RASMAG STUDY ON THE EFFECT OF AIDC AND APANPIRG CONCLUSIONS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Regional RAIM Prediction System – Progress Report
Advertisements

AMHS/SWIM Seminar Chiang Mai, Thailand 5-6 March 2012
FCMAT Response & Preparation: Process Outline October 25, 2006.
49 h Conference of Directors General of Civil Aviation, Asia and Pacific Regions, New Delhi, 8 – 12 October 2012 APANPIRG ACTIVITIES – OUTCOME OF APANPIRG/23.
Traffic Management and FUA integration
Pan regional ICD for AIDC structure and status (SP/09)
ICAO EUR/NAT Office Celso Figueiredo – Regional Officer ANS - ATM
Development of AIDC ICD in APAC Region
Federal Aviation Administration Performance-Based Communication and Surveillance (PBCS) Introductory remarks Date:13-14 May 2013 Presented to:ICAO Asia-Pacific.
LOA template AIDC Implementation Seminar 28 th – 31 st October 2014 Adam Watkin Airservices Australia.
INDIA AIDC IMPLEMENTATION STATUS AND ISSUES
AIDC Top priority in APAC Special Implementation Project AIDC Bangkok, Oct Prepared by F.Lecat 1.
ATM Implementation Support by ICAO APAC RSO
Presented by the President of the Air Navigation Commission
1 Jerry Velasquez, Ph.D. Senior Regional Coordinator International Strategy for Disaster Reduction United Nations Secretariat in Asia Pacific.
Presentation to: Name: Date: ICAO Asia-Pacific AMHS Activities & Status ICAO Asia-Pacific AMHS Activities & Status ATS Message Handling System (AMHS )
International Civil Aviation Organization REGIONAL GNSS RELATED ACTIVITIES Secretariat ICAO APAC OFFICE GNSS IMPLEMENTATION SEMINAR 26 MARCH 2012.
AMHS WORKSHOP POLICY & DOCUMENTATION. AMHS WORKSHOP POLICY & DOCUMENTATION  Operational Requirements for facilities or services are established through.
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Seamless ATM in North & East Asia Hiromu HAYASHI ATC division, JCAB THE EIGHTH MEETING OF THE INFORMAL.
INDIA AIDC IMPLEMENTATION STATUS AND ISSUES Presented by Airports Authority of India SIP AIDC Seminar October 2014.
28-31 October RASMAG STUDY ON THE EFFECT OF AIDC AND APANPIRG CONCLUSIONS Secretariat - APAC OFFICE 28 October 2014 SIP AIDC Seminar in Bangkok SP/01.
AP Outreach Program September APTLD Board/Member Meeting AP Outreach Asia Pacific Joint Secretariat.
Report of the Permanent Committee on GIS Infrastructure for Asia and the Pacific (PCGIAP) Hiroshi Murakami Vice President, PCGIAP at The Second UN Committee.
1 SEADMC 2009 ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF) Disaster Management & Emergency Response Efforts 2 December 2009.
AIDC Implementation Seminar 28th – 31st October 2014
APAC PBN Seminar F.LECAT (ICAO)
ICAO EUR/NAT Office Celso Figueiredo – Regional Officer ANS - ATM
INDIA AIDC IMPLEMENTATION STATUS AND ISSUES
ICAO EUR/NAT Office Celso Figueiredo – Regional Officer ANS - ATM
Performance-Based Communication and Surveillance (PBCS)
ATM Implementation Support by ICAO APAC RSO
AIDC Top priority in APAC
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
AMHS/SWIM Seminar Chiang Mai, Thailand 5-6 March 2012
Performance-Based Communication and Surveillance (PBCS)
Mini Global Demonstration
APANPIRG ACTIVITIES – OUTCOME OF APANPIRG/23 DP/3/1
the International Civil Aviation Organization
Briefing on APANPIRG Priorities and Targets

IATA/ATDI Senior Civil Aviation Management Course
AIDC Implementation in Hong Kong, China
INDIA AIDC IMPLEMENTATION STATUS AND ISSUES
Regional RAIM Prediction System – Progress Report
Flight State Transition diagram

GTE/17 IP/6 RVSM Safety Analyses for Mexico Airspace
ALLPIRG/4 WP/33 Appendix 1.





