The Special Education Process

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Newark Public Schools Office of Special Educations Professional Development Center Marion Bolden, Superintendent Anzella Nelms, Deputy Superintendent.
Advertisements

DEPARTMENT OF SPECIAL SERVICES PROJECTIONS PREPARED BY KIM CULKIN, DIRECTOR OF SPECIAL SERVICES MARCH 2013.
Special Education Referral and Evaluation Process Presented by Lexington Special Education Staff February 1, 2013.
THE IEP PROCESS Cassie A. Newson. Purpose of Initial Evaluation  To see if the child is a “child with a disability,” as defined by IDEA  To gather information.
Enforcing and Maintaining the IEP
State of Connecticut Department of Education Department of Developmental Services PPT 101: Understanding the Basics of the Planning and Placement Team.
Presented by: Diana Davis, M.Ed., L.D.T.C.
Understanding the IEP Process
Parent Academy Topic: Special Education Basics 1.
Surrogate Parent Training
Evaluation & Eligibility Special Education Laws Made Simple November 2013 – Austin, Texas National Business Institute Presented by Sarah S. Flournoy, J.D.,
Intervention and Referral Services (I&RS)
“Special Education 101” Dr. Kaye Tindell Special Education Director.
Response to Intervention RTI – SLD Eligibility. What is RTI? Early intervention – General Education Frequent progress measurement Increasingly intensive.
Identification, Assessment, and Evaluation
SPECIAL EDUCATION OVERVIEW
Understanding your child’s IEP.  The Individualized Education Plan (IEP) is intended to help students with disabilities interact with the same content.
ELIGIBILITY PROCEDURES FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES Chapter Seventeen.
Working Collaboratively with Your Child Study Team- Being an effective Team Member Linda Colucci, M.Ed. June, 2012.
Function ~ Process ~ Responsibilities
The process of assessment: the role of the teacher Chapter 1 ~~~~~
Disability Law Education and the Workplace in America.
I nitial E valuation and R eevaluation in IDEA Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
Laura Matson, Ph.D. Director, Special Services Puget Sound Educational Service District Navigating the School Culture September 25, 2014.
East Grand Rapids Public Schools Special Services Educating and inspiring each student to navigate successfully in a global community.
By Christina D. Ghio, Esq. The Law Office of Christina D. Ghio, LLC 1.
1 Newark Public Schools Office of Special Education’s Professional Development Center Dr. Clifford Janey, Superintendent Dr. Don Marinaro, Assistant Superintendent.
Special Education in the United States Susie Fahey and Mario Martinez.
University of Connecticut Center for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities Families As Partners Training Steps in the Special Education Process.
Welcome to the “Special Education Tour”.  Specifically designed instruction  At no cost to parents  To meet the unique needs of a child with disabilities.
1 The Special Education Assessment and IEP Process EDPOWER Teacher Institute 2013.
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
I.D.E.A LANGUAGE & LEGAL ISSUES Impacting the Process of the IEP Team, School Staff, and Parents LANGUAGE & LEGAL ISSUES Impacting the Process of.
The Brave New World of Special Education The purpose of special education and our roles in facilitating optimal learning outcomes for ALL students.
Special Education Law for the General Education Administrator Charter Schools Institute Webinar October 24, 2012.
Ed Palmisano 06/2005 Evaluation Procedures An Introduction for New School Psychologists and Members of the M- Team.
Legal Aspects of Special Education Eligibility and Placement IEP and 504.
INTODUCTION TO ASSESSMENT INTODUCTION TO ASSESSMENT Chapter One.
Pathfinder Parent Center South Valley Special Education Unit John Porter, Director
The Special Education Process By Christine Shaw.  Anyone can make a referral (ages ).  Referral received in writing.  School has 15 days to “dispose”
IDEA 1997 P.L The Facts. IEP Must explain how the child’s disability affects their ability to participate in the general education classroom Must.
Specific Learning Disability Proposed regulations.
Chapter 2 The Assessment Process. Two Types of Decisions Legal Decisions The student is determined to have a disability. The disability has an adverse.
Learning today. Transforming tomorrow. REED: Review Existing Evaluation Data 55 slides.
Exceptional Children Program “Serving Today’s Students” Student Assistance Team.
Expert Topic Presentation By Chris Coombe March 9, 2009.
Teacher Roles and Responsibilities in the IEP Process Amanda Strong Hilsmier EDUC 559.
1 An Introduction to Special Education 행복 세미나 Life Care Counseling Center.
Best Practices and Compliance
Understanding the IEP Process
The Special Education Process
Verification Guidelines for Children with Disabilities
Cowan Ave. Elementary Special Education
Related Services: The What, The How, The Why
Stanislaus SELPA Session 1
Downingtown Area School District Central Office April 4, 2018
An Introduction to Special Education
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
IEP Basics for Parents and Families
School-based evaluations
Dawn Sessa-White HFU EDU 509 August 4, 2003
Roles of Speech-Language Pathologists (SLP) in the School Setting
Introduction to Special Education
Excellence in Education… Every Student Every Day
Excellence in Education… Every Student Every Day
Evaluation in IDEA 2004.
A Comparison Section 504 and IDEA Polk,
Brielle Elementary School Special Education Monitoring Summary
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Exceptional Children’s Program
Presentation transcript:

The Special Education Process Presented by Doreen Babis, Supervisor of Special Services and Judith Koebli, Speech Language Pathologist

Child Find Every Local Education Agency (LEA) has an obligation to establish procedures to ensure that all children with disabilities are properly identified and evaluated to determine whether they are entitled to receive special education services.

