Calibration using NDP Vincenzo Scarpa 12-15-2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Protocol for SU and MU Sounding Feedback
Advertisements

Slide 1 doc.: IEEE /1092r0 Submission Simone Merlin, Qualcomm Incorporated September 2010 Slide 1 ACK Protocol and Backoff Procedure for MU-MIMO.
Doc.: IEEE /0509r3 Submission Proposed Resolution to CID 72, 119 and 128 Qian ChenSlide 1 May 2014 Date:
Doc.: IEEE /605r3 Submission November 2001 S. Kandala, et. al. Slide 1 CFB Ending Rule under HCF Srinivas Kandala, Ken Nakashima, Yashihiro Ohtani.
Beamformed HE PPDU Date: Authors: May 2015 Month Year
Doc.: IEEE /1165r0 Submission November 2005 Fischer (Broadcom), Stephens (Intel) et. al.Slide 1 Joint Proposal MAC Report Notice: This document.
Doc.: IEEE /0409r5 Submission May 2012 Shoukang Zheng et. al, I2R, SingaporeSlide 1 Supporting Low Power Operation Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1340r2 November 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 NDP Announcement for HE Sequence Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1340r0 November 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 NDP Announcement for HE Sequence Date: Authors:
A-MPDU Contents Date: Authors: Nov 2016 Liwen Chu Marvell
Proposed Modifications to e-D4.0 Group ACK
Location Measurement Protocol for Unassociated STAs
Undetected Duplicate Frame Reception
MCS, NSS, BW and PPDU selection for 11ax
Joint Proposal MAC Report
Power Save Delivery for 11ay
WUR coexistence with existing power save mode
TWT Information frames in 11ax
Proposed Modifications to
EDMG BlockAck Retransmission
BSS Management through WUR Wakeup Frame
Frame Exchange Control for Uplink Multi-user transmission
VHT Link Adaptations Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
Multiple BSSID and MU Date: Authors: Nov 2016 Liwen Chu
Non-Automatic Power Saving Delivery
MAC Capabilities Info. in HE Capabilities IE
Samsung MAC Proposal Presentation
11az NDP Announcement Date: July 2008
RIFS mode in 11ac Date: Authors: Joshua Zhao, Atheros.
TWT SP initiation and termination and legacy PS
WUR MAC Consideration Date: Authors: Nov 2016 Liwen Chu
Hybrid Coordination Function (HCF) Frame Exchange and NAV Details
MAC Clarifications Date: Authors: September 2016
RIFS mode in 11ac Date: Authors: Joshua Zhao, Atheros.
Calibration using NDP Date: Authors: December 2006
Joint Proposal MAC Detail
Reverse Direction in ac
WUR MAC and Wakeup Frame
Burst Transmission and Acknowledgment
11az NDP Announcement Date: July 2008
EDCF Issues and Suggestions
Duration/ID field in UL-MU
Slot-based Power Save without PS-Poll
Proposed Resolutions to RFI comments of LB 166 on IEEE s D7.0
Notification on Change of BW & Rx Nss
Peer Power Save Mode for TDLS
Power Efficient PS Poll
MAC Partial Proposal for TGn
TGn Beamforming and Adaptation Ad hoc - Calibration-
Objectives of Explicit Feedback rules
802.11g NAV Propagation (based on g Draft 2.1 Jan-2002)
Suggested changes to Tge D3.3
Group Block Acknowledgements for Multicast Traffic
DL MU MIMO Error Handling and Simulation Results
QoS STA function applied to Mesh STA
Explicit Block Ack Request in DL MU PPDU
Suggested changes to Tge D3.3
PS-Poll TXOP Date: Authors: Month Year
Samsung MAC Proposal Presentation
HCCA TXOP handling difficulties
Considerations on MU-MIMO Protection in 11ac
NAV Operation Rules under HCF
Scheduled Peer Power Save Mode for TDLS
Error Recovery Scheme for Scheduled Ack
Requirements and Implementations for Intra-flow/Intra-AC DiffServ
Fast Active Scan Proposals
Secure SU and MU Ranging Measurement Procedure
NAV Operation Rules under HCF
Reducing Overhead in Active Scanning
Reducing Overhead in Active Scanning
Presentation transcript:

Calibration using NDP Vincenzo Scarpa 12-15-2007

NDP rules Section 9.19.1 (D1.07) defines two simple rules about the use of NDP. The intent is to make the behavior at the transmitter/receiver always predictable: A STA that transmits an NDP shall start the transmission of the NDP as follows: a SIFS interval after sending a +HTC frame that does not require an immediate response with the NDP Announcement field set to 1 a SIFS interval after successfully receiving a correctly formed and addressed immediate response to a +HTC frame that requires an immediate response with the NDP Announcement field set to 1 On the receiver side this means that: if a STA receives a +HTC frame with NDP set and Normal ACK policy, it expects an NDP within a SIFS from the response (i.e after the ACK) if a STA receives a +HTC frame with NDP set and No ACK policy, it expects an NDP within a SIFS from the current received frame

Issue related to NDP rules In the procedure in Figure-n55 (section 9.17.2.4.2) STA A doesn't respect the rule 2): Even if the frame with Calibration Position=1 (i.e. Cal Start) has the NDP flag set and requires Immediate ACK, the NDP is not sent by STA A within a SIFS from the ACK

RDG rules Section 9.14.3 says: "After transmitting a PPDU containing one or more +HTC MPDUs in which the RDG/More PPDU field set to 0, the RD responder shall not transmit any more PPDUs within the current response burst.“

Issues related to RDG In the procedure in Figure-n55 STA B sets the RDG/More PPDU bit to zero in its ACK frame, and according to the rule described above, it shouldn’t be allowed to send any other PPDU (i.e. NDP from STA B is not allowed) Why to require an optional feature (i.e. RDG) to implement another optional feature (i.e. Calibration)? It seems that we are adding an unnecessary complexity

A slightly new approach We suggest to re-consider the definition of sounding frame in case of NDP: At least from a MAC perspective, a +HTC frame with NDP and No-ACK policy followed by an NDP frame within a SIFS is a "single" frame (obviously this implies that the Duration/ID value in the +HTC frame must cover the following NDP) According to this new definition, we don't need to use RDG since the response from STA B in Figure-n55 is not a response burst any more but just a single MAC frame STA A can now use SIFS instead of PIFS (there is no need for RDG error recovery) thus respecting the rule 2) in section 9.19.1 The frame exchange sequence doesn’t need to be changed and the overall procedure is simplified

New proposal for Calibration using NDP Non NDP + HTC NDP announcement bit = 1 ACK Policy: Normal Calibration Position = 1 TRQ = 1 (i.e. sounding request) No need for RDG Non NDP + HTC ACK Policy: No ACK Calibration Position = 3 QoS Null + HTC Calibration Start NDP QoS Null + HTC Sounding Complete AP SIFS SIFS SIFS SIFS ACK + HTC NDP QoS Null + HTC MA CSI Feedback STA Non NDP + HTC Calibration Position = 2 NDP announcement bit = 1 Non NDP + HTC MA = 1 (i.e. Management Action frame) At MAC level this is a single response frame