Miscellaneous results of flight calibration analysis

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
By: Mani Baghaei Fard.  During recent years number of moving vehicles in roads and highways has been considerably increased.
Advertisements

GOME-2 polarisation data and products L.G. Tilstra (1,2), I. Aben (1), P. Stammes (2) (1) SRON; (2) KNMI GSAG #42, EUMETSAT,
Siding Spring at Mars: BOPPS Observations Andrew Cheng (JHU/APL)
Diffraction from a Single Slit
Optical Astronomy Imaging Chain: Telescopes & CCDs.
Minor bodies observation from Earth and space: asteroid (2867)Steins A. Coradini, M.T. Capria, F. Capaccioni, and the VIRTIS International Team.
Alfvén Waves in the Solar Corona S. Tomczyk, S. Mclntosh, S. Keil, P. Judge, T. Schad, D. Seeley, J. Edmondson Science, Vol. 317, Sep., 2007.
Extracting the Mystery from the Red Rectangle Meghan Canning, Zoran Ninkov, and Robert Slawson Chester Carlson Center for Imaging Science Rochester Institute.
Physics 681: Solar Physics and Instrumentation – Lecture 17 Carsten Denker NJIT Physics Department Center for Solar–Terrestrial Research.
11 Black Holes and General Relativity Stuff that warps your mind.
Rachel Klima (on behalf of the MASCS team) JHU/APL MASCS/VIRS Data Users’ Workshop LPSC 2014, The Woodlands, TX March 17,2014 MASCS Instrument & VIRS Calibration.
990901EIS_RR_Science.1 Science Investigation Goals and Instrument Requirements Dr. George A. Doschek EIS US Principal Investigator Naval Research Laboratory.
Solar Irradiance Variability Rodney Viereck NOAA Space Environment Center Derived Total Solar Irradiance Hoyt and Schatten, 1993 (-5 W/m 2 ) Lean et al.,
Astronomical Instrumentation Often, astronomers use additional optics between the telescope optics and their detectors. This is called the instrumentation.
Galaxy Characteristics Surface Brightness Alternative to Luminosity I(R) = Flux/area = erg/s/cm 2 /arcsec 2 I(0) – center flux I(R) = at radius R Define.
Apr 17-22, Tunable filter wavelength scan and calibration of intensity ripple Y. Katsukawa (NAOJ) and SOT team.
Atomic Spectroscopy for Space Applications: Galactic Evolution l M. P. Ruffoni, J. C. Pickering, G. Nave, C. Allende-Prieto.
APOGEE: The Apache Point Observatory Galactic Evolution Experiment l M. P. Ruffoni 1, J. C. Pickering 1, E. Den Hartog 2, G. Nave 3, J. Lawler 2, C. Allende-Prieto.
Blue: Histogram of normalised deviation from “true” value; Red: Gaussian fit to histogram Presented at ESA Hyperspectral Workshop 2010, March 16-19, Frascati,
Maria Teresa Crosta and Francois Mignard Small field relativistic experiment with Gaia: detection of the quadrupolar light deflection.
14 October Observational Astronomy SPECTROSCOPY and spectrometers Kitchin, pp
1 An Observatory for Ocean, Climate and Environment SAC-D/Aquarius HSC - Radiometric Calibration H Raimondo M Marenchino 7th SAC-D Aquarius Science Meeting.
CDE CDR, September 14, 2004 Your Position, Your Name 1 GATS AIM Science Team Meeting January 23-24, 2007 CIPS Calibration Review, Aimee Merkel, Bill McClintock.
Diffraction gratings let us measure wavelengths by separating the diffraction maxima associated with different wavelengths. In order to distinguish two.
The Quest for Ultra compact dwarfs (UCDs) Guillermo, Melanie, Emanuela, Micaela Tutor: Steffen Mieske Guillermo, Melanie, Emanuela, Micaela Tutor: Steffen.
12 Black Holes and General Relativity Stuff that warps your mind.
Getting started Martin Crow Crayford Manor House Astronomical Society.
Determination of the photometric calibration and the large-scale flatfield of the STEREO Heliospheric Imagers: I. HI-1 Danielle Bewsher 1,2,3, Daniel Brown.
11-Jun-04 1 Joseph Hora & the IRAC instrument team Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics The Infrared Array Camera (IRAC) on the Spitzer Space Telescope.
Rev 131 Enceladus’ Plume Solar Occultation LW Esposito and UVIS Team 14 June 2010.
Thomas C. Stone U.S. Geological Survey, Flagstaff, AZ USA GSICS Research Working Group Meeting EUMETSAT 24−28 March 2014 Using the Moon as a Radiometric.
H. U. Keller, M. Küppers, L. Jorda, P. Gutierrez, S. Hviid, C
Jitter test Responsible Parties Test Goals
UVIS Calibration Update
OSIRIS Solar System Simulator
OSIRIS operation summary
Rosetta’s first view of CG
OSIRIS operation summary
Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía
OSIRIS Cruise Science The OSIRIS cameras have demonstrated the capability to do competitive science as astronomical telescopes We should take advantage.
Asteroid 4 Vesta observed from OSIRIS-ROSETTA
OSIRIS Calibration Report (Lab Calibration)
Relative Spectral Response and Flat Fields with Internal Calibration Lamps Luisa M. Lara IAA-CSIC Granada (SPAIN)
ANALYSIS OF SEQUENCE OF IMAGES MTP003/STP004/TRAIL_001 & TRAIL_002
Deeper insight in the Steins flyby geometry:
The Milky Way Nucleus Bulge Bar Disk Halo.
NAC flat fielding and intensity calibration
Light-Matter Interaction
I.- Relative Spectral Response: Corrected of green light contamination II.-Flat Fields with Internal Calibration Lamps during Commissioning Luisa M.
Summary of the science planned per mission phase
OSIRIS operation summary
OSIRIS flight calibrations so far
Using Sun Glint and Antarctic Ice Sheets to Calibrate MODIS and AVHRR Observations of Reflected Sunlight William R. Tahnk and James A. Coakley, Jr Cooperative.
Diffraction Grating Resolving Power
SNAP spectrograph demonstrator : Test Plan
Instrument Characterization: Status
Current HMI Polar Fields
extrasolar = outside of (external to) our solar system
Meteorological Service of Canada
First Assessments of EUVI Performance on STEREO SECCHI
UVIS Calibration Update
TanSat/CAPI Calibration and validation
UVIS Calibration Update
Spectral analysis of starlight can tell us about:
UVIS Calibration Update
Section 1: Characteristics of Stars
Fraunhofer diffraction from Circular apertures:
Modern Observational/Instrumentation Techniques Astronomy 500
Section 1: Characteristics of Stars
Solar Atmospheric Temperature
Presentation transcript:

Miscellaneous results of flight calibration analysis Star fields and stellar calibrations: Relative geometry spacecraft cameras Intensity calibration Focus Comet LINEAR Straylight Flat fields (very quick look)

Relative pointing 0/2048 y 2048/2048 Prepixels amplifier A Prepixels amplifier B 0/0 2048/0 x S/c pointing direction on NAC: 1001,1051 S/c pointing direction on WAC: 1039, 962 NAC center on WAC: 1037, 954 WAC center on NAC: 1091, 1370

Intensity calibration Definition of calibration factor A = C/ I A: Calibration factor [DN s-1 / W m-2 nm-1 sterad-1] C: Count rate [DN s-1] I: Irradiance of the lamp [W m-2 nm-1 sterad-1] at the central wavelength of the filter combination

Results (WAC) Laboratory Standard Star

Results (WAC) Visible range: Stellar calibration comparable to Lab values Better internal consistency Discrepancy to theoretical expectations remains UV range: Unfortunately no good UV calibration < 330 nm available 375 and 388 are ok

Results (NAC) Laboratory Standard Star

Results (NAC) UV and near-IR: Everything (Star, lab, and theoretical prediction) consistent Visible: Stellar calibration ~ 20 % above Lab. Calibration, expectation in between Partly resolved by relative spectral response Partly unexplained Neutral density filter inconsistency remains

Significance of relative spectral response

Focus NAC: Star FWHM 1.4-2.1 pixels dependent on filter combination Exception: near focus plate expectedly out of focus (~ 3 pixels FWHM) Wings of PSF clearly visible in some filters WAC: FWHM 1.4-1.7 pixels dependent on filter combination

Focus WAC NAC

Unexplained effect in star fields Nearly (but not exactly) vertical stripes Meteors? Too dark, too large if at typical solar system velocity (kms/s) Spacecraft junk? Too dark, if resolved Extension of ~20 pixels difficult to explain, if unresolved Instrumental effect Consistent motion along field of view seen in 3 images Seen in 2 different filters WAC starfield from 5 June

Comet LINEAR Straylight with default filter combinations ~ 100 DN/s with the NAC ~ 200 – 2000 DN/s with the WAC Due to various anomalies at the end of slot 2 presentable images obtained with the NAC only Plasma tail clearly visible

Comet imaging Comet 2002 T7/LINEAR observed on 1 May 5 images in different colours with the NAC

OSIRIS NAC Multicolour Image Comet C/LINEAR 2002 T7 - 95 106 km distance – 1. May 2004

Images with internal lamps Visible: No changes to pre-flight on first look UV: Intensities (=leakage of visible/IR light) surprisingly high Dark current needs to be evaluated