Preliminary results for electron lens with beam current of 20 A

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NEWTONIAN MECHANICS. Kinematic equations Frictional Force.
Advertisements

Imperial College London 1 3. Beam extraction 3. Extraction of particle beams 3.1 The space charge limit and Child-Langmuirs law 3.2 External and internal.
December 10, 2008 TJRParticle Refrigerator1 The Particle Refrigerator Tom Roberts Muons, Inc. A promising approach to using frictional cooling for reducing.
Method of beam extraction from a synchrotron by the instrumentality of multilayer Cu-Fe shield Bondarenko Alexey.
SPACE CHARGE EFFECTS IN PHOTO-INJECTORS Massimo Ferrario INFN-LNF Madison, June 28 - July 2.
Simulations of Neutralized Drift Compression D. R. Welch, D. V. Rose Mission Research Corporation Albuquerque, NM S. S. Yu Lawrence Berkeley National.
Solenoid-Based Focusing Lens for a Superconducting RF Proton Linac Presentation prepared for AEM 11/08/20101I. Terechkine.
COULOMB ’05 Experiments with Cooled Beams at COSY A.Lehrach, H.J.Stein, J. Dietrich, H.Stockhorst, R.Maier, D.Prasuhn, V.Kamerdjiev, COSY, Juelich, I.Meshkov,
Status Report on Mk.II Pepperpot Simon Jolly Imperial College 13 th June 2007.
AAC 2006V.Shiltsev 1 Electron beam generation and control in Tevatron Electron Lenses Vladimir Shiltsev, R.Hively, V.Kamerdzhiev, G.Kuznetsov, H.Pfeffer,
Accelerating Charge Through A Potential Difference.
ELECTRODYNAMICS. Electrodynamics: The Study of Electromagnetic Interactions Magnetism is caused by charge in motion. –Charges at rest have just an electric.
The wires are separated by distance a and carry currents I 1 and I 2 in the same direction. Wire 2, carrying current I 2, sets up a magnetic field B 2.
High Current Electron Source for Cooling Jefferson Lab Internal MEIC Accelerator Design Review January 17, 2014 Riad Suleiman.
Calculation of the beam dynamics of RIKEN AVF Cyclotron E.E. Perepelkin JINR, Dubna 4 March 2008.
Electron Beam As High Frequency Wide Band Electrostatic 3D Kicker A. Ivanov*, V. Parkhomchuk, V. Reva Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics NANOBEAM-2008.
Exam 2: Review Session CH 24–28
CLIC Project meting #16. June 2014 I. Syratchev High efficiency power sources I. Syratchev, CERN.
CLARA Gun Cavity Optimisation NVEC 05/06/2014 P. Goudket G. Burt, L. Cowie, J. McKenzie, B. Militsyn.
Lecture 5 Damping Ring Basics Susanna Guiducci (INFN-LNF) May 21, 2006 ILC Accelerator school.
Charged Particles Discovery of Electron Electron beams in Fields Electron Tubes Measurement of the Charge of the Electron.
A.Shapovalov (DESY, Zeuthen) (MEPhI, Moscow, Russia)
Book Reference : Pages To understand that the path of a charged particle in a magnetic field is circular 2.To equate the force due to the magnetic.
IPM EM Simulations 9 th DITANET Topical Workshop on Non-Invasive Beam Size Measurement for High Brightness Proton and Heavy Ion Accelerators April.
CH Review -- how electric and magnetic fields are created Any charged particle creates an electric field at all points in space around it. A moving.
GWENAEL FUBIANI L’OASIS GROUP, LBNL 6D Space charge estimates for dense electron bunches in vacuum W.P. LEEMANS, E. ESAREY, B.A. SHADWICK, J. QIANG, G.
INTENSITY LIMITATIONS (Space Charge and Impedance) M. Zobov.
Designing a Magnetron Injection Gun and magnetic field to confine the electron beam. Jayakrishnan A. Karakkad, Brian L.Beaudoin, Thomas M.Antonsen Jr.
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Jorg Kewisch, Dmitri Kayran Electron Beam Transport and System specifications.
MEIC Detector and IR Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
S. Bettoni, R. Corsini, A. Vivoli (CERN) CLIC drive beam injector design.
Doubly Convergent Multiple Beam Guns Lawrence Ives, Thuc Bui, Michael Read Calabazas Creek Research, San Mateo, CA. USA Adam Attarian, Billy Tallis, Cynthia.
HWR, SSR1 and SSR2 transverse kick summary Paolo Berrutti, Vyacheslav Yakovlev.
Bunch Shape Monitor for HINS Wai-Ming Tam Project X Collaboration Meeting September 11, 2009.
IPM Simulations at Fermilab 3-4 March 2016 Randy Thurman-Keup.
Focusing Properties of a Solenoid Magnet
BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, INJECTION AND EXTRACTION SYSTEMS
Studies at BINP Alexander Krasnov
Beam dynamics simulation with 3D Field map for FCC RF gun
Preliminary result of FCC positron source simulation Pavel MARTYSHKIN
Development of X-band 50MW klystron in BVERI
with operating voltage
M. Migliorati, C. Vaccarezza INFN - LNF
BUNCH LENGTH MEASUREMENT SYSTEM FOR 500 KV PHOTOCATHODE DC GUN AT IHEP
Adriana Rossi, Sergey Sadovich
ILCDR08 10 July 2008 Plan of measuring cloud density in the solenoid field and in the quadrupole field K. Kanazawa (KEK)
Jim Crittenden Electron Cloud/Impedance Meeting 27 May 2015
Challenges for FCC-ee MDI mechanical design
RF Theory: An Introduction
High Compression and High Current Guns
Measurement of electron’s E/M
Space-charge Effects for a KV-Beam Jeffrey Eldred
S-band RF gun based on new type accelerating structure
Magnetized Electron Beam for Ion Cooling at JLEIC
Production of Magnetized Electron Beam from a DC High Voltage Photogun
Charged Particles in Uniform Electric Fields
Chapter 29 Examples Examples 1, 6, 7.
Beam size diagnostics using diffraction radiation
R. Suleiman and M. Poelker September 29, 2016
Magnetic Fields Exert Forces on Moving Charges
The superconducting solenoids for the Super Charm-Tau Factory detector
Electron sources for FCC-ee
MEBT1&2 design study for C-ADS
Physics Design on Injector I
Accelerator Physics NMI and Synchrotron Radiation
Accelerator Physics Synchrotron Radiation
Update on ERL Cooler Design Studies
He Zhang, David Douglas, Yuhong Zhang MEIC R&D Meeting, 09/04/2014
Plans for future electron cooling needs PS BD/AC
Presentation transcript:

Preliminary results for electron lens with beam current of 20 A A. Barnyakov, D. Nikiforov, A. Levichev BINP-CERN, 18.10.2016 A.E.Levichev@inp.nsk.su

Equilibrium beam radius Equilibrium radius is the constant radius for the beam, which it will has in the uniform magnetic field. It depends on the cathode radius Rc, magnetic field on the cathode Bc, beam current I, beam voltages U and magnetic field in the channel B (Appendix 1) To obtain the beam diameter of 2 mm in the magnetic field of 5 T the cathode radius has to be 5 mm with cathode magnetic field of about 0.2 T and beam potential of 10-35 kV Cathode field 0.2 T

Estimation of the maximum of the vacuum tube perveance for thin beam Rb<<Rt The main problem for propagation through the vacuum chamber of high current beam with low energy is virtual cathode inside the vacuum chamber. This effect can be estimated with help of maximum tube perveance. For thin beam the beam and tube can be presented as cylindrical capacitor and the tube perveance can be estimated as (see Appendix 2)

Vacuum tube and beam perveance I=20, U=10 kV microperveance is 20, Rt/Rb=1 I=20, U=25 kV microperveance is 5, Rt/Rb<12.5 I=20, U=35 kV microperveance is 3, Rt/Rb<40 With tube aperture of 80 mm to obtain the beam diameter of about 2 mm the beam voltage must be about 35 kV

Magnetic field in the solenoids Equilibrium diameter of the beam with I=20 and V=10-35 kV for magnetic field of 5 T is about 2 mm for the cathode radius of 5 mm and cathode magnetic field of 0.2 T

Beam dynamics I=20 A, V=25 kV In high magnetic field of the bending solenoid the beam is compressed and when the ratio Rt/Rb>12.5 the virtual cathode is arisen. To remove this effect without changing the aperture of vacuum chamber and beam current the beam potential has be increased (~35 kV). For the cone type chamber the ratio Rt/Rb>12.5 becomes earlier and such design is worse than tube with constant radius.

