Breeding cotton for a variable rainfall environment

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dr. Adriana-Cornelia Marica & Alexandru Daniel
Advertisements

Improving Irrigation Efficiency In the Australian Cotton Industry - A Grower Led Approach IAL Conference, Adelaide June 2012.
Benchmarking Irrigation Water Use for the Australian Cotton Industry Janelle Montgomery, Robert Hoogers Kieran Shepherd & Stuart Bray Irrigation Australia.
Combined Analysis of Experiments Basic Research –Researcher makes hypothesis and conducts a single experiment to test it –The hypothesis is modified and.
Results showed in Figure 1 indicated that WE mean for grain pearl millet was higher 84% than corn and 22% than sorghum for the highland location. WE mean.
Research program 1 Our big target Reduced production costs.
Module X: Soil Moisture Relationships and Irrigation Lesson 2: Irrigation in Chili Pepper Cultivation After completing this lesson, you have learned to.
Experimental Design in Agriculture CROP 590, Winter, 2015
The Great Plains Canola Germplasm Evaluation System Michael J. Stamm, Kansas State University and Oklahoma State University Table NWCVT Great.
ACGA Seed Development Committee Started in 2001 Crossing nursery in 2001, 2002, & 2003 Evaluation nursery in 2005, & lines in ACGA advanced trials.
Receding water levels in Ogallala aquifer are threatening the sustainability of irrigated agriculture in the High Plains of Eastern New Mexico and West.
Setting goals and identifying target environments Planning breeding programs for impact.
Using Yield Data to Make Decisions. Reasons for Collecting Yield Data Document yields Conduct field experiments Bottom-line Considerations Variable Rate.
Rate and Duration of Seed Component Accumulation in Water Stressed Soybeans José L. Rotundo & Mark Westgate Iowa State University, 1301 Agronomy Hall,
Crop Modeling for better Agro Advisories D. Raji Reddy and K.M. Dakshina Murthy Agro Climate Research Center, Agricultural Research Institute Acharya N.
Web-based Irrigation Scheduling
Removal of a subsoil constraint. When does it pay? Imma Farre, Bill Bowden, Stephen Davies & Dennis van Gool Department of Agriculture and Food Western.
Comparative Performance of BARBREN and LONREN David B. Weaver Professor Department of Agronomy and Soils Auburn University AL Dallas, TX, April 4,
WP2. Adaptability and Productivity Field Trials Results from the fourth growing period and comparison of the results recorded from the years 2003, 2004.
Increasing the profitability of Legume production in Mozambique through Technology discovery, Development and Delivery linked to Markets Progress for
March 2005 ACIAR Project: Bridging the gaps between SCFs and decision makers Overview of Australian Case Studies John Mullen Research Leader, Economics.
John L. Snider Third Year Review Crop Physiologist University of Georgia Department of Crop and Soil Sciences.
Real-time irrigation decision- making and control for site- specific irrigation of cotton using a centre pivot, 2012/13 Dr Alison McCarthy, Professor Rod.
Quantifying water productivity in rainfed cropping systems: Limpopo Province, South Africa John Dimes CPWF PN17 Final Project Workshop June 2009,
Figure 3. Concentration of NO3 N in soil water at 1.5 m depth. Evaluation of Best Management Practices on N Dynamics for a North China Plain C. Hu 1, J.A.
After completing this Lesson, you have learned to answer: 1.Why pearl millet yields are often low when grown under rainfed conditions? 2.How irrigation.
After successful completion of this Lesson, you have learned to answer: 1.Why sorghum yields are often low when grown under rainfed conditions? 2.How irrigation.
Adapting to Increasing Variability.  Longer season cultivars  Supply irrigation water  Drain soil to reduce water logging  Larger planting equipment.
How to Construct a Seasonal Index. Methods of Constructing a Seasonal Index  There are several ways to construct a seasonal index. The simplest is to.
Autonomous site-specific irrigation control: engineering a future irrigation management system Dr Alison McCarthy, Professor Rod Smith and Dr Malcolm Gillies.
Root Phenotyping for Field Management of crops- dryland crops V. Maruthi Principal Scientist (Agronomy) Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture.
Introduction Nepal with a net area of 1, 47,181 square kilometer is an agricultural country, where 65% of total population depends on agriculture. It is.
Root Extension of Bahiagrass as Observed in Acrylic Columns Carlos Acuna 1, Cheryl Mackowiak 2, Thomas Sinclair 1, Ann Blount 2, and Kenneth Quesenberry.
ADVANCES IN THE SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT OF THE YAQUI RIVER RESERVOIRS SYSTEM OCTOBER 20, 2003.
Sajjad Hussain1, Cory Matthew2, Muhammad Naeem3, H. Sydney Easton4
(To be edited by Dr Raji Reddy’s Group)
Texas Alliance for Water Conservation
Development of NM Green Chile Cultivars for Mechanization
Variable Rate Nitrogen
Evaluation of early drought tolerant maize genotypes under low nitrogen conditions Nyasha E. Goredema1, Ms Nakai Goredema2, Ezekia Svotwa1, Gabriel Soropa1,
Water use in bean and cowpea: efficiency or effective use of water?
QUINAGUA VLIR-UMSA Coordinators: Prof. Dr. Dirk Raes (KULeuven)
Soil Testing and Fertiliser Application
Кnun=(Lmax-Lmin)/Lmed (1)
NICRA-Technology Demonstration Component
Impact of climate change on agriculture An overview!
Impacts of early maturing chickpea varieties in Myanmar
Dr. Vinay Nangia Senior Agricultural Hydrologist
Introduction to Expert Systems
The effect of dry period irrigation on yield of three cassava cultivar
An Agriculture Perspective
Proportion of intermediate diameter roots
Prof. DSc Eng. Zornitsa Popova, Assist. Prof. Dr Eng. Maria Ivanova
Topsoil Depth at the Centralia Site
Drought Resistance Evaluation of Diverse Wheat Germplasm
Dhurba Neupane1, Juan Solomon2 and Jay Davison3
The Business of Plant Breeding:
DROUGHT VULNERABILITY QUANTIFICATION IN BULGARIA THROUGH MODELING CROP PRODUCTIVITY AND IRRIGATION REQUIREMENTS Z. Popova*, М. Ivanova*, L.S.Pereira**,
Partial Nutrient Balance at Farm plot level under Different Irrigation Water Management for Tomato production Muluye Gedfew1, Petra Schmitter2, Prossie.
C. Kallenbach1. , W. Horwath1, Z. Kabir1, J. Mitchell2, D
Jenny Clement Koebernick
Background and Objectives
Managing Irrigation Using the STAMP Irrigation Tool
Understanding Multi-Environment Trials
Using Soil Moisture and Matric Potential Observations to Identify Subsurface Convergent Flow Pathways Qing Zhu, Henry Lin, and Xiaobo Zhou Dept . Crop.
Growth Stress Response (Agronomical Stress Response)
Improving Silage Yield and Seasonal Distribution
Answering the research questions by identifying balanced embedded factorials in messy combined trials By Kerry Bell (Queensland Department of Agriculture.
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Growing Cotton.
Presentation transcript:

