PEV Models and Scenarios for the 2015 IEPR Revised Forecast

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Discrete Choice Models of the Preferences for Alternative Fuel Vehicles Thomas Adler & Mark Fowler, Resource Systems Group, Inc. Aniss Bahreinian, California.
Advertisements

Analysis of Energy Infrastructures and Potential Impacts from an Emergent Hydrogen Fueling Infrastructure Andy Lutz, Dave Reichmuth Sandia National Laboratories.
Accelerating the Market for Zero-Emission Vehicles in New Jersey New Jersey Clean Air Council Annual Public Hearing April 8, 2014 Matt Solomon Transportation.
1000 El Camino Real Menlo Park, CA Phone Fax An Economic Evaluation of the 2005 IEPR Michael C. Keeley,
1 EVE Session 5 US Response to Regulatory Reference Guide Questionnaire April 12,
California Energy Commission California Light Duty Vehicle Surveys Inputs and Assumptions for Transportation Energy Demand Forecasts Rosenfeld Hearing.
Transportation Energy and Emissions Policy Analysis Tool with Applications TRB Planning Applications Conference May , 2011 Reno, NV Jeremy Raw FHWA.
SEDS Transportation Sector Modules Anant Vyas and Deena Patel Argonne National Laboratory Presented at SEDS Peer Review Washington, DC May 7-8, 2009.
California Energy Commission Medium and Heavy Vehicles and Movement of Light and Heavy Vehicles Inputs and Assumptions for Transportation Energy Demand.
Hart Energy Consulting Future Prospects and Potential Impacts The Electrification of Transportation in the US:
Metropolitan GHG Target Rule Review March 12, 2015 Land Conservation and Development Commission.
California Energy Commission Transportation Electrification Electricity and Natural Gas Model Inputs Workshop Rosenfeld Hearing Room February 26, 2015.
GreenSTEP Statewide Transportation Greenhouse Gas Model Cutting Carbs Conference December 3, 2008 Brian Gregor ODOT Transportation Planning Analysis Unit.
Alternatively Fueled Vehicles as Solutions GEOG 111 & 211A – Fall 2004 Part 2.
California Energy Commission Crude Oil and Transportation Fuel Price Cases For the 2015 IEPR Inputs and Assumptions for Transportation Energy Demand Forecasts.
The Road Ahead for Light Duty Vehicle Fuel Demand Joanne Shore Energy Information Administration July 7, 2005.
Tom Carlson Sierra Research, Inc. March 19, 2015 CEC Workshop Tom Carlson Sierra Research, Inc. March 19, 2015 CEC Workshop.
Market Research and Analysis Demand Forecasting Overview May 30, 2013 Agenda Overview of Demand Forecasting Model Demand Forecasting.
1Presenter, Event, Date1Richard Newell, SAIS, December 14, October 14, 2010 John Maples, Nick Chase, Matt Tanner Energy Information Administration.
California Energy Commission 2015 California Energy Demand Electricity and Natural Gas Demand Forecast: Inputs and Assumptions February 26, 2015 Chris.
Transit Estimation and Mode Split CE 451/551 Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 7.
07/14/2010 DRAFT – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE For NPC Study Discussion Only 11 National Petroleum Council Future Transportation Fuels Study CSC Meeting – Houston.
Energy Information Administration NPC Demand Task Group June 8, 2010 John Maples U.S. Energy Information Administration Transportation Modeling.
PTIS Project Update October 26 – 28, PTIS Project Objective Recommend transit investments and land use strategies for urban and rural Fresno County.
California Energy Commission Personal and Commercial Vehicle Choice High-Speed Rail Inputs and Assumptions for Transportation Energy Demand Forecasts Rosenfeld.
10/3/2011 DRAFT – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE For NPC Study Discussion Only 1 FTF Coordinating Subcommittee Meeting Model Structure Discussion Deanne Short October.
HOW WILL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS BE TRANSFORMED IN OUR ENERGY FUTURE? GEORGE A. HUME April 28, 2006 Reference was made to the following internet sites in.
California Energy Commission Overview of Revised Vehicle Attributes and Demand Scenarios Energy Demand Cases and Forecast of Vehicle Attributes for 2015.
