Day 2 DQO Training Course Module 2 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Day 2 DQO Training Course Module 3 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process
Advertisements

1 of 21 From qualitative concept to practical implementation. Evolution of the Data Quality Objectives Concept DOE EM-5 DQO Training Workshop - Day 2 Appendix.
Cytec Statement of Basis and Permit Modification July 16, 2012 Public Hearing Ohio Environmental Protection Agency.
CE 510 Hazardous Waste Engineering
Oct. 30, 2003CS WPI1 CS 509 Design of Software Systems Lecture #9 Thursday, Oct. 30, 2003.
Health Informatics Series
1 Risk Assessment Develop Objectives And Goals Develop and Screen Cleanup Alternatives Select Final Cleanup Alternative Communicate Decisions to the Public.
MODULE “STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT”
Multi-Agency Radiological Laboratory Analytical Protocols Manual: MARLAP Presentation to the Radiation Advisory Committee/Science Advisory Board April.
COMP An Introduction to Computer Programming : University of the West Indies COMP6015 An Introduction to Computer Programming Lecture 02.
1 of 39 DQO Implementation Process: Flow Chart and Wall Charts 30 minutes DQO Training Course Day 2 Module 8 Presenter: Sebastian Tindall.
1 of 25 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 5 - Define Decision Rules 15 minutes Presenter: Sebastian Tindall DQO Training Course Day 2 Module 14.
1 of 23 From Qualitative Concept to Practical Implementation Evolution of the Data Quality Objectives Concept DQO Training Course Day 1 Module 1 15 minutes.
1 of 55 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 1 - State the Problem Presenter: Sebastian Tindall 60 minutes DQO Training Course Day 2 Module 9.
1 of 35 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 4 - Specify Boundaries (30 minutes) Presenter: Sebastian Tindall Day 2 DQO Training Course Module 4.
1 of 23 EPA Inspector General Audit Reports 15 minutes DQO Training Course Day 1 Module 2 Presenter: Sebastian Tindall.
MGT-491 QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS AND RESEARCH FOR MANAGEMENT OSMAN BIN SAIF Session 19.
Waste Management Overview & Land Disposal Restrictions.
1 of 21 Introduction to the EPA 7-Step DQO Process DQO Training Course Day 1 Module 7 (30 minutes) Steps Presenter: Sebastian Tindall.
1 of 52 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 4 - Specify Boundaries (60 minutes) (15 minute Afternoon Break) Presenter: Sebastian Tindall DQO Training Course.
1 of 45 How Many Samples do I Need? Part 1 Presenter: Sebastian Tindall 60 minutes (15 minute 1st Afternoon Break) DQO Training Course Day 1 Module 4.
1 of 40 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 2 - Identify the Decisions Presenter: Sebastian Tindall (30 minutes) DQO Training Course Day 2 Module 12.
1 of 32 Systematic Planning for Environmental Decision-Making DOE EM-3 Day 2 DQO Training Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment EPA Conference.
1 of 37 Key Concepts Underlying DQOs and VSP DQO Training Course Day 1 Module 4 (60 minutes) (75 minute lunch break) Presenter: Sebastian Tindall.
Module 6: Alternatives. 2  Module 6 contains three sections: – 6.1 Development and Screening of Alternatives – 6.2 Detailed Analysis of Alternatives.
1 of 39 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 3 - Identify Inputs (45 minutes) Presenter: Sebastian Tindall Day 2 DQO Training Course Module 3.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Summary and Overview of TECDOC Russel Edge Decommissioning and Remediation Unit Division of Radiation,Transport.
Reclaimed Wastewater Quality Criteria, Standards, and Guidelines
1 of 35 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 2 – Identify the Decision Presenter: Sebastian Tindall 15 minutes (75 minute Lunch break) DQO Training Course Day.
Introduction to the EPA 7-Step DQO Process
1 of 36 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 6 - Specify Error Tolerances (60 minutes) (15 minute Morning Break) Presenter: Sebastian Tindall DQO Training Course.
1 of 27 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 5 - Define Decision Rules (15 minutes) Presenter: Sebastian Tindall Day 2 DQO Training Course Module 5.
1 of 10 Introduction to Visual Sample Plan & Applications DQO Training Course Day 3 Module 21 Presenter: Sebastian Tindall (60 minutes)
Ukraine Petro Nakhaba All-Ukrainian Public Organization “ Chysta Khvylya ” Deputy Head Kyiv, Ukraine Contaminated Sites Management Joint UMOE-DEPA Project.
1 of 19 Managing Uncertainty with Systematic Planning for Environmental Decision-Making 3-Day DQO Training Day 2.
1 of 27 How Many Samples do I Need? Part 2 Presenter: Sebastian Tindall (60 minutes) (5 minute “stretch” break) DQO Training Course Day 1 Module 5.
1 of 31 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 6 - Specify Error Tolerances 60 minutes (15 minute Morning Break) Presenter: Sebastian Tindall DQO Training Course.
Forging Partnerships on Emerging Contaminants November 2, 2005 Elizabeth Southerland Director of Assessment & Remediation Division Office of Superfund.
LTP and FSS Plan Project Status Overview Presented by Bill Barley September 28, 2015.
1 of 48 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 6 - Specify Error Tolerances 3:00 PM - 3:30 PM (30 minutes) Presenter: Sebastian Tindall Day 2 DQO Training Course.
HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION UNDER RCRA LISTING HAZARDOUS WASTE Narendra Chaudhari Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery U.S. Environmental Protection.
JSGS Professional Workshop Series Copyright ©Heather McWhinney, 2016 WRITING A CABINET DECISION ITEM.
Module 53 Landfills and Incineration
Social return on investments (SROI)
Evaluation Requirements for MSP and Characteristics of Designs to Estimate Impacts with Confidence Ellen Bobronnikov March 23, 2011.
Module 5: Communication Plan and Process for Addressing Barriers
Communication: Safety Summary
Business System Development
American Institutes for Research
DOE EM-5 DQO Training Workshop - Day 1
Unit 3 Hypothesis.
Design Process Overview
South Carolina Perspective on Part 61 Proposed Revisions
Infrastructure planning and management
Defining the Marketing Research Problem and Developing an Approach
Conceptual Frameworks, Models, and Theories
Chapter Three Research Design.
This presentation document has been prepared by Vault Intelligence Limited (“Vault") and is intended for off line demonstration, presentation and educational.
Scope management Chapter 5 Copyright ©2016 Pearson Education, Inc.
Environmental Hazard Awareness:
Cross Sectional Designs
Revisions to the Concentration Averaging and Encapsulation Branch Technical Position A. Christianne Ridge Division of Decommissioning, Uranium Recovery,
What is a Design Process?
What is Correlational Research?
Informed Consent (SBER)
What is PACE EH? PACE EH is a process for assessing and analyzing the environmental health of communities and for creating plans to address threats and.
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) Purpose To address the hazards to human health and the environment presented.
Understanding Data Choices, Characteristics, Limitations
The samples and the Error
4 FEASIBILITY STUDY KEY ACTIONS
Presentation transcript:

Day 2 DQO Training Course Module 2 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 2 - Identify the Decisions Presenter: Sebastian Tindall (15 minutes)

Step 2: Identify Decisions Step Objective: Develop decision statements that require environmental data to address the objective of the problem statement Step 1: State the Problem Step 2: Identify Decisions Step 3: Identify Inputs Step 4: Specify Boundaries Step 5: Define Decision Rules Step 6: Specify Error Tolerances Step 7: Optimize Sample Design

Step 2- Identify Decisions Information IN Actions Information OUT From Previous Step To Next Step Identify Principal Study Questions Concise Statement of the Problem Decision Statements Define Alternative Actions Define Error if AA Incorrectly Taken List Consequences of Errors Rate Severity of Consequences

Background Principal Study Question: PSQ Alternative Action: AA The PSQ identifies key unknown conditions or unresolved issues that reveal the solution to the Problem. Alternative Action: AA

Background Principal Study Question: PSQ Alternative Action: AA All the possible actions that might be taken once a PSQ has been resolved.

Creating a Decision Statement PSQ + AA Decision Statement

What types of Decisions Require the DQO Process? Only decisions whose PSQs require data (environmental measurements) to resolve Three general types of decisions: d: Red shovel/green shovel decisions D: Decisions requiring environmental data D: Large programmatic decisions

What types of Decisions Require the DQO Process? TEST: Does the PSQ require data via environmental measurements (old or new) to be resolved? Only decisions whose PSQs require data (environmental measurements) to resolve Three general types of decisions: d: Red shovel/green shovel decisions D: Decisions requiring environmental data D: Large programmatic decisions

What types of Decisions Require the DQO Process? Only decisions whose PSQs require data (environmental measurements) to resolve Three general types of decisions: d: Red shovel/green shovel decisions D: Decisions requiring environmental data D: Large programmatic decisions Do we need to collect data via environmental measurements to decide whether or not the decrease in duck population is due to the lead pellets in the wetlands?

Step 2- Identify Decisions Information IN Actions Information OUT From Previous Step To Next Step Identify Principal Study Questions Concise Statement of the Problem Decision Statements Define Alternative Actions Addressing the question will resolve the problem. Define Error if AA Incorrectly Taken Identify the questions that must be addressed in order to resolve the problem statement. Note that it is useful to divide these by either the matrix to be studied, the type waste, etc. List Consequences of Errors Rate Severity of Consequences

Example PSQs Is the Smith property radiologically contaminated? Does the waste exceed toxicity characteristic (TC) criteria? Is the waste ignitable?

