Julie Garber, NAIC Sr. Manager – Solvency Regulation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Federal Audit Executive Council (FAEC) June 2012 Bi-Monthly Meeting Heather I. Keister Doris G. Yanger June 14, 2012 Green Book Update.
Advertisements

1 Risk-Focused Surveillance Framework Enterprise Risk Management Symposium Chicago, Illinois April 26, 2004 Terri Vaughan, Iowa Insurance Commissioner.
Overview of U.S. Solvency Framework David Vacca, CPA Assistant Director Insurance Analysis & Information Services NAIC Regulatory Services Division.
The Development of Enterprise Risk Management and Supervision for Insurance Companies in Taiwan Dr. Huang, Tien-Mu Director General, Insurance Bureau Financial.
Enterprise Risk Management and the Own Risk Solvency Assessment Act Michelle M. Rogers, JD Director of Financial and Regulatory Policy National Association.
NAIC Oversight of Corporate Governance Commissioner Susan Donegan Vermont Department of Financial Regulation.
Environmental Management Systems An Overview With Practical Applications.
Current Developments at the PCAOB Ensuring Integrity: 3 rd Annual Auditing Conference at Baruch College December 4, 2008.
Are you ready for the NAIC Corporate Governance Models?
Quality evaluation and improvement for Internal Audit
NAIC Review of ERM & Internal Controls David Altmaier Florida Office of Insurance Regulation.
Purpose of the Standards
State Accreditation: Then and Now ASSAL – July 2011 Todd Sells.
Corporate Governance and Risk Management Current Practices and Ongoing Developments in the U.S. Commissioner Jim Donelon Louisiana Department of Insurance.
Consumer Protection Working Party Meeting Sponsor.
1 1 Risk-Focused Financial Analysis David A Vacca, CPA Insurance Analysis & Information Services NAIC Regulatory Services Division.
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
Corporate Governance in Financial Institutions OCDE/IAIS/ASSAL Conference on Insurance Regulation & Supervision in Latin America Punta Cana, Dominican.
Wednesday, October 13, 2010 Licensing procedures of a Connecticut Domiciled Insurance Company.
OECD Guidelines on Insurer Governance
Update on Regulatory Topics April 27, 2015 Office of Corporate and Financial Regulation Annette B. Szady, CPA, Director, Bureau of Financial Examinations.
The CPA Profession Chapter 2 By Arens et. al. Learning Objective 1 Describe the nature of CPA firms, what they do, and their structure.
CDS Operational Risk Management - October 28, 2005 Existing Methodologies for Operational Risk Mitigation - CDS’s ERM Program ACSDA Seminar - October 26.
Internal Control in a Financial Statement Audit
Best Practices: Financial Resource Management February 2011.
Corporate Governance Yoshi Kawai Secretary General, IAIS IAIS-ASSAL Regional Seminar Buenos Aires, Argentina, November 2011 PUBLIC.
© 2011 National Association of Insurance Commissioners U.S. Solvency Modernization Initiative Christina Urias Director, Arizona Department of Insurance.
Training Module 7. What You’ll Learn In This Module In what areas may Conservation Districts enter into a contractual agreement with Michigan Department.
SUERF Annual Lecture Risk Management – A supervisor’s approach Gabriel Bernardino EIOPA Chairman Helsinki, 22 September 2011.
Corporate Governance.  According to King III, the board should: ◦ be responsible for the strategic direction and control of the company; ◦ set the values.
Copyright © 2008 by the American Academy of Actuaries CAS Spring Meeting June 16, 2008 Dave Sandberg, Chair American Academy of Actuaries Solvency and.
Macroprudential Surveillance and Insurance Supervision Commissioner Susan Donegan November 19, 2014 Regional Training Seminar for Insurance Supervisors.
Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar General Session II September 9, 2003 Section 302/404 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act What Actuaries Need to Know Jan A. Lommele, FCAS,
Solvency II Andrew Mawdsley. Overview The challenges in preparing for Solvency II Adequate financial resources Supervisory Review Process Disclosure Timeline.
2002 CLRS - Arlington, VA Reserve/Opinion Issues from a Regulatory Perspective Proposed Revision to the NAIC Annual Statement Instructions Richard Marcks,
1 Issues for Consideration in the Solvency Modernization Initiative Ramon Calderon Deputy Commissioner, California Department of Insurance Chair, NAIC.
Macroprudential Surveillance and the NAIC Commissioner Adam Hamm.
Improving Compliance with ISAs Presenters: Al Johnson & Pat Hayle.
Insurance Summit 2016 REGULATORY UPDATE. Panel Participants Ray Farmer (Director, South Carolina Department of Insurance) Tim Morris (Hanover Stone Solutions)
Chapter 6 Internal Control in a Financial Statement Audit McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
RISK MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Chapter 5 ASX Guidelines for Listed Companies
The CPA Profession Chapter 2.
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: June 2012.
Update on the Latest Developments in Government Auditing Standards
Drafting the Corporate Governance Annual Disclosure – Best Practices
Legislative Compliance Management Insurance Industry Workshop 1 – 2 November 2005 Bangkok, Thailand Kim Norris Managing Director International Advisory.
State Regulation, how would it change your world?
DOE NNSA CAS EFCOG/DOE CAS Effectiveness Task Team Sharon Steele Office of the Chief Defense Nuclear Safety (NA-511) November 16, 2016.
Internal and Governmental Financial Auditing and Operational Auditing
Session 3 – Risk Management and Internal Controls: Actuary Function ICP 8: Risk Management and Internal Controls 2017 ASSAL Regional Seminar on Training.
Market Conduct Oversight
Introduction In the first lesson we demonstrated the following:-
Corporate Governance for Mutuals
COSO Internal Control s Framework
Update on the Developments in Government Auditing Standards
4. Solvency II – Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA)
IASA Northeastern Chapter Meeting
Quality Assurance and Improvement Program
2019 Local School District Charter Application Process
Roles and Responsibilities
Update on the Developments in Government Auditing Standards
Roles and Responsibilities
Elements of an Effective Safety and Health Program
Elements of an Effective Safety and Health Program
An overview of Internal Controls Structure & Mechanism
SOFE CDS 2018 Indian Wells, CA
NAIC Financial Analysis Solvency Tools (FAST) Update
Operational Risk Management
Implementation of 2014 Revisions to Model #205
Presentation transcript:

Julie Garber, NAIC Sr. Manager – Solvency Regulation 2017 Accreditation Update Julie Garber, NAIC Sr. Manager – Solvency Regulation

Overview Changes Effective for 2017 Part A: Laws and Regulations Part B1: Analysis Part B2: Examinations Modernization of the Accreditation Program Upcoming Changes Future effective date Future Considerations

Part A: Laws and Regulations Part B: Preamble Model Risk Retention Act Life RBC Trend Test Update to Corrective Action Standard Part B: Preamble Multi-state reinsurers Part B1: Financial Analysis Enterprise Risk Report (Form F) Group Profile Summary Part B2: Financial Examinations Contractor Oversight Changes Effective for 2017

Part A: Laws and Regulations Model Risk Retention Act (#705) Only required for those states that complete a Part A for RRGs Section 3D on governance standards is the only significant element Board and audit committee independence Requirements for service providers Changes Effective for 2017

Part A: Laws and Regulations Life RBC Trend Test 2011 revisions to the Risk-Based Capital for Insurers Model Act (#312) Updates the life trend test trigger point from 2.5 to 3.0 This is more conservative and consistent with the trigger point for Health and P/C insurers Changes Effective for 2017

Part A: Laws and Regulations Updates to Corrective Action Standard Section 4B(10) of the Hazardous Financial Condition Model (#385) is a new significant element If company is in HFC, commissioner may issue an order requiring company to correct corporate governance deficiencies State can demonstrate compliance through examples Q1Q1: The RBC trend test trigger point was updated for which type of insurer effective in 2017? Life Health Property/Casualty Risk Retention Groups Changes Effective for 2017

Part B: Preamble Reinsurance Assumption Determining “multi-state” for Part B: Licensed/registered/operating in state(s) other than state of domicile Accredited/certified as a reinsurer in state(s) other than state of domicile Reinsuring business covering risks residing in at least two states Accepting business on exported basis in state(s) other than state of domicile NEW! Changes Effective for 2017

Part B: Preamble Reinsurance Assumption Related change for Part A became effective January 1, 2016 States may have companies that were previously single state, but are now multi-state Part B guidelines will apply including: Timeliness of review for analysis Timeliness of examination reports Consideration of General Interrogatory question to assist with identification Note – Blanks proposal for addition of general interrogatory question was exposed by Blanks in June, comments were due July 7 and it will be considered at the Summer NM. If adopted the proposal would be effective beginning with 2018 Q1 filings. Changes Effective for 2017