Breeding cotton for a variable rainfall environment 18th Australian Cotton Conference, Broadbeach, QLD Warren Conaty, David Johnston, Alan Thompson, Susan Jaconis, and Greg Constable August 11th 2016 CSIRO agriculture AND FOOD

CSIRO rainfed breeding program Parental Selection F2& F3 Evaluations F4 Single Plant Selection Initial Evaluations (Narrabri) Progeny Rows Intermediate Preliminary Offsite Preliminary Onsite Advanced Material onsite location (Narrabri) Up to 5 offsite locations Managed water stress to improve rainfed breeding | Warren Conaty

Australian rainfall patterns Highly variable rainfall Summer dominant Average 650mm In-crop 350mm Skewed Figure 1. (a) Frequency of in-crop rainfall and (b) variability in monthly in-crop rainfall for Narrabri. Managed water stress to improve rainfed breeding | Warren Conaty

The problem One-in-five years has low yield (<550 kg ha-1) and has no statistical difference between genotypes i.e. we cannot reliably select superior lines. Historically, to manage the risk of rainfall variability the CSIRO rainfed breeding program has: selected for indeterminate cultivars; utilised skip-row configurations; reduced nitrogen inputs, and; pre-irrigated rainfed evaluations to simulate a full soil water profile. However: One-in-five years has low yield (<550 kg ha-1) and has no statistical difference between genotypes - i.e. we cannot reliably select superior lines. Managed water stress to improve rainfed breeding | Warren Conaty

