The Hope Foundation Presentation on Pre-Funding Appraisal For Partners and New Applicant Organisations.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Cycle Management
Advertisements

ERF and EIF Information Meeting Key Messages in Preparing an Application 5 th September 2013 F2 Rialto Dublin.
RBM in the context of Operations and Programme and Project Management Material of the Technical Assistance Unit (TAU)
1 Roundtable Meeting of Quality Assurance Agencies of the Organisation of Islamic Conference Member Countries Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia November 2009.
COLLEGE SPARK WASHINGTON 2012 Community Grants Program Application Webinar 12/22/201110:00 AM 1/4/20122:00 PM.
Monitoring, Review and Reporting Project Cycle Management A short training course in project cycle management for subdivisions of MFAR in Sri Lanka.
HOW TO WRITE A GOOD TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR FOR EVALUATION Programme Management Interest Group 19 October 2010 Pinky Mashigo.
EVALUATION IN THE GEF Juha Uitto Director
TEMPUS IV- THIRD CALL FOR PROPOSALS Recommendation on how to make a good proposal TEMPUS INFORMATION DAYS Podgorica, MONTENEGRO 18 th December 2009.
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
1 RBM Background Development aid is often provided on a point to point basis with no consistency with countries priorities. Development efforts are often.
INTOSAI Capacity Building Committee Meeting Stockholm, 8-10 September 2015 SAI capacity from a Post-2015 development agenda perspective The PASAI cooperative.
By Bankole Ebisemiju At an Intensive & Interactive workshop on Techniques for Effective & Result Oriented Annual Operation Plan November 24th 2010 Annual.
Tracking of GEF Portfolio: Monitoring and Evaluation of Results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points Aaron Zazueta March 2010 Hanoi, Vietnam.
Joanna Fiedler Enlargement and Neighbouring Countries Unit DG Environment European Commission REReP → RENA Vision of the European Commission PEIP Regional.
EEA Grants Norway Grants Annual Programme Report Template Brussels, 20 November
M&E in the GEF Carlo Carugi Senior Evaluation Officer Expanded Constituency Workshop Dakar, Senegal - July 2011.
TEMPUS INFORMATION DAYS Tajikistan, 18 November 2011 Alba-Chiara Tiberi, Project Officer EACEA TEMPUS IV- FIFTH CALL FOR.
Capacity Building for the Kosovo Anti- Corruption Agency Constantine Palicarsky.
Proposal on Revised Mechanism of Selecting Applications for Approval Presentation by Secretariat of Council for the AIDS Trust Fund in Sharing Session.
The GEF Monitoring and Evaluation Policy. 2  Result-Based Management (RBM) - setting goals and objectives, monitoring, learning and decision making 
Your Input Feedback from NGOs Presentation by Anne Marie Darmanin.
New approach in EU Accession Negotiations: Rule of Law Brussels, May 2013 Sandra Pernar Government of the Republic of Croatia Office for Cooperation.
A project funded by the European UnionImplemented by a consortium led by Get ready for the call! Next steps for building partnerships and developing a.
LIPH HANDBOOK PART 1: PRINCIPLES AND GUIDELINES Planning Framework
Your partner in service delivery and development
Small Charities Challenge Fund (SCCF) Guidance Webinar
Session IX: Elements of Project Proposal
GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop
PRI – Service Provider Reporting 2017
UNEP/Global Mechanism support for UNCCD reporting
Audit of predetermined objectives
Third PMC meeting University of Priština, Kosovska Mitrovica
GEF Familiarization Seminar
Revising GEF’s M&E Policy
Project Cycle Management
Fair Go Rates System Dr Ron Ben-David Chairperson
Esther Bushell – School Governance and Workforce Adviser
Budgeting Process University of Applied Science FH Campus Wien
Enhancing employers’ involvement in Social Protection policy debates
Objectives of the Training
Enhancing employers’ involvement in Social Protection policy debates
The GEF Monitoring and Evaluation Policy
SUPPORT TO PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT REFORM IN GEORGIA
The GEF Monitoring and Evaluation Policy
PARIS21 - League of Arab States
11/18/2018 ANNUAL performance PLAN (2018/19) NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE – 02 MAY 2018.
Proposal Development Overview by Proposal Development Committee
April 2011.
2018 Impact Stories.
12/5/2018 ANNUAL performance PLAN (2018/19) NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY Select COMMITTEE – 19 June 2018.
Fair Go Rates System Dr Ron Ben-David Chairperson
NEPAL ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF COLLEGE Project Appraisal: Group Works
Justice Budget Monitoring Project
Supporting Cities and Regions through Projects and Programmes
Overview of Updated Proposal and Reporting Guidelines
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
The GEF Monitoring and Evaluation Policy
EIA- Concept and Practice
Task Force on Target Setting and Reporting TFTSR
Developing a shelter strategy
The GEF Monitoring and Evaluation Policy
EVALUATIONS in the EU External Aid
Contents of the Art.20 report
IMPLEMENTATION EVALUATION OF THE RESTITUTION PROGRAMME
Some valuable tips about how to go about constructing a project
Civil Society Facility and Media Programme Call for proposals: EuropeAid/162473/DH/ACT/Multi Webinar no. 3: Preparing effective Concept Note.
Integrating Gender into Rural Development M&E in Projects and Programs
© Fresh Thoughts Consulting
Who can apply? Applicants should be:
Presentation transcript:

The Hope Foundation Presentation on Pre-Funding Appraisal For Partners and New Applicant Organisations

The Hope Foundation and Results Based Management THF has partnered with ASK to develop result based management approach in the organization. RBM is a means to improve management effectiveness and accountability by involving key stakeholders in defining realistic results, assessing risks, monitoring progress toward the achievement of expected results, integrating lessons learned into management decisions and reporting on performance. During this course, THF along with HKF has developed specific ways of developing international standard proposals based on situational analysis.

The proposals were developed with the help of Logical Framework Approach (a tool for RBM) that focused on specific, measurable, attainable, relevant and time bound results. As a funding organization, THF has decided to base the screening of the future partners/proposals for funding.

Why Pre- Funding Appraisal? Matching international donor agency standards, THF has adopted pre-funding appraisal as a key method to quality screen proposals and fund new projects. Developing pre-funding appraisal is a part of adopting result based management by THF. Adopting pre-funding appraisal will build the capacity of the existing partners in submitting international quality proposals.

When and how pre-funding appraisal protocols were developed? With handholding support from ASK (Association for Knowhow- Delhi), the pre-funding appraisal formats and protocols were developed during February 10th to February 13th, 2015. The session involved developing the procedure of how to conduct the pre-funding appraisals both at the organizational level and field level.

Protocols and Parameters developed for PFA The proposal would first be assessed and reviewed by the Programme Support Officers based on certain parameters developed by THF Ireland and India Office. A proposal which scores 40% marks or less will be considered a poor proposal. Scores between 41-75% would be considered an average quality proposal. Score of 76% or above will be considered a good quality proposal and can only be funded.

Broad Parameters for assessing Proposals The quality of the proposal and organization will be assessed based on certain broad parameters like – Aspects of Legal Compliance (Mandatory) of the organization. Situation Assessment information shared in the proposal. Problem analysis discussed. Results and indicators mentioned. Activities to achieve results. Strategies to be adopted.

Logical Framework Matrix attached with the proposal. Budget Requested for the Project highlighting organization's contribution towards the total project budget. Logical Framework Matrix attached with the proposal. Risk analysis made in the proposal. Sustainability strategies mentioned in terms of finance and programme. Proposal scoring less than 41% will be requested to apply in next grant cycle. Proposal scoring 41% and above will be accepted and sent back with feedback for quality improvement. Proposal scoring 76% and above : Organisational and field assessment will commence.

Parameters for assessing Organization History – experience of the organization ( Geography and sector wise) Quality of Human Resource (Programmes and Finance) Organizational Policies Organization structure Program Management Sources of existing / previous funding Structure for good governance and good practices at institutional level An organization need to score 75 % and above to be able to qualify for funding

Financial Management and compliance Score of the organization based on financial compliance and management

Parameters for assessing field reality Is the core problem relevant? (in terms of target groups, the issues raised in the proposal) If the community has been consulted by the identified problem?

Grant and Proposal Application Dates Request for proposal online and receiving of the 1st draft by THF: September 1st- September 15th If the 1st draft scores 41% or above, the proposal would be sent back by the THF to the applicant with feedback for required changes by September 30th The second draft of the proposal will reach THF with the changes by November, 15th. [76% and above]

Once the second draft is reviewed – THF will send the feedback by November, 21st to the applicant. During this period THF will conduct organisational and field assessment. The final draft of the proposal from the applicant reaches THF desk by December 15th. [Scoring 80 – 90%] Once the third draft reaches the PSO, the proposal is fine tuned and shared with THF Ireland Office by January 1st. An organization needs to qualify on each aspect mentioned above to be able to qualify for funding.

Thank You!!