2015 INTERNATIONAL EMISSIONS INVENTORY CONFERENCE: APRIL 14, 2015 DEVELOPING CALIFORNIA EMISSION INVENTORIES: INNOVATION AND CHALLENGES.
California Energy Commission Overview of Revised Vehicle Attributes and Scenarios Energy Demand Cases and Forecast of Vehicle Attributes for 2015 Transportation.
California Energy Commission Plug Loads in the Residential and Commercial Forecasts June 18, 2015 Tom Gorin Energy Assessments Division
1 System Dynamic Modeling Dave Reichmuth. 2 Objectives Use dynamic models of infrastructure systems to analyze the impacts of widespread deployment of.
2012 ZEV Amendments Benefits of Small Battery PHEVs – Toyota January 2012.
California Energy Commission Joint Lead Commissioner Workshop on Transportation Energy Demand Forecasts June 24, 2015 Bob McBride Demand Analysis Office.
The Electric Vehicle Attitude-Behavior Gap: Targeting the Early Majority Sanya Carley Associate Professor School of Public and Environmental Affairs Indiana.
Simulating the PHEV Ownership Distribution and its Impacts on Power Grid  Xiaohui (Sean) Cui, PhD  Dean of International School of Software, Wuhan University,
Subset of 2011 to 2013 Model Year Vehicles: Who Buys What Car? Analysis of Feebates and Household Impacts in California Julie Schiffman and Lew Fulton.
California Energy Commission Medium and Heavy Duty Truck Prices and Fuel Economy Energy Demand Cases and Forecast of Vehicle Attributes for 2015.
California Energy Commission Transportation Electrification IEPR Workshop on the Revised Transportation Energy Demand Forecasts November 24, 2015 Aniss.
California Energy Commission Light Duty Personal and Commercial Vehicle Stock Joint Lead Commissioner Workshop on Transportation Energy Demand Forecasts.
3. Transportation demand The discrete good case Theory.
Consumer Preferences for Refueling Availability: Results of a Household Survey Marc W. Melaina, National Renewable Energy Laboratory Cory Welch, Blue Summit.
Konstantinos Alexopoulos Transport Division UNECE
Fuel Economy in Macedonia
PEV Adoption: Preliminary Forecast
/ California Energy Demand (CED) 2011 Revised Electricity and Natural Gas Forecast SCE February 7, 2012 Chris.
/ California Energy Demand (CED) 2011 Revised Electricity and Natural Gas Forecast February 3, 2012 Chris.
SDG&E’s Statistically Adjusted End-Use (SAE) Sales Forecasting
Bus and coach transport for greening mobility
California Energy Demand (CED) IEPR Forecast:
/ California Energy Demand (CED) 2011 Revised Electricity and Natural Gas Forecast PG&E February 7, 2012.
/ California Energy Demand (CED) 2011 Revised Electricity and Natural Gas Forecast SMUD February 7, 2012.
Summary of Planning Area Forecasts: CED 2017 Preliminary
Revised Transition Scenarios for California
DYNAMIC LIFE CYCLE SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK
Plausible energy scenarios for use in robust decision making
CO2 and the Road Transport Sector in India
Discrete Choice Modeling
Travel Demand Forecasting: Mode Choice
Car Ownership Models Meeghat Habibian History and Analysis
Car Ownership Models Meeghat Habibian History and Analysis
Bob Wimmer Director, Energy & Environmental Research February 1, 2018
Revised Transition Scenarios for California
Multi-dimensional Evaluation of Electro-Mobility Transition in Iceland
Norman Washington Garrick CE 2710 Spring 2016 Lecture 07
California Vehicle Survey
Can Hydrogen Realize Its Potential?
Thursday Morning: Decision Making
A Low Carbon Future of Transport: an Integrated Transport Model Coupling with Computable General Equilibrium Model Shiyu Yan (Economic and Social Research.
Presentation transcript:

PEV Models and Scenarios for the 2015 IEPR Revised Forecast Aniss Bahreinian September 14, 2015 Demand Analysis Working Group Meeting

Vehicle Surveys Energy Commission periodically conducts vehicle surveys to assess shifts in consumer preferences. We survey residential and commercial vehicle owners separately. The stated preferences survey revolves around generic (not any particular make and model) hypothetical vehicles defined by their attributes, including vehicle class and fuel type.

