with objects or pictures and discuss it. They recognise.
Going SOLO Using SOLO Taxonomy to raise the quality of learning to “out of this world.”
ORGANIZING LEARNING LEARNING TAXONOMIES. BLOOM’S TAXONOMY ORIGINAL FORMAT Uses six levels in a hierarchy Each level depends on those preceding in the.
Presented by Ms. Vayas At Bancroft MS March 25, 2008.
Analysis and Critical Thinking in Assessment 1. What is the problem? Gathering information Using information to inform decisions/ judgment Synthesising.
SOLO Taxonomy SOLO Taxonomy. What level is your understanding of SOLO taxonomy.
Quality Assessment Design in HASS Using SOLO Framework.
Tiered Task design for the Australian Curriculum
Enrichment…It is not just for gifted anymore.
Understanding Standards: Higher Course Event
Bloom’s Taxonomy.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 3. Session 9. Periodic data collection methods.
Bloom’s Taxonomy of Learning
Benefits of Thinking Maps
Multiliteracies for the 21st Century Schools Written by Dr
Structured Observation of Learning Outcomes
Assessment without levels
Lecture 9- Design Concepts and Principles
Questions and Questioning Strategies
Understanding Levels of Thinking using:
THE QUESTIONS—SKILLS ANALYSE EVALUATE INFER UNDERSTAND SUMMARISE
Analysis and Critical Thinking in Assessment
Bloom's Revised Taxonomy.
Simple, Multiple, Related, Extended
To introduce the ‘SOLO Taxonomy’ framework
Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy
Some ideas for 2015 “SOLO is our language of learning”
AS LEVEL Paper One – Section A / B
Lecture 9- Design Concepts and Principles
Learning outcomes in higher education
EPQ Learner Outcomes identify, design, plan and complete an individual project, applying a range of organisational skills and strategies to meet.
How to make the Kessel Run in less than 12 par secs
Critically Evaluating an Assessment Task
BBI3420 PJJ 2009/2010 Dr. Zalina Mohd. Kasim
Analyzing Learners & Context
EBL – Why do it? Centre for Excellence in Enquiry-Based Learning.
Bloom’s Taxonomy.
Assessment of quality of standards
Bloom’s Taxonomy.
Rubric for News Report Emerging Basic Proficient Advanced Mastery OR
Bloom’s Taxonomy.
Understanding Levels of Thinking using:
Tiering Learning Experiences with Bloom’s Taxonomy
Presentation transcript:

SOLO TAXONONY Click on these symbols to reveal an item of information. Overview Pre-Structural Use Uni-Structural Thinking Multi-Structural 3 Story Links Relational Extended Abstract Example Hoi An Click on these symbols to reveal an item of information. Click on the symbol again to hide the information. Prepared by Mike Whiteman: Waitomo ICT Cluster

SOLO stands for Structure of the Observed Learning Outcomes and was developed by John Biggs and Kevin Collis. In simple terms, the taxonomy presents a systematic way to describe how learner performance grows in complexity when mastering tasks (in an educational setting). It defines levels of increasing complexity in a learners understanding of an idea. Learners may not exhibit all stages. Biggs describes it as “a framework for understanding understanding.” It seeks to provide a way to identify connections that learners make, with each level adding more. MENU

Helping learners to look at their own work in relation to this taxonomy can help in two ways: * an assessment framework independent of ‘content knowledge’ * a model to help show how a piece of work can be improved MENU

If you are using rubrics and/or success criteria, then use of the SOLO Taxonomy may be more productive educationally, because thinking about the structure responses may provide better understanding of ideas than the listing of specific knowledge bytes. As such, it can help learners develop an understanding of thinking, rather than knowing of thinking. MENU

QUANTITAVE Pre - Structural the point hasn’t been understood the task has not been worked on in an appropriate way a too simple way of going about something has been used bits without any organisation or sense irrelevant information no meaningful response may appear to be learning, but just ‘chanting’ no understanding misses the point MENU

QUANTITAVE Uni - Structural one aspect of a task is picked up and used maybe a simple, obvious connection but no significance attached only focuses on one relevant aspect terms may be used but are not developed further in any way focuses on one issue in a complex case identify, memorise, carry out a simple procedure MENU

QUANTITAVE Multi - Structural several aspects of a tasked picked up and used, but not linked aspects of a task are treated independently and additively aspects like a disorganised list with no relationships recognised a number of statements that are not built on in any way if there are connections they are very simple the significance of statements as a whole is not grasped ‘knowledge telling,’ ‘cut and paste’ described by Biggs as “seeing the trees but not the wood” enumerate, classify, describe, list, combine, do algorithms MENU

QUALITATIVE Relational integration of ideas/aspects of the task into a coherent whole this is usually seen to be an adequate understanding of a topic significance of the parts in relation to the whole is recognised several parts are integrated into a coherent whole details link to conclusions meaning is understood able to apply a concept to a familiar situation compare/contrast, explain causes, analyse, relate, apply MENU

QUALITATIVE Extended Abstract connections are made not only within a topic, but beyond it there is transfer from the specific to the general generalisations are made beyond the information given new and broader issues are identified the ‘through the roof’ notion of the Three Story Intellect model the Relational level at a higher level of abstraction theorise, generalise, hypothesise, reflect, generate MENU

Surface - Deep Learning 3 Story Intellect SOLO Taxonomy Surface - Deep Learning INPUT Pre-Structural Uni-Structural Multi-Structural Relational Extended Abstract Surface Deep PROCESS OUTPUT MENU

MENU

MENU

MENU

MENU

Hoi An is starting to look like it did years ago. Pre - Structural Trenches were made so that the power and phone lines would be under the streets in Hoi An. Just as the Cu Chi tunnels were a safe hiding place in the American war, these Hoi An tunnels make communication safer and help restore the natural beauty of the town. dunno digging a hole Uni - Structural making a trench lots of wires Hoi An is pretty Trenches were made so that the power and phone lines would be under the streets. Hoi An is starting to look like it did years ago. Multi - Structural Relational Extended Abstract MENU