LCLS-II CMTF@LERF Cost Details E. Daly / C. Hovater / M. Wiseman with help from Accel Ops and Engineering 03-AUG-2017.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LINACs Michael Bevins May 17, GeV Upgrade - Beam Transport Injection, Linac, Extraction, & Correctors Preliminary Design and Safety Review.
Advertisements

ILCTA_NML Progress at Fermilab Jerry Leibfritz September 10, 2007.
1 Draft NYISO 2003 Budget Report BS&P Report to Management Committee October 16, 2002.
Global Design Effort U.S. ILC Cost Translation R. Stanek, et al. Vic Kuchler 1/26/07.
OFFICE OF SCIENCE 1 3. Cost Estimate Gines, Fisher 2.Are the estimated cost and proposed schedule ranges realistic, consistent with the technical and budgetary.
January LEReC Review 12 – 13 January 2015 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Kerry Mirabella Cost, Schedule, Personnel.
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Alexei Fedotov Project Management.
HLRF DRAFT Global Design Effort 1 Defining EDR* Work Packages [Engineering Design Report] Ray Larsen SLAC ILC Division for HLRF Team DRAFT April.
W.J. Foyt LUSI DOE Review July 23, 2007 Project Management 1 Project Management W. J. Foyt Project Scope Timeline Cost Estimate.
U.S. Muon Accelerator Program: MICE Milestones & Resource-Loaded Schedule M. A. Palmer, Director October 31, 2012.
F Proton Plan Eric Prebys, FNAL Accelerator Division.
January LEReC Review 12 – 13 January 2015 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Kerry Mirabella Cost, Schedule, Personnel.
Test Lab Cryogenic Requirements Kirk Davis Director’s Review of Cryogenic Capacity 26 May, 2010.
ILC Test Facility at New Muon Lab (NML) S. Nagaitsev Fermilab April 16, 2007.
1 Global Design Effort: Controls & LLRF Controls & LLRF Working Group: Tuesday Session (29 May 07) John Carwardine Kay Rehlich.
Spreaders & Recombiners Beam Transport Michael Bevins May 30, GeV Upgrade - Beam Transport Spreader/Recombiner Dipoles and Layout, & Installation.
Assembly 12/14/06 #1 Assembly and Commissioning Paul Huffman.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 CEBAF Cryo & SRF Workshop April 3, 2014 Mathew Wright Cryogenic Systems Operations Engineer
26 April, 2016 LCLS II Cryomodules and Cryoplant, Joe Preble LCLS-II Overview JLAB Organization for LCLS-II JLAB responsibilities & Schedule and Status.
Jefferson Lab Cryomodule Cost and Optimization. Based Jlab energy upgrade Cryomodule design and produced to increase the energy gain of CEBAF to 12 GeV.
ILCTA_NML Progress at Fermilab Jerry Leibfritz August 16, 2007.
Development of Cryo-Module Test Stand (CMTS) for Fermi Lab (R.L.Suthar, Head,CDM, BARC) Cryo-Module Test stand (CMTS) is a very sophisticated equipment.
Integration of HWR, SSR1, and Cryo in the PXIE enclosure Curt Baffes PIP-II Collaboration Meeting 09 November 2015.
Prototype Cryomodule FDR Ken Premo 21 – 22 January 2015 High Power Coupler Design.
Introduction Six-Month Follow-Up on Action Items of Feb 2016 CEBAF Field Emitter Workshop Rongli Geng September 12, 2016.
Director’s Progress Review Closeout Meeting
LCLS-II Technical Requirements
Cryoplant Controls Installation
RF Systems and Controls for the LERF CM Tests
Cryogenic Plant Electrical and Controls
LCLS-II For LCLS-II Cryomodule Testing at JLab
Preliminary Review of LERF as Cryomodule Testing Facility for LCLS-II
CERN Construction Planning and Scheduling (LHC installation)
2K Cold Box FDR Introduction
Cryomodule test stand at ESS site
LERF as Cryomodule Testing Facility Set-Up and Installation Logistics
2K Cold Box PDR Introduction
Project Management W. J. Foyt
Installation of an Instrument on a CERN machine
Hot Checkout System for LERF Resuscitation
UK RFD Pre-Series cryomodule
2K CB FDR Overview:  Agenda, Charge, Review Process
Management Breakout: MREFC Budget Summary Victor L
C75 Risk Assessment Geoff Krafft
Director’s Progress Review Closeout Meeting
JEFFERSON LAB LCLSII CRYOPLANT INSTALLATION PACKAGE DIRECTOR’S PROGRESS REVIEW Welcome and Introduction Stuart Henderson June 1, 2017.
By Jeff Burklo, Director
E. Daly / K. Jordan / C. Hovater / T. Hiatt 03-AUG-2017
Thoughts on Energy Reach
Upgraded Injector Test Facility
LERF Cryomodule Testing Facility – Accelerator Systems Deliverable
LERF Readiness Review Kevin Jordan
Scope, Requirements Deliverables & Schedule
Baseline Change Request
LERF Readiness Review: Charge
Operator Training Requirements
SNS PPU Cryomodule Instrumentation
X-Ray Endstations Update
LERF Readiness Review Ed Daly / Matt Marchlik
Project Management Issues John N. Galayda, SLAC April 24, 2002
CTF Users’ Perspective
LCLS-II Cryoplant Controls Workshop.
LCLS Injector System Overview D. H
Conventional Facilities
Cryomodule Test Schedule
DOE Status Meeting of the LCLS Project
SNS-PPU upgrades the existing accelerator structure
LERF CM Supplemental Testing & Change Management
QCM and C50-12 Status Update
LCLS-II Operations in LERF
Presentation transcript:

LCLS-II CMTF@LERF Cost Details E. Daly / C. Hovater / M. Wiseman with help from Accel Ops and Engineering 03-AUG-2017

Cost Detail for each Phase Summary Outline Introduction Cost Roll up Cost Detail for each Phase Summary REV2, 03-AUG-2017

Introduction A detailed scope, cost and schedule estimate for installing and testing LCLS-II cryomodules (two-at-a-time) as an assembly in the LERF has been developed in response to possible LCLS-II project needs. Estimate considers four phases of increasing scope - short term limited testing (microphonics & technical characterization) up to a full test bed (a possible mitigation for schedule recovery) to operate in parallel with the CMTF in the Test Lab. Phase 1 – Set Up LERF for CM testing Phase 2 – First pair of CMs - Initial Full Power Testing Phase 3 – Three Production CM testing cycles A typical test cycle is 5-8 weeks Phase 4 – Restore LERF REV2, 03-AUG-2017

Preliminary Detailed P6 Cost Estimate Set Up First Test Three Tests Restoration Full cost recovery Including operating cost estimates for LERF Operating costs - $10.8K/week while CM is cold Path forward assuming JLab approval Proposal brought into the LCLS-II project baseline via baseline change request – expect some minor cost adjustments Subsequently managed using EVMS to monitor and report on progress REV2, 03-AUG-2017

Review of Excel Pivot File (Live) Example – Phase 1 from Excel Pivot File REV2, 03-AUG-2017

Review of Excel Pivot File (Live) Example – Phase 2 from Excel Pivot File REV2, 03-AUG-2017

Review of Excel Pivot File (Live) Example – Phase 3 from Excel Pivot File REV2, 03-AUG-2017

Review of Excel Pivot File (Live) Example – Phase 2 from Excel Pivot File REV2, 03-AUG-2017

Developed a p6 what-if file for the scope of work Schedule Developed a p6 what-if file for the scope of work Assumes early start of all activities for Phase 1 Results in labor “bump” early Plan to refine based on FY2018 plans (and acceptance of this proposal) Adjust labor to spread over 11 months rather than 8 months – more confidence in hitting date in Jul-2017 Bayonet box design decouples transient operations May be able to add testing cycles if not limited by CEBAF run program REV2, 03-AUG-2017

