Elizabeth Lovsted, P.E. February 15, 2017

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Current Legal Developments on Ratemaking - A Primer on Budget-based Water Rate Structures 1 Paul D. Jones II, P.E. General Manager, Eastern.
Advertisements

Standardized Reporting Form (B1) September 13, 2011 B1 (On Line Data Submittal Listening Session) Shem Stygar & Kent Frame 1.
SWRCB EMERGENCY DROUGHT REGULATIONS July 31, 2014.
Water Conservation Annual Report. Mission Statement The mission of the Texas Water Development Board is to provide leadership, planning, financial assistance,
Urban Water Conservation Under 2009 Legislation Ryan S. Bezerra February 8, 2013.
Municipal and Industrial Conservation and Water Reuse Workgroup Elizabeth Lovsted Sr. Civil Engineer Urban Water Institute Annual Water Policy Conference.
Catherine Elvert City of Palo Alto Utilities Communications Manager.
Farmers Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by: East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis Department.
Senate Bill X7-7 Implementation CII Task Force March 1, 2011 Manucher Alemi, Ph. D., P.E. Water Use and Efficiency Program Manager.
Proposed DRAFT New City Ordinance for Water Use in Landscaped Areas Public Meeting September 15, 2009.
Screen | 1 EPA - Drivers for Regionalisation Max Harvey Director Operations Environment Protection Authority Presentation, reference, author, date.
Water Use Efficiency Implementation: Lessons Learned in California Tom Peters Mary Lou Cotton.
2014 IRWM Drought Grants Sierra Water Workgroup Summit June Tracie L. Billington Department of Water Resources Financial Assistance Branch.
Goal: Provide information on the Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO) and how to implement it on your projects.
BMP-Based Target Setting Presented by DWR at U4 Technical Subcommittee Meeting on August 25,
Peter Brostrom California Department of Water Resources Office of Water Use and Efficiency Branch October 15, 2010.
Water Quality and Concerns
Working together. Achieving results. Water IOU Drought Management Jack Hawks Joint Agency Workshop on California’s Drought Response Sacramento, CA August.
Time Frame. Opportunities To Comment Today October 15 th - Urban Stakeholders Committee November 9 th – California Water Commission Formal Rulemaking.
Making Conservation Work for You Chris Brown Chris Brown Consulting for Office of Rural Community Affairs December 2, 2003.
DWR’s Second Alternative Proposal for Method 4 Peter Brostrom Department of Water Resources Water Use and Efficiency Branch August 25, 2010.
Working together. Achieving results. Water IOU Drought Management Jack Hawks Joint Agency Workshop on California’s Drought Response Sacramento, CA August.
SBx7-7 The New Terrain Chris Brown Greening Our Water Infrastructure Petaluma April 9, 2010.
Oakdale Irrigation District Agricultural Water Management Plan Briefing on 2015 Update January 5, /5/2016 OID AWMP Update Briefing.
WELCOME! 2015 Urban Water Management Plan Workshop.
January 25, 2106 Update Background 2015 – Fourth Year of Extreme Drought April 1, 2015 Snowpack was lowest ever recorded Risks.
MWELO Update -CII ??? April Snow Survey-No Snow.
1 Adrianne Carr Senior Water Resources Specialist Bay Area Water Supply and Conservation Agency April 15, 2015 “A multicounty agency authorized to plan.
The Sustainable Groundwater Management Act and DWR’s Role in Sustainable Groundwater Management California Irrigation Institute 2016 Conference January.
An Overview of Other Ongoing DWR Programs. Other Programs Turf and Toilet Rebates Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance Leak Detection Desalination.
Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) City of Patterson’s April 19, 2016.
1 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT Drought Response Elizabeth Lovsted, PEJolene Walsh Dr. Civil EngineerSr. Director of Public & May 8, 2015Governmental.
Kevin Pearson Public Affairs Officer Eastern Municipal Water District May 13, 2015 Drought Update IREM IE Lunch-N-Learn Presentation.
Administration Code Changes to Incorporate Graywater Policy Principles Jayne Joy, P.E. Director, Environmental & Regulatory Compliance January 2016 EASTERN.
1 California Water Plan Update 2009 Assumptions and Estimates Report.
1 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT Water Use Efficiency Master Plan Elizabeth Lovsted, PE Senior Civil Engineer January 16, 2016.
Pasadena Water and Power City of Pasadena 2015 Urban Water Management Plan Public Hearing City Council – June 13, 2016 Item 12.
Vicki Lake, Unit SupervisorContra Costa Climate Leaders Workshop Division of Statewide Water Management May 9, 2016
1 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT Drought Response – Implementing the New Landscape Requirements Elizabeth Lovsted, PE Sr. Civil Engineer.
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT Proposed Emergency Regulations Elizabeth Lovsted Sr. Civil Engineer March 17,
Monthly Reporting on Drought Response
1 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT Proposed Revisions to the Administrative Code Elizabeth Lovsted, PE Sr. Civil Engineer July 8, 2015.
Water Conservation in the San Joaquin Valley Mary Lou Cotton, C.C.P.
City Council February 6, 2017 Item 9
Monthly Drought Reporting to the State Water Resources Control Board
Monthly Drought Reporting to the State Water Resources Control Board
Monthly Drought Reporting to the State Water Resources Control Board
Monthly Drought Reporting to the State Water Resources Control Board
Water Efficiency Ordinance ZCA No. 750
Drought Management Update
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: June 2012.
Growth Management Amendments Land Use & Transportation
2015 Urban Water Management Plan Overview
La Mesa Climate Action Plan Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Scoping Meeting May 31, 2017.
Monthly Drought Reporting to the State Water Resources Control Board
Water Loss Audit Findings (FY 13-14)
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY
Revisions to the Administrative Code
Elimination of Non-Functional Turf
Water Conservation Update
PUBLIC HEARING: ESTABLISH A 20% WATER CONSERVATION TARGET AND IMPLEMENT LEVEL 1 WATER SUPPLY SHORTAGE PLAN March 27, 2017 Item 9.
Urban Water Institute Spring Conference
Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance
Drought Planning Through Integrated Rate Design
Urban Water Use Efficiency Policy-2016 and Beyond
Director Jerry Werner March 26, 2010
California’s Water Conservation Amidst A Record Drought
Paul D. Jones II, P.E., General Manager August 25, 2016
NARUC Winter Policy Summit
California Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance Findings
Presentation transcript:

Elizabeth Lovsted, P.E. February 15, 2017 State of California Proposed Long-term Water use Efficiency Framework: “Making Conservation a Way of Life” Elizabeth Lovsted, P.E. February 15, 2017

Background May 9, 2016, Governor Brown Issued Executive Order B-37-16 Entitled “Making Conservation a California Way of Life” Four Basic Elements of the Order: Use Water More Wisely Eliminate Water Waste Strengthen Local Drought Resilience Improve Agricultural Water Use Efficiency and Drought Planning Formation of Urban Advisory Group (UAG) to Review and Provide Input on First Three Elements Approximately 35 Water Agencies and NGO’s Selected Technical Sub-Groups Also Established

Executive Order Directives Use Water More Wisely (Directives #1 Through #3) Adjust Emergency Conservation Regulations and Develop Proposal that Builds Off 25% Conservation Goal Establish Long-Term Water Use Efficiency “Targets” for Agencies by Establishing Standards for Indoor Water Use, Outdoor Water Use and CII (Commercial, Industrial Institutional) Permanently Require Monthly Reporting: Usage, Conservation Levels, Enforcement

Executive Order Directives Eliminate Water Waste (Directives #4 Through #7) Permanently Prohibit Water Waste Practices Minimize System Leaks Improve Management and Prioritize Capital Projects to Reduce Water Waste Certify Innovative Water Conservation and Water Loss Detection and Control Technologies

Executive Order Directives Strengthen Local Drought Resilience (Directives #8 Through #10) DWR to Strengthen Requirements for Urban Water Shortage Contingency Plans (WSCPs) Create Common Standards and Planning for at Least Five Years of Drought Facilitate Improved Drought Planning for Small Water Suppliers and Rural Communities

Executive Order Directives Improve Ag Water Use Efficiency and Drought Planning (Directives #11 through #13) DWR and California Department of Food and Agriculture to Update Existing Requirements for Agricultural Water Management Plans (AWMP) Requirement for Preparation of a Permanent AWMP for Suppliers with Over 10,000 Acres of Land Under Irrigation

