State Payment Reform Bringing physicians together for a healthier Ohio

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Paul B. Ginsburg, Ph.D. Presentation to The Rising Costs of Health Care: What Can be Done, Alliance for Health Reform, June 12, 2012 Policy Support for.
Advertisements

THE COMMONWEALTH FUND Figure 1. More Than Two-Thirds of Opinion Leaders Say Current Payment System Is Not Effective at Encouraging High Quality of Care.
Preliminary working draft; subject to change 0 BH Health Home October 18, Commission Meeting DRAFT PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT, SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
MEDICAL HOME 1/2009 Mary Goldman, D.O., President of MAOFP.
A Plan to Transform the Empire State’s Medicaid Program 2013 Ten State Regional Conference February 23, 2013 Jason A. Helgerson, Medicaid Director NYS.
Contents Dawn Zekis, Medicaid Health Innovation Unit Director - Overview of the Healthcare Payment Improvement Initiative Shelley Tounzen, Medicaid Health.
March 16, 2015 Tricia McGinnis and Rob Houston Center for Health Care Strategies Value-Based Purchasing Efforts in Medicaid: A National Perspective.
Health Transformation in Ohio: What’s Next? The Center for Community Solutions 71 st Annual Human Services Institute November 6,
Bundled Payment Michael Chernew, PhD Michael Chernew, PhD Leonard D. Schaeffer Professor Health Care Policy Harvard Medical School February 25, 2015.
Exhibit 1. Medicare Shared Savings Program: Year 1 Performance of Participating Accountable Care Organizations (2013) Source: Centers for Medicare and.
Tracey Moorhead President and CEO May 15, 2015 No Disclosures ©AAHCM.
Health IT Policy Committee Meeting June 10, 2014 Data Analytics Update 1.
THE COMMONWEALTH FUND Exhibit 1. Availability of Public Information “In your view, how important do you think it is to have information about each of the.
WHAT'S AHEAD? Kathy Whitmire Dale Gibson February 15, 2011 HIPAA 5010, ICD-10, ACO's, VBP, HIGLAS, PECOS.
1 Emerging Provider Payment Models Medical Homes and ACOs.
0 0 Arkansas Payment Improvement Initiative (APII) Upper Respiratory Infection (URI) Episode Statewide Webinar December 17, 2012.
Exhibit ES-1. Synergistic Strategy: Potential Cumulative Savings Compared with Current Baseline Projection, 2013–2023 Total NHE Federal government State.
Digging Into the Arizona Behavioral Health Payment Reform Self-Help Toolkit Dale Jarvis, CPA
Accelerating Care and Payment Innovation: The CMS Innovation Center.
ARIAL Use Arial as the Font. Use The Health Collaborative Colors Above Ohio Healthcare Efficiencies Study Committee Richard Shonk, MD, PhD Chief Medical.
Delivery System Reform Incentive Payment Program (DSRIP), Transforming the Medicaid Health Care System.
“RECRUITS: ARE YOU READY TO MAKE CHANGES IN YOUR HOSPITAL?” "I CAN'T HEAR YOU!" Medicaid and Medicare cuts are projected to exceed $123 billion over the.
Bob Doherty Senior Vice President, Governmental Affairs and Public Policy American College of Physicians March 3, 2009 Designing new payment models for.
Maine State Innovation Model (SIM) August 2, 2013.
Managed Care. In the broadest terms, Kongstvedt (1997) describes managed care as a system of healthcare delivery that tries to manage the cost of healthcare,
Improving Patient-Centered Care in Maryland—Hospital Global Budgets
1 Implementing Transformation at Scale William Golden MD MACP Medical Director, AR Medicaid UAMS Prof. Int. Med and Public Health.
NYSACRA Outcome Based Payment & the Link to Care Coordination December 2015 Maureen M. Corcoran, President Marisa P. Weisel, Senior Advisor.
Vantage Care Positioning System®: Make Your Case with Medicare Spending Data November 2014 avalere.com.
Transforming Payment for a Healthier Ohio Greg Moody, Director Governor’s Office of Health Transformation Columbus Medical Association November 18, 2014.
Putting people first, with the goal of helping all Michiganders lead healthier and more productive lives, no matter their stage in life. 1.
Emerging Payment Models In Response To Purchaser Needs Or What Happens When Folks Are Fed Up François de Brantes Executive Director Health Care Incentives.
The Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) is a bipartisan legislation signed into law on April 16,  Repeals the flawed Sustainable.
Overview of OHIC’s Care Transformation & Payment Reform Initiatives KATHLEEN C. HITTNER, MD. HEALTH INSURANCE COMMISSIONER NOVEMBER 12 TH, 2015.
Understanding and Executing the MIPS Four Domains: How do they apply to my practice? Presented by: Pamela Ballou-Nelson, RN, MSPH, PhD, PCMH CCE Senior.
BETTER CARE THROUGH AN INTEGRATED PREVENTIve cARE NETWORK
Packages Episodes Bundles OH MY!
Population Health Management: Technical & Analytical Considerations
State Innovation Models Initiative: Round One Awards
May 5, 2017 Presenter Kelley Grayson
Post Acute Care in the Changing Health Care Landscape
Session Overview - Introduction - Significance of Post‐Acute Care - Impacts of Post‐Acute Care Performance - Mandatory Elements of Reform - Understanding.
Alternative Payment Models in the Quality Payment Program
Physician Performance Measures: Like It Or Not?
Taking Value-based Care from Theory to Action
Todd Baker, Chief Executive Officer
Bundled Payments: An Initiative of Payment Reform
ACOs and Independent Radiologists
Advocacy and Healthcare Reform Update
A Consumer Advocate’s Perspective on Vermont’s All-Payer Model
Changes in Payer Models
Value Based Contracting in Action
Ohio House Healthcare Efficiencies Summer Study Committee:
Benefits of Care Management
Idea 6: Approach to Over Capacity
BHCAG TCOC Discussion March 28, 2012 Meg Hasbrouck Vice President, Contracting and Reimbursement Mission We serve our communities by providing exceptional.
PRACTICE MANAGER MEETING Thursday June 15th 2017 Noon – 1:00PM
Using an Episode-based payment model to improve oncology care
Region 1 IDN Winter Advisory Council
Component 1: Introduction to Health Care and Public Health in the U.S.
Provider Peer Grouping: Project Overview
Bundled Payments Health Care Industry Committee
Designing new payment models for Medical Care: Version 2009 (PCMH) Presentation to The Medical Home Summit Bob Doherty Senior Vice President, Governmental.
System Improvement Provisions of the Affordable Care Act
Encouraging care coordination in FFS Medicare
Value-Based Healthcare: The Evolving Model
Transforming Perspectives
Alabama Coordinated Health Network: Primary Care Providers
Presentation transcript:

State Payment Reform Bringing physicians together for a healthier Ohio *Add footers & “Exhibit” references Bringing physicians together for a healthier Ohio 1

5-Year Goal for Payment Innovation Patient-centered medical homes Episode-based payments Goal 80-90 percent of Ohio’s population in some value-based payment model (combination of episodes- and population-based payment) within five years Year 1 In 2014 focus on Comprehensive Primary Care Initiative (CPCi) Payers agree to participate in design for elements where standardization and/or alignment is critical Multi-payer group begins enrollment strategy for one additional market Year 3 Year 5 State leads design of five episodes: asthma acute exacerbation, perinatal, COPD exacerbation, PCI, and joint replacement Payers agree to participate in design process, launch reporting on at least 3 of 5 episodes in 2014 and tie to payment within year Model rolled out to all major markets 50% of patients are enrolled 20 episodes defined and launched across payers Scale achieved state-wide 80% of patients are enrolled 50+ episodes defined and launched across payers State’s Role Shift rapidly to PCMH and episode model in Medicaid fee-for-service Require Medicaid MCO partners to participate and implement Incorporate into contracts of MCOs for state employee benefit program Overall, the 5-year focus at the state level is on PCMH and episodes. For immediate term, the focus is on CPCI for PCMH and development of 5 episode models (with the goal to launch reports in November 2014). Bringing physicians together for a healthier Ohio

