Criminal Trial Process

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Steps in a Jury Trial. STEPS IN A JURY TRIAL Selection of the Jury The Trial The Judge's Charge Deliberation The Verdict.
Advertisements

The Criminal Court System
Chapter 8 Trial Procedures. The Players Judge Appointed by government Full control of courtroom Decides question of guilt (when there is no jury) and.
+ Courtroom Participants. + 2 Fundamental Principles An accused person is innocent until proven guilty. Guilt must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
Introduction to Criminal Law Trials. The criminal justice system is a system of rules, roles, and procedures that determine whether or not someone has.
Goal 5.03 Describe the adversarial nature of the judicial process.
Participants in a Criminal Trial. Principles Canada’s criminal justice system has two fundamental principles: an accused person is innocent until proven.
THE TRIAL IN CANADIAN COURTS – Part 2 LAW 12 MUNDY
+ The Criminal Trial Process. + The Charter Section 11(d) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms states that a person charged with an offence is to be.
THE CRIMINAL COURT Chapter 7. Background  English Law practice dates back to William the Conqueror,  “Court” refers to an enclosed place.  Constitution.
Trial Procedures & Courtroom Personnel
TRIAL INFORMATION Steps, vocabulary.
THE CRIMINAL COURT SYSTEM THE TENNIS COURT OATH Tennis Court / Courtyards THE BAR FEDERAL GOV’T -SUPREME COURT OF CANADA -FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA -TAX.
The Criminal Court System The Criminal Trial Process hrsbstaff.ednet.ns.ca/pstacey/Law.
Trial Process Unit 2. Preliminary Hearing Only for indictable offences only! Similar to a trial, but usually much shorter. Witness and evidence will be.
Procedure Procedure at Trial. 1) Court Clerk reads the charge Indictment - if vague - quashed (struck down)
Where we’ve been... ‘Trial by jury is the most transcendent privilege which any citizen can enjoy’ Sir William Blackstone Where we’re going... ‘The trial.
Criminal Trial Process “Innocent until proven guilty”
+ Rules & Types of Evidence. + Rules of Evidence During a trial, either the Crown or the defence may object to questions asked by the opposing attorney.
The Trial. I. Procedures A. Jury Selection 1. Impanel (select) a jury 2. Prosecutors and Defense lawyers pose questions to potential jurors (VOIR DIRE)
Law 120.  (in Criminal Trial Process Handout P. 169)
THE TRIAL IN CANADIAN COURTS – Part 3 RULES AND TYPES OF EVIDENCE LAW 12 MUNDY
 These principles are intended to guarantee fairness and strike a balance between the power of the state and the civil liberties of the accused. 1. Rule.
The Criminal Court System. The Court System Depending on the crime committed decides at what court the trial will be held. Depending on the crime committed.
The Criminal Trial Process Section 11 (d) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms states that each person charged with an offence is to be ‘presumed innocent.
The Criminal Justice System
The Criminal Trial Process : Exploring the Variety of Evidence and Closing Court Procedures CLN4U Mr. Menla.
Motions at the Beginning of a Trial Crown and Defence may present motions to the judge Stay of Proceedings (motion to stop the trial) Only judge has authority.
Trial Procedures & Courtroom Personnel
Arraignment The reading of the charge to the accused. This must be the charge contained in the indictment or an acquittal may result. “Order in the Court”
The Courts. The Criminal Justice System has three major components: Police Courts Corrections Each plays an important role in the system and all three.
Pretrial and Courtroom Procedures Principles of LPSCS.
CJ in the USA: Copyright 2011 Curriculum Technology, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
THE COURTROOM WORKGROUP II:
Classification of Offences
Mock Trials Court Systems and Practices.
Start Figure 7.10 Trial by Jury, p. 183 End.
Criminal Law ESSENTIAL QUESTIONS Why does conflict develop? How can governments ensure citizens are treated fairly?
“A-B-C’s” of what you need to know for your mock trials!
The Criminal Trial Process
Criminal Legal Process
Courtroom Basics To Kill a Mockingbird.
Pretrial Conference After discovery, a pretrial hearing is held to clarify the issues, consider a settlement, and set rules for trial Once the trial court.
Steps in a Jury Trial.
The Criminal Court System
Courtroom Participants
The Canadian Court System
Chapter Six TRIALS.
Lesson 6- Copy the following
The Criminal Trial Process
Warm Up Who is the most important person in a courtroom? Why?
Criminal Trial Procedures
The Criminal Court System
Steps in a Trial.
The Court System A Trial.
Start Figure 7.10 Trial by Jury, p. 183 End.
THE TRIAL IN CANADIAN COURTS – Part 2
The Court System A Trial.
Lecture 2: Defences Reaching a Verdict
Types of Evidence CLU 3MR Lesson 71.
Notes on Trial Procedure
Criminal Trial Process
Evidence.
THE TRIAL IN CANADIAN COURTS – Part 3
Law 12 Criminal Trial Process.
Trial Procedures & Courtroom Personnel
The Structure of Canada’s Courts
Notes on Trial Procedure
Cookie Court.
Business Law Final Exam
Presentation transcript:

Criminal Trial Process “Innocent until proven guilty”

Burden of Proof – Crown’s obligation to prove the guilt of the accused beyond a reasonable doubt. I Trial begins with the judge explaining the jury’s role and asks the 12 members to select a foreperson (says verdict) to communicate with the judge.