Draft Framework and Implementation of Executive Order Current Status UAG Met Four Times to Review Elements of Framework Framework Includes Long-Term Water Use Efficiency Targets, Water Loss Prevention, WSCP Requirements, Ag Water Management Public Draft Comments Were Due by December 19, 2016, For DWR and State Board Consideration in Final Report DWR and State Board Required to Submit and Administrative Draft Report to the Governor by Jan 20, 2017 Final Report has been submitted to the Governor’s Office but is not yet publically available Draft Framework Report: “Making Water Conservation a California Way of Life” Released November 30, 2016

Strengthen Local Drought Resilience Components Update Contents of Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) Conduct a 5-Year Drought Risk Assessment Evaluations Criteria Used to Conduct Assessment will be Locally Applicable Water Shortage Contingency Plan (WSCP) Standardization Define Methodology and Evaluation Criteria Used to Conduct Annual Water Budget Forecast Include Six Standard Shortage Levels and Shortage Response Actions for Each Shortage Level Communication Plan Implementation Authorities Financial Plan for Drought Conditions Annual Water Assessment

Issues and Concerns: Strengthen Local Drought Resilience Recognize the Benefits of Drought Resilient, Hydrologically Independent Supplies Should be considered fully reliable under all historical drought hydrology and plausible climate change effects Examples: potable reuse, recycled water and desalination May not experience extreme shortage conditions due to drought or climate change

Executive Order Was Specific on Long-Term Efficiency Targets “These Water Use Targets Shall be Customized to the Unique Conditions of Each Water Agency, Shall Generate More Statewide Water Conservation Greater than Existing Requirements, and Shall Strengthen Standards for: Indoor residential per Capita Water Use; Outdoor irrigation, in a manner that incorporates landscape area, local climate and new satellite imagery data; and Commercial, Industrial, and Institutional (CII) water use, and water loss through leaks.”

Draft Requirements for Water Use Efficiency Targets State Agencies Will Establish New Water Use Targets or Performance Measures Based Upon Strengthened Standards in Four Areas: Indoor Residential per Capita Use Outdoor Irrigation Incorporating Landscape Area and Climate Water Lost Through Leaks Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (CII) Must Increase Targets Beyond the “20 Percent by 2020” Under SB X7-7 Also Requires Permanent Monthly Reporting

Water Use Efficiency Target - Indoor and Outdoor Use, Losses An Aggregate Indoor and Outdoor Use Target and Losses in AF/Year will be Calculated for Each Retail Agency Target Amount = (Indoor Standard) + (Outdoor Standard) + (Losses) State will Provide Landscape Area Measurements and Evapotranspiration (Eto) Data for Each Agency by 2018 Excludes Commercial/Industrial (Except Landscaping)

Indoor Residential Portion of Target Proposed Initial Standard of 55 GPCD DWR and State Board will Gather Additional Data on Indoor Water Use Potentially Revise 55 GPCD Standard Downward in 2018 Compliance Required in 2025 State will Reevaluate Every Five Years Thereafter Indoor Target = (# of Residents) x (Indoor GPCD Standard)

Outdoor Irrigation Portion of Target Outdoor Target = (Annual Evapotranspiration-Eto) x (Landscape Area) x (Evapotranspiration Adjustment Factor) Evapotranspiration or Eto A measured weather factor of solar radiation, temperature, humidity, wind-plant transpiration Evapotranspiration Adjustment Factor or “ETAF” Level of water use applied based upon landscape type The Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinances (MWELO) Use ETAF to Establish Water Budgets for Landscapes

Outdoor Target Variables Current & New MWELO Turf (cool season) Street Trees Fruit Trees Mediterranean plants Calif. Native plants 100% Special Landscapes 1.00 Existing Residential .80 Existing Commercial .70 New Residential .55 New Commercial .45 40% 20% 60% 80% Eto Plant Water Needs: Outdoor Efficiency Target: Evapotranspiration (Eto): Averaged Across the Individual Agency Service Area Landscape Area: Includes Landscape Area for the Specific Agency ETAF (Evapotranspiration Adjustment Factor): Sets a Water Allowance for Irrigation Based Upon a Landscape Type (in the State’s Proposal, Age)