Part B1: Analysis Enterprise Risk Report (Form F) Should be reviewed and incorporated into holding company analysis Group Profile Summary (GPS) Serves as holding company analysis GPS and supporting documentation should be commensurate with the nature and complexity of the insurance group Make sure GPS contains enough information to encompass full holding company analysis. Changes Effective for 2017

Part B2: Examinations Contractor Oversight Revisions were made to the Examiners Handbook to clarify requirements of the Department Designee responsible for oversight Designee must review certain elements of an exam Designee must sign the exam report Accreditation guideline: Oversight in accordance with Examiners Handbook Designee must be employed by and conducting work solely on behalf of the state insurance department Signature is in addition to the EIC Changes Effective for 2017

Modernization of Accreditation Accreditation reviews initially focused primarily on compliance States are now meeting baseline standards Focus to emphasize substance and quality of work performed Changes effective January 1, 2017

Modernization Overview Impact Parts B, C and D (Not Part A) Review Team Guidelines Results-Oriented Guidelines Process-Oriented Guidelines Workplan for Onsite Review Replace “Scoring” with “Team’s Recommendation” Review Team Report to the Committee

Modernization – Review Team Guidelines Part B1: Financial Analysis and Part B2: Financial Examinations No significant changes to content/topics covered Adds a qualitative element to most standards (results-oriented guidelines) Maintains basic requirements (process-oriented guidelines) Discuss weighting differences Changes Effective for 2017

Modernization – Review Team Guidelines Example: b) Communication of Relevant Information Process-Oriented Guideline 4 “At the beginning of each examination, the examiner should obtain input from the financial analyst regarding areas of concern and specific issues to address during the examination.” Results-Oriented Guideline 1 “…consideration should be given to the examiner’s utilization and incorporation of pertinent information from the financial analysis in planning and conducting examination procedures.”

Modernization – Review Team Guidelines Part B3: Department Procedures and Oversight No significant changes to: a) Information Sharing and b) Procedures for Troubled Companies New standard: c) Department Oversight “Department management should be involved in solvency monitoring activities for its domestic industry to ensure appropriate oversight of staffing, company interactions and key solvency issues with the ability and willingness to take action, as deemed appropriate.” Interviews with senior management and commissioner Changes Effective for 2017

Modernization – Review Team Guidelines Part C: Organizational and Personnel Practices Enhanced current standards by adding specific guidelines Examples include state’s ability to provide training, hire and retain qualified employees, and provide competitive career paths and pay structures Added d) Use of Contract Personnel Ensure those hired as contractors are held to the same standards as state employees Changes Effective for 2017

Modernization – Review Team Guidelines Part D: Organization, Licensing and Change of Control of Domestic Insurers Reorganized standards/guidelines Sufficient Qualified Staff and Resources Primary Applications Form A Filings No significant changes to topics for review Q4 Q4: Which of the following is a brand new standard in 2017? B1(d): Financial Analysis – Priority-Based Analysis B2(c): Financial Examinations – Use of Specialists B2(g): Financial Examinations – Scheduling of Examinations B3(c): Department Procedures and Oversight – Department Oversight Changes Effective for 2017

Modernization – Onsite Workplan Replace “Scoring” with “Review Team Recommendation” Allows team members to consider issues as a whole and give proper weight to those that are most significant Prevents a state from leaning too much on basic compliance when quality is lacking Encourages emphasis on quality and substance Changes Effective for 2017

Modernization – Review Team Report Dashboard Includes basic facts such as team members and number of domestic insurers Executive Summary Review Team’s Recommendation Positive Attributes Key Areas for Improvement Review Team’s Discussion Changes Effective for 2017

Upcoming Changes Part A: Laws and Regulations ORSA Credit for Reinsurance Principle-Based Reserving Corporate Governance (pending adoption) Annual Disclosure Internal Audit Requirements 2014 Revisions to Holding Company (pending adoption) Part B: Financial Analysis (none at this time) Part B: Financial Examinations (none at this time)

Upcoming Changes Part A: Laws and Regulations – Example Timeline Date Action 2014 Model adopted by NAIC Spring 2015 Accred. Cmte exposes for consideration as potential standard (30-days) Summer 2015 Based on comments, Cmte will expose for a 1-year period beginning Jan 1 2016 1-year exposure period (Jan – Dec) Spring 2017 Cmte discusses comments received Summer 2017 Cmte votes on standard Fall 2017 Exec/Plenary votes on standard 2018-2019 2-year period for states to adopt Jan 1, 2020 Effective for accreditation This slide is optional and can be removed or skipped over if time is too tight.

