From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts Date of download: 10/19/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2016;139(4):041012-041012-11. doi:10.1115/1.4034670 Figure Legend: Zinc mass material flow. Mass of zinc (m kg) cast.

From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts Date of download: 10/19/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2016;139(4):041012-041012-11. doi:10.1115/1.4034670 Figure Legend: Collated annual data from the zinc die-making foundry

From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts Date of download: 10/19/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2016;139(4):041012-041012-11. doi:10.1115/1.4034670 Figure Legend: Zinc machining power measurements (roughing: 19 kWh to remove 42.5 kg; finishing: 9.6 kWh to remove 2.5 kg)

From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts Date of download: 10/19/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2016;139(4):041012-041012-11. doi:10.1115/1.4034670 Figure Legend: Zinc die-making sensitivity analysis

From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts Date of download: 10/19/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2016;139(4):041012-041012-11. doi:10.1115/1.4034670 Figure Legend: Power profile during forming of seven-parts on the hydraulic press (750 ton loading)

From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts Date of download: 10/19/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2016;139(4):041012-041012-11. doi:10.1115/1.4034670 Figure Legend: Power profile and die displacement for hydraulic press

From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts Date of download: 10/19/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2016;139(4):041012-041012-11. doi:10.1115/1.4034670 Figure Legend: Power profile for forming of seven parts on the mechanical press

From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts Date of download: 10/19/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2016;139(4):041012-041012-11. doi:10.1115/1.4034670 Figure Legend: Forming of one part using mechanical press

From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts Date of download: 10/19/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2016;139(4):041012-041012-11. doi:10.1115/1.4034670 Figure Legend: Power profile for forming a part using a mechanical press. Loading of approximately 850 short ton.

From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts Date of download: 10/19/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2016;139(4):041012-041012-11. doi:10.1115/1.4034670 Figure Legend: The ecological impacts (Ixx) and costs (Cxx) of forming sheet metal parts

From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts Date of download: 10/19/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2016;139(4):041012-041012-11. doi:10.1115/1.4034670 Figure Legend: Stamped aluminum case study parts: (a) aluminum hood (hydraulic press) and (b) aluminum tailgate (mechanical press)

From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts Date of download: 10/19/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2016;139(4):041012-041012-11. doi:10.1115/1.4034670 Figure Legend: Environmental impacts from the hydraulic press (truck hood) case study: (a) CED, (b) GWP, and (c) human health impact

From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts Date of download: 10/19/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2016;139(4):041012-041012-11. doi:10.1115/1.4034670 Figure Legend: Environmental impacts from the mechanical press (truck tailgate) case study: (a) CED, (b) GWP, and (c) human health impact

From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts Date of download: 10/19/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2016;139(4):041012-041012-11. doi:10.1115/1.4034670 Figure Legend: Case study costs

From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts Date of download: 10/19/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2016;139(4):041012-041012-11. doi:10.1115/1.4034670 Figure Legend: Blank area versus die size. Error bars: ± 45% of mass.

From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts Date of download: 10/19/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2016;139(4):041012-041012-11. doi:10.1115/1.4034670 Figure Legend: Blank area versus die cost. Error bars: ±45% of cost.

From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts Date of download: 10/19/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: An Environmental and Cost Analysis of Stamping Sheet Metal Parts J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2016;139(4):041012-041012-11. doi:10.1115/1.4034670 Figure Legend: The CED and cost for stamping an aluminum part: 1.5 m2 surface area, 1.5 mm thick: (a) CED and (b) cost