San Francisco Continuum of Care Reform Discussion

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Katie A. Agreement Child Welfare and Mental Health working together will provide:  Intensive home and community based mental health services to children.
Advertisements

Understanding Katie A and the Core Practice Model
Caregiver Support. Child Intervention Intake Statistics  Calgary and Area 2013:  The Region received 14,100 reports about a child or youth who may be.
Katie A. Implementation Progress & Hurdles: Child & Family Team Component Donna Ewing-Marto, Executive Family Partner, Family & Youth Roundtable Sarah.
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Health and Human Services Improving the Commonwealth’s Services for Children and Families A Framework.
©2008 National Association of Social Workers. All Rights Reserved. 1 Child Protection and Family Care Cora Hardy, LCSW Clinical Director Better Life Children.
Bringing Protective Factors to Life in the Child Welfare System New Hampshire.
Maine DHHS: Putting Children First
+ Jennifer Miller, ChildFocus Melissa Devlin, FFTA Brian Lynch, Children’s Community Programs Sue Miklos, The Bair Foundation Child Welfare Peer Kinship.
Katie A. Learning Collaborative For Audio, please call: Participant code: Please mute your phone Building Child Welfare and Mental.
1 eWiSACWIS and Levels of Care Jónelle Brom, OHC Specialist Jenny Weber, eWiSACWIS
Voices of Families at Team Meetings Presentation May 18, 2015 Victor Medrano, CalWorks, FCS Linkages Carol Sentell-Bassett, Child Welfare Supervisor Danielle.
Practice Model Elements Theoretical framework Values and principles Casework components Practice elements Practice behaviors.
Your Presenters Melissa Connelly, Director, Regional Training Academy Coordination Project, CalSWEC Sylvia Deporto, Deputy Director, Family & Children’s.
A NEW RESOURCE FOR RECONNECTING CHILDREN AND FAMILIES WITH COMPLEX AND ENDURING NEEDS Residentially Based Services.
THE KATIE A SETTLEMENT: IMPLICATIONS FOR CalSWEC Child Welfare Committee Mental Health Committee Oakland February, 2012.
Project KEEP: San Diego 1. Evidenced Based Practice  Best Research Evidence  Best Clinical Experience  Consistent with Family/Client Values  “The.
Day One Introduction Review: Foundations of Independent Living Continuum of Services – Phase I Continuum of Services – Phase II Continuum of Services –
State of the State - Drivers of Change June 14, 2011 Normer Adams Executive Director Georgia Association of Homes and Services for Children In 2009, I.
Community Ownership of its Children Georgia Association of Homes and Services for Children Normer Adams, Executive Director.
11/28/12 1 CALIFORNIA FOSTERING CONNECTIONS TO SUCCESS ACT Version 2.0 Assembly Bill 12.
NOVEMBER 19 TH, AM – 12PM Resource Family Approval Project Management Team Welcome.
Lilliput Family Finding & Relative Support Efforts Karen Alvord, CEO, Beverly Johnson, CPO,
 Legislative mandate*: ◦ Reform Group Homes & FFAs with robust & diverse stakeholder input ◦ Legislative report with recommendations  Continuum of Care.
PATHWAYS TO WELLBEING: DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION February 2016.
Framing Child Welfare Practice in California Continuum of Care Reform, Resource Family Approval, Quality Parenting Initiative, and Katie A.
Keeping our Commitments to Collaborative Children’s Services.
CONTINUUM OF CARE REFORM (AB403) Alexis Barries Project Associate Youth Engagement Project Alyssum Maguire Project Coordinator Youth Engagement Project.
SAFETY ORGANIZED PRACTICE THE BASICS. A NEW CORE PRACTICE MODEL FOR CHILD WELFARE Old Practice: Adversarial, Deficit-based New Practice: Strength-based,
A COMPREHENSIVE SYSTEM OF CARE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES Ken Berrick, Founder and Chief Executive Officer Seneca Center for Children and Families
California’s Child Welfare Continuum of Care Reform (CCR) Overview California Department of Social Services January 2016.
1 Child and Family Teaming (CFT) Module 1 Developing an Effective Child and Family Team.
California’s Child Welfare Continuum of Care Reform (CCR) Overview California Department of Social Services 1.
DFCS Department of Family and Children’s Services
Recent State Changes in Laws and Finances Impacting Children and Youth: What are they all about? CMHACY Thursday, May 18, 2017 Workshop A-5 Scripps.
Continuum of CARE reform (AB403 & ab1997)
RFA Training/Coaching Model Preparing and Supporting Families
Our Community, Our Children Campaign Supporting Permanency
Continuum of Care Reform Key Issues for County Mental Health Preparation & Implementation December 12, 2016.
Effectively using partnerships to implement california’s continuum of care reform Tulare County.
California’s Child Welfare Continuum of Care Reform (CCR) Overview California Department of Social Services January 2016.
No Place Like HOME Texas Kick Off Meeting
Maryland Healthy Transition Initiative
SAN DIEGO HOUSING FEDERATION WEAVING TOGETHER A COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH TO WELLNESS October 13, 2016.
Background Legislative mandate - Senate Bill 1013 (Chapter 35, Statutes of 2012) Builds on previous reform efforts: Reexamination of Group Care (SB 933),
Continuum of Care Reform Ventura County Update
Implementation Check In
@BeMyAdvocate BeMyAdvocate BeMyAdvocate.
Continuum of Care Reform
Panhandle Partnership for Health and Human Services
California’s Child Welfare Continuum of Care Reform (CCR) Butte County Overview December 2016 ~ Cathi Grams, Director Department of Employment and Social.
Child Protective Services Update
Remarks from the South Carolina Department of Social Services
Stakeholder Webinar September 20, 2018
Behavioral Health (DBH)
Continum of Care Reform (CCR)
Fostering Connections To Success Act And What It Means For Texas Partners In CPS Reform Meeting, Jan. 14, 2009 Liz Kromrei, Department of Family and Protective.
Welcome to the CCR NEW RATE STRUCTURE
Stakeholder Webinar September 20, 2018
Continuum of Care Reform (CCR) Update March 2, 2018
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services December 19, 2014
RFA Jeopardy!.
Place Matters Nothing Matters More to a Child Than a Place to Call Home 4/6/2019.
Looking Ahead and the Texas Need…
CPM as the Framework for Practice & System Change
Permanency Planning Modified Manual
DFCS Department of Family and Children’s Services
Regional Center of Orange County 2011 Performance Contract
Foster Care to 21 Carl E. Ayers, MSW
Presentation transcript:

San Francisco Continuum of Care Reform Discussion

A very big deal! What is it? Governor Brown signed Assembly Bill 403 on October 11, 2015 Comprehensively reforms placement and treatment options for youth in foster care Builds upon years of policy changes to improve outcomes for youth in foster care A very big deal!

Key Concept of CCR Based on research that shows that a family home-based structure: Enables youth to transition through their stages of development more successfully Improves the outcomes for our foster youth.

The fundamental principles of CCR: All children deserve to live with a committed, nurturing, and permanent family that prepares youth for a successful transition into adulthood. Child and Family Voice Services follow the child (continuity of care) Family is held at the center by partnering agencies (Child and Family Teams) Normalcy in development Permanency Reduction in the use of congregate care with focus on Family based care

CCR BUILDS ON CURRENT REFORM EFFORTS California San Francisco Approved Relative Caregivers Program (ARC) Resource Family Approval Quality Parenting Initiative (QPI) Child and Family Teaming/Pathways to Mental Health Residentially-Based Services Reform (RBS) ARC county RFA and QPI iASC implementation & spread (CFT-BH) Family Meeting Framework RBS Pilot County

Congregate Care/Groups Homes Before CCR Implementation Group homes and residential treatment centers (RCL system) After CCR Implementation Short –term residential treatment programs (STRTPs) replace group homes. Service array for STRTPs must include mental health services (and requires a mental health contract). STRTPs must be accredited by a national accreditation organization.

Resource Family Assessment Before CCR Implementation Foster families, relative caregivers, NREFMs, and adoptive families have slightly different assessments After CCR Implementation All family-based care providers called Resource Families. Resource Family Approval (RFA) provides uniform placement and adoption assessments completed at beginning of placement.

Intensive Treatment Foster Care (ITFC) Before CCR Implementation Intensive treatment foster homes (ITFC) are used for intensive in-home treatment After CCR Implementation Intensive Services Foster Care (ISFC) includes ITFC, Treatment Foster Care (TFC), Therapeutic Behavioral services (TBS) etc

Child and Family Team Meeting (CFT) Before CCR Implementation Many different versions of family, team and provider meetings. After CCR Implementation One standard Child and Family Team (CFT) meeting model using trained facilitators.

Treatment Foster Care (TFC) Before CCR Implementation Did not exist After CCR Implementation New mental health billing code for use by resource families (treatment foster parents) who work with an FFA that has Medi-Cal certification.

Accountability for FFAs and STRPs Before CCR Implementation Varied After CCR Implementation Accreditation Performance measures Consumer surveys Inter-departmental oversight framework

Continuity of Services & Permanency Before CCR Implementation Continuity of care and permanency are primarily the responsibility of the child welfare agency After CCR Implementation Continuity of care and permanency are everyone’s responsibility All STRTPs and FFAs will be expected to provide a seamless continuum of mental health services across placement changes FFAs with Mental Health contracts are expected to provide those services FFAs without mental health contracts are expected to form partnerships with agencies that can provide those services for them STRTPs and FFAs will be expected to engage in family finding and partnerships to aid in finding permanency for youth

Rates Before CCR Implementation RCL system has rates based on age of the child and type of facility After CCR Implementation New rate system replaces RCL system. Resource Family rates based on needs of child and linked to child, not the facility Single STRTP rate New rates are higher, and designed to provide a variety of services to a child in any type of resource family home Eventually, a Level of Care assessment determines rate for the child. Interim rates plan starts in January 2017, Level of Care assessment starts later

New Rates Effective 1-1-2017 New basic rate for resource family homes- $889 for every child regardless of age FFA rates are interim rates until level of care is implemented and currently will remain age based FFA rate consists of the basic rate + a social worker component + a RFA component + an administration component + a service and supports component STRTP rate will be $12,036 per month per child

Questions

Current Infrastructure