PSQs 1. Are the site surface soils contaminated? CS PSQs 1. Are the site surface soils contaminated? 2. Are the underlying soils contaminated?

Step 2- Identify Decisions Information IN Actions Information OUT From Previous Step To Next Step Identify Principal Study Questions Concise Statement of the Problem Decision Statements Define Alternative Actions Decision rules (DRs) will be written in Step 5 to provide the criteria to select between the AAs. After data collection, DRs are used to select the appropriate AA. For each question, list the actions that may be taken as a result of answering the question. These actions use verbs such as “remove, dispose, delist.” Define Error if AA Incorrectly Taken List Consequences of Errors Rate Severity of Consequences

Example Relationship Between PSQs and AAs

Relationship Between PSQs and AAs CS Relationship Between PSQs and AAs

Step 2- Identify Decisions Information IN Actions Information OUT From Previous Step To Next Step Identify qualitative descriptions of the potential errors that could occur Identify Principal Study Questions Concise Statement of the Problem Decision Statements Define Alternative Actions Define Error if AA Incorrectly Taken List Consequences of Errors Rate Severity of Consequences

Step 2- Identify Decisions Information IN Actions Information OUT From Previous Step To Next Step Identify Principal Study Questions List the consequences of each qualitative error listed for each PSQ and AA. Concise Statement of the Problem Decision Statements Define Alternative Actions Define Error if AA Incorrectly Taken List Consequences of Errors Rate Severity of Consequences

Step 2- Identify Decisions Information IN Actions Information OUT From Previous Step To Next Step Identify Principal Study Questions Perform a qualitative and relative assessment of the consequences of taking each AA. Express in terms of: Low Moderate Severe Concise Statement of the Problem Decision Statements Define Alternative Actions Define Error if AA Incorrectly Taken List Consequences of Errors Rate Severity of Consequences

Step 2- Identify Decisions Information IN Actions Information OUT From Previous Step To Next Step Identify Principal Study Questions When assessing consequences, take the following aspects into consideration: Human health Environment (flora/fauna) Political Economic Legal Concise Statement of the Problem Decision Statements Define Alternative Actions Define Error if AA Incorrectly Taken List Consequences of Errors Rate Severity of Consequences

Errors, Consequences and Severity

Errors, Consequences and Severity CS Errors, Consequences and Severity

Step 2- Identify Decisions Information IN Actions Information OUT From Previous Step To Next Step Identify Principal Study Questions Concise Statement of the Problem Decision Statements Step 5 will provide criteria to select between alternatives. Define Alternative Actions Define Error if AA Incorrectly Taken Decision statements link alternative actions with PSQs. List Consequences of Errors Rate Severity of Consequences

Step 2- Identify Decisions Information IN Actions Information OUT From Previous Step To Next Step Identify Principal Study Questions Concise Statement of the Problem Decision Statements Define Alternative Actions Define Error if AA Incorrectly Taken Decision statements express a choice between AAs. List Consequences of Errors Rate Severity of Consequences

Decision Statements General Format: Determine whether [Principal Study Question #1] requires [Alternative Action A] or [Alternative Action B]. Added Clarification: Determine whether [unknown environmental condition/issue/criterion from the Problem Statement] requires [choosing between two or more Alternative Actions].

Decision Statements General Format: Determine whether [Principal Study Question #1] requires [Alternative Action A] or [Alternative Action B]. Added Clarification: Determine whether [unknown environmental condition/issue/criterion from the Problem Statement] requires [choosing between two or more Alternative Actions]. Using a standardized format is important because it helps: Eliminate red/green shovel PSQs Improve the consistency between DQO documents Make it easier for the reviewer to understand the decisions to be made

Decision Statement Example Determine whether [the waste is ignitable] and requires [disposal in a RCRA landfill] or [requires only consideration of the remaining RCRA characteristics].

‘Typical’ Decision Statement Examples The question is whether a cap is needed and what COPCs are needed to assess the effectiveness of the cap. EXAMPLE: Lard oil that contained carbon tetrachloride was used; however it is unclear as to whether the oil and carbon tetrachloride are listed wastes.

CS Decision Statements 1. Determine whether the surface soils are contaminated and require remedial action or require no further action. 2. Determine whether the site underlying soils are contaminated and require remedial action or require no further action.

Step 2 Summary Decisions that are regulatory or professional judgement are not part of the Step 2 decisions For the decision to be valid, there must be two or more alternative actions Data are needed to choose between the alternative actions

Step 2- Identify Decisions Information IN Actions Information OUT From Previous Step To Next Step Identify Principal Study Questions Concise Statement of the Problem Decision Statements Define Alternative Actions Define Error if AA Incorrectly Taken List Consequences of Errors Rate Severity of Consequences

End of Module 2 Thank you