Stated Preference Survey Instrument Delete this slide

Survey Data Use survey data to estimate a nested multinomial logit model for the residential segment, composed of 4 behavioral equations: Vehicle Quantity Vehicle Replacement New/Used Vehicle Choice Commercial segment model is composed of one behavioral multinomial logit equation:

Simplified Multinomial Logit Formulation Example: Single Vehicle Choice “Utility” U calculated for each vehicle choice i given m vehicle attributes Vi1…Vim Ui= b1Vi1+b2Vi2+…bmVim, where b’s are estimated coefficients Given n vehicle choices, probability of choosing vehicle i = exp(Ui)/(exp(U1)+exp(U2)+…+exp(Un))

Model Results Define Synthetic Households in Forecast

Fleet size vs Fleet Composition Economic and demographic forecasts determine fleet size, in residential LDV model. GSP determines the growth of fleet size in commercial LDV model. Fuel prices and vehicle attributes determine fleet composition, by vehicle class and fuel type. PEVs compete with other fuel types and vehicle technologies, including FCVs, given their attributes and relative fuel prices.

11Vehicle Technologies, and 15 classes of Vehicles Compete for Consumer Choice Gasoline Gasoline Hybrid Flex Fuel Vehicle (E85) Diesel Diesel Hybrid CNG CNG Hybrid CNG Dual Fuel Battery Electric Vehicle Plug-in Electric vehicle (PHEV) Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicle (FCV) Self Driving Vehicles (New to 2015-2017 survey)

Electricity Consumption Exogenously determined VMT per vehicle forecasts travel demand by commercial LDV. Urban travel (short distance) and Intercity travel (long distance) travel demand models interact with residential LDV model to generate travel demand by households. Different modes compete with each other in the travel demand models; if people choose to take light rail, it will reduce travel by PEVs. To the extent that HSR or electrified rail influences long distance travel by autos, it will reduce personal travel in PEVs.

Preliminary Forecast Scenarios Three demand cases were defined by 3 scenarios each for energy prices, income and population. One set of light duty vehicle attributes, identified as reference, was used for all demand cases. Demand cases were defined as: High Energy Demand: Low energy prices, high income, high population Reference: Reference energy price, income, and population Low Energy Demand: High energy prices, low income and low population

ZEV Compliance Method Since ZEV regulations target the manufacturers, then the vehicle attributes were derived to meet the ZEV requirements for manufacturers. Consultants projecting vehicle attributes have been directed to generate vehicle attributes to ensure compliance with ZEV regulations, for all demand cases. Used the 2013 vehicle attribute projections. State and Federal ZEV incentives are applied in demand models with additional impact on consumer choices. Consumer Preferences are held constant.

What is Different in the Revised Forecast? There will be three scenarios for each of the following vehicle attributes: Vehicle Price Makes and Models The LDV attribute scenario differences will be driven by energy price scenario differences. More aggressive measures, as they relate to ZEV vehicle prices, to ensure better ZEV compliance in the reference case.

What is Different in the Revised Forecast? (Continued) We will create 3 PEV Demand scenarios for consumer preferences for fuel type: No change in consumer preferences over the forecast period. Low PEV demand case. Continuously improving preferences, in favor of all ZEV vehicles, as the ZEV markets expand. Reference case. Continuously improving preferences in favor of all PEV vehicles, with expanding ZEV markets, assuming zero growth in FCVs, adding its ZEV share to BEVs. This will be High PEV demand case. This is a departure from past practice. The revised reference case forecast will be constrained to meet the ZEV most likely scenario.