TVTC Impact Fee Update Nexus Study January 30, 2008

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measure M Sunset Action Plan. Overview  Promises Made, Promises Kept  Funding Picture  Use of Measure M (M1) Freeway Funds  Next Steps 2.
Advertisements

West Contra Costa Unified School District
I-80 Corridor System Management Plan Alameda County Transportation Commission ACTAC Meeting September 7, 2010.
Background Why Plan For Transportation? Facts You Should Know Expectations Projects and Costs Conclusions/ Next Steps.
1 Corey W. Hill Chief of Public Transportation May 20, 2008 May 20, 2008.
Transportation Infrastructure Bond Corridor Mobility Improvement Account.
Tysons 1 Operational Analysis of Dulles Toll Road Ramps to Tysons Board Transportation Committee Meeting September 17, 2013 Seyed Nabavi Fairfax County.
Traffic & Congestion In Connecticut State of Connecticut Department of Transportation April 2010.
CFEE Conference March 23 rd, 2007 By: Jim Madaffer State & Local Authority What We Have, and What We Need.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Congestion Mitigation Fee Program Nexus Study GIS Based.
Cherry Creek North and Country Club Historic RNOs and TDA Colorado Cherry Creek North BID Cumulative Traffic Study.
Developing a Regional Express Lane Network Hercules City Council Meeting April 28, 2009 Doug Kimsey MTC Planning Director.
Less Stop More Go EXPRESS LANES Travel Choices and Strategies to Relieve Congestion Presentation to FDOT’s Annual ITS Working Group Meeting March 2008.
Seminar 23rd November 2001 Other Policies: Demand Management & Highway Investment Professor Marcial Echenique.
Bus Rapid Transit: Chicago’s New Route to Opportunity Josh Ellis, BRT Project Manager Metropolitan Planning Council.
Page Avenue What has it done for the region? A comparison of traffic volumes from Fall 2003 to Fall 2004 What has it done for the region? A comparison.
COUNTYWIDE TRANSIT CORRIDORS FUNCTIONAL MASTER PLAN Coalition for Smarter Growth Presentation on Staff Recommendations for Bus Rapid Transit Silver Spring.
BPAC. “Congestion management is the application of strategies to improve transportation system performance and reliability by reducing the adverse impacts.
I-680 Value Pricing: A “Smart Carpool “ Lane Demonstration Project June 2004.
What are Managed Lanes What are Express Lanes What are HOT Lanes Regional Express Lanes Network I-95 Express I-595 Express I-75 Express.
Portland North Small Starts Alternatives Analysis Coordination Meeting June 16, 2009.
I-394 MnPASS Technical Evaluation Preliminary Findings March 23, 2006 Doug Sallman – Cambridge Systematics, Inc.
I-394 MnPASS Technical Evaluation Doug Sallman – Cambridge Systematics, Inc.
Route 1 Project Study Report Overview. A report that describes the transportation problem and identifies the project scope, schedule and estimated cost.
Some things can’t wait for traffic Capital Beltway HOT Lanes Project New Travel Choices Ahead.
DRAFT What If… The Washington Region Grew Differently? Public Forum on Alternative Transportation and Land-Use Scenarios National Capital Region.
Cal y Mayor y Asociados, S.C. Atizapan – El Rosario Light Rail Transit Demand Study October th International EMME/2 UGM.
Major Transportation Corridor Studies Using an EMME/2 Travel Demand Forecasting Model: The Trans-Lake Washington Study Carlos Espindola, Youssef Dehghani.
Portland North Small Starts Alternatives Analysis Coordination Meeting June 15, 2009.
Town of Cobourg Division Street Improvements Public Information Centre October 1, 2015 Image Courtesy of Google 2015.
Freeway Congestion In The Washington Region Presentation to National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board February 15, 2006 Item # 9.
1 What If… The Washington Region Grew Differently? February 2005 Public Meeting on Alternative Transportation and Land-Use Scenarios National Capital Region.
