The Geographic Support System Initiative (GSSI)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Geographic Support System Initiative (GSS-I) Update Andrea Grace Johnson Geography Division U.S. Census Bureau.
Advertisements

Geographic Support System (GSS) Discussion FY 2011 Update Tim Trainor February 16, 2011.
Boundary & Annexation Survey Program (BAS) Kevin Holmes, Geographer US Census Bureau: Philadelphia Regional Office.
MAF/TIGER Accuracy Improvement Program (MTAIP) Indiana GIS 2005 Conference March 10, 2005 Indianapolis, Indiana.
1 Geographic Support System Proposed Initiative – FY 2011 and Beyond Timothy Trainor U.S. Census Bureau 1.
Introduction to the Digital BAS 1. Overview What is the MAF/TIGER Database? What is included in the Digital BAS package? What is the difference between.
1 Geographic Support System Proposed Initiative – FY 2011 and Beyond Michael Ratcliffe U.S. Census Bureau 1.
The Census Bureau's Geographic Support System Initiative – An Update Council of Professional Associations on Federal Statistics September 21, 2012 Tim.
The Geographic Support System Initiative (GSS-I) Partnership Program Donna Bullock U.S. Census Bureau November 2,
Update on the U.S. Census Bureau’s GSS Initiative Tim Trainor Chief, Geography Division U.S. Census Bureau NGAC Meeting – June 8, 2011.
On the Road to 2020 Census Geographic Programs Update Oregon State Data Center Annual Meeting 11/29/2012 Rick Campbell Geographer L.A. Regional Office.
PA SDC Conference, 9/19/13 Kevin Holmes, Geographer US Census Bureau: Philadelphia Regional Office The US Census Geographic Support System Initiative (GSS-I):
The Census GSS Initiative: Expanded Partnerships Leading to Improved Data Quality Kevin Holmes Geographer US Census Bureau 2014 Ohio GIS Conference September.
2010 Census Geography & 2020 Census Planning Michaellyn Garcia Geographer Seattle Region.
Geographic Support System Initiative (GSS-I) Partnership Program Update for the State Data Center Leads September 19, 2012.
Geocoding: - Table to geocode may be an ASCII, spreadsheet, dBase, or MapInfo table - Referred to as the “target” table - The target table is the attribute.
© John M. Abowd 2005, all rights reserved Sampling Frame Maintenance John M. Abowd February 2005.
NYSDC Affiliate Meeting Michael Horgan Geographer, Address Programs Management Division May 7-8,
MAF Update Plans and The Proposed FY2011 Geographic Support System Initiative Tim Trainor Chief, Geography Division.
Use of Geospatial Technologies for Census Data Collection: Issues and Considerations Timothy Trainor U.S. Census Bureau.
ON THE ROAD TO THE 2020 CENSUS North Carolina GIS Conference February 26, 2015.
Geographic Partnerships In Support of the 2020 Census U.S. Census Bureau, Geography Division SDC/CIC Annual Training Conference June 3, 2015.
Geographic Partnerships In Support of the 2020 Census U.S. Census Bureau, Geography Division SDC/CIC Steering Committee April 2015.
Building Quality Address Data: A Census Bureau Perspective Rocket City Geospatial Conference Huntsville, AL November 16, 2011.
Research and Testing Phase of the 2020 Census (FY ) Local Update of Census Addresses (LUCA) Program Improvement Rebecca Swartz Geographic Specialist.
U.S. Census Bureau Geography Division Programs Presentation to the Indiana Government Geospatial Coordinator Forum September 20, 2012.
US Census Bureau Philadelphia Region Update Maryland State Data Center Annual Affiliate Meeting June 12, 2014.
US Census Bureau West Virginia GIS Conference June 2 – June 5, 2014 Anne Jeffers Geographer 1.
Building Blocks The process of creating decennial census tabulation blocks. GeoElections User’s Conference October 6 th, 2011 Tampa, Florida.
The Group Quarters Frame Update Pilot Program Preliminary Research Results and Requirements for Implementation Jim Farber U.S. Census Bureau Presentation.
Geographic Support System Initiative
The 2010 Local Update of Census Addresses Program Linda M. Franz Geography Division 2007 SDC/BIDC Mid-Year Meeting March 27, 2007.
Planning for 2010: A Reengineered Census of Population and Housing Preston Jay Waite Associate Director for Decennial Census U.S. Census Bureau Presentation.
Plans for the Research and Testing Phase of the 2020 Census Presentation to the State Data Centers October 15, 2010 Daniel H. Weinberg (Assistant Director.
The 2020 Redistricting Data Program (and the role of the Boundary and Annexation Survey)
Update on the American Community Survey (ACS) and Geographic Products 2012 PA SDC Data User Conference September 20,2012 Noemi Mendez Eliasen Geographer.
FSCPE Briefing on LUCA September 27, 2006 Linda Franz Geography Division.
Gearing up for 2010 Geographic Programs Leading up to the Census Katy Rossiter US Census Bureau – Denver North Dakota GIS Users Conference October 24,
Census Geographic Programs Update Linda M. Franz U.S. Census Bureau CIC/SDC Annual Training Conference October 8, 2008.
CENSUS 2010 Geography Update, Programs, Timelines Gail A. Krmenec U.S. Census Bureau Chicago Regional Office Westchester, Illinois
Vector data model TIN: Triangulated Irregular Network.
The 2020 Census Geographic Partnership Opportunities Bernard Bundy Jr. Partnership Communication and Outreach Branch Geography Division U.S. Census Bureau.
Census New Construction Program. 2 Ensure that the Census Day address list is as complete and accurate as possible by providing an opportunity.
BLM Decision Making Process
Geocoding Addresses Ming-Chun Lee.
Geographic Partnership Opportunities
The Future of GIS in the World
Key Terms Attribute join Target table Join table Spatial join.
A new platform for testing TSO-DSO coordination schemes
Census Bureau Agency Briefing
policymap Teach your students mapping
GIS Basic Training June 7, 2007 – ICIT Midyear Conference
GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM
Iowa Geographic Information Council Infrastructure Update
Attribute Extraction.
2020 Census Redistricting Data Program
Spatial Data Processing
Support to Rural Development Statistics – Distances to Primary Schools
Regional Government Involvement in
Census TIGER File Maintenance
2020 Census Local Update of Census Addresses Operation (LUCA)
2020 Census Local Update of Census Addresses Operation (LUCA)
West Virginia GIS Conference
Why Do My Voting Districts Look Different?*
Anne Jeffers, Geographer Philadelphia Regional Office
Extracting or collecting geospatial data
Louisiana Primary Care along Interstate Highways
Streets & Address Workgroup Activities
2020 Census New Construction Program U. S
Geographic Information Systems
Presentation transcript:

The Geographic Support System Initiative (GSSI) Arizona Geographic Information Council Symposium Prescott, Arizona Jim Castagneri Sept 4, 2014

Key Components of the GSS-I An integrated program that utilizes a partnership program for: Improved address coverage Transaction-based address and spatial feature updates Enhanced quality assessment and measurement Address Updates 123 Testdata Road Anytown, CA 94939 Lat 37 degrees, 9.6 minutes N Lon 119 degrees, 45.1 minutes W Quality Measurement Street/Feature Updates

The GSS-I Partnership Program Launched in October 2012 Opportunity for tribal, state, county, and local governments to continually exchange address & spatial data with the Census Bureau Recognizes partner governments as a definitive authority for quality address and street data within their communities Utilizes the Census Bureau’s broad partner network to encourage participation

Benefits of Participation Expanded ROI – encourages re-use of local government geospatial data investment Integrates local government data into multiple federal programs, including the 2020 Census and the USGS National Map Provides maximum input into the American Community Survey and closes the gap between local addresses and Census addresses for the 2020 census.

What is the Basic Process? Acquire local data and perform Content Verification to determine general usability Standardize, match, and geocode partner addresses and structure points using the Master Address File (MAF) Match street centerline data to identify differences, calculate spatial accuracy (CE95 method) of partner data using GPS control points Ideal Scenario: new addresses are added to the MAF, new streets are added to TIGER, address and spatial inconsistencies are submitted for resolution

Targeted Canvassing in 2019? 2009 Address Canvassing 100% Canvassing vs 2019 Targeted Canvassing

Data Content Guidelines The Census Bureau has released Data Content Guidelines to describe the minimal and optimal information required for Addresses (including structure points), Street Centerlines, and Metadata provided by partners for the GSS-I Data Content Guidelines are located at: http://www.census.gov/geo/www/gss/gdlns/addgdln.htm

Partner Data Acquisition and Content Verification - Status

Partner Data Acquisition Data as of May 5, 2014 Partners Contacted Partners Providing Files Address List Acquired Structure Coordinates Acquired Street Centerlines Acquired Partner Files Processed TOTAL 482 313 177 622 691* 859** * Some counties provided multiple partial-coverage street centerline datasets (i.e., cities vs. balance of county) ** Includes feature and address files processed through the MAF/TIGER system update process

Problems Found in Content Verification Frequent contact for explanations and missing data – i.e., missing Interstate Highway layer, cryptic building use codes, etc. Incomplete metadata – projection, datum, data dictionaries, etc. Coverage gaps – some counties excluded data for incorporated cities within their legal jurisdiction

Partner Address Matching & Geocoding

Minimum Address Guidelines - MATCHING    To successfully match to the Master Address File (MAF), a partner address must include:   Complete Address Number Complete Street Name and AT LEAST ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: Address Coordinate (latitude, longitude) ZIP Code Postal City and State Census 2010 Tabulation State, County, Tract and Block Code This minimum information allows the Census Bureau to update the source data for an existing MAF address record, adding to our confidence that the address is valid.

Total Partner Addresses Received (6/20/13) 28,673,572   Duplicates Identified within Partner Datasets 1,148,866 4% Total Unduplicated Partner Addresses 27,526,810  96 % Total Partner Addresses Matched to Master Address File (MAF) 24,336,743 88% of Total Addresses in Same Block as MAF 22,526,027 93% of Matched Addresses in Different Block than MAF 1,410,562 6% of Matched New Geocode Attained 140,427 1% of Matched Addresses w/ Same Address Class as MAF (residential, etc.) 12,397,201 51% of Matched Addresses w/ Different Address Class than MAF 494,185 2% of Matched Addresses w/ No Address Class Identified 11,445,357 47% of Matched Total Partner Addresses Unmatched to MAF 3,190,067 12% of Total Unmatched Class Residential 952,003 30% of Unmatched Unmatched Commercial/Other/ Unspecified 2,238,064 70% of Unmatched

Street Centerline Evaluation and Update

Interactive Review and Update Digitizers interactively review the potential new and misaligned streets using the partner data and current imagery In this example, the green-blue lines indicate street updates made by the Census Bureau based on the partner data The Census Bureau added 39 miles of new streets and modified 115 miles of misaligned streets based on this partner’s street centerline data

Street Centerline Updates 3,105 Miles of new roads added 8,887 Miles of updated roads 11,992 total miles of feature updates

Feature Feedback Adding a date of last update field to the partnership shapefiles:

For more information, please visit: http://www. census For more information, please visit: http://www.census.gov/geo/www/gss/ Thank you! James.d.castagneri@census.gov 720-962-3880