Electron Cloud Measurement Summary for the April 2014 Run

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beam-based Measurements of HOMs in the HTC Adam Bartnik for ERL Team, Daniel Hall, John Dobbins, Mike Billing, Matthias Liepe, Ivan Bazarov.
Advertisements

RedOffice.com Presentation templates Slide No. 1 RFA Detector Data of Electron Cloud Build-up and Simulations Eric Wilkinson Mentor: Jim Crittenden Cornell.
Using Tune Shifts to Evaluate Electron Cloud Effects on Beam Dynamics at CesrTA Jennifer Chu Mentors: Dr. David Kreinick and Dr. Gerry Dugan 8/11/2011REU.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Jim Crittenden & John Sikora Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Modelling Cyclotron Resonances in ECLOUD 1) Comparison with CesrTA.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York ECLOUD Simulations for the Tune Shift Measurements of December.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Modeling Cyclotron Resonances in ECLOUD Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Recent Studies with ECLOUD Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for.
Space Charge Electric-Field Calculations for Coherent Tune Shift Estimations using the Electron-cloud Modelling Algorithm ECLOUD Jim Crittenden Cornell.
Title Date Author for the C ESR TA Collaboration.
21 December 2009 ECLOUD Simulations for Measurements of December 2009 / J.A.Crittenden 1/1 ECLOUD Simulations for Measurements of 19/20 December.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York ECLOUD Simulations for the Tune Shift Measurements of December.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York First Results on the Introduction of the Rediffused SEY Component.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York CesrTA Electron Cloud Measurements and Simulations Jim Crittenden.
TE Wave Measurements Of Electron Cloud At CesrTA J. Byrd, M. Billing, S. De Santis,M. Palmer, J. Sikora ILC08 November 17 th, 2008.
4/18/2009TILC’09 Electron Cloud Studies at LBNL S. De Santis Center for Beam Physics.
Witness Bunch Experimental Studies at CESR-TA Robert Holtzapple Alfred University/Cal Poly San Luis Obispo.
CesrTA Experimental Plan M. Palmer for the CesrTA Collaboration November 17, 2008.
Electron Cloud Mitigation Studies at CesrTA Joseph Calvey 10/1/2009.
02/04/2009 AS-TAGL Mtg Global Design Effort 1 CesrTA Update Mark Palmer CLASSE.
C ESR TA Status Report July 22, 2010 Mark Palmer for the C ESR TA Collaboration.
Cesr-TA Simulations: Overview and Status G. Dugan, Cornell University LCWS-08.
Electron cloud measurements and simulations at CesrTA G. Dugan, Cornell University 4/19/09 TILC09 4/18/09.
LCWA09 – October 1 st S. De Santis Measurements of the Electron Cloud Density by TE wave propagation in Cesr-TA M. Billing, J. Calvey, B. Carlson, S. De.
November 18, 2011David L. Rubin1 CESR Test Accelerator – Investigation of the physics of charged particle beams Circumference = 768m - Beam energy
Shielded-Pickup Measurements in June and Update on Modeling Results / J.A. Crittenden 23 August / 4 Shielded-Pickup Measurements in June and Update.
CesrTA Electron cloud simulation update ILC 10 Workshop G. Dugan, Cornell 3/28/09 2/24/2016ILC 10 Workshop.
Electron cloud measurement in Cu/Al chambers with/without TiN coating at KEKB positron ring ILC DR Working Group Meeting Kyo Shibata (KEK)
RFA Simulations Joe Calvey LEPP, Cornell University 6/25/09.
Measurements Of Electron Cloud Density By Microwave Transmission J. Byrd, M. Billing, S. De Santis, A. Krasnykh, M. Palmer, M. Pivi, J. Sikora, K. Sonnad.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Jim Crittenden & John Sikora Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences.
49th ICFA Advanced Beam Dynamics Workshop. October 8–12, 2010 LEPP, the Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics, has joined with.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences.
LEPP, the Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics, has joined with CHESS to become the Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-based Sciences.
Status of ECLOUD Simulations for the Shielded Button Measurements
Mark Palmer for the CESRTA Collaboration
Electron Cloud R&D at Cornell ILCDR08--7/8/08
Using Time-Resolved Retarding Field Analyzer Measurements to Determine the SEY Mitigation Effectiveness of Grooves -- Bonus: first look at last night's.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN MODELING
e- Cloud Machine Studies-Tune Shift Studies
Electron Cloud Meeting
Physics Scope and Work Plan for the Shielded-Pickup Measurements -- Synchrotron Radiation Photon Distributions Photoelectron Production Parameters.
First Look at the New SYNRAD3D Results
Detailed Characterization of Vacuum Chamber Surface Properties Using Measurements of the Time Dependence of Electron Cloud Development Jim Crittenden.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN MODELING
Use of the Shielded-Pickup Measurements for Optimization of the Photoelectron Production Energy Distribution in ECLOUD -- This topic was included in the.
Physics Scope and Work Plan for the Shielded-Pickup Measurements -- Synchrotron Radiation Photon Distributions Photoelectron Production Parameters.
First Look at Modeling Photoelectron Energy Distribution for a 2
Shielded Button Measurement/ECLOUD Simulation Comparison for 5
Electron Cloud Meeting
Why Study Electron Clouds? Methods and Tools to Study Electron Clouds
Ryan Badman Jim Crittenden July 20, 2011 Electron Cloud Meeting
First Attempt to Simulate the Shielded Button Measurements with ECLOUD
J.A.Crittenden, Y.Li, X.Liu, M.A.Palmer, J.P.Sikora (Cornell)
Quadrupole Shielded-Pickup Data Comparison of Signals from 10- and 20-Bunch e+ Trains -- Trapping ! Updated after meeting to include suggested.
All material for this talk may be obtained at
Measurement of Electron Cloud Density Using Microwaves
Recent Electron Cloud Studies at CESR and Future Plans
CESRTA Measurement of Electron Cloud Density by TE Wave and RFA
Code Benchmarking and Preliminary RFA Modelling for CesrTA
CesrTA Experimental Schedule and Priorities
Electron cloud studies at CESR
CesrTA Wiggler RFA Measurements
CTA 09 - Introduction David Rubin Cornell Laboratory for
Chicane and Bunch Spacing Scans
Presentation transcript:

Electron Cloud Measurement Summary for the April 2014 Run May 2, 2014 John Sikora, Jim Crittenden, Joe Calvey and Others

Electron Cloud Measurements: April 2014 Overview of 5.3 GeV Data Instruments: Quad Shielded Pickup in Q48W (QSPU) Time-Resolved Retarding Field Analyzers in the L3 Chicane (TR-RFA) TE Wave measurements in the L3 Chicane and 13E-15E (TEW) Shielded Pickups at 15E/15W (SPU) Retarding Field Analyzers – one set of comparison measurements (RFA) There are also some turn-turn CBPM measurements of witness bunches. Beam Configurations: Positrons: 10-bunch and 20-bunch trains, with and without a witness bunch Data versus total current and Chicane Field (QSPU, TR-RFA, SPU, TEW, RFA) Data versus witness spacing and/or current (QSPU, TR-RFA, SPU, TEW) Data versus bunch spacing: 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 ns (QSPU, TR-RFA, SPU, TEW) Electrons: 20-bunch train Data versus total current and Chicane Field (SPU, TEW) Data versus witness bunch spacing and/or current (SPU, TEW) Positrons and Electrons 2-bunch (SPU) May 3, 2014

Data Examples from April 2014 QSPU in Q48W (biased at +50 V) With a single positron bunch at 8 mA there is almost no signal (magenta trace) 20-bunch positrons with 16 ns spacing at 8mA/bunch with no witness bunch (blue trace). Then add an 8 mA witness bunch about 1 μs after the train (green trace). Witness signal is much larger than that of a single bunch, and The 20-bunch signal decreases when the witness bunch is added (red trace). May 3, 2014

Data Examples from April 2014 QSPU in Q48W QSPU signal with 20-bunch positrons at 8 mA/bunch with different bunch spacings. QSPU signal with 28-bunch positrons (14 ns) versus bunch current May 3, 2014

Data Examples from April 2014 SPU at 15W (TiN) and 15E (Al) SPU signals were recorded at a large number of bunch patterns and currents. Signals from 15E with 20-bunch positrons at four currents are to be used for cross-calibration the SPU, RFA and Microwave measurements. May 3, 2014

Data Examples from April 2014 SPU at 15W (TiN) and 15E (Al) One way to view the data is by integrating the SPU signal to obtain the charge/turn into the detector. This is plotted versus current for a 20-bunch train of both positrons and electrons with data taken at both 15W and 15E. The larger symbols in the positron data are the four currents at which the cross-calibration data was taken. May 3, 2014

Data Examples from April 2014 Microwave Measurements Data was taken in three regions between 13E and 15E At the same time, SPU 15E data was also taken. RFA data was taken with positrons at the points with large symbols. Both show (cloud) saturation, but the electron data has more “features”. May 3, 2014

Data Examples from April 2014 Microwave Measurements Drive OFF Drive ON A scan of Chicane (dipole) field shows that the sidebands have a sharp peak at the cyclotron resonance. At the cyclotron resonance, the TR-RFA signal in the same chamber increases when the microwaves are turned ON May 3, 2014

Data Examples from April 2014 Microwave Measurements However, the sidebands that are measured using an independent mode (vertical) in the same chamber do NOT show a significant change in amplitude at the cyclotron resonance when the horizontal drive is turned ON/OFF. This indicates that the EC density does not actually change with horizontal excitation. May 3, 2014

. Summary and Comments More than 60 hours were dedicated to 5.3 GeV data collection. Transitions in energy, totaling 11 hours, generally went smoothly. There was also an 8 hour shift of 5.3 GeV setup and a 6 hour RFA only data shift. We harvested large quantities of data from a variety of detectors with both positron and electron beams. This data will be used both for comparison with simulations and with complementary detectors where that is possible. May 3, 2014