Derived From State Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinances (MWELOs) State Proposed Initial Application of Evapotranspiration Adjustment Factors Applied to Individual Parcels in an Agency’s Service Area Based Upon Age and Aggregated to Calculate Target: Pre-2010 Landscapes 0.8 2010 to 2015 0.7 Post-2015 0.55 Residential 0.45 Commercial Irrigation Special Landscapes* 1.0 (*Includes Play Fields, Areas Irrigated with Recycled Water, etc.) Derived From State Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinances (MWELOs)

Outdoor Irrigation Portion of Target All Suppliers Receive Land Area Imagery Data from DWR at the End of 2018 DWR and State Board will review landscape area applied water analysis between 2018 and 2020 Final Landscape Standards (Evapotranspiration Adjustment Factors) Set by DWR and State Board in 2020 Compliance Required in 2025 State will Reevaluate Landscape Standards Every Five Years Thereafter

Water Loss Standard Portion of Target Loss Target = (Loss Standard per Connection) x (Number of Connections) Establish Water Loss Standard Through SB 555 Process: Account for infrastructure age and condition Include real and apparent losses Water Loss Standard and Target Set by 2020, Compliance Required in 2025 State will Reevaluate Standard Every Five Years Thereafter

Commercial, Industrial and Institutional (CII) – Performance Measures No Volumetric Standard or Target, but Requires Three Performance Measures: Classify All CII Accounts by North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Code or Other System Require CII Accounts with Certain Size Landscape Areas to Have Separate Metering Irrigated Areas to be incorporated into outdoor target Require Audits and Water Management Plans for Certain CII Customers Based on Usage, Percentage, Accounts, etc. State to Issue “Regulations and Guidelines” for CII Performance Measures by End of 2018 Public process with CII Workgroup

Required Progress Reporting on Target Compliance In 2019, Suppliers Required to Submit a Limited Annual Progress Report: Progress Toward Interim Targets, CII Performance Measures 2020 Urban Water Management Plan to Include Plan for Meeting 2025 Targets Starting in 2022, Comprehensive Annual Progress Report: Calculation of progress toward final 2025 Targets (Indoor, Outdoor, Losses) and CII Performance Standards If not progressing, narrative description of actions the supplier will take to meet targets by 2025

Enforcement of Efficiency Standards Suppliers Submit 2025 Compliance Report on Water Use Targets - Enforcement Would Start in 2026 Suppliers that Do Not Meet 2025 Targets Would be Subject to Enforcement by SWRCB SWRCB Enforcement Could Potentially Include: Information Orders or Conservation Orders Cease and Desist Orders Administrative Civil Liability Penalties (Fines) Enforcement from State Would Occur at the Water Agency Level (Not Customers)

Issues and Concerns: Long-Term Efficiency Target Process Target Approach May Not Work for All Agencies: Aerial imagery to get landscape area may not be accurate in some areas Areas with older landscaping (Pre-1992) should Get a higher Evapotranspiration Adjustment Factor (ETAF) Older housing stock may pose unique issues (Swamp Coolers) Should Indirect Potable Reuse be Counted as Conservation Toward Meeting Efficiency Target?

Issues and Concerns: Long-Term Efficiency Target Process (cont’d) Concern with State’s Ability to Deliver Accurate and Representative Data (Landscape Area, Eto) How is Growth Considered (Population and Landscaped Areas)? Commercial/Industrial Performance Standards - Impacts to Economic Growth Continuous Downward Ratcheting of Standards - Water Rights? Definition of Key Terms Irrigable/Irrigated

EMWD Current Landscape Water Use (% of ET) 2013 2014 2015 2016 Residential 46% 41% 25% 22% Dedicated Landscape Meters 50% 49% 37% 35% Assumes 55 GPCD Residential Indoor Proposed Ranges = 45% (New) to 80%(Older) Uses EMWD Developed Definition of Landscape Area

Next Steps Report Finalized and Publically Released by Administration - February 2017 (?) Rulemaking process - 2017 (SWRCB) Reporting and Restrictions Legislation 2017-2018 UWMP Requirements WSCP Requirements Water Use Efficiency Targets Develop Landscape Data 2017-2018 Pilot Study Develop Data for All Suppliers Reevaluate Water Use Efficiency Targets – 2018 Proposed Progress Reporting -2019 Compliance 2025 (Updated Targets)

Contact Information Elizabeth Lovsted, P.E. Director of Water Supply Planning (951) 928-3777 Ext. 4307 lovstede@emwd.org