Bringing physicians together for a healthier Ohio

Bringing physicians together for a healthier Ohio

Bringing physicians together for a healthier Ohio

Bringing physicians together for a healthier Ohio

Bringing physicians together for a healthier Ohio

Bringing physicians together for a healthier Ohio

Bringing physicians together for a healthier Ohio

Bringing physicians together for a healthier Ohio

Bringing physicians together for a healthier Ohio

Bringing physicians together for a healthier Ohio

Bringing physicians together for a healthier Ohio

Bringing physicians together for a healthier Ohio

Ohio Comprehensive Care Initiative *Add footers & “Exhibit” references Bringing physicians together for a healthier Ohio 15

Episodes of Care Bringing physicians together for a healthier Ohio 16 *Add footers & “Exhibit” references Bringing physicians together for a healthier Ohio 16

Retrospective episode model mechanics Patients seek care and select providers as they do today Providers submit claims as they do today Payers reimburse for all services as they do today 1 2 3 Patients and providers continue to deliver care as they do today Providers may: Share savings: if average costs below commendable levels and quality targets are met Pay part of excess cost: if average costs are above acceptable level See no change in pay: if average costs are between commendable and acceptable levels Review claims from the performance period to identify a ‘Principal Accountable Provider’ (PAP) for each episode 4 5 6 Calculate incentive payments based on outcomes after close of 12 month performance period Payers calculate average cost per episode for each PAP1 Compare average costs to predetermined ‘’commendable’ and ‘acceptable’ levels2 Ohio episode model is RETROSPECTIVE, not prospective. To repeat, there is not pre-set price for a bundle in the retrospective model. Patients seek care and providers bill and are reimbursed as they do today. After the fact, claims data is analyzed to: - identify the principal accountable provider, or PAP, who is held accountable for all episode costs, not just those he/she directly bills for - calculate the average episode code per PAP and compare to set “commendable” and “acceptable” thresholds to determine any gain or risk sharing Bringing physicians together for a healthier Ohio

Retrospective thresholds reward cost-efficient, high-quality care 7 Provider cost distribution (average episode cost per provider) Eligible for gain sharing based on cost, didn’t pass quality metrics Gain sharing No change Risk sharing Ave. cost per Episode $ - Risk sharing Pay portion of excess costs No change in payment to providers + Gain sharing Eligible for incentive payment Acceptable ILLUSTRATIVE Commendable ILLUSTRATIVE Gain sharing limit here is 1 bar for each principal accountable provider. The height of the bar represents that PAP’s average episode cost across all their episodes in a given time frame, after adjustments have been applied (i.e., risk adjustment, outlier and other exclusions). The bars are ordered from left to right, from the PAP with the highest average episode cost to the PAP with the lowest average episode cost. If a PAP’s average cost is above a pre-set “acceptable” threshold (those in red, on the left), they may be at risk and pay back some of the cost to the payer. If a PAP’s average cost is below a pre-set “commendable” threshold (those in green, on the right), they may share in the savings. However, if these low-cost PAPs have an average episode cost below a gain-sharing limit, their savings will be capped, to reduce the incentive to limit care. In addition, PAPs must also achieve certain clinical quality metrics (defined for each episode) to receive gain-sharing. The blue bars indicate PAPs who met the cost requirements for gain sharing but did not meet the quality requirements. This model rewards both absolute performance – with shared savings for those who are already performing commendably - and performance improvement, with potential for gain-sharing (or to move out of risk-sharing) as PAPs improve. The thresholds are not meant to be constantly moving targets, but to give everyone a chance to improve performance and realize gain-sharing. Principal Accountable Provider SOURCE: Arkansas Payment Improvement Initiative; each vertical bar represents the average cost for a provider, sorted from highest to lowest average cost Bringing physicians together for a healthier Ohio

Ohio’s Episode Timeline

How To Access Your Report View Notification of new episode report Determine list of episode reports to view Open individual reports Download and save episode report http://www.medicaid.ohio.gov/Portals/0/Providers/P aymentInnovation/Access-Your-Report-FFS-2015- 02.pdf

How To Read Your Report Summary Performance Quality Cost Types http://www.medicaid.ohio.gov/Portals/0/Providers/Pay mentInnovation/HowtoReadYourReport.pdf

State Payment Reform Resources Office of Health Transformation: http://www.healthtransformation.ohio.gov/currentiniti atives/payforvalue.aspx Medicaid: http://medicaid.ohio.gov/PROVIDERS/PaymentInnovati on.aspx *Add footers & “Exhibit” references 22