OpenRIF and VIVO Mike Conlon, PhD

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 ICS-FORTH & Univ. of Crete SeLene November 15, 2002 A View Definition Language for the Semantic Web Maganaraki Aimilia.
Advertisements

Developing an application ontology for biomedical resource annotation and retrieval: challenges and lessons learned C. Torniai, M. Brush, N. Vasilevsky,
UF VIVO is intended to be a comprehensive resource for scholarship, scholarly networking, and information about scholarship at the university. Automation.
CH-4 Ontologies, Querying and Data Integration. Introduction to RDF(S) RDF stands for Resource Description Framework. RDF is a standard for describing.
Creating Linked Data Juan F. Sequeda Semantic Technology Conference June 2011.
The Semantic Web – WEEK 4: RDF
Dr. Bhavani Thuraisingham February 18, 2011 Building Trustworthy Semantic Webs RDF and RDF Security.
ESDSWG2011 – Semantic Web session Semantic Web Sub-group Session ESDSWG 2011 Meeting – Semantic Web sub-group session Wednesday, November 2, 2011 Norfolk,
RDF Tutorial.
VIVO and Linked Open Data December 13, 2010 Dean B. Krafft Chief Technology Strategist and Director of IT Cornell University Library.
Ontology Notes are from:
Data Sources & Using VIVO Data Visualizing Scholarship VIVO provides network analysis and visualization tools to maximize the benefits afforded by the.
Ontologies: Making Computers Smarter to Deal with Data Kei Cheung, PhD Yale Center for Medical Informatics CBB752, February 9, 2015, Yale University.
RDF: Concepts and Abstract Syntax W3C Recommendation 10 February Michael Felderer Digital Enterprise.
I DENTIFYING AND A PPROACHING D ATA P ROVIDERS ; F ULL L IFE C YCLE D ATA M ANAGEMENT Mike Conlon Kristi Holmes.
RDF (Resource Description Framework) Why?. XML XML is a metalanguage that allows users to define markup XML separates content and structure from formatting.
Mike Conlon Here’s Mike on a conference call from his home. Mike spends a lot of time on conference calls from his home, and from coffee shops in and around.
VIVO is supported by NIH award U24 RR The UF CTSI is supported in part by NIH awards UL1 RR029890, KL2 RR and TL1 RR The UF CTSI VIVO:
VIVO: Sharing Data for Research Discovery Mike Conlon University of Florida
What is VIVO? Research and Scholarship Discovery Across the University of Florida – A service of the Clinical and Translational Science Institute A Grant.
Information Interchange on the Semantic Web an interactive talk by Piotr Kaminski, University of Victoria
RDF and triplestores CMSC 461 Michael Wilson. Reasoning  Relational databases allow us to reason about data that is organized in a specific way  Data.
Developing “Geo” Ontology Layers for Web Query Faculty of Design & Technology Conference David George, Department of Computing.
RDF and XML 인공지능 연구실 한기덕. 2 개요  1. Basic of RDF  2. Example of RDF  3. How XML Namespaces Work  4. The Abbreviated RDF Syntax  5. RDF Resource Collections.
Semantic Web Programming in Python an Introduction Biju B Jaganath G.
The future of the Web: Semantic Web 9/30/2004 Xiangming Mu.
Anatomy Ontology Community Melissa Haendel. The OBO Foundry More than just a website, it’s a community of ontology developers.
AGROVOC Thesaurus. 1980s: developed as multilingual structured thesaurus for agricultural terminology (“rice”) : parallel effort to express thesaurus.