Future Effective Date: 2018 Upcoming Changes Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) Requires insurers/groups to Maintain a risk management framework and regularly perform an own risk and solvency assessment (ORSA) Annually file an ORSA Summary Report Exempts: Insurers < $500 million premium Groups < $1 billion premium Part B (Exam/Analysis) Guidelines referred to F Cmte with expected effective date of Jan. 1, 2018 Note – Part B referral will be exposed by F Cmte at Summer meeting and expected to be adopted at Fall with effective date of 1/1/18. Proposed guideline is high-level, expects ORSA review to be completed and applicable risks brought into either analysis or examination process. But team will not be reviewing the ORSAs themselves. Also – the referral does not currently include timeliness expectations as the process is too new to set clear deadlines. We expect another referral on timeliness in the next year. Pending Future Effective Date: 2018

Future Effective Date: 2019 Upcoming Changes Credit for Reinsurance Requires all states to adopt Models #785 and #786 requiring reduced collateral provisions Previous requirement of 100% collateral Changes increase consumer protection: Increased scrutiny to certified reinsurers Review of effective supervision by the Qualified Jurisdiction (E) Working Group Passporting (allowing reliance by other states) requires increased financial analysis by the Reinsurance Financial Analysis (E) Working Group Future Effective Date: 2019

Future Effective Date: 2020 Upcoming Changes Principle-Based Reserving Revisions were made to the Standard Valuation Law (#820) in 2009 Significant elements added to the Liabilities and Reserving standard Impacts reserving for life companies as well as fraternals Future Effective Date: 2020

Expected Effective Date: 2020 Upcoming Changes Corporate Governance Annual Disclosure Model Act (#305) and Model Regulation (#306) Annual collection of information on company governance practices (new filing) Applicable to all U.S. Insurers Disclosure filed annually to domestic or lead state Flexibility in level at which information is to be provided Ultimate parent, holding company or insurer Data collection includes: corporate governance framework and structure, board of directors policies and procedures, management policies and procedures, oversight of critical risk areas Expected Effective Date: 2020

Expected Effective Date: 2020 Upcoming Changes Model Audit Rule (#205) Revised to incorporate internal audit requirement for large insurers Insurer > $500 million in premium Groups > $1 billion in premium Internal audit function must provide independent assurance Areas of assurance Reporting requirements Expected Effective Date: 2020

Expected Effective Date: 2020 Upcoming Changes 2014 Revisions to Holding Company Model Group-wide supervision of Internationally Active Insurance Groups (IAIGs) Authority to act as group-wide supervisor Factors to determine group-wide supervisor Role of group-wide supervisor F Committee will need to determine application of standard Any state that is Lead State of an IAIG Any state that is Lead State of an IAIG + any state that is the domestic regulator for any insurer that is part of an IAIG All states Q6 Q6: When will the ORSA model law become effective for accreditation purposes? January 1, 2017 January 1, 2018 January 1, 2019 January 1, 2020 Expected Effective Date: 2020

Summary of Part A Changes January 1, 2017 Model Risk Retention Act (#705) RBC Life Trend Test (#312) Section 4B(10) of Hazardous Financial Condition Model (#385) January 1, 2018 ORSA (#505) January 1, 2019 Credit for Reinsurance (#785 and #786) January 1, 2020 Principle-Based Reserving (#820) Corporate Governance (#305 and #306) Model Audit Rule (#205) 2014 Holding Company Model (#440)

Future Considerations Term and Universal Life Insurance Reserve Financing Model Regulation (#787) and the 2016 Changes to the Credit for Reinsurance Model Law (#785) Provide authority concerning certain captive transactions (XXX/AXXX, long-term care, VA, etc.) F Committee exposed at 2017 Spring Meeting, discussion of significant elements will continue at the Summer National Meeting Proposed effective date: January 1, 2020

Future Considerations Financial Analysis Risk-Focused Framework Analysis process undergoing significant changes to become more risk-focused Expect referral regarding accreditation guidelines at Summer National Meeting with an effective date of January 1, 2018 The underlying goals of the proposed guidelines do not change significantly and still focus on ensuring appropriate coverage/analysis of key issues facing each insurer.

Contact Information/Questions? Becky Meyer, Senior Accreditation Manager bmeyer@naic.org or 816-783-8434 Sara Franson, Accreditation Program Manager sfranson@naic.org or 816-783-8425 Sherry Shull, Accreditation Program Specialist sshull@naic.org or 816-783-8128 Julie Garber, Senior Manager II – Solvency Regulation jgarber@naic.or or 816-783-8130