GMT NEXT GEN TRANSIT PLAN PROJECT OVERVIEW

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Prioritization Framework Principles
Advertisements

Blueprint for Transportation Excellence Downtown CAG January 16, 2014.
Greater Minnesota Transit Investment Plan PAC December 14, 2010.
Interim Guidance on the Application of Travel and Land Use Forecasting in NEPA Statewide Travel Demand Modeling Committee October 14, 2010.
Regional Rural Transit Strategy Prepared for: Kern Council of Governments Prepared by: Nelson Nygaard Consulting Associates August 2003.
Tacoma Link Expansion Infrastructure, Planning and Sustainability Committee Tacoma City Council--Nov. 13, 2013.
Community Transit Solutions for the Suburbs APTA Annual Meeting September 30, 2013.
National Cohesive Wildland Fire Strategy 1. What is the Cohesive Strategy? A national, collaborative approach to addressing wildland fire across all lands.
Neighborhood Preservation and Revitalization Division Board of County Commissioners March 10, Neighborhood Improvement Plan.
Click to edit Master title style 1 Nelson/Nygaard Consulting Associates Public Meeting
Comprehensive Operations Analysis. Background ■On March 6, 2014, Escambia County Board of County Commissioners approved an agreement between Escambia.
King County Metro Long Range Public Transportation Plan Kirkland Transportation Commission_ April 10, 2015.
Helena Inclusive Transit Planning Grant Round 2 Service Improvement Planning -Recommended Local Transit Service Improvement October 21, 2014 Presented.
Program Update Baltimore MPO November 25, Internal Draft AGENDA  Program Overview  Alternatives Development  Stakeholder and Public Outreach.
South/West Corridor Improvements Service and Facility Alternatives September 9, 2014 Planning & Project Development Committee March 3, 2015.
06/20/2007 Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation (DRPT) Update on FTA New Initiatives on Transportation Services.
MBAD/F 619: Risk Analysis and Financial Modeling Instructor: Linda Leon Fall 2014
Climate Change Council November 2011 draft ACT Planning Strategy.
NEW STRATEGY FOR TRANSPORT GOVERNANCE IN MONTREAL March EMTA Meeting, Madrid.
Effective Decision Making – Part 2. Effective Decision Making Key components: Service Standards (Part 1) Transit Improvement Program (TIPs) Three Year.
OPEN HOUSE #4 JUNE AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for list  Fill out comment.
February 24, “Moving Transit Forward”  A fiscally responsible, community-driven vision for restoring, enhancing, and expanding the Metro Transit.
Transportation Planning Process Freight Transportation Planning Workshop July 11, 2001.
FDOT Transit Office Modeling Initiatives The Transit Office has undertaken a number of initiatives in collaboration with the Systems Planning Office and.
00 Metropolitan Transit System Transit Serving Point Loma September 23, 2008.
Regional Transit Study Project Update. Four open houses held between November , 2009 Informed and engaged the public in the study process Provided.
On the Right Track Meeting Greater Boston’s Transit and Land Use Challenges May 17, 2006.
Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida Developing Customer Oriented Transit Performance Measures National Transit GIS Conference.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Fairfax County Comprehensive Transit Plan and Transit Development Plan Board Transportation Committee December 1, 2015 Randy.
Project Background  Several recent initiatives have helped transform the system in positive ways – New brand and logo – New website and real-time bus.
San Diego Regional Comprehensive Plan Presentation to Senate Transportation and Housing Committee February 8, 2005.
City of Joliet - Sustainability City of Joliet Sustainability Initiatives American Planning Association National Conference April 16, 2013.
Service Guidelines and Standards Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority Board of Directors Meeting September 2015 capmetro.org |1.
City Council – Project Update September 14, 2015.
Service Development Process 1. Our mission: To meet our constituents’ present and future public transit needs by offering safe, clean, reliable, courteous,
TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY RECOMMENDATIONS AND SERVICE OPTIONS JUNE 14, 2016.
Diversified Revenue + Funding Strategies presented by
GMT NEXT GEN TRANSIT PLAN CATMA ETC MEETING
Multi Agency Exchange May 16, 2017.
Move New Haven Transit Mobility Study:
A Presentation to: River to Sea TPO Board October 26, 2016.
Comprehensive Route Network Analysis
GMT NEXT GEN TRANSIT PLAN PROJECT OVERVIEW
Alexander Graham Bell Elementary School
Gunnison Valley Transportation Authority (RTA) 2016 Transit Planning Process Funded through a Section 5304 Planning Grant 5/23/2018.
A Presentation to: River to Sea TPO BPAC November 9, 2016.
River to Sea TPO - CAC/TCC
VicRoads – Movement & Place
Service Routes and Community Transit Hubs: Right Sizing Transit
Local economic development agency
Transit for Tomorrow strategic plan
Microtransit Pilot In Sacramento
Transit Competitiveness and Market Potential
Getting to an Inclusive, Regional Economic Development Strategy
VicRoads – Movement & Place
Tweet about this presentation #TransitGIS
Focus40 Overview A long-range plan for how the MBTA can meet the needs of the region in 2040: A 20-year plan as required by MBTA enabling legislation A.
Office of Research and Analysis
2018 Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Conference
Transit Integration and Efficiency Study Transit Advisory Committee
GMT NextGen Update CVRPC TAC
National Center for Mobility Management Webinar May 10, 2018
Aniko Laszlo, MassDOT/MBTA
A Focus on Strategic vs. Tactical Action for Boards
West Central Avenue Strategic Plan
1. Where should buses run and with what frequency?
RTC RIDE Service Improvement Recommendations
HRT Workshop: Transit Strategic Plan and Aug-Dec working items
Travel Washington 18th Biennial State Programs Meeting and
Presentation transcript:

GMT NEXT GEN TRANSIT PLAN PROJECT OVERVIEW May 3, 2017

BACKGROUND GMT has grown rapidly through “mergers and acquisitions” Over recent years, more emphasis on organization and capital improvements than service Service consolidation Governance and management structures Unified branding Capital improvements (downtown transit center) Most services still operate in similar manner as before mergers This effort is designed to improve the way services work as a system

Starting point Expansive service area across northern and central Vermont Diverse service area with many types of transit Fixed-route service in urban areas Fixed- and deviated fixed-route service to rural communities Regional and commuter service Seasonal skier-oriented service Other specialized services More service types than many much larger systems

Ending point Individual services that provide more attractive service Individual services that are well integrated to form a strong system Better service for existing riders Better service that will attract new riders

THE PROCESS Stakeholder Engagement Analyze Existing Urban and Rural Services Assess Customer Markets Evaluation Framework Develop Alternatives and Scenarios Develop Recommended Plan Implementation

1. Public Engagement Communicate early and often Be clear and transparent Leverage existing groups Clarity and transparency Engage diverse and disadvantaged communities Use technology VISIT THE PROJECT WEBSITE www.ridegmt.com/nextgen/

2. Analyze Existing Service Overview of overall system Bottom-up, detailed evaluation of each route Ridership by route, by time of day, and direction Ons and offs by stop and by time of day Maximum loads and load profiles Identify strengths and weaknesses of each route Identify potential improvements PVTA Comprehensive Operations Analysis (Springfield, MA)

3. Conduct Market Analysis Determine underlying demand for transit Population and employment density Socio-economic factors Travel patterns Location of major activity centers RIPTA Comprehensive Operational Analysis (Providence, RI_

4. Develop vision, goals, and objectives What kind of service do you want to provide? How should trade-offs be made? Decisions on how to make trade-offs are an important component of Board input Productivity Span of Service Cost-Effectiveness Speed/Travel Time Direct Routes Expand to New Areas Coverage Frequency Equity Distance to Stops Walk Distance Improve Existing OR

4. Develop vision, goals, and objectives Themes, Goals, Objectives, and Evaluation Criteria For example: Cost per Passenger Passengers per Revenue Vehicle Hour Etc.

5. Develop Scenarios There are many ways to provide great transit Like a puzzle, many different pieces must fit together: Transit strategies Service structures Service balances (ways to make trade-offs) Other factors But unlike a puzzle, the pieces can fit together in different ways

5. Develop Scenarios Will develop and vet three different scenarios Each will represent different ways to put the puzzle pieces together Scenarios change discussion from “should changes be made?” to “what changes should be made? SEAT Transit Study (New London/Groton, CT)

6. Develop Recommended Plan Stakeholder Preferences & Feedback Consistent with Vision Technical Evaluation Financial Constraints Recommendations

timeline Dec 2017