Legal Brief Thwaites v. Canada (Armed Forces)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
This multimedia product and its contents are protected under copyright law. The following are prohibited by law: Any public performance or display, including.
Advertisements

FEDERALLY EMPLOYED WOMEN (FEW) AND COMPLIANCE UNDERSTANDING YOUR RIGHTS Presented By: Melvie Hall-Bellinger FEW National Vice President - Compliance.
Living with HIV Know Your Rights Accommodation in the workplace The information contained in this publication is information about the law, but it is not.
+ Ground for Discrimination. + Employment Exceptions There are times when issues that we would typically consider discrimination are actually not if they.
Jody Blanke, Professor Computer Information Systems and Law Mercer University, Atlanta 1.
COMPLYING WITH HUMAN RIGHTS LAWS: WHAT FIRST NATIONS EMPLOYERS NEED TO KNOW Landon Young & Jeffrey Murray Stringer LLP Management Lawyers 110 Yonge St.
Human Rights Chapter 5. Human Rights Human rights include the right to receive equal treatment to be free from prohibited discrimination and harassment,
The Legal Series: Employment Law I. Objectives Upon the completion of training, you will be able to: Understand the implications of Title VI Know what.
Traditional Recruitment Practices Positive characteristics, rather than those things insiders find dissatisfying about the org, are communicated to outsiders.
Hampton Inn Case Study Bryan Andrews. Meeting Legal Requirements Bryan Andrews.
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMAT IVE ACTION All materials provided in this training, including the contents of linked pages, are provided for general.
3-1 Copyright ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Understanding Equal Opportunity and The Legal Environment Chapter 3.
Major EEO Laws (1960s- 1970s) Major EEO Laws (1990s- Current) TERMS The Legal Environment TERMS The Legal Environment and Sexual Harassment TERMS The.
The University of Texas at Austin General Compliance Training Program Equal Employment Opportunity.
Chapter 3 The Legal and Ethical Environment Nature of employment laws Key equal employment opportunity laws Employment-at-will Fair Labor Standards Act.
Bias-free hiring: Policy on removing the “Canadian experience” barrier.
Employee Law Challenge. Requires employers to pay men & women similar wage rates for similar work? Name the Act… 2 point question 1. Civil Rights Act.
Managing Human Resources, 12e, by Bohlander/Snell/Sherman. © 2001 South-Western/Thomson Learning 2-1.
Human Rights Complaints and Discrimination Prevention Canadian Human Rights Commission January 2005.
Chapter 3 Diversity and Employment Equity Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. All rights reserved.
Human Rights. Human rights include the right to receive equal treatment to be free from prohibited discrimination and harassment, and to have equal access.
Copyright © 2008 by West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning Chapter 40 Equal Employment Opportunity Law Twomey Jennings Anderson’s.
1 Copyright © 2005 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.Schwind 7th Canadian Edition. 4 F O U R Meeting Legal Requirements C H A P T.
Employment Discrimination.  Fifth Amendment – Prohibits the federal government from: ◦ Depriving individuals of “life, liberty, or property” without.
Comprehensive Volume, 18 th Edition Chapter 42: Equal Employment Opportunity Law.
What is the Concept of Unjustified Discrimination?
Titles II and III of the ADA Sherrie Brown CHID/LSJ 434 February 2009.
© 2005 West Legal Studies in Business, a division of Thompson Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 PowerPoint Slides to Accompany The Legal, Ethical, and International.
Equal Opportunity in Employment. The Employment Agreement Employment at Will Contracts –employees can quit at any time and employers can fire you at any.
BUSINESS LAW FALL 2012 Protection Employment Law.
Chapter 33 Equal Opportunity in Employment. Civil Rights Act of 1964  Statutes that outlawed employment discrimination against certain classes  Providing.
Chapter 19 Equal Opportunity in Employment. Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.19-2 Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.
Discrimination in Employment Chapter 23. Employment Discrimination Treating individuals differently based on differences Treating individuals differently.
Chapter 19.  Equal opportunity in employment: The rights of all employees and job applicants  To be treated without discrimination  To be able to sue.
Equal Employment Opportunity Concepts Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Blind to differences Affirmative Action Discrimination Protected Class.
Chapter 41 Equal Employment Opportunity Law Twomey, Business Law and the Regulatory Environment (14th Ed.)
EMPLOYMENT RIGHTS AWARENESS SLO: I can understand the terms and conditions associated with fair workplace practices.
© 2013 by Nelson Education1 Foundations of Recruitment and Selection II: Legal Issues.
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business, a Division of Thomson Learning 16.1 Chapter 16 Employment Discrimination.
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning BUSINESS LAW Twomey Jennings 1 st Ed. Twomey & Jennings BUSINESS LAW Chapter 38 Equal.
ACCOMMODATING MENTAL HEALTH DISABILITIES In the Workplace Sylvie Gauthier Discrimination Prevention Officer, CHRC April 2016.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter 13 Employment Discrimination Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written.
Chapter 7 Employment Law Halsey/McLaughlin, Legal Environment You will be able to answer the following questions after reading this chapter: What is an.
C H A P T E R 6 Employment Law Chapter ??.
The New Zealand Human Rights Commission; Insurance and human rights
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT
DISCRIMINATION & Harassment
DISCRIMINATION IN THE WORKPLACE
Discrimination In Employment
Medical Marijuana in the Workplace
Chapter 24 Discrimination in Employment
The Legal Framework of HRM
Human Rights.
Up in Smoke: Legalized Marijuana and the Workplace
US Airways, Inc. v. Barnett, 535 U.S. 391 (2002)
Administering Human Rights Legislation
Human Rights Complaints and Discrimination Prevention Canadian Human Rights Commission January 2005.
DISCRIMINATION & Harassment
Charter of Rights and Freedoms and Ontario Human Rights Code
Human Rights in Canada Filing a Human Rights Complaint
Human Rights.
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY IN EMPLOYMENT
Chapter 40 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY LAW
The Legal Environment of Human Resources Management
Human Rights Lesson 15 CLU 3MR.
Chapter 18: Employment Discrimination
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY IN EMPLOYMENT
Chapter 33 Equal Opportunity in Employment
Employment Discrimination
Presentation transcript:

