Arguments for the Existence of God – ‘theistic proofs’

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How do we know what exists?
Advertisements

The ontological argument is based entirely upon logic and reason and doesn’t really try to give a posteriori evidence to back it up. Anselm would claim.
© Michael Lacewing A priori knowledge Michael Lacewing
Today’s Outline Hume’s Problem of Induction Two Kinds of Skepticism
The Cosmological argument
Cosmological argument
L ECTURE 17: T HE T ELEOLOGICAL A RGUMENT AND C AUSALITY.
PHIL/RS 335 Arguments for God’s Existence Pt. 1: The Cosmological Argument.
The Design Argument Introduction. This proof always deserves to be mentioned with respect. It is the oldest, clearest, and the most accordant with the.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 5 The Ontological Argument By David Kelsey.
God and the Enlightenment Mr. Bach Accelerated World History.
We need your help!!. Snamahs in need of help! We are called the snamahs and we need your help We need several products to help us on our planet Yelap.
Proof and Probability (can be applied to arguments for the existence of God)
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 5 The Ontological Argument By David Kelsey.
Arguments for The Existence of God St. Thomas Aquinas’ 5 Proofs.
WEEK 3: Metaphysics Natural Theology – Anselm’s Ontological Argument.
The Design or Teleological Argument for the Existence of God.
The Design or Teleological Argument for the Existence of God.
Lesson Objective: Lesson Outcomes: Lesson Objective: Lesson Outcomes: Mr M Banner 2016 Grade 12 th May 2016 Starter: What does Cosmology mean to you? Title:
Lesson Aim To recall and explore other forms of the Cosmological Argument.
The Cosmological Argument
Key Words Key Quotations
Starter: Mix-Pair-Share
The design argument.
Arguments based on observation Arguments based on reason
Philosophy of Religion
Arguments and Conclusions
Define: Design also known as?? Greek word? Meaning? Theistic argument
Challenges to the OAs The different versions of OA are challenged by:
Aquinas’ Five Proofs.
Introduction to the Religion, Philosophy & Ethics A Level
The Teleological Argument
AO1 Comparison questions
O.A. so far.. Anselm – from faith, the fool, 2 part argument
AO2 Questions Evaluating the Teleological Argument
The Ontological Argument
Lecture 18: God and Reason
The Cosmological Argument
Arguments and Proofs Learning Objective:
Religious Studies A Level Lesson 1
The Ontological Argument: St. Anselm’s First Argument
Qua Regularity & Qua Purpose
Recap: William Paley Qua Regularity Socrates Classical Philosophy
The Copleston, Russell Debate
The Cosmological Argument Kalam Argument
Explore the use of inductive reasoning in the cosmological argument
The analogy of the Arrow
The Ontological Argument
In pairs, write a list of all the reasons people believe in God.
THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT.
Explore key ideas in the ontological argument. (8 marks)
Explore different ideas about inductive reasoning in the design argument for the existence of God. (8 marks) Clarify key ideas – design argument uses.
THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT.
Aquinas’ three ways Learning Objective
The Teleological Argument for the existence of God
Explore the use of a’priori reasoning in the ontological argument
1 A The Cosmological Argument Kalam Argument
Starter: Glossary (key word) test- what do the words mean?
The Ontological Argument
The First Cause (Cosmological) Argument
The Cosmological Argument
The Big Picture Deductive arguments - origins of the ontological argument Deductive proofs; the concept of ‘a priori’. St Anselm - God as the greatest.
Is the jigsaw task a fair analogy?
‘Assess how credible evolution is as alternatives to the design argument for the existence of God’ (12 marks) Intro – order and purpose Design qua purpose.
THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT.
Clarify and explain the key ideas. A’priori Deductive
What conclusions could we draw from each of these photos
By the end of today’s lesson you will:
Philosophy of Religion Arguments for the existence of God
The Teleological Argument
Presentation transcript:

Arguments for the Existence of God – ‘theistic proofs’ Aim: Explore the teleological argument put forward by Aquinas. Proving God inductively.

The Design or Teleological Argument Derived from Greek telos – ‘aim’, ‘purpose’ or ‘goal’. The teleological argument looks at the idea of order and purpose in the universe. The teleological argument is a posteriori and inductive. start features in world and inductively infer Godhead. Follows conclusion only yield probabilities. Deductive – deals with certainties. Based on experience.

Has a long history – early forms put forward by Socrates and Plato in Timaeus. One of the most popular forms located in St. Thomas Aquinas’ fifth way to prove the existence of God. Located in ‘Summa Theologiae’ (the greatest things of theology). Tremendous influence. TA is based on the idea that the world was designed. Its main principle is that there is evidence for design in the world. Aquinas (1225-1274) argues from the fact of design in the world to the postulation of a designer .(the 5th way).

Proving God inductively P1: There is order and purpose (guidedness) in the world. P2: Order/purpose presuppose design. P3: Design presupposes a designer. C: Designer is God.

Title: The Design Argument (Tyler). Read and colour code notes on pg. 12-15 Tyler. Dictionary: Highlight key words to learn – definitions written on.

Read pack and colour code. Key words. Scholars names. Important points. Quotations. Tell – essays look like underline……..

Plenary: Key Cards Key Words Quotations - 2

See 5th way (the cosmological argument) He argued that for non-intelligent matter to behave in a way that is beneficial, there needs to be an intelligent power to bring this state of affairs about. This is God.

Synthetic – to deny does not entail a contradiction. Analytic – to a priori The proof of the statement does not rely on external evidence. For example: All bachelors are unmarried. John is a bachelor John is unmarried. a posteriori The proof of the statement relies on external (empirical) evidence. For example: the girls in year 11 achieved higher grades than the boys. Synthetic – to deny does not entail a contradiction. Analytic – to deny entails a contradiction