Hypothesis Application of a single furrow irrigation in dry years will increase trial yields above the threshold of statistical genotypic resolution Managed water stress to improve rainfed breeding | Warren Conaty

Aims To determine if and when a single irrigation could be applied to rainfed evaluations when yield is expected to fall below the confidence threshold (Crop Modeling) To assess the stability of germplasm performance under both rainfed conditions and limited water situations (Field Trials) clarify if germplasm selected under rainfed conditions can produce high lint yields in seasons with higher than average rainfall. Managed water stress to improve rainfed breeding | Warren Conaty

Development of: Managed stress system (MSS) Result: An irrigation should be applied to a ‘rainfed’ experiment when soil water deficit reached 90-100mm by 100-110 DAS Managed water stress to improve rainfed breeding | Warren Conaty

Field Validation: MSS Three seasons Figure 4. Soil water deficit for each season in Rainfed and MSS treatment Three seasons 21 genotypes grown under rainfed and managed stress Soil water deficit measured via neutron attenuation Yield analysis Managed water stress to improve rainfed breeding | Warren Conaty

MSS Validation- Results Rainfed Sowing year Treatment Rainfall (mm) Avg. trial yield (kg ha-1) Genotype p-value Co-efficient of variation (%) Treatment x genotype 2013 Rainfed 127 546 0.329 16.4 0.726 MSS 1121 0.008 9.9 2014 199 785 0.002 11.0 0.020 1324 0.004 7.8 2015 350 823 <0.001 14.1 n/a Managed water stress to improve rainfed breeding | Warren Conaty

Interactions Genotype rankings differed significantly between rainfed and MSS in 2014/2015. different rainfall and crop fruit setting pattern. driven by low and medium yielding genotypes high yielding genotypes are consistent interaction is no longer significant when looking at multiple years Genotype rankings under MSS were different to rainfed in 2014/15. Due to effect of different rainfall pattern on genotypes with different crop setting pattern. Genotype rankings differed significantly between rainfed and MSS. This interaction was driven by low and medium yielding genotypes. Thus selection for yield under MSS would not necessarily omit the best yielders from rainfed in dry seasons. More seasons of testing are required to evaluate this interaction. Figure 5. Rainfed and MSS rankings for lint yields (2013/2014 and 2014/2015). Managed water stress to improve rainfed breeding | Warren Conaty

Main Conclusions Developed a managed stress system that optimized a single irrigation to meet yield threshold Irrigating the MSS was necessary to resolve genotype differences in 2013/14 When rainfed yields increase due to rainfall, the MSS was not necessary to resolve genotype differences MSS Rainfed Managed water stress to improve rainfed breeding | Warren Conaty

What does this mean for our breeding program? Using the MSS, we are able to get useful data in years when yields would be too low to evaluate genotypes Since grower income is greater under better environments than very limited water situations, genotype performance under MSS may actually identify better and more realistic long term options for growers. Best performing genotypes under rainfed conditions in dry seasons will also be captured. Rainfed genotype evaluation is repeated over multiple seasons and sites and genotype selection is based on all sites, not just MSS. Rainfed genotype evaluation is repeated over multiple seasons and sites and genotype selection is based on all sites, not just MSS. Thus best performers under rainfed conditions in dry seasons will not be missed. Note however that since grower income is greater under better environments than very limited water situations, genotype performance under MSS may actually identify better long term options for growers. Managed water stress to improve rainfed breeding | Warren Conaty

CSIRO rainfed breeding program Parental Selection F2& F3 Evaluations F4 Single Plant Selection Initial Evaluations (Narrabri) Progeny Rows Intermediate Preliminary Offsite Preliminary Onsite Advanced Material MSS onsite location (Narrabri) 5 offsite locations Managed water stress to improve rainfed breeding | Warren Conaty

Thank you Thank you to the technical staff of CSIRO cotton breeding group, particularly Mark Laird, Mick Price, Adam Suckling, Megan Cameron, Deon Cameron, Jo Price and Kellie Cooper for their invaluable contribution to this work. CSIRO cotton breeding is undertaken in the Cotton Breeding Australia joint venture between CSIRO and Cotton Seed Distributors. CSRIO AGRICULTURE AND FOOD Dr Warren Conaty Research Scientist Warren.Conaty@csiro.au CSIRO AGRICULTURE AND FOOD