Figure 2. Dose distribution function for thyroid cancer cases and for healthy members of the cohort for adults (18 y of age and older at the time of the.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Childhood Thyroid Cancer in Russia Following the Chernobyl accident V.K. Ivanov Chairman, Russian Scientific Commission on Radiological Protection Medical.

Advertisements

From: An open day in the metric space

Fig. 3. Plot of overall survival by adjuvant therapy for patient subgroups. (A) Patients with M0 disease (n = 411). (B) Patients receiving 36 Gy craniospinal.

Figure 1 The spatial and temporal distribution of diarrhoea rates

From: Global Banking: Recent Developments and Insights from Research*

Fig. 1 Graphical representation

Figure 2 Effects of political reforms on tariff reduction and political approval rating. From: TPP negotiations and political economy reforms in Japan’s.

Figure 1. Scree plot for the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of the Death Depression Scale (DDS). From: Development and psychometric evaluation of a.

Figure 2. CONSORT flow diagram.

Figure 1. Period–cohort diagram.

Source:Rosnes and Vennemo 2009.

Figure 1. Disposition of study participants, by group. Data are no

Test characteristics of MRI-detected inflammation for the development of arthritis in CSA patients (A) and RA in UA patients (B) during 1-year follow-up.

Figure 1. Joint effect of rs and rs on prostate cancer aggressiveness and reclassification. (A) Joint effect of rs and rs on.

Figure 4. Sensitivity of illustrative simulated cumulative US deaths to cigarettes per day (CPD) reduction and to Excess Risk transition rates. See text.

Figure 1. An example of an original simulation film used during the 1960s to 1990s to plan radiotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma, with field borders marked.

Figure 1. Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli (STEC) isolates by method of initial detection and STEC serotype, Connecticut, 2000–2009. From: Ten-Year.

Figure 1. Meta-analysis of prospective biomarker studies examining associations between eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and total, low-, and high-grade prostate.

Figure 1. Conceptual framework.

Figure 1. Selection of papers.

Fig. 1 Flow chart of study selection

Figure 1. Conceptual model of well-being related to involvement in theatre. From: Theatre Involvement and Well-Being, Age Differences, and Lessons From.

Figure 1. VoC conceptual framework linking employment mobility and welfare production regimes From: Complexity in Employment Life Courses in Europe in.

Figure 1 Individual Lifted from Group Photograph

Figure 1. Orthodontic set-up and location of LLLT or placebo-laser

From: What Drives Local Food Prices

Fig. 1 Flow of ascertainment of cases with incident childhood IgA vasculitis reported by four sources From: Incidence of IgA vasculitis in children estimated.

From: Face Recognition is Shaped by the Use of Sign Language

Figure 4 Comparison of school and leisure time activity energy expenditure on weekdays between preschool and adolescent boys in different age categories.

Figure 4. p-Values from Larsson et al

Figure 1. Activity found in nose swabs and early faecal excretion for each subject at the MOX facilities. From: Practical action levels for chelation therapy.

From: A European Disease

Figure 1. Overall survival of patients receiving alternative medicine (solid lines) vs conventional cancer treatment (dashed lines). Overall survival of.

Figure 1. Relationship between Log Transfers and Age of Eldest HH Member(a) Bandwidth 0.05(b) Bandwidth 0.1(c) Bandwidth 0.5 From: The Effect of a Transfer.

Figure 1. Single-Tree Model and BART Fits to Simulated Data.

Figure 1 Effects of time constant and time-varying characteristics on occupational status at the start of a career and at the time of change in the time.

Figure 1 Flow of data processing

Figure 1. Examples of e-cigarette discussions in social media

From: Estimating the Location of World Wheat Price Discovery

Figure 3. Hypothalamic–Pituitary–Adrenal (HPA)-axis functioning moderates crime exposure: regions of significance on X (crime). The lines represent two.

Figure 1. Time of initiation of therapeutic hypothermia according to who initiated it. Note the logarithmic scaling of the vertical axis. From: Initiation.

Figure 1. Publication channels used by scholars at the faculty of Arts, 2006–2013. From: Accountability in context: effects of research evaluation systems.

Figure 1: Logistic regression showing association of prescribing provider and patient panel characteristics with occurrence of a hospitalization or ED.

Fig. 1. Median survival time (LT 50 ) estimated for the Piracicaba population of S. zeamais from Brazil exposed to increasing doses of clove.

Figure 6. Effect of seed MC on the global DNA methylation of Acer platanoides (A) and Acer pseudoplatanus (B) seedlings. Values labeled with different.

Figure 1. Distribution of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels at the baseline visit in a study population of adults aged 18–59 years (n = 309), Toronto,

From: Consumer Bankruptcy, Bank Mergers, and Information *

From: Ethics and Epidemiology: The Income Debate

Figure I Distribution of Shift Length in Hours

Figure 1. Impact ratings for prospective memory lapses for younger (~age 30), middle-age (~age 50), and older (~age 65) adults. From: Daily Memory Lapses.

Figure 2. Entrance dose at the detector for the clinical (light grey bars) and reference (dark bars) protocols. From: COMPARISON OF WIRELESS DETECTORS.

Figure 6. RRs for clinical cure rates stratified by different diseases

Figure 1. Example of phase shift angles among three different terns where one of them has been taken as a reference. From: Assessment of ELF magnetic fields.

Figure 1. Percentage of participants in each group (holocaust survivors, prewar immigrants, and postwar immigrants) by the main coded strategies. From:

FIGURE 1. Estimated instantaneous fault detection rate

Figure 1. HR (95% CI) of death from dementia associated with weight or BMI in middle age and in old age. From: Adiposity in middle and old age and risk.