II Crown presents opening statement: Identifies offence committed Summarizes evidence Outlines how the Crown will present it’s case.

III Crown calls witnesses Direct examination – first questioning of a witness to determine what he/she observed about the crime. Cross-examination – second questioning of a witness by the defence to test the accuracy of the testimony. Four Purposes of Cross-examination: 1)     To elicit new information not given 2)     To obtain a different interpretation of the facts 3)     To challenge the powers of observation and recall of the witness 4)     To test the reliability and credibility of the witness

IV After the Crown calls all witnesses the Defence may bring a “motion for dismissal”   Judge has two options: 1)    Directed verdict – withdraw case and enter a verdict of not guilty. 2)    Not dismiss the case and trial proceeds (if pleading not guilty still)

V Defence makes opening statement: May call witnesses to refute prior testimonies or show reasonable doubt Direct examination and cross-examination occur (reverse)   VI After all evidence from defence is presented the Crown can “rebut” – contradict evidence introduced by the opposing side. Defence counsel can then present a “surrebuttal” – reply to the Crown’s rebuttal.

Rules of Evidence #1) Cannot ask a “leading question”. ie: “You are hard of hearing, aren’t you?” “Wasn’t it Joe you saw with the knife?” #2) Hearsay evidence is not admissible.   #3) Opinion Evidence is not admissible unless given by experts qualified in a particular area.

Rules of Evidence #4) Immaterial or Irrelevant Questions are not admissible – no connection with the matter at hand. All evidence must relate to the case. #5) Non-responsive Answers – if a witness does not answer the question posed, the judge can direct the witness to answer the question properly.

Types of Evidence A) Direct Evidence – testimony given by a witness to prove an alleged fact based on what he/she saw, heard, tasted, touched… B) Circumstantial Evidence – indirect evidence that leads to a reasonable inference of the defendant’s guilt.

Types of Evidence C) Character Evidence – evidence used to establish the likelihood that the defendant is the type of person who either would or would not commit a certain offence. The Crown can not attack a person’s character. The defence can try to prove it is not in the defendant’s character to commit the crime and establish good character. However, the Crown can rebut this.

Types of Evidence C)    Electronic Surveillance – use of an electronic device to overhear or record communications between two or more people. ie: wiretapping(telephone) and bugging(records voice) D)    Polygraph Tests – “lie detector” tests. Measures changes in pulse, respiration and blood pressure. Not entirely accurate though (varies with the skill of the examiner) Not used as evidence to prove that a person is lying or telling the truth about a particular crime.

Voir Dire – mini-trial or “trial within a trial” Voir Dire – mini-trial or “trial within a trial”. This is a hearing during a trial and in the absence of the jury. The jurors are escorted from the courtroom and the judge, Crown and Defence discuss the admissibility of evidence.   VII Summary of the Case – after all testimony has been given, each counsel presents a summary of the case in the form of closing arguments.

VIII Charge to the Jury – Judge’s explanation to the jurors of how the law applies to the case before them. The Sheriff escorts jurors to the jury room to deliberate on their verdict.   VIV The Verdict – must be unanimous Hung Jury – a jury that can’t reach an unanimous decision and is dismissed from the case. A new jury is selected to try the case again.

Appeals ü must be filed within 30 days ü     heard in the correct appeals court ü     3 choices: a) affirm the lower court’s decision b) reverse the lower court’s decision c) order a new trial

Appeals  either the Defence or the Crown can appeal in criminal cases (can appeal sentence too) appeals are generally heard by a panel of 3-5 judges using the original transcripts, exhibits and legal documents of the case (majority decision)

Plea Bargaining – the majority of people charged with criminal offences never go to trial. Instead, the Crown and Defence negotiate a “plea bargain”. This is a negotiated deal whereby the accused pleads guilty in exchange for a lighter sentence.   ie: first degree murder = life sentence with no parole for 25 years. Plead guilty to second degree murder (possible parole after 10 years)

Famous Plea Bargain Case: Karla Homolka May 1993, in exchange for her sworn statements against her estranged husband, Paul Bernardo, Karla was charged with two counts of manslaughter in relation to the homicides of Leslie Mahaffy and Kristen French. She received two 12-year sentences to be served concurrently.