Legal Brief Thwaites v. Canada (Armed Forces) (1993), 19 C.H.R.R. D/259 Canadian Human Rights Tribunal Nina Stephens

Facts The complainant Thwaites had been a naval electronics sensor operator aboard a Canadian naval destroyer Diagnosed as HIV positive and was subject to investigation for suspected homosexuality Thwaites security status was downgraded to door attendant Thwaites was later released from the forces and filed a complaint under the Canadian Human Rights Act. Nina Stephens

Issues Did the Canadian Armed Forces discriminate against the complainant on the basis of disability contrary to section 7 of the Canadian Human Rights Act? was the treatment of the complainant by the Canadian armed forces justified on the basis of a bona fide occupational requirement under section 15 of the Act? Nina Stephens

Arguments: Thwaites Discriminated against on the basis of disability, as well as sexual orientation Substantive equality was not being fulfilled, and Thwaites was not receiving equal opportunity His position was downgraded even though it is not specified that being without HIV is a bona fide job requirement Nina Stephens

Arguments: Canada (Armed Forces) Concern for “undue hardship” as destroyers did not have medical doctors on board and were unequipped to monitor and treat the complainant’s condition Re – categorizing Thwaites was in keeping with an Armed Forces general policy, regarding enlisted personnel who were HIV or AIDS patients requiring the services of a medical specialist. Nina Stephens

Decision The court upheld his claim for damages, Thwaites was awarded $152 015 plus interest, for lost and future wages as well as costs. The Attorney General of Canada appealed the decision of the Human Rights Tribunal. Nina Stephens

Rationale The defense of “undue hardship” excuses an employer only where accommodating an employee’s disability would cause significant difficulty or expense The Canadian Armed Forces failed to show that it could not accommodate the complainant without significant risk to him and others They also failed to demonstrate that no reasonable alternative existed other than release Nina Stephens