1 CTC Discussion P3 Ingenuity Made Congestion Managing Pricing a Success James Martling, April 9, 2008.
Fred Luna, SBCAG Paul Martinez, Caltrans District 5 April 3, 2013 SBCAG North County Subregional Committee State Route 246 Passing Lanes.
Review of the Texas Transportation Institute (TTI) 2007 Urban Mobility Report By Ronald F. Kirby Daivamani Sivasailam TPB Technical Committee October 5,
THE EL MONTE HOV / BUSWAY: A Policy Driven Experiment in Congestion Management Frank Quon Division of Operations Deputy District Director HOV LANES IN.
Transportation Finance Advisory Committee May 18, 2012.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Fairfax County Parkway Corridor Study Board of Supervisors Transportation Committee December 1,
I-15 Express Lanes Project January 2012 I-15 Express Lanes Project January 2012.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee Overview of RCTC’s Major Projects December 8, 2015.
Interstate 95 Managed Lanes PD&E Study (95 Express) Project Development and Environment Study SE FSUTMS Users Group The Corradino Group November 2, 2007.
Review of the Texas Transportation Institute (TTI) 2007 Urban Mobility Report By Ronald F. Kirby Presentation to Transportation Planning Board October.
Metro Highway Program Presentation to CMAA Abdollah Ansari
© 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved. North Country Access Improvements Stakeholder Advisory Committee Meeting No. 9 January 19, 2016.
December 17, 2010 Developing Transit Performance Measures for Integrated Multi-Modal Corridor Management.
Shaping our Future Transportation Transportation trends Influencing trends through land use decisions Alternative futures: Base Case and Scenario Complementary.
IH-10 Managed Lanes Project: A “Public-Public” Partnership ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates Presented at the Value Pricing Conference.
MED SR 18 Corridor Project MED PID October 13, 2015.
© 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved. North Country Access Improvements Stakeholder Advisory Committee Meeting No. 8 December 3, 2015.
I-35W/Highway 62 Crosstown Commons Reconstruction Nathan Aul, Bob Krussow, and Michael Martin.
1 CPA Request to expand the Oaks Mall Activity Center and change land use to Mixed Use 87 acres 8000 Block of W Newberry Rd.
I-66 OUTSIDE THE BELTWAY Shrevecrest HOA JUNE 21, Susan Shaw, P. E
Orange County Transportation Authority
Integrating Transit and Highway Solutions In High Volume Corridors
City of New Braunfels Regional Transportation Planning Garry Ford, P.E., PTOE City Engineer June 13, 2017.
SR 417 Extension Sketch-Level Traffic & Revenue Evaluation
Sully District Council of Citizens Associations January 25, 2017 Susan Shaw, P.E., Megaprojects Director Virginia Department of Transportation.
BELLE TERRE BLVD/PKWY CORRIDOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Project Status Update I-680 Southbound HOV Gap Closure Project Environmental Phase September 2011 PARSONS.
The Oakton Condominium Association September 12, 2017
SR 417 Extension Sketch-Level Traffic & Revenue Evaluation
San Mateo Countywide Transportation Plan update
Transportation System Development Charge Working Group
Ventura County Traffic Model (VCTM) VCTC Update
Transportation Impact Fees and Funding
Presentation and Discussion of the Draft Transportation Land Use Assumptions and Infrastructure Improvement Plan Report (Impact Fee Report) Town Council.
Stockton City Council December 6, 2007 Land Use Diagram Changes
Funding the Town’s Transportation Infrastructure Improvement Plan (IIP) – An Initial Discussion of Impact Fees Town Council Meeting March 1, 2017.
Project Location. Cambridge/Arlington Intersection Reconstruction Public Information Meeting June 16, 2015.
State Route 55 Improvement Project from Interstate 5 to State Route 91
Presentation transcript:

TVTC Impact Fee Update Nexus Study January 30, 2008 presented to Tri-Valley Transportation Commission (TVTC) presented by Christopher Wornum, Cambridge Systematics, Inc. January 30, 2008

Agenda Nexus process Impacts of growth Final projects Nexus findings Maximum fee rates Next steps Status of project - what has been done since last July Schedule for completion with milestones tied to TVTC meetings - draft report targeted for discussion at TVTC meeting on April 25th. Preliminary Nexus findings - i.e. not done with all Nexus analysis and report, but preliminary results indicate that all proposed projects can be funded up to 100% of unfunded balance by TVTC fee (if true) Fee rate alternatives - include discussion that fee rates determination is needed to complete draft report Next steps?

How a Nexus is Calculated Four Basic Steps LOS A LOS B LOS C LOS D LOS E LOS F LOS A LOS B LOS C LOS D LOS E LOS F LOS A LOS B LOS C LOS D LOS E LOS F LOS A LOS B LOS C LOS D LOS E LOS F Existing Conditions Future No Project Future No Project Future No Project Existing LOS Existing LOS Existing LOS Existing LOS Mitigating Improvements New development funds up to its share of needed capacity Through trips Existing population & employment and current V/C ratio Total traffic reduced by through trips Net new traffic impacts on congestion without improvements

Travel Demand from New Development Average AM/PM Peak Hour Trip Ends, 2007 to 2030 Average AM/PM Peak Hour Trips 350,000 321,446 300,000 98,066 44% 250,000 223,357 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 2007 2030

Thousands of Vehicle Hours of delay Tri-Valley Average Change in Congestion Vehicle Hours of Delay for Local Traffic (2005 and 2030) 45 Morning Peak Hour Evening Peak Hour 40,058 2030 no Project PM 40 38,715 2030 no Project AM 35 30 25 Thousands of Vehicle Hours of delay 20 15 10 5,092 2005 AM 4,505 2005 PM 5

Previous TVTDF Projects (Appendix A) Millions of 2008 Dollars Project Total Cost Unfunded Cost I-580/I-680 Interchange (southbound to eastbound) - - Route 84 Expressway I-580 to I-680 $337 $222 Isabel Route 84/I-580 Interchange $180 $15 I-680 Auxiliary Lanes $47 $38 West Dublin/Pleasanton BART Station - - I-580 HOV Lane Eastbound $162 $8 I-580 HOV Lane Westbound $165 $20 I-680 HOV Lanes, SR 84 to Top of Sunol Grade - - I-580/Foothill/San Ramon Road Interchange $1 $1 I-680/Alcosta Interchange - - Crow Canyon Road Improvements Phase 1 $16 $11 Crow Canyon Road Improvements Phase 2 $32 $32 Vasco Road Safety Improvements Phase 1 $23 $4 Vasco Road Safety Improvements Phase 2 $26 $26 Express Bus/Bus Rapid Transit $20 $12 Total $1,009 $389

Proposed TVTDF Projects (Appendix B) Millions of 2008 Dollars Project Total Cost Unfunded Cost I-580/I-680 interchange (westbound to southbound) $705 $700 5th eastbound lane on I-580: Santa Rita to Vasco Rd. $131 $131 I-580/First St. interchange modification $30 $4 I-580/Vasco Rd. interchange modification $51 $15 I-580/Greenville Rd. interchange modification $35 $8 Jack London Boulevard extension $28 $4 El Charro Road Extension $19 $5 Camino Tassajara widening: E. Blackhawk Dr to Cty line $49 $45 Danville Blvd/Stone Valley Rd I-680 Interchange $3 $3 I-680 SB HOV lane Gap Closure, North Main to Livorna $55 $37 I-680 Express Bus/HOV On- and Off-Ramps $80 $47 I-680 Transit Corridor Improvements $100 $100 Total $1,286 $1,098

