CERN meeting report, and more … D. Breton

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
J. Varela, CERN & LIP-Lisbon Tracker Meeting, 3rd May Partitions in Trigger Control J. Varela CERN & LIP-Lisbon Trigger Technical Coordinator.
Advertisements

Calo Piquet Training Session - Xvc1 ECS Overview Piquet Training Session Cuvée 2012 Xavier Vilasis.
Architecture and Dataflow Overview LHCb Data-Flow Review September 2001 Beat Jost Cern / EP.
Databases in CMS Conditions DB workshop 8 th /9 th December 2003 Frank Glege.
Hall D Electronics Review (July 23-24) Elton Smith Hall D Collaboration Meeting August 4-6.
Management of the LHCb Online Network Based on SCADA System Guoming Liu * †, Niko Neufeld † * University of Ferrara, Italy † CERN, Geneva, Switzerland.
1 Calorimeters LED control LHCb CALO meeting Anatoli Konoplyannikov /ITEP/ Status of the calorimeters LV power supply and ECS control Status of.
SuperB DAQ U. Marconi Padova 23/01/09. Bunch crossing: 450 MHz L1 Output rate: 150 kHz L1 Triggering Detectors: EC, DC The Level 1 trigger has the task.
P. Branchini (INFN Roma 3) Involved Group: INFN-Roma1 V. Bocci, INFN-Roma3 INFN-Na.
20OCT2009Calo Piquet Training Session - Xvc1 ECS Overview Piquet Training Session Cuvée 2009 Xavier Vilasis.
IRFU The ANTARES Data Acquisition System S. Anvar, F. Druillole, H. Le Provost, F. Louis, B. Vallage (CEA) ACTAR Workshop, 2008 June 10.
D.Breton, U.Marconi, Perugia SuperB Workshop – June 16th 2009 Electronics, Trigger and DAQ for SuperB: proposal for the system architecture. Dominique.
ETD/Online Summary D. Breton, U. Marconi, S. Luitz Frascati Workshop 04/2011.
Status of ETD D. Breton, U.Marconi, S.Luitz WS summary plenary session October 1 st 2010 D. Breton - SuperB Frascati Workshop – September 2010.
Some thoughs about trigger/DAQ … Dominique Breton (C.Beigbeder, G.Dubois-Felsmann, S.Luitz) SuperB meeting – La Biodola – June 2008.
Giovanna Lehmann Miotto CERN EP/DT-DI On behalf of the DAQ team
Trigger, DAQ, & Online Planning and R&D needs
LHCb and InfiniBand on FPGA
ETD meeting Architecture and costing On behalf of PID group
LKr status R. Fantechi.
PANDA collaboration meeting FEE session
ETD meeting First estimation of the number of links
Electronics Trigger and DAQ CERN meeting summary.
ETD summary D. Breton, S.Luitz, U.Marconi
ETD/Online Report D. Breton, U. Marconi, S. Luitz
Trigger, DAQ and Online Closeout
Status of ETD/Online D. Breton, U.Marconi, S.Luitz
Modelisation of SuperB Front-End Electronics
Summary of the parallel session. Design and organisation
ETD/Online Report D. Breton, U. Marconi, S. Luitz
DAQ for ATLAS SCT macro-assembly
A few ideas about detector grounding and shielding D. Breton
Electronics, Trigger and DAQ for SuperB
RT2003, Montreal Niko Neufeld, CERN-EP & Univ. de Lausanne
Discussion after electronics parallel session
Commissioning of the ALICE HLT, TPC and PHOS systems
ALICE Trigger Upgrade CTP and LTU PRR
Trigger, DAQ, & Online: Perspectives on Electronics
ALICE, ATLAS, CMS & LHCb joint workshop on DAQ
ProtoDUNE SP DAQ assumptions, interfaces & constraints
Modelisation of control of SuperB Common Front-End Electronics
Read-out of High Speed S-LINK Data Via a Buffered PCI Card
EMC Electronics and Trigger Review and Trigger Plan
The LHCb Event Building Strategy
Dominique Breton, Jihane Maalmi
The IFR Online Detector Control at the BaBar experiment at SLAC
during Fall GMp run (high current)
LHCb Trigger and Data Acquisition System Requirements and Concepts
SVT detector electronics
ETD/Online Summary D. Breton, U. Marconi, S. Luitz
John Harvey CERN EP/LBC July 24, 2001
The IFR Online Detector Control at the BaBar experiment at SLAC
The Online Detector Control at the BaBar experiment at SLAC
Throttling: Infrastructure, Dead Time, Monitoring
LHCb Alignment Strategy
DC trigger Present DC design Lab tests and implementation.
PID meeting Mechanical implementation Electronics architecture
Possible parasitic measurement during Fall GMp run
ETD parallel session March 18th 2010
SVT detector electronics
SVT – SuperB Workshop – Frascati Sept. 2010
Electronics for the PID
Electronics, Trigger and DAQ for SuperB: summary of the workshop.
The LHCb Front-end Electronics System Status and Future Development
U. Marconi, D. Breton, S. Luitz
Orsay Talks Christophe : General questions and future developments.
Fixed Latency Serial Links with FPGA-embedded SerDes for SuperB
Links and more … D. Breton
Computing production Need for detector studies
LNF PID session 1 December 1st 2009
Presentation transcript:

CERN meeting report, and more … D. Breton ETD/online session - Frascati Meeting December 3rd 2009

Outcome of the CERN meeting (1) The meeting took place beginning of November: Attendance was 14 people (all sub-systems represented, unfortunately except DCH) It was very pleasant and useful We spent one day going through the ETD architecture once again to convince ourselves our choices were coherent with our goals No showstopper was raised! We started discussing about the L1 trigger New proposals emerged there and since, and we will discuss them in this session. We finalized the chapters for the white paper (see farther). We also realized that costing couln’t be performed without realistic numbers for all the different type of fast links, especially the readout links we requested all the sub-detectors to give us estimations for these numbers before the meeting. we had fruitful exchanges about these points since, and we have now a first good (?) estimation of these numbers. We defined « Online » and discussed choices for Online technologies Could LHC frameworks & packages be directly applicable? Network protocols for event building and data transport

Outcome of the CERN meeting (2) Discussing about level 1 trigger, we realized that its granularity is of high importance for the quality of the selection In BABAR, crystals were summed by 24 before being used in the trigger algorithm, grouped in phi strips We think that a much higher (full?) granularity trigger is feasible with today’s technology (like on LHCb for instance). To this end, we would need all the calorimeter information to go to the EMT => like on BABAR, the EMC front-end readout could be untriggered => but the latency buffer could then reside in the EMT itself, thus keeping the same overall architecture and a reasonable number of ROMs Drawback of this solution is that the number of calorimeter readout links (~ 600) would be significantly higher than the total of all other sub-detectors (~140) => BABAR like! Anyhow, we have to find a way to reduce the granularity detecting overlap & pileup at trigger level, Bhabha veto, etc. Once finalized, all chapters of the white paper got names in front of them and first contributions of all subsystems already arrived! These exchanges are really helpful for system understanding at all levels We refined the needs for the WBS cost estimates (see farther)

ETD/online chapters for white paper (1) 4.9 System level introduction(DB + UM + SL) Global architecture (DB + UM + SL) Overall trigger strategy (SL + UM) Event Size Estimation and trigger rates (SL + UM) Dead time and buffer queue depth (SL) 4.10 Front-End Electronics (DB) 4.10.1 SVT Electronics (MV) 4.10.2 DCH Electronics (GF) 4.10.3 PID Electronics (DB) 4.10.3.1 Forward PID option 4.10.3.2 Barrel PID 4.10.4 EMC Electronics (VB) 4.10.4.1 Forward calorimeter 4.10.4.2 Barrel calorimeter 4.10.4.3 Backward option 4.10.5 IFR Electronics (ACR)

ETD/online chapters for white paper (2) 4.11 Electronics, Trigger, DAQ (ETD) and Online (DB + UM + SL) 4.11.1 Introduction to ETD (DB) 4.11.2 ETD components (DB) Fast Control and Timing System (DB + DC + CB) Clock, Control & Data Links (AA + RG) Common Front-End Electronics (JM) Read Out Module (MB + UM) Experiment Control System (DC + SL) Low Level Hardware Trigger (DB + UM + SL) 4.11.3 Online (SL + GM) Software infrastructure Event building High Level Software Trigger Data logging Event data quality monitoring and display Other components 4.11.4 Conclusions (DB + UM + SL) Cost estimations consideration

ETD elements for SuperB_costing EDIA [mm] M&S [k€] 1.7.10 ETD (without Trigger) 1.7.10.1 FCTS 144 150 1.7.10.1.1 FCTS crates and supplies 2 30 1.7.10.1.2 Control and Distribution Module (2) 12 10 1.7.10.1.3 Fast Control and Timing Module (15) 84 60 Clock & Control Link Switch Module (7) 36 40 Throttle Switch Module (2) 1.7.10.2 CFEE 1.7.10.2.1 FCTS mezzanine (400 + protos) 48 140 1.7.10.2.2 Level 1 Buffer Control 6 Readout link control & serializer Option 1: triggered EMC => 400 links Option 2: untriggered EMC => 1000 links 320 1.7.10.3 ROM 1.7.10.3.1 ROM crates and supplies (5) 75 1.7.10.3.2 ROM crate controller (7) 50 1.7.10.3.3 ROM boards (40 ? 8 links/board) 200 1.7.10.4 ECS 1.7.10.4.1 SPECS masters (400 + protos) 3 100 SPECS Mezzanine (400 + protos) 80 1.7.10.4.2 SPECS links (400 cat5+ cables) 16 1.7.10.5 Clock & Control Links (400) 20 1.7.10.6 Readout links

What we expect(ed) from this workshop We will try to refine our estimations for the number of links => done. the front-end dedicated ETD session (Wednesday at 9:00) will focus on this point. all the types of links will be visited, including FCTS and ECS be aware that these elements are deeply related to the system topology We will go on discussing about level 1 trigger fundamentals in the second session (Thursday at 11:15) We will wonder what could be an optimum number of readout links at the input of a ROM We will try to have the first ETD cost estimation ready for the TB => done Overall ETD cost without L1 trigger is ~1M€ (if 400 links => EMC) Further discussions on Online (many informal) Applicability of existing LHC software and frameworks to SuperB Online Discussion of event building networking protocols and transports Run Control and Experiment Control System Review of data logging rates