2009 TIMELINE PROJECT PLANNING 12 Months Example text Jan Feb March


Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
East Asia Hydrographic Commission (EAHC) Three Year Work Plan
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3

Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3

2009 TIMELINE PROJECT PLANNING 12 Months Example text Jan Feb March
Presentation transcript:

RASMAG STUDY ON THE EFFECT OF AIDC AND APANPIRG CONCLUSIONS SP/01 RASMAG STUDY ON THE EFFECT OF AIDC AND APANPIRG CONCLUSIONS Secretariat - APAC OFFICE 28 October 2014 SIP AIDC Seminar in Bangkok 28-31 October 2014

OUTLINE use case between Japan and ROK; APANPIRG Conclusions on AIDCs. RASMAG Review Effectiveness of AIDC for LHDs use case between Japan and ROK; APANPIRG Conclusions on AIDCs. 28-31 October 2014 SIP AIDC SEMINAR

RASMAG Many RVSM Large Height Deviations (LHDs) are being reported to RASMAG. (2009) LHD – Any vertical deviation of 90m/300ft or more from the flight level expected to be occupied by the flight. The use of AIDC has long been advocated by RASMAG as a way of reducing ATC unit to ATC unit coordination errors.

AIDC Implementation AIDC has been implemented among the area control centres (ACCs) of Japan and the Republic of Korea since 15 June 2009. RASMAG reviewed the effect on the occurrence of Large Height Deviations (LHDs) before and after the implementation of AIDC.

RASMAG REVIEW Japan and the United States (Regional Monitoring Agency – RMA responsible for ROK) conducted analyses on occurrences of HF caused by ATC-to-ATC Transfer errors. 28-31 October 2014 SIP AIDC SEMINAR

Analysis on B576 Japan and the United States focused on ATS route B576 (shown on map next slide) B576 – bidirectional and 228 aircraft movement per day at that time.

B576

Summary of LHD Occurrences and Duration A total of 26 LHD events - from 1 August 2008 to 31 May 2010. Table (next slide) shows the summary of occurrences in terms of numbers and duration.

Findings 16 LHDs in 11 months before the AIDC implementation vs. 10 LHDs in 11 months after the AIDC implementation Significant reduction however not perfect

Duration of LHD (min) in Incheon FIR Event Date Source Location of Deviation Duration of LHD (min) in Incheon FIR Code 21-Jul-09 Naha ACC ATOTI (B576) E 19-Aug-09 Incheon ACC SADLI (A593) 0.08 23-Aug-09 21-Sep-09 1-Oct-09 15-Nov-09 Unknown 7-Dec-09 21-Jan-10 26-Jan-10 11-May-10 Fukuoka

Conclusions RASAMG – continues the study of effect of AIDC to improve safety. AIDC – not perfect at the time however a powerful tool to reduce the LHDs between ATC units. APANPIRG Conclusion 18/3 – noting the continued prevalence of the RVSM LHD occurrences resulting from ATC unit/ATC unit coordination errors as reported by RMAs, ….. States – urged to implement compatible AIDC capabilities as soon as possible.

APANPIRG Conclusions on AIDCs Conclusion 19/19 – Implementation of AIDC in Asia and Pacific Regions That, States be urged to expedite implementation of AIDC between neighboring ATS facilities in accordance with the Regional Air Navigation Plan and the Asia/Pacific AIDC/ICD. Conclusion 24/17 – AIDC Implementation ….. States should Engage as soon as possible in AIDC trials to develop knowledge and address any related ATM or communications system issues; b) Implement operational AIDC messaging as a matter of priority, in accordance With APANPIRG 19/19; and c) Implement as far as practical, the AIDC messages – ABI, EST, ACP, TOC & AOC.

APANPIRG Conclusions on AIDCs Conclusion 24/27 – Prioritization of AIDC Implementation to Address LHDs Considering that AIDC is an important means of minimizing Large Height Deviations (LHD), Asia/Pacific States should support the expedition of AIDC through collaborative project at the following significant LHF interfaces areas: Indonesia: between Jakarta and Chennai/Ujung Pandang/Brisbane/Melbourne FIRs; India: between Chennai and Kuala Lumpur FIRs; Philippines: between Manila and Fukuka/Taipei/Hong Kong/Ho Chi Minh/Singapore/Kota Kinabalu/Ujung Pandang FIRs; and China: between - Urumqi and Lahore FIRs; and - Beijing and Ulaan Baatar FIRs.

APANPIRG Conclusions on AIDCs Conclusion APANPIRG 25/38 – Harmonization for AIDC Implementation   That, States/Administrations in the APAC Region be urged to share their implementation plans and experiences with concerned States for an expeditious AIDC implementation in a harmonized and timely manner. Also APANPIRG made Decision 25/37 – establishment of AIDC Implementation Task Force focusing facilitation of AIDC Implementation in the BoB and ScS sub-regions.