Introduction to the Semantic Web and Linked Data Module 1 - Unit 2 The Semantic Web and Linked Data Concepts 1-1 Library of Congress BIBFRAME Pilot Training.
Chapter 7: Resource Description Framework (RDF) Service-Oriented Computing: Semantics, Processes, Agents – Munindar P. Singh and Michael N. Huhns, Wiley,
Deepcarbon.net Xiaogang Ma, Patrick West, John Erickson, Stephan Zednik, Yu Chen, Han Wang, Hao Zhong, Peter Fox Tetherless World Constellation Rensselaer.
Doc.: IEEE /0169r0 Submission Joe Kwak (InterDigital) Slide 1 November 2010 Slide 1 Overview of Resource Description Framework (RFD/XML) Date:
THE SEMANTIC WEB By Conrad Williams. Contents  What is the Semantic Web?  Technologies  XML  RDF  OWL  Implementations  Social Networking  Scholarly.
 Key integrating concepts  Groups  Formal Community Groups  Ad-hoc special purpose/ interest groups  Fine-grained access control and membership 
Introduction to Biomedical Ontology for Imaging Informatics Barry Smith, PhD, FACMI University at Buffalo May 11, 2015.
Building on VIVO and going the next step: Adding or Linking to Local and National repositories and/or research data; research resources and core facilities;
Basic Formal Ontology Barry Smith August 26, 2013.
Versatile Information Systems, Inc International Semantic Web Conference An Application of Semantic Web Technologies to Situation.
Getting More from Your VIVO Mike Conlon, UF Melissa Haendel, OHSU Kristi Holmes, Northwestern.
Data Sources & Using VIVO Data Visualizing Science VIVO provides network analysis and visualization tools to maximize the benefits afforded by the data.
From Hire to Promotion What Everyone Should Know About Faculty Appointments Faculty Affairs and Development (FAD) Executive Dean’s Office School of Medicine.
February 24, 2016Hot Topics: DuraSpace Community Webinar Series Hot Topics: The DuraSpace Community Webinar Series Series Thirteen: VIVO plus SHARE: Closing.
Subjects in the FR family
Service-Oriented Computing: Semantics, Processes, Agents
Introduction to Persistent Identifiers
Service-Oriented Computing: Semantics, Processes, Agents
VIVO: Faculty Research Information System and Discovery
Resource Description Framework
Yaşar Tonta & Orçun Madran [yasartonta, Hacettepe University
Service-Oriented Computing: Semantics, Processes, Agents
Jun Zhao University of Oxford
SPARQL Exercise Much of this exercise has been copied from: INF3580/INF4580 – MANDATORY EXERCISE 3
Grid Computing 7700 Fall 2005 Lecture 18: Semantic Grid
Introduction to Implementing an Institutional Repository
Analyzing and Securing Social Networks
Ontology.
Introduction to RDF and RDFS Editor: MR3
Sparql Examples.
Semantic Web: Core Concepts and Mechanisms
An ecosystem of contributions
How can DDI make the most of RDF?
Paolo Ciccarese, PhD Mass General Hospital / Harvard Medical School
Grid Computing 7700 Fall 2005 Lecture 18: Semantic Grid
SPARQL Exercise Most of this exercise has been copied from: INF3580/INF4580 – MANDATORY EXERCISE 3
Ontology.
Information Networks: State of the Art
ToolMatch Discovering What Tools can be used to Access, Manipulate, Transform, and Visualize Data Products Patrick West1 Nancy
Digital Libraries & Technology Trends
Linked Data 101 Things, URIs, RDF, Triples, Turtle, Ontologies, Vocabularies and SPARQL Linked Data is our Implementation choice for FAIR.
CIS Monthly Seminar – Software Engineering and Knowledge Management IS Enterprise Modeling Ontologies Presenter : Dr. S. Vasanthapriyan Senior Lecturer.
Presentation transcript:

OpenRIF and VIVO Mike Conlon, PhD Professor Emeritus, University of Florida VIVO Project Director, Duraspace

What is VIVO? VIVO is ontologies, software, data, and a community for representing scholars and their works Ontologies — 1 core ontology (VIVO-ISF), 3 additional VIVO-specific ontologies, 22 related ontologies, including OBO, BFO, and CRO (contribution ontology). Software — a triple store for subject-predicate-object assertions, a web-based ontology editor, generic assertion management (Vitro) and scholarship assertion management and display (VIVO). See http://github.com/vivo-project Data — assertions about scholars and their scholarly works. At UF, 23M assertions for 63K people, 62K papers, 24K grants, 87K courses taught. 1.7M assertions of the form “uri isa BFO_0000001” See http://vivo.ufl.edu/all-uf-triples.tar.gz OpenVIVO. 3.1M triples at http://openvivo.org/data Community — 130+ sites in 24 countries, 200K scholars, 1M+ works. See http://vivoweb.org, Twitter: @VIVOCollab

Domains of Representation

Ontologies integrated into VIVO-ISF VIVO – http://vivoweb.org/ontology/core Contribution ontology — https://github.com/openrif/contribution-ontology eagle-i Resource Ontology (ERO) – http://code.google.com/p/eagle-i Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) – http://www.ifomis.org/bfo Bibliographic Ontology (BIBO) – http://code.google.com/p/bibotools Cell Ontology (CL) – http://cellontology.org/?q=download Event Ontology – http://motools.sourceforge.net/event/event.html Friend of a Friend (FOAF) – http://www.foaf-project.org/ Gene Ontology (GO) – http://geneontology.sourceforge.net/#code Geopolitical UN FAO (GEO) http://www.fao.org/countryprofiles/geoinfo/geopolitical/resource/geopolitical.owl Information Artifact Ontology (IAO) – http://code.google.com/p/information-artifact-ontology/ Ontology for Biomedical Investigations (OBI) – http://obi.sourceforge.net/ontologyInformation/ Ontology of Clinical Research (OCRe) – http://code.google.com/p/ontology-of-clinical-research/ Reagent Ontology (ReO) – http://code.google.com/p/reagent-ontology/ Relations Ontology (RO) – http://obofoundry.org/ro/ Software Ontology (SWO) – http://theswo.sourceforge.net/ Sequence Ontology (SO) – http://www.sequenceontology.org/ SKOS (Simple Knowledge Organization System) – http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/ Uberon (Uber anatomy ontology) – http://obo.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/obo/uberon/releases/ vCard – http://www.w3.org/TR/vcard-rdf/

26 Ontologies used in VIVO PREFIX rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> PREFIX rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> PREFIX xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> PREFIX owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> PREFIX swrl: <http://www.w3.org/2003/11/swrl#> PREFIX swrlb: <http://www.w3.org/2003/11/swrlb#> PREFIX vitro: <http://vitro.mannlib.cornell.edu/ns/vitro/0.7#> PREFIX bibo: <http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/> PREFIX c4o: <http://purl.org/spar/c4o/> PREFIX cito: <http://purl.org/spar/cito/> PREFIX event: <http://purl.org/NET/c4dm/event.owl#> PREFIX fabio: <http://purl.org/spar/fabio/> PREFIX foaf: <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/> PREFIX geo: <http://aims.fao.org/aos/geopolitical.owl#> PREFIX p1: <http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/> PREFIX p2: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> PREFIX p3: <http://vivoweb.org/ontology/provenance-support#> PREFIX obo: <http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/> PREFIX ocrer: <http://purl.org/net/OCRe/research.owl#> PREFIX ocresd: <http://purl.org/net/OCRe/study_design.owl#> PREFIX skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#> PREFIX ufVivo: <http://vivo.ufl.edu/ontology/vivo-ufl/> PREFIX vcard: <http://www.w3.org/2006/vcard/ns#> PREFIX vitrop: <http://vitro.mannlib.cornell.edu/ns/vitro/public#> PREFIX vivo: <http://vivoweb.org/ontology/core#> PREFIX scires: <http://vivoweb.org/ontology/scientific-research#>

A Person Has type(s) — faculty, staff, graduate student, etc (these are more correctly modeled as roles, see future work) Has a vcard for contact information Has various identifiers — SCOPUS, ResearcherID, ORCiD, eRACommons Photo, home department, research areas (concepts) Is related to positions, education, and roles in grants, papers, courses, organizations, and other activities The ontologies are sufficient to represent the relationships between the entities and properties of scholars and their works

Issue: The Middle Ground VIVO occupies the “middle ground” in ontologies Above VIVO-ISF (more abstract) is the BFO and OBO Below VIVO-ISF (less abstract) are domain specific ontologies and vocabularies (clinical trials, LD4L, agriculture, cultural heritage, …) Most ontologies “below” VIVO introduce their own “middle concepts” — person, paper, project — these must be “reconciled” with VIVO-ISF. This is fundamental collaborative work across projects to be facilitated by OpenRIF

Issue: Missing Ontologies To represent scholarship, VIVO must represent detail that is best defined by authoritative sources Example: Academic Degrees VIVO supports its own vocabulary of 173 academic degrees (because the world doesn’t have one) Example: Research Areas Many vocabularies exist for expressing research areas of faculty members. What might be “useful” for faculty to find people working in related areas? Example: Contribution Ontology The contribution ontology developed by the Force16 Attribution Work Group, VIVO Project, and OpenRIF is new. It will need to be refined based on experience and further analysis

Issue: Boundaries of sub-graphs To represent a scholar and the scholar’s work, we include the scholar (a graph) and the graphs of the works, but these lead to other scholars, and to graphs representing journals, or publishers of journals. What is the boundary for a graph representing a scholar?

Issue: Assertions about Assertions We want to be able to make assertions about a graph of assertions for a scholar: “these assertions were made by the University of Florida” “these assertions are provided under license x” “these assertions were verified as of date y”