Possible design of electron gun with 35 kV and 20 A Beam current is I=20 A Voltage is 35 kV Magnetic field is 0.2 T Cathode radius is 5 mm

Electron gun with 35 kV and 20 A Gun parameters Cathode diam. 10 mm Cathode material Ir-Ce Energy Up to 35 kV Current 21 A Tr. Profile Flat top Emit (gun exit) 7.8 mm mrad

All current (20 A) propagates through the electron lens Beam dynamics I=20 A, V=35 kV All current (20 A) propagates through the electron lens

Beam dynamics I=20 A, V=35 kV Beam potential is decreased when the beam is compressed and inputted in the vacuum chamber with high aperture of the bending solenoid. Due to asymmetric vacuum chamber the beam potential becomes also asymmetric and particles get different velocities.

Beam dynamics I=20 A, V=35 kV: transverse beam space Due to asymmetric vacuum chamber the beam profile is also asymmetric. For particles with different potential the Lorenz radius are differed. Besides the individual rotation for every particle the beam is rotated as a whole due to magnetic field on the cathode therefore the potential distribution along the radius is changed during the time.

Beam dynamics I=20 A, V=35 kV: energy of the particles

Beam dynamics I=20 A, V=35 kV: conclusion The initial beam potential of 25 kV is not enough for beam current of 20 A and vacuum tube aperture of 80 mm. For vacuum tube aperture of 80 mm and beam current of 20 A the initial beam potential has to be about 35 kV. To compress beam down to 2 mm by magnetic field of 5 T the cathode diameter has to be about 10 mm with magnetic field of 0.2 T. Reducing the cathode magnetic field allows the cathode diameter to be increased. Increasing of the ratio between transverse size of the vacuum chamber and beam size decreases the beam potential. Asymmetric vacuum chamber leads to asymmetric distribution of the potential of the particles and profile of the beam. For single particles the potential can be reduced down to 9 kV in the vacuum tube with aperture of 80 mm and beam diameter of about 3 mm. In this case the average beam potential is about 20 kV. Due to nonuniform beam potential the velocities of the particles are differed, the front of the beam can be increased and particles motion is not laminar. The typical beam size in the main solenoid is about 3 mm. Most likely, to decrease this size the new design of the bend can be needed. Needs to investigate of 10 mm cathode lifetime (See Appendix 3).

Beam dynamics I=20 A, V=35 kV: vacuum chamber symmetrization Symmetrization of the vacuum chamber can improve the beam potential

Beam dynamics I=20 A, V=35 kV: vacuum chamber symmetrization More particles have potential less than 20 kV 10 kV 30 kV Potential distribution is more uniform 12 kV

Beam dynamics I=20 A, V=35 kV: vacuum chamber symmetrization Transverse beam space

Beam dynamics I=20 A, V=35 kV: vacuum chamber symmetrization Conclusion: Symmetrical vacuum chamber can improve the beam potential distribution More uniform beam potential can reduce transverse beam size For this solution the design of the vacuum chamber has to be changed and, may be, bend design too Needs more investigation to choice and optimize new design

Additional researches: beam propagation not along solenoid axis Taking into account high magnetic field the beam will go along the magnetic field force lines. In the center of the solenoid, the beam will move rectilinearly due to high radiuses of the solenoid. In the end of the magnet the beam will have some angle which is excited by magnetic field force lines. Additional corrector can compensate this angle.

Proton beam with electron beam Additional researches: compensation of the electron beam field by proton field Proton beam with electron beam There is no influence of the proton field on the electron field due to ultra relativistic energy of proton (relativistic factor is about 7000) Electric field from the electron beam is up to 1.6 MV/m Electric field from the proton beam is up to 22 kV/m

Additional researches: collimator with wires Current is 230 A with the same direction, maximum magnetic field is 0.01 T

Thank you for the attention

Appendix 1: equilibrium beam radius in magnetic field I – beam current U – beam potential Bc – magnetic field on the cathode Rc – radius of the cathode B – magnetic field in the transport channel

Appendix 2: maximum of the tube perveance

Appendix 3: IrCe Current density vs. Temperature