Proposed TVTDF Projects (Millions of 2006 Dollars) $1,600 $1,487 Million $1,500 Appendix A $389 Million $0 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $600 $700 $800 $900 $1,000 $1,100 $1,200 Millions of 2006 Dollars $1,300 $1,400 Appendix B $1,098 Million $808 Million Appendix B $188 Million Appendix A $620 Million Funded (Millions) Unfunded (Millions)

Thousands of Vehicle Hours of delay Tri-Valley Average Change in Congestion Vehicle Hours of Delay for Local Traffic (2005 and 2030) 45 Morning Peak Hour Evening Peak Hour 40,058 2030 no Project PM 40 38,715 2030 no Project AM 35 32,890 2030 with Project AM 31,062 2030 with Project PM 30 25 Thousands of Vehicle Hours of delay 20 15 10 5,092 2005 AM 4,505 2005 PM 5

TVTC Transportation Development Fees Existing Fees (2007 Dollars) $4,000 $3,390 $3,500 $2,500 $2,290 $2,000 $1,888 Fees by Land Use Type $1,500 $1,270 $1,200 $1,000 Replace subtitle or add text box in chart: “Demand projected to increase 46% while funded capacity projects will add only 1%” Simplify: In legend say “Demand (VMT)” and “Capacity (lane-miles)” Does lane miles includes all funded CIP projects (STIP, etc.)? $500 $0 Single Family Multi-Family Retail per 1,000 sq. ft. Office per 1,000 sq. ft. Industrial per 1,000 sq. ft.

TVTC Transportation Development Fees Maximum Residential Fee Rates (2007 Dollars) $0 $7,000 $5,000 $4,000 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $6,000 $12,000 $11,000 $8,000 $9,000 $10,000 $13,000 $12,238 $8,430 Rate per Dwelling Unit Replace subtitle or add text box in chart: “Demand projected to increase 46% while funded capacity projects will add only 1%” Simplify: In legend say “Demand (VMT)” and “Capacity (lane-miles)” Does lane miles includes all funded CIP projects (STIP, etc.)? Single Family Multi-Family

Industrial per square foot TVTC Transportation Development Fees Maximum Commercial Fee Rates (2007 Dollars) $0 $14 $10 $8 $2 $4 $6 $12 $24 $22 $16 $18 $20 $26 $22.71 $20.80 $13.60 $12.10 Rate per square foot Replace subtitle or add text box in chart: “Demand projected to increase 46% while funded capacity projects will add only 1%” Simplify: In legend say “Demand (VMT)” and “Capacity (lane-miles)” Does lane miles includes all funded CIP projects (STIP, etc.)? Retail per square foot Office per 1,000 square foot Industrial per square foot Other per square foot

Fee per Single Family Home Contra Costa Transportation Development Fees Comparison Across Four Subregions Southern CC1 Western Contra Costa Lamorinda $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000 $12,000 $14,000 $16,000 Tri-Valley $0 East County $15,000 $12,238 Fee per Single Family Home Replace subtitle or add text box in chart: “Demand projected to increase 46% while funded capacity projects will add only 1%” Simplify: In legend say “Demand (VMT)” and “Capacity (lane-miles)” Does lane miles includes all funded CIP projects (STIP, etc.)? $4,718 $3,038 SCC Subregional $2,595 $1,101 SCC Regional 1. Southern contra Costa fee program includes the cities of Danville, San Ramon, and the unincorproated area of SCC

Single Family Home Price in 1995 and 2006 $1 $972,193 $864,353 $800 $804,103 $781,771 $686,201 $600 Average Price for a Single Family Home $432,173 $400 Replace subtitle or add text box in chart: “Demand projected to increase 46% while funded capacity projects will add only 1%” Simplify: In legend say “Demand (VMT)” and “Capacity (lane-miles)” Does lane miles includes all funded CIP projects (STIP, etc.)? $309,829 $313,753 $312,228 $200 $221,997 $12,238 Fee $0 Danville San Ramon Dublin Pleasanton Livermore