Preschool Eligibility for Special Education 3-5 year olds with an identified disabling condition adversely affecting learning/development AND must establish relevant impact and need for special education Developmental delay of 33% in one developmental area Or 25% delay in two developmental areas Intellectual Communication Social/emotional Adaptive Physical Gross/fine motor Sensory (vision/hearing)

Pre-K Eligibility Child must demonstrate a need for special education Curricular modifications Specialized instructional strategies Supplementary aids (www.nj.gov/education) Not just a need for a related service Speech therapy Occupational therapy Physical therapy

Prereferral Intervention and Referral Services Request for assistance Collect information Notify parents Problem solve Action plan Support and evaluate Problem resolved or referral to CST

Referral First step in special education process Written request from parent, teacher, principal, or guidance counselor CST conducts a planning meeting within 20 days of referral

Primary Purposes of Evaluations To determine if the student is a child with a disability as defined in section 1401(3) of the IDEA, and To determine the educational needs of the child

Identification Initial Planning/Identification meeting CST members, parents, teachers Speech Only? Are assessments warranted? Suspected disability? Parental consent required 90 day timeline

Who Attends the Meeting? Parent Case Manager Social Worker School Psychologist Learning Consultant Student (optional) General Education Teacher (classroom teacher) Special Education Teacher (if warranted) Related Service members (if warranted) Others

Eligibility Classifications Does the disablity adversely affect the student’s educational performance and does it require special education and related services? Classifications Auditory impairment Specific Learning Disability Autistic Traumatic Brain Injury Intellectually disabled Social maladjustment Communication impaired Other Health Impaired Emotionally disturbed Orthopedically Impaired Multiply disabled Deaf/Blindness Preschool disabled Visually Impaired

Specific Learning Disability Must be a discrepancy between ability and achievement in one or more of these areas: Basic Reading Skills Comprehension Oral Expression Listening Comprehension Mathematical Calculations Problem Solving Written Expression Reading Fluency

School Age Eligibility Criteria for Speech Tx. Articulation Delayed based upon Iowa-Nebraska norms Norms state at what age 90% of the population have master a specific phoneme Fluency Dysfluent 5% of the time or more Voice Need script from an ENT

Negative Impact upon Education Speech pattern is influencing spelling Student writes how they speak Intelligibility is reduced Adults and peers can not understand the student’s speech Student avoids speaking in class Won’t raise hand/volunteer Apprehensive or refuses to speak in front of peers Speech pattern negatively impact social interactions. Peers have difficulty understanding student Peers do not interact with student in a positive way.

Eligibility based upon Language Skills Student scores 1.5 standard deviations below the mean on two standardized language tests. One of the two language tests must look at both receptive and expressive language skills The second test is usually focused upon a specific language weakness the child demonstrates. Negative impact on education Poor grammar impacts on students ability to write clearly and/or correctly Student has difficulty expressing his thoughts in a cohesive and/or grammatically correct way Student avoids participating in class discussions, or answering questions

Referral Process Classroom Teacher Parent Completes & Mails referral form to Supervisor of Special Services Writes a letter of request for an evaluation to Supervisor of Special Services Case manager contacts parents and teacher(s) to meet to discuss student concerns Director of Special Services assigns case to a case manager Meeting must take place within 20 days from the date referral was received. If evaluation is found to be warranted, areas needed to be tested is decided Evaluations must be completed within 90 days. This includes, if eligible, the IEP to be in place Parents receive copies of written reports 10 days prior to eligibility meeting

INDIVIDUALIZED EDUCATION PROGRAM (IEP) The IEP is a written plan that describes in detail the student’s special education program. The IEP is implemented for one year at which point an annual review of the IEP is conducted. A reevaluation to determine eligibility for special education and related services occurs every 3 years.

Parental Rights PRISE Mediation Due Process

Time-Lines Meeting must take place within 20 days from the date referral was received Evaluations must be completed within 90 days. This includes, if eligible, the IEP to be in place Parents receive copies of written reports 10 days prior to eligibility meeting Annual reviews, for classified students, 1x year by anniversary date of last IEP Every 3 years, for classified students, a re-evaluation must be considered Re-evaluations must be completed within 60 days

Frequently Asked Questions What are the guidelines for how a disorder (or diagnosis) impacts education? What if it is not impacting education? Do they not get picked up for services then?

Articulation and Language Concerns? For a child referred for articulation issues and during their planning meeting or evaluation, teachers state that there are learning/language issues, can the SLP test for language at that time, or does there need to be a referral to the Child Study Team for an evaluation?

Answer To the team. Whenever there are language concerns a referral must go to the entire CST. The philosophy is that if there are language concerns, then other areas of learning may be affected. SLP may not test language independent of the team.

When is Parental consent required? Prior to conducting any assessment as part of an initial evaluation

When is Parental consent required? Prior to conducting any assessment as part of an initial evaluation Prior to implementation of the initial IEP resulting from above

When is Parental consent required? Prior to conducting any assessment as part of an initial evaluation Prior to implementation of the initial IEP resulting from above Prior to conducting any assessment as part of a re-evaluation, except if the BOE can demonstrate that it had taken reasonable measures to obtain consent and the parent failed to respond Prior to the release of student records according to NJAC6:3-6. section 6A:14-2.3(a)

What can the district do if the parent Refuses to give consent? If a parent refuses to provide consent for an initial evaluation, the district can request a due process hearing according to NJAC.6A:14-2.7(b) If a parent refuses to consent to implement an initial IEP, the district may not request a due process hearing. 6A:14-2.3(b)

What are the considerations for placement in the Least Restrictive Environment? Whether the student can be educated satisfactorily in a regular classroom with supplementary aids and services; A comparison of the benefits provided in a regular class and the benefits provided in a special education class; The potentially beneficial or harmful effects which a placement may have on the student with disabilities or the other students in the class. section 6A:14- 4.2(a)8

Thank You ?