Assumptions Priority for JLab is 12 GeV Operations Schedule for testing CMs will be coordinated with FY2018 & FY2019 run schedules CM testing windows will be adjusted to minimize impact on NP program Full cost recovery from LERF operations is required Defined boundaries between laboratory program and WFO Cost includes specific LERF facility charges Draft cost and schedule presented in parallel to LCLS-II and JLab management. Updates and revisions based on discussions are included Staffing requirements will be considered as part of overall FY2018/2019 laboratory planning. Priority consistent with WFO vs. CEBAF operations. Recommend meeting with LCLS-II Project Director, Lab Director and Chief Planning Officer to review and discuss overall plan REV2, 03-AUG-2017

Impacts & Risks Cryogenics: present 2K issues complicate near term scheduling. Contamination is a concern that could affect availability. Can’t stab U-tubes during CEBAF ops (need CEBAF @ 4K for 1 week) Repeated stabbing adds potential contamination problems Cooldown and warm-up : overall cryo load must be handled properly with controls. CEBAF Operations: Phase I no impact. Phase II & III requires PSS Control and interface. Cannot keep two of the FEL CMs cold as CEBAF spares. Coordination is required with other cryo activities. Phase II & III need coordination with CEBAF 12 GeV operations. LERF Operations: Phase II and Phase III would eliminate all other LERF operations. Staffing: Initial plan utilizes combination of in-house staff and possibly term hires. Higher priority work might limit available staff. Schedule: Working towards July test cycle (April if all goes very well.) REV2, 03-AUG-2017

Ready for BCR proposal to LCLS-II Summary Detailed costs have been presented for the scope associated with testing LCLS-II CMs in the LERF Costs are part of an integrated preliminary proposal that includes cost & schedule details Ready for BCR proposal to LCLS-II Some minor updates/modifications may be needed based on feedback from this review REV2, 03-AUG-2017

Back Up REV2, 03-AUG-2017

Phase I – Configure LERF for Testing Removal of 20’ of back leg of existing machine to install/position CMs Removal of u-tubes from two existing CMs in FEL vault Can remove two high performing CMs to augment CEBAF Requires a set of u tubes to connect CMs to existing cryogenic transfer line bayonet connections Review design; procure cryogenic hardware Requires one set of CM testing end caps (same design as CMTF) Requires two sets of stands (same design as CMTF) Requires one set of interconnect hardware including HOM BLA, bellows Install cryogenic controls (Cryocon temp readbacks, heaters, JT and cooldown valves, etc.) Pull cabling Install SLAC-provided SSAs and HPRF hardware Install SLAC-provided LLRF controls Review and approve any updates to OSP for FEL vault operations Decarad and Faraday cups for radiation monitoring REV2, 03-AUG-2017

Phase II – Initial Full Power RF/Cryo Testing Assumes all hardware from Phase I available Schedule allows for more time and resources for initial testing cycle Install pair of CMs in LERF Connect RF, instrumentation and cryo controls Coordinate cooldown with CEBAF operations Evaluate procedures for cooldown, RF testing and warm up Coordinate warm up with CEBAF operations Remove pair of CMs from LERF REV2, 03-AUG-2017

Phase III – CM Acceptance Testing Assumes Phase II completed Schedule considers logistics for installing multiple CMs in LERF vault Staffing estimate will be based on current project baseline Assumes one test cycle in CMTF / 5 wks Potential impact - CMTF & LERF testing is conducted in parallel REV2, 03-AUG-2017

Assumes Phase III completed Phase IV – Restore LERF Assumes Phase III completed Remove any LCLS-II specific hardware from vault Replace LERF specific hardware REV2, 03-AUG-2017