CAMPUS CLIMATE SURVEY SPRING 2009

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

© 2009 Richard Day Research, Inc. Purdue University Calumet Campus Climate Survey Results Richard Day, Ph.D. Richard Day Research November 27, 2009.

Advertisements

Results of the Faculty Survey on Internationalization at Villanova: A Preliminary Report Prepared for the International Leadership Committee Prepared by.

University of Louisville Employee Satisfaction Survey Presented by Dey Systems, Inc.

© 2006 SHRM SHRM Weekly Online Survey: March 21, 2006 Ethics - Held Accountable to Ethics Standards Sample comprised of 458 randomly selected HR professionals.

Voice Project Survey Report (c) Voice Project Pty Ltd & Access Macquarie Ltd – Overview Of Results Page 1 Guidelines For Interpretation Of Results.

The Economic Impact of a University on its Community and State: Examining Trends Four Years Later Presented by: Allison M. Ohme Institutional Research.

UGA Libraries Faculty Job Satisfaction Survey Conducted Spring 2006.

Online Course Evaluations Is there a perfect time? Presenters: Cassandra Jones, Ph.D., Director of Assessment Michael Anuszkiewicz, Research Associate.

Physics Education Research The University of Edinburgh Attitudes and Beliefs about Physics from a UK Academics’ Perspectives Robyn Donnelly 1, Cait MacPhee.

Question Everything.  Questionnaire should be: ◦ Valid – Questions should measure what was meant to be measured ◦ Reliable – Should give you the same.

Comparing Senior And Sophomore Knowledge and Confidence Concerning Academic Advising Anecdotal evidence suggested that a discrepancy existed between what.

University as Entrepreneur Results of Surveys of ASU Faculty, Students and Staff Spring 2007 Surveys conducted by the Institute for Social Science Research.

Office of Institutional Research CAMPUS CLIMATE SURVEY FALL, 2006.

Fall 2003 Survey: Employer Perceptions of UNA Graduates Office of Research, Planning, and Institutional Effectiveness April 2004.

Pagosa Springs Area Tourism Consumer Satisfaction and Demographic Information Study Jenalle Beaman, Candace Corrales, and Kayla Wright.

T Relationships do matter: Understanding how nurse-physician relationships can impact patient care outcomes Sandra L. Siedlecki PhD RN CNS.

© 2016 Results and Analysis: Elementary Schools Only 2016 School Quality Survey Spring ISD January 19 – 31, 2016.

Community Survey Report

WVU Faculty Work Climate Survey

Carolyn M. Shivers, June Chen, & Stacy Clifford

Office of Planning, Research, and Institutional Effectiveness

Selection of appropriate instruments/Validation of the Instrument It is important to ensure that instruments measures what they are designed to measure.

Generational Differences in the Workforce

SPANISH Results Schools comparison. SPANISH Results Schools comparison.

Saint Joseph’s college of maine

prepared by Ellis Ott, Ph.D., Research & Accountability Department

Woodland Public Schools Parent Survey Results

2016 School Climate Survey: Northgate Crossing Elementary School

Improving Student Engagement Through Audience Response Systems

ATEM Tertiary Education Sector Workplace Survey 2016

Community Survey Report

Online Ad Test Results July 2nd to 7th, 2015.

Student Opinion | Climate change

“I don’t Want to Work, I just want to bang on the drum all day”

Grading Rubric – Student Presentations

Evaluating performance management

Journalism 614: Relationship testing

SLP Knowledge of ADHD and Medication:

Your Institutional Report Step by Step

Employee Satisfaction Survey Report 2006

School Climate Survey 2008.

Employee Survey Results 2017

AVID College Completion Project

UA Workplace Experience Survey - Chime in!

Cal Poly Pomona Faculty Sentiment Survey

prepared by Ellis Ott, Ph.D., Research & Accountability Department

Overview and Highlights of Results June 12, 2018

Spring 2018 College Algebra Assessment

What is Market Research?

Student Satisfaction Results

Butler University Great Colleges To Work For

2017 Evergreen Valley College Student Communications and Class Scheduling Survey March 2017.

© Employee Benefit Research Institute 2019

2018 UNC System employee engagement survey

2018 Great Colleges Survey for Champlain College

The Global Community for Academic Advising

Select Findings from the Fall 2018 Enrolled Student Survey

Preliminary Findings from the 2008 ISU Faculty Needs Assessment

Self-Reported Health Status and Health Behaviors of Pharmacy Students

McPherson College, Fall 2017

2008 Space Grant Regional Meetings Survey Results

2.06 Understand data-collection methods to evaluate their appropriateness for the research problem/issue.

Employee Engagement Defined

Feedback for Quality Improvement

Survey Taker Name: Question Survey Taker Name:

2018 UNC System Employee Engagement Survey Results

Online Ad Test Results July 2nd to 7th, 2015.

Woodland Public Schools Parent Survey Results

Consumer Behaviour Lecture 3.

Fall 2018 Student satisfaction Survey

Presentation transcript:

CAMPUS CLIMATE SURVEY SPRING 2009 Office of Institutional Research

Methodology Survey using online/email technology mailed to faculty/staff email distributions lists of the Main University and the Law School during March of the Spring 2009 semester. Follow-up email sent approximately 10 days later. One hundred sixty eight score able surveys returned, resulting in a response rate of approximately 43%. Analysis of respondent characteristics indicate sample was representative of all full-time employees at STU. Results presented for total sample and additionally by employee type.

The Survey Instrument

Demographics of respondents

What Is Your Position at St. Thomas University?

What Is Your Gender?

RESULTS SPRING 2009

The first series of questions requested respondents to indicate their opinion in terms of level of agreement on a four point scale with a list of positively written statements about their job and STU. The scales were: 4 = Agree Strongly 3 = Agree Somewhat 2 = Disagree Somewhat 1= Disagree Strongly

RESULTS OF PART I IN ORDER OF MEAN LEVEL OF AGREEMENT Blue Cells within a Row are Significantly Different

The second series of questions requested respondents to provide their attribution of quality on a five point scale with various attributes of STU. The scales were: 5 =Excellent 4 = Good 3 = Average 2 = Fair 1= Poor

Average ‘Quality’ Ratings for Total Sample

Items Concerning University Mission

COMPARISON OF RESULTS SPRING 2009 TO FALL 2006

In order to facilitate the comparison of results from Spring 2009 administration of the survey the four categories from Part I were collapsed into two categories; Agree (Strongly Agree & Agree), Disagree (Strongly Disagree & Disagree).

In order to facilitate the comparison of results from Spring 2009 administration of the survey the five categories from Part II were collapsed into two categories; Positive (Excellent & Good), Negative (Fair & Poor). ‘Average’ attributions were not included in the analyses.

Change in Positive Attributions Ordered by Magnitude of Change

Change in Negative Attributions Ordered by Magnitude of Change