Figure 4. Influence of Clerk Ideology on Justice Voting.

Note: The top and bottom payoffs belong to the principal and agent, respectively. From: Exchange in the Absence of Legal Enforcement: Reputation and Multilateral.

Scheme 1. Scheme of the quartz sample holder.

Figure 3. Values of the correction factor kmtx,j for the sixty energy channels j = 1,…,60. The values for ten iteration steps are shown. In addition, the.

Figure 1 Overall lag-cumulative exposure–response relationships between air temperature and myocardial infarction ... Figure 1 Overall lag-cumulative exposure–response.

Figure 1 Maternal relatedness between calves and non-calf unit members correlates with babysitting rate. Relatedness ... Figure 1 Maternal relatedness.

bDMARD: biologic DMARD.

Fig. 1. A flowchart of cohort participants screened, enrolled and followed-up between 1 July 2015 and 31 May Fig. 1. A flowchart of cohort participants.

Figure 1. Percentage of Pacific and European children completing all components of B4SC in 2013 and 2015 Figure 1. Percentage of Pacific and European.

Figure 1. Design and data processing in a study of the effectiveness of endoscopic screening for esophageal cancer, Hua ... Figure 1. Design and data processing.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Figure 1: Trade shares of South Korea's major trading partners (% of South Korea's total trade in goods) Figure 1: Trade shares of South Korea's major.

Figure 1. Forest plot of lung cancer mortality in LDCT trials.

Figure 1. Estimated weight functions (dotted-dashed lines) and pointwise 95% bootstrap confidence intervals (shaded ... Figure 1. Estimated weight functions.

Presentation transcript:

Figure 2. Dose distribution function for thyroid cancer cases and for healthy members of the cohort for adults (18 y of age and older at the time of the Chernobyl accident). From: Radiation-epidemiological studies of thyroid cancer incidence in Russia after the Chernobyl accident (estimation of radiation risks, 1991–2008 follow-up period) Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2012;151(3):489-499. doi:10.1093/rpd/ncs019 Radiat Prot Dosimetry | © The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

Figure 1. Dose distribution function for thyroid cancer cases and for healthy members of the cohort for children and adolescents (0–17 y of age) at the time of the Chernobyl accident. From: Radiation-epidemiological studies of thyroid cancer incidence in Russia after the Chernobyl accident (estimation of radiation risks, 1991–2008 follow-up period) Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2012;151(3):489-499. doi:10.1093/rpd/ncs019 Radiat Prot Dosimetry | © The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

Figure 3. RR by dose groups (point estimates, vertical lines—95 % CIs) estimated from the model (3) for children and adolescences (0–17 y of age) at the time of the Chernobyl accident; dashed line represents the value RR(d)=1+ERR d, where the ERR value was estimated from the models (1, 2). From: Radiation-epidemiological studies of thyroid cancer incidence in Russia after the Chernobyl accident (estimation of radiation risks, 1991–2008 follow-up period) Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2012;151(3):489-499. doi:10.1093/rpd/ncs019 Radiat Prot Dosimetry | © The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

Figure 8. Estimates of excess relative risk per 1 Gy (ERR/Gy), with 95 % CI, for recent thyroid cancer studies among children and adolescents, carried out in different time periods after the Chernobyl accident. (*) ERR estimates for the study periods 1990–2001<sup>(16)</sup>, 1998–2000<sup>(5, 18)</sup> and 1998–2007<sup>(17)</sup> are placed at 10, 13 and 17 y after the exposure, respectively; points at 10, 13 and 17 y are connected only for purpose of better presentation; (**) ERR, calculated according to the model<sup>(20)</sup>, for an age at exposure 8-y-old. From: Radiation-epidemiological studies of thyroid cancer incidence in Russia after the Chernobyl accident (estimation of radiation risks, 1991–2008 follow-up period) Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2012;151(3):489-499. doi:10.1093/rpd/ncs019 Radiat Prot Dosimetry | © The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

Figure 4. Dose distribution function for thyroid cancer cases (boys of 0–17 y of age at the time of the Chernobyl accident) and for healthy cohort members of the same age. From: Radiation-epidemiological studies of thyroid cancer incidence in Russia after the Chernobyl accident (estimation of radiation risks, 1991–2008 follow-up period) Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2012;151(3):489-499. doi:10.1093/rpd/ncs019 Radiat Prot Dosimetry | © The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

Figure 5. Dose distribution function for thyroid cancer cases (girls of 0–17 y of age at the time of the Chernobyl accident) and for healthy cohort members of the same age. From: Radiation-epidemiological studies of thyroid cancer incidence in Russia after the Chernobyl accident (estimation of radiation risks, 1991–2008 follow-up period) Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2012;151(3):489-499. doi:10.1093/rpd/ncs019 Radiat Prot Dosimetry | © The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

Figure 6. RR of thyroid cancer incidence in boys (0–17 y of age) of different dose groups. Dashed line represents RR=1+ERR. From: Radiation-epidemiological studies of thyroid cancer incidence in Russia after the Chernobyl accident (estimation of radiation risks, 1991–2008 follow-up period) Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2012;151(3):489-499. doi:10.1093/rpd/ncs019 Radiat Prot Dosimetry | © The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

Figure 7. RR of thyroid cancer incidence in girls (0–17 y of age) of different dose groups. Dashed line represents RR=1+ERR. From: Radiation-epidemiological studies of thyroid cancer incidence in Russia after the Chernobyl accident (estimation of radiation risks, 1991–2008 follow-up period) Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2012;151(3):489-499. doi:10.1093/rpd/ncs019 Radiat Prot Dosimetry | © The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com