Erasmus+ Evaluation 2014/2015 International Office.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Accessible Small Group Work : What you need to know and what you need to do Anne Simpson Manager Teachability Project Lucy Foley Assistant Director Scottish.

Advertisements

Panel Reviewer Training Overview 1 ANA Objective Panel Review Process Each year, ANA convenes panels of experts to objectively analyze and score eligible.

APT & Classified Council.  Survey objectives and conception:  Solicit employee feedback to generate agendas  Use data to inform the governance process.

Date: in 12 pts Education and Culture International Credit mobility.

Perkins 202 Dr. Michelle Crary – Staff Development and Accountability Coordinator Nori Cannell – Director – Guidance & Career and Technical Education.

Key Communities and Objectives Outcomes- Based Assessment Telling the Story Results Closing the Loop.

ACADEMIC QUALITY & STANDARDS TEAM Strategic Priorities refining assessment practice and improving academic feedback research-led teaching use.

- Objective of the Program Evaluation - The process of the Program Evaluation.

Benchmarks from the Harvard Collaborative on Academic Careers in Higher Education (COACHE) Faculty Job Satisfaction Survey University Faculty Meeting October.

PRESENTATION Internationalisation Policy for Higher Education Malaysia

The London Metropolitan University Writing Centre: An overview of teaching and research Savita Bakhshi School of Psychology, Faculty of Life Sciences,

Components of a Quality Induction Program Shirley P. Andrews Valdosta State University Valdosta, Georgia.

Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.

2015 Commendations and Citations Information Session.

Submitted by: Sara Jones, Jenny Martinez, & Christie Medina Florida State University Higher Education Program MyEU A Portal for Ellingsburg University.

ASSESSMENT. Assessment is the systematic and on-going process of collecting and reviewing evidence about the College's academic and administrative programs.

Group work – why do it? Rachel Horn – Civil & Structural Engineering.

Quality in Vocational Training. Q uality in G eneral S tate A dministration QUALITY PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION CENTRAL AUTONOMOUS LOCAL.

UTEP Office of Research and Sponsored Projects Results from Spring 2004 Satisfaction Survey SOURCE: UTEP Center for Institutional Evaluation, Research.

National Erasmus+ Office - Jordan Education and Culture International credit mobility with partner countries.

AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Polk Pre-Collegiate Academy April 16– 17, 2014.

A decade of the Disability Support Service (DSS): closer to Europe in terms of equal opportunities.

Results of Survey on the Mentoring Component: May 2006 Northern Plains Area Dr. Will Blackburn Ms. Barbara King.

McGill UniversityFaculty of Engineering Faculty of Engineering McGill University Faculty of Engineering McGill University Faculty of Engineering Career.

Date: in 12 pts Education and Culture International opportunities for Higher Education.

THE NEED TO TRAIN THE TRAINERS. Who University lecturers /academics Teaching assistants (such as research students who do tutoring etc) Senior academics.

Education and Culture International credit mobility with partner Countries Ayna Chorekliyeva Coordinator of National Erasmus+ Office in Turkmenistan Information.

Call for Proposals for the implementation of mobility actions in the academic year 2008/2009 Piedad RIVAS, EM ECW Project Manager Erasmus Mundus and External.

1 Quality Assurance System UOC Planning and Quality Office

Ensuring Success For Each Student AdvancED District Accreditation Process Five-Year External Review March 13 – 16, 2016 Produced by Mr. Tony Pickett, Assistant.

1Mobile Computing Systems © 2001 Carnegie Mellon University Writing a Successful NSF Proposal November 4, 2003 Website: nsf.gov.

YFU experience Ensuring quality via the “International Basics Standards”

Planning for NSS 2013 School of Medicine Manjit Bansal.

Automated feedback processing in the educational process VІI SCIENTIFIC AND PRACTICAL SEMINAR WITH INTERNATIONAL PARTICIPATION "ECONOMIC SECURITY OF THE.

{ North East ISD Technology Plan North East ISD Technology Plan By Dilene Witt-Nelson EDLD 5362 ET 8040.

Dat e: in 12 pts Erasmus+ Генствами Education and Culture International credit Mobility National Erasmus+ Office in Kyrgyzstan 28 November 2014.

Erasmus+ Higher Education (ECHE) in de praktijk José Ravenstein, NA Erasmus+, Juni 2015.

Victor Akulinin, Vice-Rector Omsk State Medical Academy.

1311A.1 - Achieving Success as PresidentP-V #1  Feature quality programming  Require manual speeches  Expect effective evaluations  Encourage active.

Education and Culture International credit mobility with partner countries.

BEST PRACTICES IN PUBLIC HEALTH LEADERSHIP AND COMMUNICATION Clarisa Sifford March 19,2016.

How to be prepared for implementation of credit mobility in Erasmus+ ? From experiences of Polish National Agency for the LLP-Erasmus programme Beata Skibińska,

Embedding Careers provision at Bournemouth University Jacqui Gush Head of Graduate Employment Service.

Creating a Campus of Diversity – Policies and Measures Barbara Hasenmüller, International Office.

– Closed User Group – EBA CLEARING’s Quality Survey December 2015 Results.

Peer support at the University of Edinburgh. What is Peer Support? Peer Support is when students with more experience share their knowledge and expertise.

1 Researcher mobility Why and How?. 2 NTNU as an example Vision: To be internationally outstanding Objective: The entire organization upholds quality.

Examples of Good Practice concerning international mobility programmes

St Kliment Ohridski University – Bitola (UKLO)

Experience from university as participant in PASCL project

Accreditation External Review

International credit mobility with partner countries

The positive impact of personal advising training

Administrative Review Process

Governance and leadership roles for equality and diversity in Colleges

National Student Survey 2018

The UK Professional Standards Framework

ERASMUS+ STAFF MOBILITY Confirmation of Participation

Introduction to the training

Student Charter We will provide:

Workforce Development Goal

Erasmus Evaluation 2014/2015 International Office.

Implementing Race to the Top

Influence of Erasmus+ mobility on higher education students’ competences and attitudes Warsaw, November 2018.

Academic Development Survey By School Spring 2007

PARTICIPANTS’ REPORTS

Debate: Warm-up Questions!

ERASMUS+ STAFF MOBILITY Confirmation of Participation

Evaluate the integral {image}

Presentation transcript:

Erasmus+ Evaluation 2014/2015 International Office

1- Participants‘ Profile Activity Type Total Number of Participants Student mobility for studies (outbound) 271 Student mobility for traineeships (outbound) 117 Total 388 Activity Type Total Number of Participants Student mobility for studies (inbound) 272 Activity Type Total Number of Participants Staff mobility for teaching (outbound) 57 Staff mobility for training (outbound) 5 Total 62 Activity Type Total Number of Participants Staff mobility for teaching (inbound) 39

2- Participants‘ Feedback 2.1- Participants‘ overall satisfaction with their mobility experience Activity Type Number of students that submitted a final report % of students who were very or rather satisfied with their mobility experience Student mobility for studies (outbound) 271 94,83% Student mobility for traineeships (outbound) 117 97,44% Total 388 95,62% Activity Type Number of students that submitted a final report % of students who were very or rather satisfied with their mobility experience Student mobility for studies (inbound) 272 96,32%

Activity Type Number of staff that submitted a final report % of staff who were very or rather satisfied with their mobility experience Staff mobility for teaching (outbound) 57 100,00% Staff mobility for training (outbound) 5 Total 62 Activity Type Number of staff that submitted a final report % of staff who were very or rather satisfied with their mobility experience Staff mobility for teaching (inbound) 39 100,00%

2.2. Charter provisions Equal treatment and integration Activity Type Number of students who submitted a final report % of students who stated that equal academic treatment was ensured Student mobility for studies (inbound) 272 74,26% Activity Type Number of students who submitted a final report % of students who stated that their integrationto UR‘s everyday life was good or very good Student mobility for studies (inbound) 271 84,87% Mentoring and support Activity Type Number of students who submitted a final report % of students who were satisfied or very satisfied with the academic mentoring & administrative support Student mobility for studies (inbound) 271 90,41%

International Office